Seattle’s New Socialist Mayor Flatly Refuses to Investigate Fraud at Somali Daycare Centers

I myself am very vocal about the fact that the words "racist" and "racism" have no meaning anymore.

I shared an article on here months ago about what the author called the "Purity Spiral". It's a phenomenon that happens in a culture like we're experiencing now where a moral idea takes hold (such as anti-racism) and, because there are no defined upper or lower limits or criteria or parameters, it spirals out of control until anything and everything can be deemed racist.

As the crusade gets more and more intense and more and more everyday words and behaviors are added to the list, people start demanding justice and retribution in the harshest of terms for the most innocuous things, including death (think Charlie Kirk).

Not surprisingly, the thread only got a handful of views and not one response.

And it can be a huge problem. If you can label someone a Nazi, and or a fascist, and those labels become accepted, then the next steps can lead to violence directed at those who are accused.
There is no doubt in my mind that a lot of self-righteous individuals on the left believe violence and even assassinations are now acceptable.



"the Network Contagion Research Institute, along with Rutgers University, found that 55% of self-identified left-of-center respondents said that it was at least somewhat justified to murder President Trump. Forty-eight percent said the same of Elon Musk, and 40% of respondents, including 59.6% of left-of-center respondents, said it was at least somewhat acceptable to destroy a Tesla dealership in protest."


Democrats and liberals are becoming more open to political violence.​

In the Marquette poll, taken days after Kirk was killed, 15% of Democrats agreed with the statement that it is "justified for Americans today to resort to violence in order to achieve political goals." That was higher than for independents (12%) and Republicans (6%).


Few support political violence, but some polls show Democrats agreeing more​

For Marquette Law School poll, the number shows the percent agreeing with the statement that it is "jusitified for Americans today to resort to violence in order to achieve political goals." The next two questions, from the Reuters/Ipsos, are the percent agreeing with, first, "to achieve my idea of a better society, violent acts are acceptable," and second, agreeing that it is acceptable "for someone in my political party to commit violence to achieve a political goal."


1780178938569.webp
 
If there is no evidence of fraud, and the white woman in charge of the program is different from the one in Minnesota, why would they investigate at all?

You clowns keep forgetting that the "mastermind" of this caper was the white woman in charge of the program.
What does race have to do with anythi.....
Oh, wait.
I forgot: you're RACE OBSESSED.
 
And it can be a huge problem. If you can label someone a Nazi, and or a fascist, and those labels become accepted, then the next steps can lead to violence directed at those who are accused.
There is no doubt in my mind that a lot of self-righteous individuals on the left believe violence and even assassinations are now acceptable.



"the Network Contagion Research Institute, along with Rutgers University, found that 55% of self-identified left-of-center respondents said that it was at least somewhat justified to murder President Trump. Forty-eight percent said the same of Elon Musk, and 40% of respondents, including 59.6% of left-of-center respondents, said it was at least somewhat acceptable to destroy a Tesla dealership in protest."


Democrats and liberals are becoming more open to political violence.​

In the Marquette poll, taken days after Kirk was killed, 15% of Democrats agreed with the statement that it is "justified for Americans today to resort to violence in order to achieve political goals." That was higher than for independents (12%) and Republicans (6%).


Few support political violence, but some polls show Democrats agreeing more​

For Marquette Law School poll, the number shows the percent agreeing with the statement that it is "jusitified for Americans today to resort to violence in order to achieve political goals." The next two questions, from the Reuters/Ipsos, are the percent agreeing with, first, "to achieve my idea of a better society, violent acts are acceptable," and second, agreeing that it is acceptable "for someone in my political party to commit violence to achieve a political goal."


View attachment 1263250
The irony is, Democrats, liberals and leftists swear up and down that most of the violence is on the right. Once, maybe. But the left is definitely committing more violence today.
 
That is what may be the worst part of it all.

Not only did these scum STEAL taxpayer money, THOSE WHO NEEDED THESE SERVICES DID NOT GET THE SERVICES.

