Sex for hire: A 1st amendment right.

[EvilCat Breath]

Prostitution does not easily accept legalization. Like the legalization of drugs, the legalization of vice only gets more vice and lawlessness.

Amsterdam 'lawless jungle' at night, ombudsman warns

 

[Stormy Daniels]

I was reading an article from Politico Magazine about the case against the owners of Backpage and the free speech implications. I just can't see how the law that put them out of business can be upheld in court. But it got me thinking about something else. In this day and age spending money itself is legally equated with free speech.

With that foundation already laid, I now submit it's a first amendment right to get paid to get laid, even if it's not on camera. Years ago we showed that paying someone to have sex on camera was protected free speech. It's about time we extend that off camera, too.

If one were to make an argument with regard to the constitutionality of laws criminalizing prostitution, it would be based on the right to privacy guaranteed by the Third, Fourth, Fifth, and 14th Amendments.

Pornography is entitled to First Amendment protections because it’s form of free expression, where prostitution is not.

If you had been paying attention you would have noticed that I am arguing that sex for hire is a first amendment issue.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

Prostitution is demeaning to women but supported by liberals. What does that tell you?

Oh look, another white knight wannabe who thinks that women need to be saved from themselves.

 

[TNHarley]

One of the most natural things on this planet, and "capitalists" dont think it should be paid for

 

[Vastator]

The issue as far as government goes, is that it is so intimate, and private; that they cannot be certain to recieve a cut of the profits. And the profits would be rather substantial. They simply cannot allow that much money to change hands without getting a piece of the action, so to speak...

 

[Sahba]

Decriminalize it like 'pot'.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Sure, why the hell not

 

[Stormy Daniels]

The issue as far as government goes, is that it is so intimate, and private; that they cannot be certain to recieve a cut of the profits. And the profits would be rather substantial. They simply cannot allow that much money to change hands without getting a piece of the action, so to speak...

But that's what they get by keeping it underground. How many people do you think file a schedule C for illegal income?

 

[bendog]

I was reading an article from Politico Magazine about the case against the owners of Backpage and the free speech implications. I just can't see how the law that put them out of business can be upheld in court. But it got me thinking about something else. In this day and age spending money itself is legally equated with free speech.

With that foundation already laid, I now submit it's a first amendment right to get paid to get laid, even if it's not on camera. Years ago we showed that paying someone to have sex on camera was protected free speech. It's about time we extend that off camera, too.

I'd pay a woman to shut up during sex.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

I was reading an article from Politico Magazine about the case against the owners of Backpage and the free speech implications. I just can't see how the law that put them out of business can be upheld in court. But it got me thinking about something else. In this day and age spending money itself is legally equated with free speech.

With that foundation already laid, I now submit it's a first amendment right to get paid to get laid, even if it's not on camera. Years ago we showed that paying someone to have sex on camera was protected free speech. It's about time we extend that off camera, too.

I'd pay a woman to shut up during sex.

Don't worry honey, for you I'm sure any woman would shut everything for free.

 

[Vastator]

The issue as far as government goes, is that it is so intimate, and private; that they cannot be certain to recieve a cut of the profits. And the profits would be rather substantial. They simply cannot allow that much money to change hands without getting a piece of the action, so to speak...

But that's what they get by keeping it underground. How many people do you think file a schedule C for illegal income?

But they also fine offenders. And contribute to the PIC.

 

[rightwinger]

Why is paying for sex a 'Crime?' It's a logical fair question. I suspect it has something to do with religious zealots of the past, forcing their agendas on others. If parties agree on a business transaction pertaining to sex, so be it. It's not a Government issue. As long as their adults, let them decide.

Decriminalizing X act leads to the normalization and acceptance of X act which leads to an anything goes, no boundaries type of society....you know, the kind of society immoral, indecent LefTards dream of.
Sometimes we have to step back and see things through a wider lens...Progressives hate that principle.

Sex is a normal act. It is not dirty or yucky

No reason it should be criminalized.

I agree...sex is amazing...I suggest people have as much sex as possible...sex should not be illegal. So what?

So why is it illegal if money changes hands?

 

[rightwinger]

Prostitution does not easily accept legalization. Like the legalization of drugs, the legalization of vice only gets more vice and lawlessness.

Amsterdam 'lawless jungle' at night, ombudsman warns

If Vice moves over to other lawlessness then prosecute that lawlessness

 

[bendog]

Prostitution is demeaning to women but supported by liberals. What does that tell you?

Oh look, another white knight wannabe who thinks that women need to be saved from themselves.

All they do is complain, just like you. (-:

 

[danielpalos]

I was reading an article from Politico Magazine about the case against the owners of Backpage and the free speech implications. I just can't see how the law that put them out of business can be upheld in court. But it got me thinking about something else. In this day and age spending money itself is legally equated with free speech.

With that foundation already laid, I now submit it's a first amendment right to get paid to get laid, even if it's not on camera. Years ago we showed that paying someone to have sex on camera was protected free speech. It's about time we extend that off camera, too.

Natural Rights! Make it Common under the Common Law!

We need equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will, and unemployment compensation for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment!

Exculpatory circumstance without it; what a legal concept!

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Prostitution does not easily accept legalization. Like the legalization of drugs, the legalization of vice only gets more vice and lawlessness.

Amsterdam 'lawless jungle' at night, ombudsman warns

If Vice moves over to other lawlessness then prosecute that lawlessness

Vice lends itself to lawlessness. There are just some acts and transactions that cannot be made fully legal. It might be better if robotics improves to the point where human interaction is taken out completely.

 

[Mr Natural]

Vice lends itself to lawlessness. There are just some acts and transactions that cannot be made fully legal. It might be better if robotics improves to the point where human interaction is taken out completely.

So it’s Ok to get a blow job from a robot but not from a human?

Interesting.

 

[rightwinger]

Prostitution does not easily accept legalization. Like the legalization of drugs, the legalization of vice only gets more vice and lawlessness.

Amsterdam 'lawless jungle' at night, ombudsman warns

If Vice moves over to other lawlessness then prosecute that lawlessness

Vice lends itself to lawlessness. There are just some acts and transactions that cannot be made fully legal. It might be better if robotics improves to the point where human interaction is taken out completely.

If it does....then prosecute the lawlessness

Vice, by its very nature, is a victimless crime

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Vice lends itself to lawlessness. There are just some acts and transactions that cannot be made fully legal. It might be better if robotics improves to the point where human interaction is taken out completely.

So it’s Ok to get a blow job from a robot but not from a human?

Interesting.

You miss the point completely. it has nothing to do with being okay or not okay. A robot cannot be exploited like humans can. it cannot be hurt or mistreated.

 

[Billy000]

I was reading an article from Politico Magazine about the case against the owners of Backpage and the free speech implications. I just can't see how the law that put them out of business can be upheld in court. But it got me thinking about something else. In this day and age spending money itself is legally equated with free speech.

With that foundation already laid, I now submit it's a first amendment right to get paid to get laid, even if it's not on camera. Years ago we showed that paying someone to have sex on camera was protected free speech. It's about time we extend that off camera, too.

Apparently this is issue is why you joined the Republican Party which I find very odd. The RNC doesn’t give a shit about your libertarian beliefs. It would have made more sense to register as an independent...