Setting the record straight about "White Supremacy"!

[BackAgain]

Except I provided the evidence to back up my assertions. All you could do was complain that Kracker Democrats didn't vote for the 1964 CRA even as you denied it.

Except that’s bull. You denied my claim that it took the GOP to pass the various acts. YOU focused on one of the later acts. I corrected you.

The fact remains: it took the GOP To overcome the filthy Democrat KKK loving vermin who opposed civil rights.

 

[cnm]

The fact remains: it took the GOP To overcome the filthy Democrat KKK loving vermin who opposed civil rights.

Kracker revisionism. For when the truth hurts. More Democrats voted for the 1964 CRA than Republicans. Krackers opposed it and voted against it. Northerners supported it and voted for it.
I can tell that hurts your feefee.

Oh well. Rub some segregation on it.

 

[cnm]

This is where it started. What you really meant to say was 'Better talk to Northerners'.

Want a civil rights act? Better talk to the GOP.

No, it was Northern representatives, the majority of who were Democrat, that passed the CRA, voting against the Krackers in both parties. Nothing has changed.

 

[BackAgain]

This is where it started. What you really meant to say was 'Better talk to Northerners'.

No. What I meant was what I said. Without the GOP, you feeble-brained racist Dumbocraps would still be blocking civil rights.

 

[IM2]

Except that’s bull. You denied my claim that it took the GOP to pass the various acts. YOU focused on one of the later acts. I corrected you.

The fact remains: it took the GOP To overcome the filthy Democrat KKK loving vermin who opposed civil rights.

Actually it didn't.

And the 1964 republican presidential nominee opposed civil rights.

You reepublicans need to quit this shit. Because you want to tell everybody how nobody today was alive to otwn slaves then you try telling us how blacks should be republicans because the democratic party was the slavery party before you were born. Todays republican party has voted afainst the votuing rights act. Several times now. So what we have today is the RepubliKKKlan party.

 

[IM2]

No. What I meant was what I said. Without the GOP, you feeble-brained racist Dumbocraps would still be blocking civil rights.

Incorrect. If left up to the modern RepubliKKKlans, the CRA would be repealed.

 

[BackAgain]

Actually it didn't.

And the 1964 republican presidential nominee opposed civil rights.

You reepublicans need to quit this shit. Because you want to tell everybody how nobody today was alive to otwn slaves then you try telling us how blacks should be republicans because the democratic party was the slavery party before you were born. Todays republican party has voted afainst the votuing rights act. Several times now. So what we have today is the RepubliKKKlan party.

Actually, it did. The Dumbocrap Party detested civil rights. Once they acknowledged that it was a battle they couldn’t win, they chose to exploit black voters by their pandering policies towards African Americans.

No one can stop you from issuing your blatant lies. But it was a Democrat US Senator who was a kleagal (kleagal!!??) in the KKK. And the Dumbocrap Party leadership adored him and venerated him as a lion of or the heart of the Senate. The miserable Robert Byrd, Dumbocrap Party.

It was the present infestation of the Oval Office who (in his earlier days as a brain dead Senator) who opposed school integration. Why? He said he didn’t want his kids to be taught in a “jungle.” Brandon is a Dumbocrap, not a Republican.

Now, I am willing to acknowledge that the GOP has a less than perfect record. By contrast, you can’t be honest for a moment when it comes to this race baiting stuff you and cnm always try to make use of.

 

[AZrailwhale]

More Democrats than Republicans voted for the CRA. Krackers voted against it, Northerners voted for it.
You happen to be a Kracker, by any chance?
That you have trouble accepting those plain facts shows your lack of reconstruction.

More Democrats than Republicans voted for the CRA. Krackers voted against it, Northerners voted for it.
You happen to be a Kracker, by any chance?
That you have trouble accepting those plain facts shows your lack of reconstruction.

Per capita more republicans voted for the CRA

 

[sealybobo]

Those people making a million dollars make it possible for you to live in the comfort you live in today...don't hate them and don't punish them out of existence or it will be your quality of life that will suffer....

Don't you think it's a little wrong that the people who made it to to top changed the percentages of how much more they make than the rest of us? The top guy used to make 35 x what the average worker made. Today it's 351 times what the rest of us make.

There is just something wrong with the fact my brother is worth $1 million dollars. I went up north and watched him work. Listened to those conference calls. What a bunch of shit. $1 million dollars?

Of course I'm happy for him because he's my brother, but let's be honest, that job is worth $200K. Maybe I'd buy $300K. I thought as a VP he made $500K plus bonus' that put him somewhere between $500 and $1 million but now he tells me if he does well on stock it's over $1 million and if not he can make $800K.

But then they have a bunch of mid level people under them making $200-$500K a year. They aren't going to complain. One day they hope to make it to the top.

I don't want to regulate this. It's up to the employees at the bottom to say they deserve more. I'm just saying, it's not right. My brother should make $500K. And every other VP should make $500K. And the CEO should make half of what he makes. And we should take all that money and divide it by all the lowest paid workers and give it to them. If those lowest paid workers were organized that's how it would be.

