SHAFFER: Here’s The Evidence Of Widespread Election Fraud.

[candycorn]

The first whistleblower was Gregory Stenstrom, a Navy veteran and computer scientist who served as a Republican poll watcher in Delaware County, Pennsylvania, just outside of Philadelphia. After a five-hour battle just to gain access to the centralized counting center, Stenstrom witnessed a number of significant abnormalities and breaches of protocol.

Stenstrom was at ground zero of the Democrat’s cheat — the point where all their preparation had to (and did) come together

First, Stenstrom saw election workers carrying postal trays full of ballots out of a locked back room. When he asked for access to the room in order to observe what was going on inside — something he was entitled to do as a credentialed election observer — he was flatly refused by an election supervisor. After offering a number of increasingly flimsy excuses, the supervisor eventually exclaimed, “there’s no fraud going on” — as though her assurances should have been considered the final word on the matter.

SHAFFER: Here’s The Evidence Of Widespread Election Fraud. - The National Pulse

The establishment keeps claiming there’s “no evidence of widespread fraud” in the 2020 presidential election. That was never entirely accurate, but now it’s a whopper of Clintonian proportions.Over the course of an extensive press conference, the Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society...

thenationalpulse.com

There has been massive fraud. Screaming NOOOOOOdoesnt change this.

It is useless. Lefties have been programmed to automatically dismiss any claims of voter fraud. No amount of evidence or first hand testimony can change their minds. The mind-meld is strong.

That must be frustrating--that nobody believes you.

Not frustrating at all. Well-informed people believe me. There are a lot of ignorant people out there.

LOL...

I tend to believe the judges are well informed. They think you're nuts and should be in a padded room.

 

[JLW]

This thread is just a rehash of the same crap that numerous Pennsylvania courts have heard and found without merit. You can post the same shit over and over again, but in the end, it is the same shit.
‘

Here is some breaking news:

U.S. Supreme Court rejects Republican challenge to Biden's Pennsylvania win

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday handed a defeat to Republicans seeking to throw out up to 2.5 million mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania as they try to undo President Donald Trump's election loss, with the justices refusing to block the state from formalizing President-elect...

www.reuters.com

 

[candycorn]

Too little too late. Try again next time.

Agreed. Too many accounts such as these regarding irregularities and inconsistencies. Next time, Republican observers will be more vigilante and aware and mindful to make sure they have better access and visibility.

Short of forcing their way in at the risk of violence what else could they have done? It's like arguing with a cop over a speeding ticket. It's a no win situation.

Do you honestly believe what is being alleged in the OP happened? Seriously?

If the Democrats are rigging the machines, why would they care what a poll observer is seeing?

 

[CowboyTed]

The first whistleblower was Gregory Stenstrom, a Navy veteran and computer scientist who served as a Republican poll watcher in Delaware County, Pennsylvania, just outside of Philadelphia. After a five-hour battle just to gain access to the centralized counting center, Stenstrom witnessed a number of significant abnormalities and breaches of protocol.

Stenstrom was at ground zero of the Democrat’s cheat — the point where all their preparation had to (and did) come together

First, Stenstrom saw election workers carrying postal trays full of ballots out of a locked back room. When he asked for access to the room in order to observe what was going on inside — something he was entitled to do as a credentialed election observer — he was flatly refused by an election supervisor. After offering a number of increasingly flimsy excuses, the supervisor eventually exclaimed, “there’s no fraud going on” — as though her assurances should have been considered the final word on the matter.

SHAFFER: Here’s The Evidence Of Widespread Election Fraud. - The National Pulse

The establishment keeps claiming there’s “no evidence of widespread fraud” in the 2020 presidential election. That was never entirely accurate, but now it’s a whopper of Clintonian proportions.Over the course of an extensive press conference, the Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society...

thenationalpulse.com

There has been massive fraud. Screaming NOOOOOOdoesnt change this.

It is useless. Lefties have been programmed to automatically dismiss any claims of voter fraud. No amount of evidence or first hand testimony can change their minds. The mind-meld is strong.

So you have proof that will over turn 80,000 votes.... That is not it... At best this an election worker not allowing a observer into a room...

"
The lawsuit also includes an affidavit by a Republican ballot watcher in Delaware County, a Democratic-leaning suburb of Philadelphia.

The ballot watcher, Gregory Stenstrom, lodged complaints about perceived violations of chain-of-custody procedures for electronic ballot-scanner drives that he connected to large, unexplained additions of vote totals for Biden.

