Senate should refuse to confirm ALL of Clinton's judicial nominees

[Preacher]

The Senate Should Refuse To Confirm All Of Clinton’s Judicial Nominees

Indeed I agree! Don't give an inch! They want it make them bleed for it.

 

[AceRothstein]

They won't be able to as they are going to lose the Senate.

 

[Vastator]

They won't be able to as they are going to lose the Senate.

We'll see...

 

[koshergrl]

Yeah but they won't.

 

[Vastator]

Yeah but they won't.

Until the people start making some noise and press the issue.

 

[Mitsu]

The Senate Should Refuse To Confirm All Of Clinton’s Judicial Nominees

Indeed I agree! Don't give an inch! They want it make them bleed for it.

Right, we wouldn't want them to say, do their ******* job per the Constitution or anything! ******* Nazis.

 

[Vastator]

The Senate Should Refuse To Confirm All Of Clinton’s Judicial Nominees

Indeed I agree! Don't give an inch! They want it make them bleed for it.

Right, we wouldn't want them to say, do their ******* job per the Constitution or anything! ******* Nazis.

Not confirming, would also be doing their job.

 

[nat4900]

A simple majority in the senate (which democrats will almost surely have with the VP's vote) CAN change the rules and bring up the so-called "nuclear option" to fill Scalia's vacancy....and perhaps 2 or more justices' positions......

To the winners belong the spoils, and McConnell will long regret not even holding a hearing for Garland.

 

[Vastator]

The Senate Should Refuse To Confirm All Of Clinton’s Judicial Nominees

Indeed I agree! Don't give an inch! They want it make them bleed for it.

Right, we wouldn't want them to say, do their ******* job per the Constitution or anything! ******* Nazis.

Not confirming, would also be doing their job.

That's why selections require confirmation...

 

[TNHarley]

The Senate Should Refuse To Confirm All Of Clinton’s Judicial Nominees

Indeed I agree! Don't give an inch! They want it make them bleed for it.

Right, we wouldn't want them to say, do their ******* job per the Constitution or anything! ******* Nazis.

Maybe you should read it?

 

[Mitsu]

The Senate Should Refuse To Confirm All Of Clinton’s Judicial Nominees

Indeed I agree! Don't give an inch! They want it make them bleed for it.

Right, we wouldn't want them to say, do their ******* job per the Constitution or anything! ******* Nazis.

Not confirming, would also be doing their job.

They don't have to confirm, they have to vote. If they don't like them, that's fine.

And if they refuse to vote Clinton will simply appoint one or one will retire and then we'll have an odd number again so the court can stop being paid for nothing like the whole ******* Congress.

You little Nazis are such ******* babies. If you can't get your way you refuse to play and take your ball and run home to mommy. FU.

 

[nat4900]

That's why selections require confirmation...

Actually, "selections" or nominations, REQUIRE for the senate to hold a hearing....which the GOP-led senate has refused to even do that........GOP'ers in the senate will pay for that mistake.:

 

[Mitsu]

The Senate Should Refuse To Confirm All Of Clinton’s Judicial Nominees

Indeed I agree! Don't give an inch! They want it make them bleed for it.

Right, we wouldn't want them to say, do their ******* job per the Constitution or anything! ******* Nazis.

Maybe you should read it?

I have you idiot. Maybe you should try that and learn where it doesn't say you can just do whatever the **** you like because you lost yet another election.

 

[Nosmo King]

The Senate Should Refuse To Confirm All Of Clinton’s Judicial Nominees

Indeed I agree! Don't give an inch! They want it make them bleed for it.

Why do you hate the constitutional process so much? Would you like to ball up the constitution and toss it in the trash?

 

[TNHarley]

The Senate Should Refuse To Confirm All Of Clinton’s Judicial Nominees

Indeed I agree! Don't give an inch! They want it make them bleed for it.

Right, we wouldn't want them to say, do their ******* job per the Constitution or anything! ******* Nazis.

Not confirming, would also be doing their job.

They don't have to confirm, they have to vote. If they don't like them, that's fine.

And if they refuse to vote Clinton will simply appoint one or one will retire and then we'll have an odd number again so the court can stop being paid for nothing like the whole ******* Congress.

You little Nazis are such ******* babies. If you can't get your way you refuse to play and take your ball and run home to mommy. FU.

You are so ignorant and such a hypocrite, that when I see your posts, all I feel is pity.

 

[hangover]

Senate should refuse to confirm ALL of Clinton's judicial nominees
It looks like the dems will take control of the Senate now too.....Thanks Trump.

 

[TNHarley]

The Senate Should Refuse To Confirm All Of Clinton’s Judicial Nominees

Indeed I agree! Don't give an inch! They want it make them bleed for it.

Right, we wouldn't want them to say, do their ******* job per the Constitution or anything! ******* Nazis.

Maybe you should read it?

I have you idiot. Maybe you should try that and learn were it doesn't say you can just do whatever the **** you like because you lost yet another election.

I know it doesn't say that..

 

[g5000]

And if they refuse to vote Clinton will simply appoint one or one will retire and then we'll have an odd number again

That's a very good point. One justice has to retire to get us to an odd number again.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

The Senate Should Refuse To Confirm All Of Clinton’s Judicial Nominees

Indeed I agree! Don't give an inch! They want it make them bleed for it.

Of course you are assuming the senate will still be controlled by the Reps. I don't know if the polls are accurate, but if they are, her nominees may walk thru confirmation.

 

[rightwinger]

But....but
I thought Republicans said they wanted the PEOPLE to decide in the next election
Doesn't that mean Hillary decides?

Are you telling us republicans were lying all along?