What we see happening today is because unions don't exist anymore.

The median annual wage in 2019 was $34,248.45.

 

[Correll]

Don't you think it's a little wrong that the people who made it to to top changed the percentages of how much more they make than the rest of us? The top guy used to make 35 x what the average worker made. Today it's 351 times what the rest of us make.

There is just something wrong with the fact my brother is worth $1 million dollars. I went up north and watched him work. Listened to those conference calls. What a bunch of shit. $1 million dollars?

Of course I'm happy for him because he's my brother, but let's be honest, that job is worth $200K. Maybe I'd buy $300K. I thought as a VP he made $500K plus bonus' that put him somewhere between $500 and $1 million but now he tells me if he does well on stock it's over $1 million and if not he can make $800K.

But then they have a bunch of mid level people under them making $200-$500K a year. They aren't going to complain. One day they hope to make it to the top.

I don't want to regulate this. It's up to the employees at the bottom to say they deserve more. I'm just saying, it's not right. My brother should make $500K. And every other VP should make $500K. And the CEO should make half of what he makes. And we should take all that money and divide it by all the lowest paid workers and give it to them. If those lowest paid workers were organized that's how it would be.

What we see happening today is because unions don't exist anymore.

The median annual wage in 2019 was $34,248.45.

I don't know if it was really those people at the top that control it.

IMO, the real factor could be the way that the labor market, since the 70s, have been flooded based on three factors, two of which are the results of policy.


1. women entering the workforce in large numbers.

2. high levels of immigration.

3. automation.


I also wonder if Mutual Funds are removing some of the oversight that ceos, used to get from their Boards.



But yes, this period should have seen a massive push for outreach by unions.

 

[sealybobo]

I don't know if it was really those people at the top that control it.

IMO, the real factor could be the way that the labor market, since the 70s, have been flooded based on three factors, two of which are the results of policy.


1. women entering the workforce in large numbers.

2. high levels of immigration.

3. automation.


I also wonder if Mutual Funds are removing some of the oversight that ceos, used to get from their Boards.



But yes, this period should have seen a massive push for outreach by unions.

Employees at least need to INSIST on cost of living increases. EVERY YEAR. EVERY EMPLOYEE. Or else we might organize.

 

[Correll]

Employees at least need to INSIST on cost of living increases. EVERY YEAR. EVERY EMPLOYEE. Or else we might organize.

Any and all pushback is good.


I keep hearing how women make less because of not "staying late" or "going the extra mile".

My response is, "good for them". If the only way to get ahead is to build your life around work, or god forbid, to work for free, or some such shit,


that is bullshit, and those that play along with such bullshit, are part of the problem.

 

[sealybobo]

Any and all pushback is good.


I keep hearing how women make less because of not "staying late" or "going the extra mile".

My response is, "good for them". If the only way to get ahead is to build your life around work, or god forbid, to work for free, or some such shit,


that is bullshit, and those that play along with such bullshit, are part of the problem.

Remember the people making the least work for an hourly rate. Don't feel bad for the guy who stays late if he's salary. It's probably a good salary.

 

[22lcidw]

Kracker revisionism. For when the truth hurts. More Democrats voted for the 1964 CRA than Republicans. Krackers opposed it and voted against it. Northerners supported it and voted for it.
I can tell that hurts your feefee.

Oh well. Rub some segregation on it.

Many of the Northern Progs are frauds. Live a distance away from the problems but support the causes. So we end up with a dystopian Western World with White Prog Women empowered to the max and bringing that civilization to its knees.

 

[Correll]

Remember the people making the least work for an hourly rate. Don't feel bad for the guy who stays late if he's salary. It's probably a good salary.

Mmm, not always. My one buds wife, is a freaking social worker. She turned down a promotion because it would end up with her making LESS money, per hour.

And even if they do make a decent salary, it is still not fair. A man (or woman) should not have to give up on the life or family to be a.... well, anything really.


But yes, hourly work and overtime, is a different matter.


People should not be punished, for wanting to have a life outside of work. Man or woman. White or black.

 

[BackAgain]

Don't you think it's a little wrong that the people who made it to to top changed the percentages of how much more they make than the rest of us? The top guy used to make 35 x what the average worker made. Today it's 351 times what the rest of us make.

There is just something wrong with the fact my brother is worth $1 million dollars. I went up north and watched him work. Listened to those conference calls. What a bunch of shit. $1 million dollars?

Of course I'm happy for him because he's my brother, but let's be honest, that job is worth $200K. Maybe I'd buy $300K. I thought as a VP he made $500K plus bonus' that put him somewhere between $500 and $1 million but now he tells me if he does well on stock it's over $1 million and if not he can make $800K.

But then they have a bunch of mid level people under them making $200-$500K a year. They aren't going to complain. One day they hope to make it to the top.