Still, no state or county election official or prosecutor in Pennsylvania has raised evidence of widespread election fraud in the state.

Given a copy of Stenstrom’s affidavit, Delaware County officials called Stenstrom’s information “fundamentally inaccurate,” saying he misunderstood how electronic drives from ballot-scanners are handled.

In a statement, they said Stenstrom’s allegations rely on the proposition that senior county elections staff who worked for years under Republican county administrations were “working in league with the Democratic Party to engage in a mass fraud.”

“It is simply absurd to propose that after years and years of running elections under Republican administrations in Delaware County, they all suddenly became Democratic fraudsters overnight,” county officials said."

Trump campaign appeals another ballot case in Pennsylvania

HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — President Donald Trump's campaign continues to press lawsuits over Pennsylvania's election, appealing another case it lost to the state Supreme Court, this time over fewer than 2,000 ballots in a suburban Philadelphia county.

www.snopes.com

 

[LeftofLeft]

Too little too late. Try again next time.

Agreed. Too many accounts such as these regarding irregularities and inconsistencies. Next time, Republican observers will be more vigilante and aware and mindful to make sure they have better access and visibility.

Short of forcing their way in at the risk of violence what else could they have done? It's like arguing with a cop over a speeding ticket. It's a no win situation.

Do you honestly believe what is being alleged in the OP happened? Seriously?

If the Democrats are rigging the machines, why would they care what a poll observer is seeing?

I think it needs to be looked at and investigated

 

[Hutch Starskey]

The first whistleblower was Gregory Stenstrom, a Navy veteran and computer scientist who served as a Republican poll watcher in Delaware County, Pennsylvania, just outside of Philadelphia. After a five-hour battle just to gain access to the centralized counting center, Stenstrom witnessed a number of significant abnormalities and breaches of protocol.

Stenstrom was at ground zero of the Democrat’s cheat — the point where all their preparation had to (and did) come together

First, Stenstrom saw election workers carrying postal trays full of ballots out of a locked back room. When he asked for access to the room in order to observe what was going on inside — something he was entitled to do as a credentialed election observer — he was flatly refused by an election supervisor. After offering a number of increasingly flimsy excuses, the supervisor eventually exclaimed, “there’s no fraud going on” — as though her assurances should have been considered the final word on the matter.

SHAFFER: Here’s The Evidence Of Widespread Election Fraud. - The National Pulse

The establishment keeps claiming there’s “no evidence of widespread fraud” in the 2020 presidential election. That was never entirely accurate, but now it’s a whopper of Clintonian proportions.Over the course of an extensive press conference, the Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society...

thenationalpulse.com

There has been massive fraud. Screaming NOOOOOOdoesnt change this.

There has been massive fraud. Screaming NOOOOOOdoesnt change this.

Yes, just massive!
This observer’s claim is the smoking gun despite the lack of any evidence whatsoever.

Which ballots representing which registered voters were fraudulent?

 

[iceberg]

Too little too late. Try again next time.

Agreed. Too many accounts such as these regarding irregularities and inconsistencies. Next time, Republican observers will be more vigilante and aware and mindful to make sure they have better access and visibility.

Short of forcing their way in at the risk of violence what else could they have done? It's like arguing with a cop over a speeding ticket. It's a no win situation.

Do you honestly believe what is being alleged in the OP happened? Seriously?

If the Democrats are rigging the machines, why would they care what a poll observer is seeing?

I think it needs to be looked at and investigated

for trump all we had was russia trolling us on facebook and some meeting with a lawyer not allowed in the country but obama let her in for the meeting.

RUSSIA for 3 years.

we have all this and the same people who demanded we look into their fears refuse to allow others the same leeway or even recognize the possibility it happened.

you simply can't keep living by 2 different sets of rules or standards before all hell breaks loose and it has been. the right has every "right" to look into these and deserve the same NEWS attention as RUSSIA got. after all, it is NEWS that is happening.

they've made it PR now and this is not a good place to be. not if you value the traditional american freedoms we've all grown up with. now they tell you want you can say, when you can say it, how you can say it, and if you can even say it at all. what to wear to "be safe" and whether not your hard earned business can even stay open.

this really where people want to be? i can't name a time the gov "gave back" rights, can you? the left may THINK they are getting what they want, but they are merely getting the 1st wave out of the way WITH THEIR HELP.

they're next.

you can't control the chaos the left has unleashed to make this happen.

this man was there and a navy vet. he deserves to be heard IF YOU REALLY WANT TRANSPARENT ELECTIONS.

if not, just say so and be honest about it.

