serious question on core Jewish belief

[Blues Man]

GOD selected a representative group that were suppose to be the beacon of GOD (HIS representatives/missionaries) to the other nations. And in fact Joseph would be GOD's emissary the the nation of EGYPT, Solomon would influence the surrounding kingdoms, as Daniel would be the the emissary to BABYLON, and Ezekiel the PERSIANS, etc... This group would be the linage of the MESSIAH --- who would make salvation possible for the entire world.

I always wondered by any god would have to enlist humans to convince other people to believe in him.

Why not just appear to everyone at the same time ?

God didn't enlist me and I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything.

I am defending my beliefs from attacks from others.

So now you're comparing yourself to Moses and the others that god allegedly spoke to?

Not at all. I have no idea how you even made that leap in logic. God didn't enlist me and I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything. I am defending my beliefs from attacks from others.

But in the OT he did enlist people to bring his message to others.

If he was indeed all powerful why did he have to send Moses the 10 Commandments? Why not just appear to everyone on the entire planet and declare himself?

I don't know that he did. For all I know that was an embellishment.

But it seems to me that for any given thing there will be some who have a natural talent for it and those are the ones who NATURALLY end up instructing others who have less talent in it. So whether we are talking about music or math or science or spirituality there will always be a distribution within each subset. The better naturally instruct the average.

I'm not talking about music or math.

I am asking why an all powerful god can't deliver his message all the people he supposedly created at the same time.

There weren't that many people living back then so I think it wouldn't have been too much for a god to handle.

 

[Indeependent]

GOD selected a representative group that were suppose to be the beacon of GOD (HIS representatives/missionaries) to the other nations. And in fact Joseph would be GOD's emissary the the nation of EGYPT, Solomon would influence the surrounding kingdoms, as Daniel would be the the emissary to BABYLON, and Ezekiel the PERSIANS, etc... This group would be the linage of the MESSIAH --- who would make salvation possible for the entire world.

I always wondered by any god would have to enlist humans to convince other people to believe in him.

Why not just appear to everyone at the same time ?

God didn't enlist me and I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything.

I am defending my beliefs from attacks from others.

So now you're comparing yourself to Moses and the others that god allegedly spoke to?

Not at all. I have no idea how you even made that leap in logic. God didn't enlist me and I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything. I am defending my beliefs from attacks from others.

But in the OT he did enlist people to bring his message to others.

If he was indeed all powerful why did he have to send Moses the 10 Commandments? Why not just appear to everyone on the entire planet and declare himself?

He did; King David wrote a hymn about it.
The nations were happy eating pork and committing adultery.

 

[hobelim]

The nations were happy eating pork ...

One cannot comply with the literal interpretation and application of the law that prohibits eating the vile and loathsome flesh of unclean creatures that do not ruminate without violating the deeper implications of the exact same law.

Here lies the choice between a blessing or a curse.

 

[Indeependent]

The nations were happy eating pork ...

One cannot comply with the literal interpretation and application of the law that prohibits eating the vile and loathsome flesh of unclean creatures that do not ruminate without violating the deeper implications of the exact same law.

There is no literal interpretation because the verses are explicit and need no interpretation.

 

[hobelim]

The nations were happy eating pork ...

One cannot comply with the literal interpretation and application of the law that prohibits eating the vile and loathsome flesh of unclean creatures that do not ruminate without violating the deeper implications of the exact same law.

There is no literal interpretation because the verses are explicit and need no interpretation.

lol....Then why do you follow the talmud, the traditional interpretation of those verses written by men that arose and became compulsory after the death of Moses who said, " I know that after my death you will turn aside from the way that I taught to follow the law and defile yourselves with the work of your hands?

If what you said was true then you might as well throw it in the trash.

And why would you need and what do you await a messiah to reveal about the Law?

And if the people would "turn aside from the way" that Moses taught to follow the law before his death implies that there is a another way to follow the law than what became tradition after his death.

 

[Indeependent]

The nations were happy eating pork ...

One cannot comply with the literal interpretation and application of the law that prohibits eating the vile and loathsome flesh of unclean creatures that do not ruminate without violating the deeper implications of the exact same law.

There is no literal interpretation because the verses are explicit and need no interpretation.

Then why do you follow the talmud?

If what you said was true then you might as well throw it in the trash.

