Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I like this guy.For the Grand Canyon, it was a one gigantic global flood the likes of we've never seen before. It would affect the whole world as a killer flood.
I've only experience man-made flooding. For example, we were suppose to go white water rafting and met someplace in the forest near what appeared to be a dried up creek. The guide said to be there at 10:00 am sharp. If you can picture a large groups of people in flotation vests waiting there with large rafts and paddles in the middle of nowhere, the sight and pictures we took look ridiculous. Suddenly, we heard this rushing gurgling sound and voila we had a class III river. Upstream, they let the dam gates open at this time. The other thing I'll never forget is falling heads over heel at Meatgrinder (the more interesting rapids have names). The raft hit a drop and then an up current so it tossed me overboard (I was sitting in the back). You get disoriented. I had no idea where I was except for being in the river. All I could see were large rocks and found up by following the light. I probably was about 15 - 20 ft down, so I swam up towards it and looking out for large rocks. I felt like I was weightless and not moving. I broke the surface of the water and took a quick breath and then was pulled down again. More disorientation and weightless feeling, but I knew I was moving downstream and at a rapid pace so just tried swimming up towards the light and avoiding rocks. Once I bobbed my head out of the water, I could see the raft was waiting for me further downstream and swam towards it and they pulled me back aboard.
Thus, I think if you're caught in a flood, the rapid current will keep pulling you down and disoriented. You can't fight it, so you'll just have to keep underwater and swim up when you can and hopefully you can catch a breath before it pulls you down again. You could see a large amount of bubbles and that will obscure your vision and add to the disorientation.
If you're traveling 120 mph, then likely you don't stand much of a chance.
I think you can see that floods can cause great destruction and carve out gigantic canyons and gorges in rapid fashion.
I agree that canyons can be formed quickly ... do you agree that canyons can also be formed slowly? ... over hundreds if not thousands of years ...
Both types of canyon have clear and distinct features ... thus we can compare the Channeled Scablands to the outflow areas along the California/Arizona border ... I'm asking you how are these two areas comparable ... do we see the gravel hills, the potholes, the high water marks? ... these features are plentiful in eastern Washington, but seem absent along the lower Colorado ...
How do they form slowly? Rocks can form slowly from sedimentary layers from other layers and pressure from above.
We should be able to see what you are talking about like watching a pine tree grow. I learned glaciers cut out mountains and such, but I don't know. What do you have on the Channeled Scablands? You want to compare that to GC?
Go visit the Scablands ... all that has been reproduced in the lab ...
What do you mean by "reproduced in the lab?"
Not sure how to unpack this ... so I'll go straight to the end ...
What do you mean by "reproduced in the lab?"
Ripple beds - Unidirectional bedforms -- 15'04"
Potholes - Physical Geography - Potholes -- 1'33"
Erratics - Erratic Boulders -- 2'35"
This last video is from the guy, Nick on the Rocks, where I've been getting all my information ... watch some of his other videos ... top quality stuff and presented in a real accessible way ...
www.nickzentner.com
100% wrong. The OP article is false garbage. The estimate of the age of the Earth's solid core was revised UPWARD by these studies, for one. AOL news can immediately fire their science team.The implication is that therefore the earth must be younger than previously assumed.
That's exactly your problem, you can see, study, or reproduce everything I said. You just refuse to.how can I believe something I cant see, study or reproduce???If you're not willing to believe your own eyes you'll never believe me. Happy holidays.its obvious the problem is yours,,, all of the claims youre making are theories,, another word for theories is opinions not facts,,,Maybe the disconnect is you don't understand the difference between fact and opinion. I've given you nothing but facts. For example, "Iceland, Hawaii, and the GC all owe their existence to continental drift" is fact supported by science. It is not any one's opinion nor is it based on politics or religion.the one youve been giving dumbass,,,Then your last statement was: I reject the opinion cause its an opinion lacking in evidence and based on assumptions not facts,,you and i left that part a long way back,,The title of the thread is "Secular scientists keep reducing the age they suppose the earth to be". Seems like you need to ask the OP that question.and why are you bringing god into it???Exactly which opinion is that?I reject the opinion cause its an opinion lacking in evidence and based on assumptions not facts,,It is not me who says so it is just about every geologist on the planet. Do you know different or do you just refuse to accept the evidence because it contradicts your interpretation of God's word?if you say so,,, who am I to tell you that continents cant float,,Wrong again, they are all related. Iceland, Hawaii, and the GC all owe their existence to continental drift.OK so its growing,, so is Hawaii,, that doesnt have anything to do with how the GC was formed,,
As for me, whenever someone refuses to accept facts it is because they already have the answer and that answer usually comes from their God. Am I wrong?