 

[schmidlap]

how does this relate to the topic at hand?

The "topic at hand" is the baseless lie that there is "Evidence Of Widespread Election Fraud."

None has been shown, consistent with Trump's own cybersecurity chief confirming that the 2020 election was "the most secure in America;s history," and further validated by Trump's own sycophantic Attorney General who admitted that there was no evidence of voter fraud that could change the outcome of the election.

Given repeated opportunities to present it, Squid Head Giuliani and his complicit radicals have failed to produce anything, being thrown out of courts across the land by Republican and democratic judges alike.

Meanwhile, dedicated public servants are being harassed and threatened by Trump goons:

Report: Sen. Elena Parent receives death threats, asks for additional police protection

State Sen. Elena Parent is requesting additional police protection after attending hearings about allegations of voter fraud, the Atlanta Journal Constitution reports.

decaturish.com

​

FBI Investigating Threats Against Georgia Election Officials

Both the federal and Georgia bureaus of investigations are looking into threats against Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and his team.

www.forbes.com

'It's surreal': the US officials facing violent threats as Trump claims voter fraud

​

... and Trump's neo-nazi fanatics are encouraging the trashing of America's democratic process as well:

Daily Stormer

The Most Censored Publication in History ...

dailystormer.su

​

​

If you demur, please provide your list of all judicial adjudications where credible evidence has resulted in rulings that recognize the aforementioned "election fraud."

 

[iceberg]

Too little too late. Try again next time.

Agreed. Too many accounts such as these regarding irregularities and inconsistencies. Next time, Republican observers will be more vigilante and aware and mindful to make sure they have better access and visibility.

Short of forcing their way in at the risk of violence what else could they have done? It's like arguing with a cop over a speeding ticket. It's a no win situation.

Do you honestly believe what is being alleged in the OP happened? Seriously?

If the Democrats are rigging the machines, why would they care what a poll observer is seeing?

I think it needs to be looked at and investigated

for trump all we had was russia trolling us on facebook and some meeting with a lawyer not allowed in the country but obama let her in for the meeting.

RUSSIA for 3 years.

we have all this and the same people who demanded we look into their fears refuse to allow others the same leeway or even recognize the possibility it happened.

you simply can't keep living by 2 different sets of rules or standards before all hell breaks loose and it has been. the right has every "right" to look into these and deserve the same NEWS attention as RUSSIA got. after all, it is NEWS that is happening.

they've made it PR now and this is not a good place to be. not if you value the traditional american freedoms we've all grown up with. now they tell you want you can say, when you can say it, how you can say it, and if you can even say it at all. what to wear to "be safe" and whether not your hard earned business can even stay open.

this really where people want to be? i can't name a time the gov "gave back" rights, can you? the left may THINK they are getting what they want, but they are merely getting the 1st wave out of the way WITH THEIR HELP.

they're next.

you can't control the chaos the left has unleashed to make this happen.

this man was there and a navy vet. he deserves to be heard IF YOU REALLY WANT TRANSPARENT ELECTIONS.

if not, just say so and be honest about it.

Except that Mueller documented collusion between the Trump Campaign and Russian intel. As did the US Senate.

Trump’s Russia Cover-Up By the Numbers – 251 contacts with Russia-linked operatives

A new brief from the Center for American Progress Action Fund’s Moscow Project shows that, based on public reporting and indictments by special counsel Robert Mueller, there are at least 272 known contacts between Trump’s team and Russia-linked operatives during the campaign and transition...

themoscowproject.org

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/report_volume5.pdf

This after Hope Hicks (Campaign spokeswoman) said that the campaign had no contact with any foreign government:

Hope Hicks: “There was no communication between the campaign and any foreign entity during the campaign.”

Moving the goal posts: The evolution of Trump's collusion denials

"There was no communication between the campaign and any foreign entity during the campaign.”

www.axios.com

Exactly.. the idea that Trump’s election fraud hoax is analogous to the Mueller investigation is an outright lie.
34 indictments for Mueller and numerous convictions vs Trump losing 99% of his cases on this election fraud farce.

Swearing that there was an investigation into Russia justifies an investigation into fantasy voter fraud is simply disingenuous.