Did I post that every verse was explicit or that many verses pertaining to kashrut are explicit?

 

[hobelim]

The nations were happy eating pork ...

One cannot comply with the literal interpretation and application of the law that prohibits eating the vile and loathsome flesh of unclean creatures that do not ruminate without violating the deeper implications of the exact same law.

There is no literal interpretation because the verses are explicit and need no interpretation.

Then why do you follow the talmud?

If what you said was true then you might as well throw it in the trash.

Did I post that every verse was explicit or that many verses pertaining to kashrut are explicit?

They are explicit. The command to not eat the flesh of anything that crawls on its belly is a direct reference to Genesis 3:14 where God condemns the talking serpent, a metaphor for a religious deceiver, to crawl on its belly as the lowest of low lifes.., lower than cattle, herd people, and all the wild beasts of the field, godless barbarians.

Flesh is a metaphor for teaching. The law has nothing to do with food and never did.

You may never have eaten pork, even once, for your entire life but you still are guilty of eating the flesh of swine who do not ruminate because your belly is full of the baloney that the law is about food.

The blood is dripping from your lips.

 

[ding]

GOD selected a representative group that were suppose to be the beacon of GOD (HIS representatives/missionaries) to the other nations. And in fact Joseph would be GOD's emissary the the nation of EGYPT, Solomon would influence the surrounding kingdoms, as Daniel would be the the emissary to BABYLON, and Ezekiel the PERSIANS, etc... This group would be the linage of the MESSIAH --- who would make salvation possible for the entire world.

I always wondered by any god would have to enlist humans to convince other people to believe in him.

Why not just appear to everyone at the same time ?

God didn't enlist me and I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything.

I am defending my beliefs from attacks from others.

So now you're comparing yourself to Moses and the others that god allegedly spoke to?

Not at all. I have no idea how you even made that leap in logic. God didn't enlist me and I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything. I am defending my beliefs from attacks from others.

But in the OT he did enlist people to bring his message to others.

If he was indeed all powerful why did he have to send Moses the 10 Commandments? Why not just appear to everyone on the entire planet and declare himself?

I don't know that he did. For all I know that was an embellishment.

But it seems to me that for any given thing there will be some who have a natural talent for it and those are the ones who NATURALLY end up instructing others who have less talent in it. So whether we are talking about music or math or science or spirituality there will always be a distribution within each subset. The better naturally instruct the average.

I'm not talking about music or math.

I am asking why an all powerful god can't deliver his message all the people he supposedly created at the same time.

There weren't that many people living back then so I think it wouldn't have been too much for a god to handle.

You will have to ask God that question.

I believe He did and does. It's just that some are too busy listening to themselves to hear Him.

But why do you care?

 

[Blues Man]

GOD selected a representative group that were suppose to be the beacon of GOD (HIS representatives/missionaries) to the other nations. And in fact Joseph would be GOD's emissary the the nation of EGYPT, Solomon would influence the surrounding kingdoms, as Daniel would be the the emissary to BABYLON, and Ezekiel the PERSIANS, etc... This group would be the linage of the MESSIAH --- who would make salvation possible for the entire world.

I always wondered by any god would have to enlist humans to convince other people to believe in him.

Why not just appear to everyone at the same time ?

God didn't enlist me and I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything.

I am defending my beliefs from attacks from others.

So now you're comparing yourself to Moses and the others that god allegedly spoke to?

Not at all. I have no idea how you even made that leap in logic. God didn't enlist me and I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything. I am defending my beliefs from attacks from others.

But in the OT he did enlist people to bring his message to others.

If he was indeed all powerful why did he have to send Moses the 10 Commandments? Why not just appear to everyone on the entire planet and declare himself?

I don't know that he did. For all I know that was an embellishment.

But it seems to me that for any given thing there will be some who have a natural talent for it and those are the ones who NATURALLY end up instructing others who have less talent in it. So whether we are talking about music or math or science or spirituality there will always be a distribution within each subset. The better naturally instruct the average.

I'm not talking about music or math.

I am asking why an all powerful god can't deliver his message all the people he supposedly created at the same time.

There weren't that many people living back then so I think it wouldn't have been too much for a god to handle.

You will have to ask God that question.

I believe He did and does. It's just that some are too busy listening to themselves to hear Him.