To which I asked: Exactly which opinion is that?
you should take your ADD meds cause this conversation is getting boring since you cant keep up with it,,
sorry your narrative falls flat when tested but it is what it is,, an opinion,,
not true,,, exactly how do you reproduce floating continents when they dont float,,, not to mention how do you reproduce millions or billions of yrs???That's exactly your problem, you can see, study, or reproduce everything I said. You just refuse to.how can I believe something I cant see, study or reproduce???If you're not willing to believe your own eyes you'll never believe me. Happy holidays.its obvious the problem is yours,,, all of the claims youre making are theories,, another word for theories is opinions not facts,,,Maybe the disconnect is you don't understand the difference between fact and opinion. I've given you nothing but facts. For example, "Iceland, Hawaii, and the GC all owe their existence to continental drift" is fact supported by science. It is not any one's opinion nor is it based on politics or religion.the one youve been giving dumbass,,,Then your last statement was: I reject the opinion cause its an opinion lacking in evidence and based on assumptions not facts,,you and i left that part a long way back,,The title of the thread is "Secular scientists keep reducing the age they suppose the earth to be". Seems like you need to ask the OP that question.and why are you bringing god into it???Exactly which opinion is that?I reject the opinion cause its an opinion lacking in evidence and based on assumptions not facts,,It is not me who says so it is just about every geologist on the planet. Do you know different or do you just refuse to accept the evidence because it contradicts your interpretation of God's word?if you say so,,, who am I to tell you that continents cant float,,Wrong again, they are all related. Iceland, Hawaii, and the GC all owe their existence to continental drift.OK so its growing,, so is Hawaii,, that doesnt have anything to do with how the GC was formed,,
As for me, whenever someone refuses to accept facts it is because they already have the answer and that answer usually comes from their God. Am I wrong?
To which I asked: Exactly which opinion is that?
you should take your ADD meds cause this conversation is getting boring since you cant keep up with it,,
sorry your narrative falls flat when tested but it is what it is,, an opinion,,
If the earth was without form and void in the beginning as God created it according to the Bible, who knows how long it existed in that form or absence of form, as it were?While I still believe the earth to be much younger, it would seem that scientists are being forced to squeeze more and more environmental changes in less and less time:
The true age of Earth's core has been discovered – and it's younger than previously thought
Scientists now believe Earth’s solid core is around one billion years old, far younger than thought.www.aol.com
Have you considered looking this up? It's not a mystery.If the Universe is 13.8 billion years old, then how did these scientists count years before the earth existed to orbit the sun?
You mentioned Hawaii so here is a lesson for you. There is a hot spot below the Pacific plate that has been erupting for millions of years. It is stationary but the plate moves from SE to NW so you can trace the movement back in time. You can even see where it changed from a S to N direction. Hawaii is in the SE corner.not true,,, exactly how do you reproduce floating continents when they dont float,,, not to mention how do you reproduce millions or billions of yrs???That's exactly your problem, you can see, study, or reproduce everything I said. You just refuse to.how can I believe something I cant see, study or reproduce???If you're not willing to believe your own eyes you'll never believe me. Happy holidays.its obvious the problem is yours,,, all of the claims youre making are theories,, another word for theories is opinions not facts,,,Maybe the disconnect is you don't understand the difference between fact and opinion. I've given you nothing but facts. For example, "Iceland, Hawaii, and the GC all owe their existence to continental drift" is fact supported by science. It is not any one's opinion nor is it based on politics or religion.the one youve been giving dumbass,,,Then your last statement was: I reject the opinion cause its an opinion lacking in evidence and based on assumptions not facts,,you and i left that part a long way back,,The title of the thread is "Secular scientists keep reducing the age they suppose the earth to be". Seems like you need to ask the OP that question.and why are you bringing god into it???Exactly which opinion is that?I reject the opinion cause its an opinion lacking in evidence and based on assumptions not facts,,It is not me who says so it is just about every geologist on the planet. Do you know different or do you just refuse to accept the evidence because it contradicts your interpretation of God's word?if you say so,,, who am I to tell you that continents cant float,,Wrong again, they are all related. Iceland, Hawaii, and the GC all owe their existence to continental drift.OK so its growing,, so is Hawaii,, that doesnt have anything to do with how the GC was formed,,
As for me, whenever someone refuses to accept facts it is because they already have the answer and that answer usually comes from their God. Am I wrong?