This is why the Mueller investigation has so many skins on the wall
This is why the FISA warrant "esposee" went nowhere
This is why the Durham report has gone nowhere

and once again 3 more posts that have NOTHING to do with the topic. comparing giving you time for RUSSIA to ask for time to look into FRAUD is not a segway into more RUSSIA bullshit. find your own thread.

 

[Seawytch]

Where is this alleged "evidence" ?

 

[iceberg]

how does this relate to the topic at hand?

The "topic at hand" is the baseless lie that there is "Evidence Of Widespread Election Fraud."

None has been shown, consistent with Trump's own cybersecurity chief confirming that the 2020 election was "the most secure in America;s history," and further validated by Trump's own sycophantic Attorney General who admitted that there was no evidence of voter fraud that could change the outcome of the election.

Given repeated opportunities to present it, Squid Head Giuliani and his complicit radicals have failed to produce anything, being thrown out of courts across the land by Republican and democratic judges alike.

Meanwhile, dedicated public servants are being harassed and threatened by Trump goons:

Report: Sen. Elena Parent receives death threats, asks for additional police protection

State Sen. Elena Parent is requesting additional police protection after attending hearings about allegations of voter fraud, the Atlanta Journal Constitution reports.

decaturish.com

​

FBI Investigating Threats Against Georgia Election Officials

Both the federal and Georgia bureaus of investigations are looking into threats against Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and his team.

www.forbes.com

'It's surreal': the US officials facing violent threats as Trump claims voter fraud

​

... and Trump's neo-nazi fanatics are encouraging the trashing of America's democratic process as well:

Daily Stormer

The Most Censored Publication in History ...

dailystormer.su

​

​

If you demur, please provide your list of all judicial adjudications where credible evidence has resulted in rulings that recognize the aforementioned "election fraud."

Trump is going through the courts to address his issues. by nature, that is the most AMERICAN way to do it AND the democratic process in action.

riots in the streets and making up bullshit investigations are the trashing of process and policy.

 

[schmidlap]

Which ballots representing which registered voters were fraudulent?

One theory is that the 3-5 million invisible bogus balloteers that Trump blamed in 2016 for his popular vote loss (every one of whom eluded Trump's super-sleuth Kobach) have, during the reign of trumpery, multiplied until they now number over 8 million, but remain as stealthy as ever.

 

[candycorn]

Too little too late. Try again next time.

Agreed. Too many accounts such as these regarding irregularities and inconsistencies. Next time, Republican observers will be more vigilante and aware and mindful to make sure they have better access and visibility.

Short of forcing their way in at the risk of violence what else could they have done? It's like arguing with a cop over a speeding ticket. It's a no win situation.

Do you honestly believe what is being alleged in the OP happened? Seriously?

If the Democrats are rigging the machines, why would they care what a poll observer is seeing?

I think it needs to be looked at and investigated

for trump all we had was russia trolling us on facebook and some meeting with a lawyer not allowed in the country but obama let her in for the meeting.

RUSSIA for 3 years.

we have all this and the same people who demanded we look into their fears refuse to allow others the same leeway or even recognize the possibility it happened.

you simply can't keep living by 2 different sets of rules or standards before all hell breaks loose and it has been. the right has every "right" to look into these and deserve the same NEWS attention as RUSSIA got. after all, it is NEWS that is happening.

they've made it PR now and this is not a good place to be. not if you value the traditional american freedoms we've all grown up with. now they tell you want you can say, when you can say it, how you can say it, and if you can even say it at all. what to wear to "be safe" and whether not your hard earned business can even stay open.

this really where people want to be? i can't name a time the gov "gave back" rights, can you? the left may THINK they are getting what they want, but they are merely getting the 1st wave out of the way WITH THEIR HELP.

they're next.

you can't control the chaos the left has unleashed to make this happen.

this man was there and a navy vet. he deserves to be heard IF YOU REALLY WANT TRANSPARENT ELECTIONS.

if not, just say so and be honest about it.

Except that Mueller documented collusion between the Trump Campaign and Russian intel. As did the US Senate.

Trump’s Russia Cover-Up By the Numbers – 251 contacts with Russia-linked operatives

A new brief from the Center for American Progress Action Fund’s Moscow Project shows that, based on public reporting and indictments by special counsel Robert Mueller, there are at least 272 known contacts between Trump’s team and Russia-linked operatives during the campaign and transition...

themoscowproject.org

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/report_volume5.pdf

This after Hope Hicks (Campaign spokeswoman) said that the campaign had no contact with any foreign government:

Hope Hicks: “There was no communication between the campaign and any foreign entity during the campaign.”