But why do you care?

It's an interesting question that people have never given a satisfactory answer for

 

[Rigby5]

GOD selected a representative group that were suppose to be the beacon of GOD (HIS representatives/missionaries) to the other nations. And in fact Joseph would be GOD's emissary the the nation of EGYPT, Solomon would influence the surrounding kingdoms, as Daniel would be the the emissary to BABYLON, and Ezekiel the PERSIANS, etc... This group would be the linage of the MESSIAH --- who would make salvation possible for the entire world.

I always wondered by any god would have to enlist humans to convince other people to believe in him.

Why not just appear to everyone at the same time ?

God didn't enlist me and I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything.

I am defending my beliefs from attacks from others.

So now you're comparing yourself to Moses and the others that god allegedly spoke to?

Not at all. I have no idea how you even made that leap in logic. God didn't enlist me and I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything. I am defending my beliefs from attacks from others.

But in the OT he did enlist people to bring his message to others.

If he was indeed all powerful why did he have to send Moses the 10 Commandments? Why not just appear to everyone on the entire planet and declare himself?

He did; King David wrote a hymn about it.
The nations were happy eating pork and committing adultery.

Wrong.
Eating pork is not a sin and is a good idea as long as you cook it sufficiently.
And there is not any other primate that is monogamous.
There is no benefit to being monogamous or any reason at all to assume humans are or should be monogamous.
It should be clear God made no such edicts, and those claiming he did are just liars.

 

[Rigby5]

GOD selected a representative group that were suppose to be the beacon of GOD (HIS representatives/missionaries) to the other nations. And in fact Joseph would be GOD's emissary the the nation of EGYPT, Solomon would influence the surrounding kingdoms, as Daniel would be the the emissary to BABYLON, and Ezekiel the PERSIANS, etc... This group would be the linage of the MESSIAH --- who would make salvation possible for the entire world.

I always wondered by any god would have to enlist humans to convince other people to believe in him.

Why not just appear to everyone at the same time ?

God didn't enlist me and I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything.

I am defending my beliefs from attacks from others.

So now you're comparing yourself to Moses and the others that god allegedly spoke to?

Not at all. I have no idea how you even made that leap in logic. God didn't enlist me and I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything. I am defending my beliefs from attacks from others.

But in the OT he did enlist people to bring his message to others.

If he was indeed all powerful why did he have to send Moses the 10 Commandments? Why not just appear to everyone on the entire planet and declare himself?

I don't know that he did. For all I know that was an embellishment.

But it seems to me that for any given thing there will be some who have a natural talent for it and those are the ones who NATURALLY end up instructing others who have less talent in it. So whether we are talking about music or math or science or spirituality there will always be a distribution within each subset. The better naturally instruct the average.

I'm not talking about music or math.

I am asking why an all powerful god can't deliver his message all the people he supposedly created at the same time.

There weren't that many people living back then so I think it wouldn't have been too much for a god to handle.

You will have to ask God that question.

I believe He did and does. It's just that some are too busy listening to themselves to hear Him.

But why do you care?

It's an interesting question that people have never given a satisfactory answer for

The diversity of religions means they are all equally wrong.
It means we have a hereditary need for religion, but that none of them can possibly be correct.

 

[Rigby5]

GOD selected a representative group that were suppose to be the beacon of GOD (HIS representatives/missionaries) to the other nations. And in fact Joseph would be GOD's emissary the the nation of EGYPT, Solomon would influence the surrounding kingdoms, as Daniel would be the the emissary to BABYLON, and Ezekiel the PERSIANS, etc... This group would be the linage of the MESSIAH --- who would make salvation possible for the entire world.

I always wondered by any god would have to enlist humans to convince other people to believe in him.

Why not just appear to everyone at the same time ?

God didn't enlist me and I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything.

I am defending my beliefs from attacks from others.

So now you're comparing yourself to Moses and the others that god allegedly spoke to?

Not at all. I have no idea how you even made that leap in logic. God didn't enlist me and I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything. I am defending my beliefs from attacks from others.

But in the OT he did enlist people to bring his message to others.

If he was indeed all powerful why did he have to send Moses the 10 Commandments? Why not just appear to everyone on the entire planet and declare himself?

I don't know that he did. For all I know that was an embellishment.

