Senate To Vote Next Week On Garland's AG Nomination

[Dana7360]

I'm glad to know that we will have an AG next week.

His nomination shouldn't have been held up.

Senate to vote next week on Garland’s AG nomination

The Senate is teeing up a vote for next week on Merrick Garland’s nomination to lead the Justice Department.Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) laid the groundwork for the next tr…

thehill.com

 

[Auld Phart]

Wonder if Harris will need to cast the deciding vote?

 

[Coyote]

I hope not. There is no reason.

 

[BluesLegend]

He's a corrupt bought and paid for Dem shill.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Honestly, he should be an SC justice. AG confirmation should be automatic. And my guess is that it will be.

 

[AFrench2]

He's a corrupt bought and paid for Dem shill.

He's a Republican. Was part of the big story in 2016 when he was nominated for SCOTUS.

 

[BluesLegend]

He's a corrupt bought and paid for Dem shill.

He's a Republican. Was part of the big story in 2006 when he was nominated for SCOTUS.

I have no use for Republican hacks either.

 

[AFrench2]

All Republicans are hacks.

 

[Indeependent]

I'd like a list of people involved in politics that don't owe anything to anybody.

 

[blackhawk]

Wonder if Harris will need to cast the deciding vote?

I really doubt he doesn't seem to have the baggae in his background that Neera Tanden and Xavier Becerra have in fact Tanden has already dropped out to be the OMB head.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

I'm glad to know that we will have an AG next week.

His nomination shouldn't have been held up.

Senate to vote next week on Garland’s AG nomination

The Senate is teeing up a vote for next week on Merrick Garland’s nomination to lead the Justice Department.Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) laid the groundwork for the next tr…

thehill.com

We should all be glad that we will have an AG who follows the Constitution, its case law, and the rule of law; an AG who will put the people first; an AG who understands that he works for the people, not the president; and an AG who understands that it’s country over party – we haven’t had that the last four years.

 

[Dana7360]

Wonder if Harris will need to cast the deciding vote?

Does it really matter?

 

[Dana7360]

I'm glad to know that we will have an AG next week.

His nomination shouldn't have been held up.

Senate to vote next week on Garland’s AG nomination

The Senate is teeing up a vote for next week on Merrick Garland’s nomination to lead the Justice Department.Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) laid the groundwork for the next tr…

thehill.com

We should all be glad that we will have an AG who follows the Constitution, its case law, and the rule of law; an AG who will put the people first; an AG who understands that he works for the people, not the president; and an AG who understands that it’s country over party – we haven’t had that the last four years.

Yes it will be very refreshing after the last four years.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

I'm glad to know that we will have an AG next week.

His nomination shouldn't have been held up.

Senate to vote next week on Garland’s AG nomination

The Senate is teeing up a vote for next week on Merrick Garland’s nomination to lead the Justice Department.Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) laid the groundwork for the next tr…

thehill.com

We should all be glad that we will have an AG who follows the Constitution, its case law, and the rule of law; an AG who will put the people first; an AG who understands that he works for the people, not the president; and an AG who understands that it’s country over party – we haven’t had that the last four years.

Yes it will be very refreshing after the last four years.

Yet the next president will likely be a Republicans, and back to a partisan AG who protects the president rather than the American people; an AG with nothing but contempt for the Constitution, its case law, and the rule of law; an AG who will put party before country, and an AG who will make Justice an appendage of the GOP.

Voting for a Republican for president is the definition of insanity.

 

[Auld Phart]

I'm glad to know that we will have an AG next week.

His nomination shouldn't have been held up.

Senate to vote next week on Garland’s AG nomination

The Senate is teeing up a vote for next week on Merrick Garland’s nomination to lead the Justice Department.Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) laid the groundwork for the next tr…

thehill.com

We should all be glad that we will have an AG who follows the Constitution, its case law, and the rule of law; an AG who will put the people first; an AG who understands that he works for the people, not the president; and an AG who understands that it’s country over party – we haven’t had that the last four years.

Yes it will be very refreshing after the last four years.

Yet the next president will likely be a Republicans, and back to a partisan AG who protects the president rather than the American people; an AG with nothing but contempt for the Constitution, its case law, and the rule of law; an AG who will put party before country, and an AG who will make Justice an appendage of the GOP.

Voting for a Republican for president is the definition of insanity.

Voting for a Republican for president is the definition of insanity.

and no worse than voting for a Democrat.

 

[Snouter]

He is a holohoax survivor and hates Whitey because Whitey are essentially Germans and Germans kicked out Jews because Jews openly declared war on them and the Germans while fighting every country not controlled by Jews took the priceless assets which impoverished Jews hid in their ghettos to result in billions in reparations to the ethno-state of Israel as well as billions each year to defend against Arabs whose main weapon is a kitchen knife and a bomb much weaken than that used by the zionists to help establishment the fake Israel. Is there any government, academic, media, retail employee in the West who is not a White-hating non-White?