Honestly, if this line appeared in the Texas lawsuit, it wouldn't surprise me.
But they have hundreds, if not thousands, of sworn affidavits, and all those suspicious videos on YouTube? Do your research.
and they use this to justify bullshit to get rid of him. a lot of people didn't like obama.
The bullshit to get rid of him was coming out and voting for Biden.
His fanatical cultists worship him, but even some of the majority of Americans who have disapproved of him consistently and relentlessly for four years might have still voted for him if he had not been such a dismal failure.
except most didn't. they were mailed a ballot and got to return them. from any address is fine. how did they COME OUT and vote for biden when they were too scared of COVID to COME OUT and vote, but riots and protests are ok?
Americans exercised their political franchise on November 3 without all the screeching.
Oh, so your argument is now one of semantics.
Not to mention what Squid Head still has hidden in his pants that he won't allow any judges to see.
No one condones cheating.I believe him.That must be frustrating--that nobody believes you.The first whistleblower was Gregory Stenstrom, a Navy veteran and computer scientist who served as a Republican poll watcher in Delaware County, Pennsylvania, just outside of Philadelphia. After a five-hour battle just to gain access to the centralized counting center, Stenstrom witnessed a number of significant abnormalities and breaches of protocol.
Stenstrom was at ground zero of the Democrat’s cheat — the point where all their preparation had to (and did) come together
First, Stenstrom saw election workers carrying postal trays full of ballots out of a locked back room. When he asked for access to the room in order to observe what was going on inside — something he was entitled to do as a credentialed election observer — he was flatly refused by an election supervisor. After offering a number of increasingly flimsy excuses, the supervisor eventually exclaimed, “there’s no fraud going on” — as though her assurances should have been considered the final word on the matter.
SHAFFER: Here’s The Evidence Of Widespread Election Fraud. - The National Pulse
The establishment keeps claiming there’s “no evidence of widespread fraud” in the 2020 presidential election. That was never entirely accurate, but now it’s a whopper of Clintonian proportions.Over the course of an extensive press conference, the Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society...thenationalpulse.com
There has been massive fraud. Screaming NOOOOOOdoesnt change this.
It is useless. Lefties have been programmed to automatically dismiss any claims of voter fraud. No amount of evidence or first hand testimony can change their minds. The mind-meld is strong.
We're not all uninformed twats or partisans who condone cheating.
except there was fraud. you keep forgetting your side changed it from "no fraud" to "not much fraud" to "no widespread fraud".No one condones cheating.I believe him.That must be frustrating--that nobody believes you.The first whistleblower was Gregory Stenstrom, a Navy veteran and computer scientist who served as a Republican poll watcher in Delaware County, Pennsylvania, just outside of Philadelphia. After a five-hour battle just to gain access to the centralized counting center, Stenstrom witnessed a number of significant abnormalities and breaches of protocol.
Stenstrom was at ground zero of the Democrat’s cheat — the point where all their preparation had to (and did) come together
First, Stenstrom saw election workers carrying postal trays full of ballots out of a locked back room. When he asked for access to the room in order to observe what was going on inside — something he was entitled to do as a credentialed election observer — he was flatly refused by an election supervisor. After offering a number of increasingly flimsy excuses, the supervisor eventually exclaimed, “there’s no fraud going on” — as though her assurances should have been considered the final word on the matter.
SHAFFER: Here’s The Evidence Of Widespread Election Fraud. - The National Pulse
The establishment keeps claiming there’s “no evidence of widespread fraud” in the 2020 presidential election. That was never entirely accurate, but now it’s a whopper of Clintonian proportions.Over the course of an extensive press conference, the Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society...
There has been massive fraud. Screaming NOOOOOOdoesnt change this.
It is useless. Lefties have been programmed to automatically dismiss any claims of voter fraud. No amount of evidence or first hand testimony can change their minds. The mind-meld is strong.
We're not all uninformed twats or partisans who condone cheating.
Pointing out the fact that there was no fraud is not to condone cheating.
Three fucking yeas of screeching RUSSIA! with nothing more than faked evidence and squeezing peripheral players trying to get them to make shit up.
This makes no sense whatsoever.
You didn't really think that the goalposts were going to move themselves, didja?except there was fraud. you keep forgetting your side changed it from "no fraud" to "not much fraud" to "no widespread fraud".No one condones cheating.I believe him.That must be frustrating--that nobody believes you.The first whistleblower was Gregory Stenstrom, a Navy veteran and computer scientist who served as a Republican poll watcher in Delaware County, Pennsylvania, just outside of Philadelphia. After a five-hour battle just to gain access to the centralized counting center, Stenstrom witnessed a number of significant abnormalities and breaches of protocol.
Stenstrom was at ground zero of the Democrat’s cheat — the point where all their preparation had to (and did) come together
First, Stenstrom saw election workers carrying postal trays full of ballots out of a locked back room. When he asked for access to the room in order to observe what was going on inside — something he was entitled to do as a credentialed election observer — he was flatly refused by an election supervisor. After offering a number of increasingly flimsy excuses, the supervisor eventually exclaimed, “there’s no fraud going on” — as though her assurances should have been considered the final word on the matter.
SHAFFER: Here’s The Evidence Of Widespread Election Fraud. - The National Pulse
The establishment keeps claiming there’s “no evidence of widespread fraud” in the 2020 presidential election. That was never entirely accurate, but now it’s a whopper of Clintonian proportions.Over the course of an extensive press conference, the Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society...
There has been massive fraud. Screaming NOOOOOOdoesnt change this.
It is useless. Lefties have been programmed to automatically dismiss any claims of voter fraud. No amount of evidence or first hand testimony can change their minds. The mind-meld is strong.
We're not all uninformed twats or partisans who condone cheating.
Pointing out the fact that there was no fraud is not to condone cheating.
kinda like global warming. climate change. whatever y'all call it today. you keep changing things around to fit your moods.
It's pretty crazy how easy it would have been for Trump to avoid the whole Russia scandal.
and this is going to be what really sparks something. they cry and demand how did waters and company put it? MY TIME! YOU ARE INTRUDING ON MY TIME!!!
Trump losing the election is not evidence of fraud. The system worked, you just don't like the outcome.