But it seems to me that for any given thing there will be some who have a natural talent for it and those are the ones who NATURALLY end up instructing others who have less talent in it. So whether we are talking about music or math or science or spirituality there will always be a distribution within each subset. The better naturally instruct the average.

I'm not talking about music or math.

I am asking why an all powerful god can't deliver his message all the people he supposedly created at the same time.

There weren't that many people living back then so I think it wouldn't have been too much for a god to handle.

You will have to ask God that question.

I believe He did and does. It's just that some are too busy listening to themselves to hear Him.

But why do you care?

No, if there was a God and he gave a message, it would have to have been universal.
And that has never happened, so he didn't and therefore does not exist.
For example, Judaism is out because of things like Joshua massacring Canaanite women and children at Jericho.
Morally the Hebrew should not even have invaded the Land of Canaan.
There can be no excuse.

 

[Rigby5]

The nations were happy eating pork ...

One cannot comply with the literal interpretation and application of the law that prohibits eating the vile and loathsome flesh of unclean creatures that do not ruminate without violating the deeper implications of the exact same law.

There is no literal interpretation because the verses are explicit and need no interpretation.

Explicitly horrific.
No sane or moral person would stone suspected adulterers, for example.
Adultery is a personal emotion that no one else has any right to even comment on, and stoning is a gazillion times worse than anything else anyone could possibly do.

 

[hobelim]

The diversity of religions means they are all equally wrong.
It means we have a hereditary need for religion, but that none of them can possibly be correct.

It's not about a hereditary need for religion, it's about the instinct to survive.

Historically if you did not subscribe to whatever religion you were exposed to by accident of birth, or at least pretended to, you were demonized, banished from participating in society, and/or killed.

Many are on their hands and knees five times a day not because they are believers or have a hereditary need for religion. They just don't want their heads chopped off.

 

[ding]

GOD selected a representative group that were suppose to be the beacon of GOD (HIS representatives/missionaries) to the other nations. And in fact Joseph would be GOD's emissary the the nation of EGYPT, Solomon would influence the surrounding kingdoms, as Daniel would be the the emissary to BABYLON, and Ezekiel the PERSIANS, etc... This group would be the linage of the MESSIAH --- who would make salvation possible for the entire world.

I always wondered by any god would have to enlist humans to convince other people to believe in him.

Why not just appear to everyone at the same time ?

God didn't enlist me and I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything.

I am defending my beliefs from attacks from others.

So now you're comparing yourself to Moses and the others that god allegedly spoke to?

Not at all. I have no idea how you even made that leap in logic. God didn't enlist me and I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything. I am defending my beliefs from attacks from others.

But in the OT he did enlist people to bring his message to others.

If he was indeed all powerful why did he have to send Moses the 10 Commandments? Why not just appear to everyone on the entire planet and declare himself?

I don't know that he did. For all I know that was an embellishment.

But it seems to me that for any given thing there will be some who have a natural talent for it and those are the ones who NATURALLY end up instructing others who have less talent in it. So whether we are talking about music or math or science or spirituality there will always be a distribution within each subset. The better naturally instruct the average.

I'm not talking about music or math.

I am asking why an all powerful god can't deliver his message all the people he supposedly created at the same time.

There weren't that many people living back then so I think it wouldn't have been too much for a god to handle.

You will have to ask God that question.

I believe He did and does. It's just that some are too busy listening to themselves to hear Him.

But why do you care?

It's an interesting question that people have never given a satisfactory answer for

I doubt there is any answer you will find satisfactory. That isn't the point of you asking it.

 

[ding]

GOD selected a representative group that were suppose to be the beacon of GOD (HIS representatives/missionaries) to the other nations. And in fact Joseph would be GOD's emissary the the nation of EGYPT, Solomon would influence the surrounding kingdoms, as Daniel would be the the emissary to BABYLON, and Ezekiel the PERSIANS, etc... This group would be the linage of the MESSIAH --- who would make salvation possible for the entire world.

I always wondered by any god would have to enlist humans to convince other people to believe in him.

Why not just appear to everyone at the same time ?

God didn't enlist me and I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything.

I am defending my beliefs from attacks from others.

So now you're comparing yourself to Moses and the others that god allegedly spoke to?

