C_Clayton_Jones
Diamond Member
Further proof that conservatives’ rhetoric about ‘bans’ and ‘confiscation’ are nothing but lies and demagoguery.Senate's latest attempt at a gun control deal falls apart
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Further proof that conservatives’ rhetoric about ‘bans’ and ‘confiscation’ are nothing but lies and demagoguery.Senate's latest attempt at a gun control deal falls apart
There are firearm regulatory measures which are perfectly appropriate and warranted – such as UBCs.We do not need Gun control, we need more mental health options, and facilities. We have a lot of mentally ill people who use guns to harm others. That is at the root of these shootings. We are focusing on the wrong issue. The problem is not Guns, but mentally ill people with guns.
The dog-shit GOP better continue doing nothing on this issue.what did you expect from the do-nothing Congress?
Senate's latest attempt at a gun control deal falls apart
But Connecticut Democrat Chris Murphy said he was still hopeful for a compromise with the GOP.www.politico.com
It's not for a lack of trying that they fail.Further proof that conservatives’ rhetoric about ‘bans’ and ‘confiscation’ are nothing but lies and demagoguery.Senate's latest attempt at a gun control deal falls apart
You mean the do nothing Republicans who are useless and the do nothing moderate Democrats who are too spineless to take a stand.what did you expect from the do-nothing Congress?
Senate's latest attempt at a gun control deal falls apart
But Connecticut Democrat Chris Murphy said he was still hopeful for a compromise with the GOP.www.politico.com
Nope. Go fuck yourself. Repeal it all.There are firearm regulatory measures which are perfectly appropriate and warranted – such as UBCs.We do not need Gun control, we need more mental health options, and facilities. We have a lot of mentally ill people who use guns to harm others. That is at the root of these shootings. We are focusing on the wrong issue. The problem is not Guns, but mentally ill people with guns.
Jack, there is nothing funnier than a clueless putz like you trying to act smart about something you obviously know nothing about! There are so many gun laws that it is hard for anyone to accurately count them all! Part of the problem is that already, many of them are simply not enforced, and the other problem is that most shootings occur by people who don't care a thing about the law!If there were thousands of gun control laws, there would hardly be any shootings.How come THOUSANDS of existing Gun control laws are not enough for you?
More die from abortions, which Democrats approve of. If the issue of guns is to save lives, more would be saved by banning abortions.You mean the do nothing Republicans who are useless and the do nothing moderate Democrats who are too spineless to take a stand.what did you expect from the do-nothing Congress?
Senate's latest attempt at a gun control deal falls apart
But Connecticut Democrat Chris Murphy said he was still hopeful for a compromise with the GOP.www.politico.com
How come THOUSANDS of existing Gun control laws are not enough for you?
If there were thousands of gun control laws, there would hardly be any shootings. Because almost no one would be able to own a gun.
Yet, mass shootings still happen frequently. Why? Well, when you have a gun proliferation problem with almost no checks, no national registration
database, and a free flow of guns from gun friendly states into urban areas (which are supposed to be gun free zones), you get chaos.
This has been documented multiple times. All you have to do is search.
But wait, we already have background checks. Why another law? Because this isn't just about background checks. Is it? It's about gun bans and registration. You curiously left that part out.what did you expect from the do-nothing Congress?
Senate's latest attempt at a gun control deal falls apart
But Connecticut Democrat Chris Murphy said he was still hopeful for a compromise with the GOP.www.politico.com
It's about the same old chestnut of background checks. They have NOT tried to restrict the purchases as you are suggesting.
In your crusade to ensure your right to weapons comes the addition of nut cases joining your ranks. Mass slaughters are now regarded as collateral damage to preserve the right to include nut cases in the your ranks. It hasn't even dawned in you guys yet that to eliminate idiots with guns would give you cause respectability and demonstrate your concern for the remainder of innocent people who die from guns.
But I don't expect any gun owners to think like that.
Why do Democrats want a Federal gun registry that is open to the public, then?Further proof that conservatives’ rhetoric about ‘bans’ and ‘confiscation’ are nothing but lies and demagoguery.Senate's latest attempt at a gun control deal falls apart
Wild Bill Kelsoe
Who said anything on banning gun ownership?
He's talking about gun registry forcing people to declare what weapons they own and where they are.
In Australia, the last mass slaughter was in Tasmania. The guns were bought back by the government and destroyed. It hasn't stopped gun ownership nor did it try.
It stopped the ratbags which America is full of, getting access to guns at will.
Not one mass slaughter since. Plenty of bikies and drug dealers getting whacked but who cares about them.
That's incorrect. There have been several mass slaughters since the gun ban. The gun ban didn't prevent massacres.Wild Bill Kelsoe
Who said anything on banning gun ownership?
He's talking about gun registry forcing people to declare what weapons they own and where they are.
In Australia, the last mass slaughter was in Tasmania. The guns were bought back by the government and destroyed. It hasn't stopped gun ownership nor did it try.
It stopped the ratbags which America is full of, getting access to guns at will.
Not one mass slaughter since. Plenty of bikies and drug dealers getting whacked but who cares about them.