I don't want to regulate this. It's up to the employees at the bottom to say they deserve more. I'm just saying, it's not right. My brother should make $500K. And every other VP should make $500K. And the CEO should make half of what he makes. And we should take all that money and divide it by all the lowest paid workers and give it to them. If those lowest paid workers were organized that's how it would be.

What we see happening today is because unions don't exist anymore.

The median annual wage in 2019 was $34,248.45.

Assuming rational economic thinking by the company, yiur brothers value to the company presumably is several times what they pay him. They pay him large because they value him large. How the he’ll is that any of our business?

No. I don’t think it’s odd in any way. Good for him. As a related thought, I cannot imagine any reason why a doctor shouldn’t make significantly more than a local garbage man. That’s not a slight on garbage men. It is an economic thought. Even a dedicated professional sanitation guy is quite a bit more easily replaced than a dedicated doctor. I want the garbage collectors to have a home and a car and healthcare and all that. But I can’t fathom why we should be jealous that a doctor might be living a bit larger.

 

[sealybobo]

Assuming rational economic thinking by the company, yiur brothers value to the company presumably is several times what they pay him. They pay him large because they value him large. How the he’ll is that any of our business?

No. I don’t think it’s odd in any way. Good for him. As a related thought, I cannot imagine any reason why a doctor shouldn’t make significantly more than a local garbage man. That’s not a slight on garbage men. It is an economic thought. Even a dedicated professional sanitation guy is quite a bit more easily replaced than a dedicated doctor. I want the garbage collectors to have a home and a car and healthcare and all that. But I can’t fathom why we should be jealous that a doctor might be living a bit larger.

Totally agree. I'm not a commy who wants everyone to make the same amount. I just want things to go back to what they were. The workers really did well. Thanks to Unions. And the execs were still rich. Just not as rich as they are now.

Saying that, perhaps like blue collar workers had to take a step back when we sent jobs overseas, perhaps in the future doctors will make $150-$300 a year instead of $500K. Or teachers today no longer make what teachers used to make. Maybe general practice doctors will only make $150K. That will help cut down on the high costs of healthcare. Maybe we have to lower the cost of malpractice insurance.

 

[Rambunctious]

Don't you think it's a little wrong that the people who made it to to top changed the percentages of how much more they make than the rest of us? The top guy used to make 35 x what the average worker made. Today it's 351 times what the rest of us make.

There is just something wrong with the fact my brother is worth $1 million dollars. I went up north and watched him work. Listened to those conference calls. What a bunch of shit. $1 million dollars?

Of course I'm happy for him because he's my brother, but let's be honest, that job is worth $200K. Maybe I'd buy $300K. I thought as a VP he made $500K plus bonus' that put him somewhere between $500 and $1 million but now he tells me if he does well on stock it's over $1 million and if not he can make $800K.

But then they have a bunch of mid level people under them making $200-$500K a year. They aren't going to complain. One day they hope to make it to the top.

I don't want to regulate this. It's up to the employees at the bottom to say they deserve more. I'm just saying, it's not right. My brother should make $500K. And every other VP should make $500K. And the CEO should make half of what he makes. And we should take all that money and divide it by all the lowest paid workers and give it to them. If those lowest paid workers were organized that's how it would be.

What we see happening today is because unions don't exist anymore.

The median annual wage in 2019 was $34,248.45.

If you want to live in a socialist nation there are plenty to choose from...I never got a job from a poor man...rich people make life better for everyone by creating jobs and opportunity...now thanks to hard work I'm retired and I hire people to do jobs for me...

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Every step black people have taken away from bondage has been a fight against conservative bigots. Do you fear retribution by blacks for all those years of being treated like garbage?

During 400 Years in America, Aframs Have Never Been Treated Worse Than They Deserved

As an imaginary honest Jussie Smollett would have said, "Why am I being singled out when my whole race has been faking victimization for the last 60 years?"

Africa is nothing but Black-on-Black crime, an import that must be sent back by us.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Actually, it did. The Dumbocrap Party detested civil rights. Once they acknowledged that it was a battle they couldn’t win, they chose to exploit black voters by their pandering policies towards African Americans.

No one can stop you from issuing your blatant lies. But it was a Democrat US Senator who was a kleagal (kleagal!!??) in the KKK. And the Dumbocrap Party leadership adored him and venerated him as a lion of or the heart of the Senate. The miserable Robert Byrd, Dumbocrap Party.

It was the present infestation of the Oval Office who (in his earlier days as a brain dead Senator) who opposed school integration. Why? He said he didn’t want his kids to be taught in a “jungle.” Brandon is a Dumbocrap, not a Republican.

Now, I am willing to acknowledge that the GOP has a less than perfect record. By contrast, you can’t be honest for a moment when it comes to this race baiting stuff you and cnm always try to make use of.

Shaming for That Is Virtue-Signaling to the Race Traitors

What the meme handed down to you from the top means is, "The Democrats used to be on the side of White people and should never be forgiven for that." Entitled elitists control Left and Right and we have to break loose from them.