Not at all. I have no idea how you even made that leap in logic. God didn't enlist me and I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything. I am defending my beliefs from attacks from others.

But in the OT he did enlist people to bring his message to others.

If he was indeed all powerful why did he have to send Moses the 10 Commandments? Why not just appear to everyone on the entire planet and declare himself?

I don't know that he did. For all I know that was an embellishment.

But it seems to me that for any given thing there will be some who have a natural talent for it and those are the ones who NATURALLY end up instructing others who have less talent in it. So whether we are talking about music or math or science or spirituality there will always be a distribution within each subset. The better naturally instruct the average.

I'm not talking about music or math.

I am asking why an all powerful god can't deliver his message all the people he supposedly created at the same time.

There weren't that many people living back then so I think it wouldn't have been too much for a god to handle.

You will have to ask God that question.

I believe He did and does. It's just that some are too busy listening to themselves to hear Him.

But why do you care?

No, if there was a God and he gave a message, it would have to have been universal.
And that has never happened, so he didn't and therefore does not exist.
For example, Judaism is out because of things like Joshua massacring Canaanite women and children at Jericho.
Morally the Hebrew should not even have invaded the Land of Canaan.
There can be no excuse.

I don't think there's an if and the message was written into each of us. Some can discern it and some can't.

 

[Blues Man]

GOD selected a representative group that were suppose to be the beacon of GOD (HIS representatives/missionaries) to the other nations. And in fact Joseph would be GOD's emissary the the nation of EGYPT, Solomon would influence the surrounding kingdoms, as Daniel would be the the emissary to BABYLON, and Ezekiel the PERSIANS, etc... This group would be the linage of the MESSIAH --- who would make salvation possible for the entire world.

I always wondered by any god would have to enlist humans to convince other people to believe in him.

Why not just appear to everyone at the same time ?

God didn't enlist me and I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything.

I am defending my beliefs from attacks from others.

So now you're comparing yourself to Moses and the others that god allegedly spoke to?

Not at all. I have no idea how you even made that leap in logic. God didn't enlist me and I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything. I am defending my beliefs from attacks from others.

But in the OT he did enlist people to bring his message to others.

If he was indeed all powerful why did he have to send Moses the 10 Commandments? Why not just appear to everyone on the entire planet and declare himself?

He did; King David wrote a hymn about it.
The nations were happy eating pork and committing adultery.

Wrong.
Eating pork is not a sin and is a good idea as long as you cook it sufficiently.
And there is not any other primate that is monogamous.
There is no benefit to being monogamous or any reason at all to assume humans are or should be monogamous.
It should be clear God made no such edicts, and those claiming he did are just liars.

Humans aren't exactly monogamous

 

[Blues Man]

GOD selected a representative group that were suppose to be the beacon of GOD (HIS representatives/missionaries) to the other nations. And in fact Joseph would be GOD's emissary the the nation of EGYPT, Solomon would influence the surrounding kingdoms, as Daniel would be the the emissary to BABYLON, and Ezekiel the PERSIANS, etc... This group would be the linage of the MESSIAH --- who would make salvation possible for the entire world.

I always wondered by any god would have to enlist humans to convince other people to believe in him.

Why not just appear to everyone at the same time ?

God didn't enlist me and I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything.

I am defending my beliefs from attacks from others.

So now you're comparing yourself to Moses and the others that god allegedly spoke to?

Not at all. I have no idea how you even made that leap in logic. God didn't enlist me and I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything. I am defending my beliefs from attacks from others.

But in the OT he did enlist people to bring his message to others.

If he was indeed all powerful why did he have to send Moses the 10 Commandments? Why not just appear to everyone on the entire planet and declare himself?

I don't know that he did. For all I know that was an embellishment.

But it seems to me that for any given thing there will be some who have a natural talent for it and those are the ones who NATURALLY end up instructing others who have less talent in it. So whether we are talking about music or math or science or spirituality there will always be a distribution within each subset. The better naturally instruct the average.

I'm not talking about music or math.

I am asking why an all powerful god can't deliver his message all the people he supposedly created at the same time.

There weren't that many people living back then so I think it wouldn't have been too much for a god to handle.

You will have to ask God that question.

I believe He did and does. It's just that some are too busy listening to themselves to hear Him.

But why do you care?

