Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
"Child pornography offenses are one of the fastest growing crimes in California, with a 150% increase in detection and arrests each year. As more and more people are caught in police stings as a result of Task Force operations, it is increasingly apparent that people accused of this crime come from all walks of life."
Child Pornography Arrests Increase in California - HG.org
And when did this thread become about child pornography?
KG is obsessed with kiddie porn. Too bad she cannot link serial killers to child porn. But probably not from a lack of trying on her part.
Going off topic a tad, but keep wanting to mention how serial murderers usually didn't get raised having pets. Maybe that lack of empathy has something to do with things. Certainly more than porn does.
Stick to the fucking subject, weirdo.
cant believe this thread op passes for serious thought for anyone
jeebus
Going off topic a tad, but keep wanting to mention how serial murderers usually didn't get raised having pets. Maybe that lack of empathy has something to do with things. Certainly more than porn does.
Stick to the fucking subject, weirdo.
That's a very Christian way to debate. LOL!
cant believe this thread op passes for serious thought for anyone
jeebus
cant believe this thread op passes for serious thought for anyone
jeebus
You don't get your news from nanny.com? LOL!
false correlation and irrelevance = not legit.cant believe this thread op passes for serious thought for anyone
jeebus
Oh it's serious and legit. Irrelevant but legit. It's making a false correlation like but why people become violent is my own area of interest.
No, wrong = not legit.Being wrong is legit. Every scientist is wrong before they're right but still legit.
No, wrong = not legit.Being wrong is legit. Every scientist is wrong before they're right but still legit.
Scientists can be wrong, what theyre wrong about is no longer legit. Stop quibbling, it's stupid. The op is fucking stupid.
we have differing opinions.No, wrong = not legit.Being wrong is legit. Every scientist is wrong before they're right but still legit.
Scientists can be wrong, what theyre wrong about is no longer legit. Stop quibbling, it's stupid. The op is fucking stupid.
I don't think she's stupid so much as wrong and incredibly biased. There's a difference.
"THREE YEARS AGO, WE BELIEVED CHILD PORNOGRAPHY WAS BEING TRADED OVER APPROXIMATELY 500,000 MAKEU -- UNIQUE IP ADDRESSES. WE KNOW THAT IT IS 20 TIMES THE ORIGINAL ESTIMATE. WHEN WE PASSED THE LAW, WE ESTIMATE WE COULD RESCUE THE CHILD FROM ONGOING VICTIMIZATION IN 30% TO 40% OF INVESTIGATIONS. WE THINK THIS FIGURE COULD BE HIGHER THAN THAT. LET ME BE CLEAR. THIS IS AN EPIDEMIC."
Child Exploitation Prevention Video C-SPAN.org
Child porn does NOT protect children. Hopefully nobody but the most abject lunatics would ever believe that it does.
No, wrong = not legit.Being wrong is legit. Every scientist is wrong before they're right but still legit.
Scientists can be wrong, what theyre wrong about is no longer legit. Stop quibbling, it's stupid. The op is fucking stupid.
I don't think she's stupid so much as wrong and incredibly biased. There's a difference.
No, wrong = not legit.Being wrong is legit. Every scientist is wrong before they're right but still legit.
Scientists can be wrong, what theyre wrong about is no longer legit. Stop quibbling, it's stupid. The op is fucking stupid.
I don't think she's stupid so much as wrong and incredibly biased. There's a difference.
I think she is bat shit crazy.
Mostly because it's like dismissing them or their opinions unfairly. Being unpopular doesn't mean you're position or thing isn't without value. Without the opposing viewpoints we'd have nothing to talk about and nothing'd get talked about. Everyone has value. Even when they're wrong.
No, wrong = not legit.Being wrong is legit. Every scientist is wrong before they're right but still legit.
Scientists can be wrong, what theyre wrong about is no longer legit. Stop quibbling, it's stupid. The op is fucking stupid.
I don't think she's stupid so much as wrong and incredibly biased. There's a difference.
I think she is bat shit crazy.
No, wrong = not legit.Being wrong is legit. Every scientist is wrong before they're right but still legit.
Scientists can be wrong, what theyre wrong about is no longer legit. Stop quibbling, it's stupid. The op is fucking stupid.
I don't think she's stupid so much as wrong and incredibly biased. There's a difference.
I think she is bat shit crazy.
People I actually know even if just online I like to not describe in such terms, people on tv sure.
cant believe this thread op passes for serious thought for anyone
jeebus
You don't get your news from nanny.com? LOL!
I just don't understand how any functioning adult has so many boogy men in their disgusting little brains.
54% of men used photographs, drawings or paintings for arousal apart from physical sex with women.
IN THE 1940'S AND 50'S.
Today, porn is so huge and especially here in America, that if it had any true link to serial killing we'd all be dead. derp derp derp logic, is the OP.
Or, it's really without value, is batshit crazy, and should be treated as such.No, wrong = not legit.Being wrong is legit. Every scientist is wrong before they're right but still legit.
Scientists can be wrong, what theyre wrong about is no longer legit. Stop quibbling, it's stupid. The op is fucking stupid.
I don't think she's stupid so much as wrong and incredibly biased. There's a difference.
I think she is bat shit crazy.
People I actually know even if just online I like to not describe in such terms, people on tv sure.