To which I asked: Exactly which opinion is that?
you should take your ADD meds cause this conversation is getting boring since you cant keep up with it,,
sorry your narrative falls flat when tested but it is what it is,, an opinion,,
all I said is it was growing,,, and plates moving means nothing when youre claiming that continents can float around the planet,,,You mentioned Hawaii so here is a lesson for you. There is a hot spot below the Pacific plate that has been erupting for millions of years. It is stationary but the plate moves from SE to NW so you can trace the movement back in time. You can eve see where it changed from a S to N direction.not true,,, exactly how do you reproduce floating continents when they dont float,,, not to mention how do you reproduce millions or billions of yrs???That's exactly your problem, you can see, study, or reproduce everything I said. You just refuse to.how can I believe something I cant see, study or reproduce???If you're not willing to believe your own eyes you'll never believe me. Happy holidays.its obvious the problem is yours,,, all of the claims youre making are theories,, another word for theories is opinions not facts,,,Maybe the disconnect is you don't understand the difference between fact and opinion. I've given you nothing but facts. For example, "Iceland, Hawaii, and the GC all owe their existence to continental drift" is fact supported by science. It is not any one's opinion nor is it based on politics or religion.the one youve been giving dumbass,,,Then your last statement was: I reject the opinion cause its an opinion lacking in evidence and based on assumptions not facts,,you and i left that part a long way back,,The title of the thread is "Secular scientists keep reducing the age they suppose the earth to be". Seems like you need to ask the OP that question.and why are you bringing god into it???Exactly which opinion is that?I reject the opinion cause its an opinion lacking in evidence and based on assumptions not facts,,It is not me who says so it is just about every geologist on the planet. Do you know different or do you just refuse to accept the evidence because it contradicts your interpretation of God's word?if you say so,,, who am I to tell you that continents cant float,,Wrong again, they are all related. Iceland, Hawaii, and the GC all owe their existence to continental drift.OK so its growing,, so is Hawaii,, that doesnt have anything to do with how the GC was formed,,
As for me, whenever someone refuses to accept facts it is because they already have the answer and that answer usually comes from their God. Am I wrong?
To which I asked: Exactly which opinion is that?
you should take your ADD meds cause this conversation is getting boring since you cant keep up with it,,
sorry your narrative falls flat when tested but it is what it is,, an opinion,,
View attachment 433036
Which are saying the same thing. The attention begging troll intentionally says stupid things for attention. Again.all I said is it was growing,,, and plates moving means nothing when youre claiming that continents can float around the planet,,,You mentioned Hawaii so here is a lesson for you. There is a hot spot below the Pacific plate that has been erupting for millions of years. It is stationary but the plate moves from SE to NW so you can trace the movement back in time. You can eve see where it changed from a S to N direction.not true,,, exactly how do you reproduce floating continents when they dont float,,, not to mention how do you reproduce millions or billions of yrs???That's exactly your problem, you can see, study, or reproduce everything I said. You just refuse to.how can I believe something I cant see, study or reproduce???If you're not willing to believe your own eyes you'll never believe me. Happy holidays.its obvious the problem is yours,,, all of the claims youre making are theories,, another word for theories is opinions not facts,,,Maybe the disconnect is you don't understand the difference between fact and opinion. I've given you nothing but facts. For example, "Iceland, Hawaii, and the GC all owe their existence to continental drift" is fact supported by science. It is not any one's opinion nor is it based on politics or religion.the one youve been giving dumbass,,,Then your last statement was: I reject the opinion cause its an opinion lacking in evidence and based on assumptions not facts,,you and i left that part a long way back,,The title of the thread is "Secular scientists keep reducing the age they suppose the earth to be". Seems like you need to ask the OP that question.and why are you bringing god into it???Exactly which opinion is that?I reject the opinion cause its an opinion lacking in evidence and based on assumptions not facts,,It is not me who says so it is just about every geologist on the planet. Do you know different or do you just refuse to accept the evidence because it contradicts your interpretation of God's word?if you say so,,, who am I to tell you that continents cant float,,Wrong again, they are all related. Iceland, Hawaii, and the GC all owe their existence to continental drift.OK so its growing,, so is Hawaii,, that doesnt have anything to do with how the GC was formed,,
As for me, whenever someone refuses to accept facts it is because they already have the answer and that answer usually comes from their God. Am I wrong?