Moving the goal posts: The evolution of Trump's collusion denials

"There was no communication between the campaign and any foreign entity during the campaign.”

www.axios.com

Exactly.. the idea that Trump’s election fraud hoax is analogous to the Mueller investigation is an outright lie.
34 indictments for Mueller and numerous convictions vs Trump losing 99% of his cases on this election fraud farce.

Swearing that there was an investigation into Russia justifies an investigation into fantasy voter fraud is simply disingenuous.

This is why the Mueller investigation has so many skins on the wall
This is why the FISA warrant "esposee" went nowhere
This is why the Durham report has gone nowhere

and once again 3 more posts that have NOTHING to do with the topic. comparing giving you time for RUSSIA to ask for time to look into FRAUD is not a segway into more RUSSIA bullshit. find your own thread.

Merely opining on your equating russian investigations as some sort of "we deserve one too" justification.

 

[colfax_m]

It is useless. Lefties have been programmed to automatically dismiss any claims of voter fraud. No amount of evidence or first hand testimony can change their minds. The mind-meld is strong.

I mean, we listened to the first few dozen and every single one was bullshit, so after a while you kinda just become numb to the right wing outrage machine.

 

[iceberg]

Which ballots representing which registered voters were fraudulent?

One theory is that the 3-5 million invisible bogus balloteers that Trump blamed in 2016 for his popular vote loss (every one of whom eluded Trump's super-sleuth Kobach) have, during the reign of trumpery, multiplied until they now number over 8 million, but remain as stealthy as ever.

yet you can believe a man who didn't get 30 people to a rally got more votes than obama?

when you want it bad enough, you'll let yourself fall for anything.

 

[colfax_m]

Shaffer utilizes a "whistleblower" that had his story picked apart by Politifact.

PolitiFact - Alleged ‘backdated’ ballots wouldn’t have been counted even if USPS claim were true

A U.S. Postal Service contractor working in Wisconsin during the election claims USPS workers told him about 100,000 "mi

www.politifact.com

The entirety of Pease’s allegations involve actions taken Nov. 4 and 5. In terms of the vote tally, it doesn’t matter what USPS employees did with ballots at that point. No election officials were going to count them. And the entire state had already reported its election results (Milwaukee County was last about 4 a.m. Nov. 4)

 

[schmidlap]

Where is this alleged "evidence" ?

One theory is that it is being kept safe and secure in Squid Head's pants.

"I'll let you peek at what I won't allow even federal judges to see,
and I'll favor you with my encrypted farts that confirm it all."​

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Which ballots representing which registered voters were fraudulent?

One theory is that the 3-5 million invisible bogus balloteers that Trump blamed in 2016 for his popular vote loss (every one of whom eluded Trump's super-sleuth Kobach) have, during the reign of trumpery, multiplied until they now number over 8 million, but remain as stealthy as ever.

yet you can believe a man who didn't get 30 people to a rally got more votes than obama?

when you want it bad enough, you'll let yourself fall for anything.

yet you can believe a man who didn't get 30 people to a rally got more votes than obama?

when you want it bad enough, you'll let yourself fall for anything.

Of course rally crowds aren’t indicative of anything. Hardly enough to change any election.
There are many millions who did not attend in the same region.

 

[colfax_m]

Shaffer's other whistle blower Jesse Morgan is a troubled man with a long history of substance abuse, some serious sounding mental health issues and lying to the court system.

Witness in Pa. election fraud suit from York is a ghost hunter with a long criminal record

Jesse Morgan of York, who claims he trucked completed mail-in ballots from New York to Pennsylvania, is the star witness in a GOP election lawsuit.

www.ydr.com

Common Pleas Judge Stephen P. Linebaugh remarked that a common theme with Morgan in drug treatment court had been “it was never your fault.” He also “constantly lied,” the judge said.

In 2006, Morgan pleaded guilty to forgery for a sentence of five years’ probation, with the first 192 days in Adams County Prison. But a judge resentenced him in 2008 to 1 1/2 to five years in prison, according to court records.

 

[schmidlap]

Of course rally crowds aren’t indicative of anything.

Unfortunately, screeching that political opponents should all be locked up at super-spreader jamborees is indicative of something.