It's an interesting question that people have never given a satisfactory answer for

The diversity of religions means they are all equally wrong.
It means we have a hereditary need for religion, but that none of them can possibly be correct.

I can agree with that.

I think we as humans hate a mystery and our brains are evolved enough that we can imagine almost anything and convince ourselves that our imaginings are real

 

[Blues Man]

GOD selected a representative group that were suppose to be the beacon of GOD (HIS representatives/missionaries) to the other nations. And in fact Joseph would be GOD's emissary the the nation of EGYPT, Solomon would influence the surrounding kingdoms, as Daniel would be the the emissary to BABYLON, and Ezekiel the PERSIANS, etc... This group would be the linage of the MESSIAH --- who would make salvation possible for the entire world.

I always wondered by any god would have to enlist humans to convince other people to believe in him.

Why not just appear to everyone at the same time ?

God didn't enlist me and I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything.

I am defending my beliefs from attacks from others.

So now you're comparing yourself to Moses and the others that god allegedly spoke to?

Not at all. I have no idea how you even made that leap in logic. God didn't enlist me and I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything. I am defending my beliefs from attacks from others.

But in the OT he did enlist people to bring his message to others.

If he was indeed all powerful why did he have to send Moses the 10 Commandments? Why not just appear to everyone on the entire planet and declare himself?

I don't know that he did. For all I know that was an embellishment.

But it seems to me that for any given thing there will be some who have a natural talent for it and those are the ones who NATURALLY end up instructing others who have less talent in it. So whether we are talking about music or math or science or spirituality there will always be a distribution within each subset. The better naturally instruct the average.

I'm not talking about music or math.

I am asking why an all powerful god can't deliver his message all the people he supposedly created at the same time.

There weren't that many people living back then so I think it wouldn't have been too much for a god to handle.

You will have to ask God that question.

I believe He did and does. It's just that some are too busy listening to themselves to hear Him.

But why do you care?

It's an interesting question that people have never given a satisfactory answer for

I doubt there is any answer you will find satisfactory. That isn't the point of you asking it.

If the all powerful creator wanted all of his creations to worship him in just one particular way then he should have been able to tell everyone he ever created exactly what he wants and not leave the rules of worship up to mere mortals

 

[ding]

GOD selected a representative group that were suppose to be the beacon of GOD (HIS representatives/missionaries) to the other nations. And in fact Joseph would be GOD's emissary the the nation of EGYPT, Solomon would influence the surrounding kingdoms, as Daniel would be the the emissary to BABYLON, and Ezekiel the PERSIANS, etc... This group would be the linage of the MESSIAH --- who would make salvation possible for the entire world.

I always wondered by any god would have to enlist humans to convince other people to believe in him.

Why not just appear to everyone at the same time ?

God didn't enlist me and I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything.

I am defending my beliefs from attacks from others.

So now you're comparing yourself to Moses and the others that god allegedly spoke to?

Not at all. I have no idea how you even made that leap in logic. God didn't enlist me and I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything. I am defending my beliefs from attacks from others.

But in the OT he did enlist people to bring his message to others.

If he was indeed all powerful why did he have to send Moses the 10 Commandments? Why not just appear to everyone on the entire planet and declare himself?

I don't know that he did. For all I know that was an embellishment.

But it seems to me that for any given thing there will be some who have a natural talent for it and those are the ones who NATURALLY end up instructing others who have less talent in it. So whether we are talking about music or math or science or spirituality there will always be a distribution within each subset. The better naturally instruct the average.

I'm not talking about music or math.

I am asking why an all powerful god can't deliver his message all the people he supposedly created at the same time.

There weren't that many people living back then so I think it wouldn't have been too much for a god to handle.

You will have to ask God that question.

I believe He did and does. It's just that some are too busy listening to themselves to hear Him.

But why do you care?

It's an interesting question that people have never given a satisfactory answer for

I doubt there is any answer you will find satisfactory. That isn't the point of you asking it.

If the all powerful creator wanted all of his creations to worship him in just one particular way then he should have been able to tell everyone he ever created exactly what he wants and not leave the rules of worship up to mere mortals

Who said "the all powerful creator" wanted all of his creations to worship him in just one particular way?

Which way is that? Was there a memo that was sent out that I missed?

You know that nobody cares if you don't believe in "the all powerful creator," right? I mean other than you that is.