To which I asked: Exactly which opinion is that?
you should take your ADD meds cause this conversation is getting boring since you cant keep up with it,,
sorry your narrative falls flat when tested but it is what it is,, an opinion,,
View attachment 433036
If Iceland is growing, what is shrinking?all I said is it was growing,,, and plates moving means nothing when youre claiming that continents can float around the planet,,,You mentioned Hawaii so here is a lesson for you. There is a hot spot below the Pacific plate that has been erupting for millions of years. It is stationary but the plate moves from SE to NW so you can trace the movement back in time. You can eve see where it changed from a S to N direction.not true,,, exactly how do you reproduce floating continents when they dont float,,, not to mention how do you reproduce millions or billions of yrs???That's exactly your problem, you can see, study, or reproduce everything I said. You just refuse to.how can I believe something I cant see, study or reproduce???If you're not willing to believe your own eyes you'll never believe me. Happy holidays.its obvious the problem is yours,,, all of the claims youre making are theories,, another word for theories is opinions not facts,,,Maybe the disconnect is you don't understand the difference between fact and opinion. I've given you nothing but facts. For example, "Iceland, Hawaii, and the GC all owe their existence to continental drift" is fact supported by science. It is not any one's opinion nor is it based on politics or religion.the one youve been giving dumbass,,,Then your last statement was: I reject the opinion cause its an opinion lacking in evidence and based on assumptions not facts,,you and i left that part a long way back,,The title of the thread is "Secular scientists keep reducing the age they suppose the earth to be". Seems like you need to ask the OP that question.and why are you bringing god into it???Exactly which opinion is that?I reject the opinion cause its an opinion lacking in evidence and based on assumptions not facts,,It is not me who says so it is just about every geologist on the planet. Do you know different or do you just refuse to accept the evidence because it contradicts your interpretation of God's word?if you say so,,, who am I to tell you that continents cant float,,Wrong again, they are all related. Iceland, Hawaii, and the GC all owe their existence to continental drift.OK so its growing,, so is Hawaii,, that doesnt have anything to do with how the GC was formed,,
As for me, whenever someone refuses to accept facts it is because they already have the answer and that answer usually comes from their God. Am I wrong?
To which I asked: Exactly which opinion is that?
you should take your ADD meds cause this conversation is getting boring since you cant keep up with it,,
sorry your narrative falls flat when tested but it is what it is,, an opinion,,
View attachment 433036
yes you doWhich are saying the same thing. The attention begging troll intentionally says stupid things for attention. Again.,,,all I said is it was growing,,, and plates moving means nothing when youre claiming that continents can float around the planet,,,You mentioned Hawaii so here is a lesson for you. There is a hot spot below the Pacific plate that has been erupting for millions of years. It is stationary but the plate moves from SE to NW so you can trace the movement back in time. You can eve see where it changed from a S to N direction.not true,,, exactly how do you reproduce floating continents when they dont float,,, not to mention how do you reproduce millions or billions of yrs???That's exactly your problem, you can see, study, or reproduce everything I said. You just refuse to.how can I believe something I cant see, study or reproduce???If you're not willing to believe your own eyes you'll never believe me. Happy holidays.its obvious the problem is yours,,, all of the claims youre making are theories,, another word for theories is opinions not facts,,,Maybe the disconnect is you don't understand the difference between fact and opinion. I've given you nothing but facts. For example, "Iceland, Hawaii, and the GC all owe their existence to continental drift" is fact supported by science. It is not any one's opinion nor is it based on politics or religion.the one youve been giving dumbass,,,Then your last statement was: I reject the opinion cause its an opinion lacking in evidence and based on assumptions not facts,,you and i left that part a long way back,,The title of the thread is "Secular scientists keep reducing the age they suppose the earth to be". Seems like you need to ask the OP that question.and why are you bringing god into it???Exactly which opinion is that?I reject the opinion cause its an opinion lacking in evidence and based on assumptions not facts,,It is not me who says so it is just about every geologist on the planet. Do you know different or do you just refuse to accept the evidence because it contradicts your interpretation of God's word?if you say so,,, who am I to tell you that continents cant float,,Wrong again, they are all related. Iceland, Hawaii, and the GC all owe their existence to continental drift.OK so its growing,, so is Hawaii,, that doesnt have anything to do with how the GC was formed,,
As for me, whenever someone refuses to accept facts it is because they already have the answer and that answer usually comes from their God. Am I wrong?
To which I asked: Exactly which opinion is that?
you should take your ADD meds cause this conversation is getting boring since you cant keep up with it,,
sorry your narrative falls flat when tested but it is what it is,, an opinion,,
View attachment 433036
who said something is shrinking and whats that got to do with floating continents???If Iceland is growing, what is shrinking?all I said is it was growing,,, and plates moving means nothing when youre claiming that continents can float around the planet,,,You mentioned Hawaii so here is a lesson for you. There is a hot spot below the Pacific plate that has been erupting for millions of years. It is stationary but the plate moves from SE to NW so you can trace the movement back in time. You can eve see where it changed from a S to N direction.not true,,, exactly how do you reproduce floating continents when they dont float,,, not to mention how do you reproduce millions or billions of yrs???That's exactly your problem, you can see, study, or reproduce everything I said. You just refuse to.how can I believe something I cant see, study or reproduce???If you're not willing to believe your own eyes you'll never believe me. Happy holidays.its obvious the problem is yours,,, all of the claims youre making are theories,, another word for theories is opinions not facts,,,Maybe the disconnect is you don't understand the difference between fact and opinion. I've given you nothing but facts. For example, "Iceland, Hawaii, and the GC all owe their existence to continental drift" is fact supported by science. It is not any one's opinion nor is it based on politics or religion.the one youve been giving dumbass,,,Then your last statement was: I reject the opinion cause its an opinion lacking in evidence and based on assumptions not facts,,you and i left that part a long way back,,The title of the thread is "Secular scientists keep reducing the age they suppose the earth to be". Seems like you need to ask the OP that question.and why are you bringing god into it???Exactly which opinion is that?I reject the opinion cause its an opinion lacking in evidence and based on assumptions not facts,,It is not me who says so it is just about every geologist on the planet. Do you know different or do you just refuse to accept the evidence because it contradicts your interpretation of God's word?if you say so,,, who am I to tell you that continents cant float,,Wrong again, they are all related. Iceland, Hawaii, and the GC all owe their existence to continental drift.OK so its growing,, so is Hawaii,, that doesnt have anything to do with how the GC was formed,,
As for me, whenever someone refuses to accept facts it is because they already have the answer and that answer usually comes from their God. Am I wrong?
To which I asked: Exactly which opinion is that?
you should take your ADD meds cause this conversation is getting boring since you cant keep up with it,,
sorry your narrative falls flat when tested but it is what it is,, an opinion,,
View attachment 433036
progressive hunter 's argumentsIf Iceland is growing, what is shrinking?all I said is it was growing,,, and plates moving means nothing when youre claiming that continents can float around the planet,,,You mentioned Hawaii so here is a lesson for you. There is a hot spot below the Pacific plate that has been erupting for millions of years. It is stationary but the plate moves from SE to NW so you can trace the movement back in time. You can eve see where it changed from a S to N direction.not true,,, exactly how do you reproduce floating continents when they dont float,,, not to mention how do you reproduce millions or billions of yrs???That's exactly your problem, you can see, study, or reproduce everything I said. You just refuse to.how can I believe something I cant see, study or reproduce???If you're not willing to believe your own eyes you'll never believe me. Happy holidays.its obvious the problem is yours,,, all of the claims youre making are theories,, another word for theories is opinions not facts,,,Maybe the disconnect is you don't understand the difference between fact and opinion. I've given you nothing but facts. For example, "Iceland, Hawaii, and the GC all owe their existence to continental drift" is fact supported by science. It is not any one's opinion nor is it based on politics or religion.the one youve been giving dumbass,,,Then your last statement was: I reject the opinion cause its an opinion lacking in evidence and based on assumptions not facts,,you and i left that part a long way back,,The title of the thread is "Secular scientists keep reducing the age they suppose the earth to be". Seems like you need to ask the OP that question.and why are you bringing god into it???Exactly which opinion is that?I reject the opinion cause its an opinion lacking in evidence and based on assumptions not facts,,It is not me who says so it is just about every geologist on the planet. Do you know different or do you just refuse to accept the evidence because it contradicts your interpretation of God's word?if you say so,,, who am I to tell you that continents cant float,,Wrong again, they are all related. Iceland, Hawaii, and the GC all owe their existence to continental drift.OK so its growing,, so is Hawaii,, that doesnt have anything to do with how the GC was formed,,
As for me, whenever someone refuses to accept facts it is because they already have the answer and that answer usually comes from their God. Am I wrong?
To which I asked: Exactly which opinion is that?
you should take your ADD meds cause this conversation is getting boring since you cant keep up with it,,
sorry your narrative falls flat when tested but it is what it is,, an opinion,,
View attachment 433036
I understand youre trying to seek attention,, but could you say something on the topic so we can respond in kind??progressive hunter 's argumentsIf Iceland is growing, what is shrinking?all I said is it was growing,,, and plates moving means nothing when youre claiming that continents can float around the planet,,,You mentioned Hawaii so here is a lesson for you. There is a hot spot below the Pacific plate that has been erupting for millions of years. It is stationary but the plate moves from SE to NW so you can trace the movement back in time. You can eve see where it changed from a S to N direction.not true,,, exactly how do you reproduce floating continents when they dont float,,, not to mention how do you reproduce millions or billions of yrs???That's exactly your problem, you can see, study, or reproduce everything I said. You just refuse to.how can I believe something I cant see, study or reproduce???If you're not willing to believe your own eyes you'll never believe me. Happy holidays.its obvious the problem is yours,,, all of the claims youre making are theories,, another word for theories is opinions not facts,,,Maybe the disconnect is you don't understand the difference between fact and opinion. I've given you nothing but facts. For example, "Iceland, Hawaii, and the GC all owe their existence to continental drift" is fact supported by science. It is not any one's opinion nor is it based on politics or religion.the one youve been giving dumbass,,,Then your last statement was: I reject the opinion cause its an opinion lacking in evidence and based on assumptions not facts,,you and i left that part a long way back,,The title of the thread is "Secular scientists keep reducing the age they suppose the earth to be". Seems like you need to ask the OP that question.and why are you bringing god into it???Exactly which opinion is that?I reject the opinion cause its an opinion lacking in evidence and based on assumptions not facts,,It is not me who says so it is just about every geologist on the planet. Do you know different or do you just refuse to accept the evidence because it contradicts your interpretation of God's word?if you say so,,, who am I to tell you that continents cant float,,Wrong again, they are all related. Iceland, Hawaii, and the GC all owe their existence to continental drift.OK so its growing,, so is Hawaii,, that doesnt have anything to do with how the GC was formed,,
As for me, whenever someone refuses to accept facts it is because they already have the answer and that answer usually comes from their God. Am I wrong?
To which I asked: Exactly which opinion is that?
you should take your ADD meds cause this conversation is getting boring since you cant keep up with it,,
sorry your narrative falls flat when tested but it is what it is,, an opinion,,
View attachment 433036
If Iceland is growing but nothing is shrinking:who said something is shrinking and whats that got to do with floating continents???If Iceland is growing, what is shrinking?all I said is it was growing,,, and plates moving means nothing when youre claiming that continents can float around the planet,,,You mentioned Hawaii so here is a lesson for you. There is a hot spot below the Pacific plate that has been erupting for millions of years. It is stationary but the plate moves from SE to NW so you can trace the movement back in time. You can eve see where it changed from a S to N direction.not true,,, exactly how do you reproduce floating continents when they dont float,,, not to mention how do you reproduce millions or billions of yrs???That's exactly your problem, you can see, study, or reproduce everything I said. You just refuse to.how can I believe something I cant see, study or reproduce???If you're not willing to believe your own eyes you'll never believe me. Happy holidays.its obvious the problem is yours,,, all of the claims youre making are theories,, another word for theories is opinions not facts,,,Maybe the disconnect is you don't understand the difference between fact and opinion. I've given you nothing but facts. For example, "Iceland, Hawaii, and the GC all owe their existence to continental drift" is fact supported by science. It is not any one's opinion nor is it based on politics or religion.the one youve been giving dumbass,,,Then your last statement was: I reject the opinion cause its an opinion lacking in evidence and based on assumptions not facts,,you and i left that part a long way back,,The title of the thread is "Secular scientists keep reducing the age they suppose the earth to be". Seems like you need to ask the OP that question.and why are you bringing god into it???Exactly which opinion is that?I reject the opinion cause its an opinion lacking in evidence and based on assumptions not facts,,It is not me who says so it is just about every geologist on the planet. Do you know different or do you just refuse to accept the evidence because it contradicts your interpretation of God's word?if you say so,,, who am I to tell you that continents cant float,,Wrong again, they are all related. Iceland, Hawaii, and the GC all owe their existence to continental drift.OK so its growing,, so is Hawaii,, that doesnt have anything to do with how the GC was formed,,
As for me, whenever someone refuses to accept facts it is because they already have the answer and that answer usually comes from their God. Am I wrong?
To which I asked: Exactly which opinion is that?
you should take your ADD meds cause this conversation is getting boring since you cant keep up with it,,
sorry your narrative falls flat when tested but it is what it is,, an opinion,,
View attachment 433036
thats above my pay grade and why I wasnt talking about it,,,If Iceland is growing but nothing is shrinking:who said something is shrinking and whats that got to do with floating continents???If Iceland is growing, what is shrinking?all I said is it was growing,,, and plates moving means nothing when youre claiming that continents can float around the planet,,,You mentioned Hawaii so here is a lesson for you. There is a hot spot below the Pacific plate that has been erupting for millions of years. It is stationary but the plate moves from SE to NW so you can trace the movement back in time. You can eve see where it changed from a S to N direction.not true,,, exactly how do you reproduce floating continents when they dont float,,, not to mention how do you reproduce millions or billions of yrs???That's exactly your problem, you can see, study, or reproduce everything I said. You just refuse to.how can I believe something I cant see, study or reproduce???If you're not willing to believe your own eyes you'll never believe me. Happy holidays.its obvious the problem is yours,,, all of the claims youre making are theories,, another word for theories is opinions not facts,,,Maybe the disconnect is you don't understand the difference between fact and opinion. I've given you nothing but facts. For example, "Iceland, Hawaii, and the GC all owe their existence to continental drift" is fact supported by science. It is not any one's opinion nor is it based on politics or religion.the one youve been giving dumbass,,,Then your last statement was: I reject the opinion cause its an opinion lacking in evidence and based on assumptions not facts,,you and i left that part a long way back,,The title of the thread is "Secular scientists keep reducing the age they suppose the earth to be". Seems like you need to ask the OP that question.and why are you bringing god into it???Exactly which opinion is that?I reject the opinion cause its an opinion lacking in evidence and based on assumptions not facts,,It is not me who says so it is just about every geologist on the planet. Do you know different or do you just refuse to accept the evidence because it contradicts your interpretation of God's word?if you say so,,, who am I to tell you that continents cant float,,Wrong again, they are all related. Iceland, Hawaii, and the GC all owe their existence to continental drift.OK so its growing,, so is Hawaii,, that doesnt have anything to do with how the GC was formed,,
As for me, whenever someone refuses to accept facts it is because they already have the answer and that answer usually comes from their God. Am I wrong?
To which I asked: Exactly which opinion is that?
you should take your ADD meds cause this conversation is getting boring since you cant keep up with it,,
sorry your narrative falls flat when tested but it is what it is,, an opinion,,
View attachment 433036
This is not even considering that the entire Atlantic Ocean is also growing, Iceland is just the easiest to visit. So the real question is how is Iceland growing and is the Earth solid right to the core?
- Is the Earth getting larger?
- Is Iceland bulging upward into space?
Smart. It's always better to punt than to take a chance of fumbling.thats above my pay grade and why I wasnt talking about it,,,If Iceland is growing but nothing is shrinking:who said something is shrinking and whats that got to do with floating continents???If Iceland is growing, what is shrinking?all I said is it was growing,,, and plates moving means nothing when youre claiming that continents can float around the planet,,,You mentioned Hawaii so here is a lesson for you. There is a hot spot below the Pacific plate that has been erupting for millions of years. It is stationary but the plate moves from SE to NW so you can trace the movement back in time. You can eve see where it changed from a S to N direction.not true,,, exactly how do you reproduce floating continents when they dont float,,, not to mention how do you reproduce millions or billions of yrs???That's exactly your problem, you can see, study, or reproduce everything I said. You just refuse to.how can I believe something I cant see, study or reproduce???If you're not willing to believe your own eyes you'll never believe me. Happy holidays.its obvious the problem is yours,,, all of the claims youre making are theories,, another word for theories is opinions not facts,,,Maybe the disconnect is you don't understand the difference between fact and opinion. I've given you nothing but facts. For example, "Iceland, Hawaii, and the GC all owe their existence to continental drift" is fact supported by science. It is not any one's opinion nor is it based on politics or religion.the one youve been giving dumbass,,,Then your last statement was: I reject the opinion cause its an opinion lacking in evidence and based on assumptions not facts,,you and i left that part a long way back,,The title of the thread is "Secular scientists keep reducing the age they suppose the earth to be". Seems like you need to ask the OP that question.and why are you bringing god into it???Exactly which opinion is that?I reject the opinion cause its an opinion lacking in evidence and based on assumptions not facts,,It is not me who says so it is just about every geologist on the planet. Do you know different or do you just refuse to accept the evidence because it contradicts your interpretation of God's word?if you say so,,, who am I to tell you that continents cant float,,Wrong again, they are all related. Iceland, Hawaii, and the GC all owe their existence to continental drift.OK so its growing,, so is Hawaii,, that doesnt have anything to do with how the GC was formed,,
As for me, whenever someone refuses to accept facts it is because they already have the answer and that answer usually comes from their God. Am I wrong?
To which I asked: Exactly which opinion is that?
you should take your ADD meds cause this conversation is getting boring since you cant keep up with it,,
sorry your narrative falls flat when tested but it is what it is,, an opinion,,
View attachment 433036
This is not even considering that the entire Atlantic Ocean is also growing, Iceland is just the easiest to visit. So the real question is how is Iceland growing and is the Earth solid right to the core?
- Is the Earth getting larger?
- Is Iceland bulging upward into space?
www.nationalgeographic.com
From the link:Apparently, the Channeled Scablands happened rapidly.
View attachment 433128View attachment 433129
"Standing in the middle of a broad swath of scablands extending from horizon to horizon, my mind’s eye could clearly see the floodwaters blasting through, like a raging inland sea, ripping up everything not strong enough to stay moored. Driving through what’s known as the Ephrata Fan, a broad open area where floodwaters left the confines of the Grand Coulee and spread out and slowed as they neared what would become Ancient (and very temporary) Lake Lewis, I easily understood why the landscape was riddled with boulders: As the water lost speed, it began dropping all the rocks it was carrying. And when I stood on the lip of the dry falls of Potholes Coulee, looking at this immense canyon with farmland on three sides and a precipitous drop on the other, I felt what Bretz was thinking when he looked at that map a century ago: If a river didn’t carve this, what did?"
How did the channeled scablands form?
Geologists couldn't account for the strange landforms of eastern Washington State. Then a high school teacher dared to question the scientific dogma of his day.