Just putrid.

But the commies do not care because of the BAD ORANGE MAN.

It is so bizarre to witness.

I've heard hints from other people, in other communities of similar money handouts.

I suspect that this is not limited to one or two or even 10 bad programs,

I think that this is hte norm. That everywhere the dems have control of government money, that they are using it to advance the lefty agenda, adn damn everything, or everyONE else.
 
I've heard hints from other people, in other communities of similar money handouts.

I suspect that this is not limited to one or two or even 10 bad programs,

I think that this is hte norm. That everywhere the dems have control of government money, that they are using it to advance the lefty agenda, adn damn everything, or everyONE else.
It seems you are spot on.

The fallout over the USAID scam bolsters your point. Billions of dollars in lefty FRAUD was uncovered and stopped…so the commies character assassination machine went to work.

Musk and his team uncovered the fraud, therefore HE IS BAD.

In stopping the fraud, some legitimate services and payments were also halted…so the commies used these anecdotes to “PROVE” there is NO FRAUD in USAID because it is not “ALL FRAUD”.

To use a basic analogy, when they cut skin cancer out of your body, THEY END UP REMOVING SOME HEALTHY TISSUE. That does not mean THE CANCER SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN REMOVED.

They remove the cancer until “the margins are negative”…meaning no more cancer. Some healthy tissue is removed in the process.

I say this over and over. I get why the Somalians and local politicians are stealing the money….I do not understand why your average working class commie dumbazz has no problem with it. That baffles me.

SOMALIANS STOLE BILLIONS….BUT ORANGE MAN IS BAD….SO SOMALIAN DAY CARE FRAUD IS GOOD! 😂:eusa_wall:
 
It seems you are spot on.

The fallout over the USAID scam bolsters your point. Billions of dollars in lefty FRAUD was uncovered and stopped…so the commies character assassination machine went to work.

Musk and his team uncovered the fraud, therefore HE IS BAD.

In stopping the fraud, some legitimate services and payments were also halted…so the commies used these anecdotes to “PROVE” there is NO FRAUD in USAID because it is not “ALL FRAUD”.

To use a basic analogy, when they cut skin cancer out of your body, THEY EMD UP REMOVING SOME HEALTHY TISSUE. That does not mean THE CANCER SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN REMOVED.

They remove the cancer until “the margins are negative”…meaning no more cancer. Some healthy tissue is removed in the process.

I say this over and over. I get why the Somalians and local politicians are stealing the money….I do not understand why your average working class commie dumbazz has no problem with it. That baffles me.

SOMALIANS STOLE BILLIONS….BUT ORANGE MAN IS BAD….SO SOMALIAN DAY CARE FRAUD IS GOOD! 😂:eusa_wall:


You saw it in the way that the mainstream news attacked nich shirley.

They wanted to undermine him, make him the story, and in effect thus, DEFEND and PROTECT the thieves.
 
You saw it in the way that the mainstream news attacked nich shirley.

They wanted to undermine him, make him the story, and in effect thus, DEFEND and PROTECT the thieves.
Exactly.

If you expose communist corruption, you are bad,

Weird way to justify the corruption.

THERE CANNOT BE CORRUPTION BECAUSE THE PERSON WHO EXPOSED IT IS BAD!

Have you seen any commie posters to this MB say anything close to “AUTISM, DAYCARE, MEDICAL TRANSPORT SERVICES, AND HOSPICE FRAUD IS BAD”?

These minions of the commie borg are fully assimilated into the hivemind and only do what they are told.
 
Exactly.

If you expose communist corruption, you are bad,

Weird way to justify the corruption.

THERE CANNOT BE CORRUPTION BECAUSE THE PERSON WHO EXPOSED IT IS BAD!

Have you seen any commie posters to this MB say anything close to “AUTISM, DAYCARE, MEDICAL TRANSPORT SERVICES, AND HOSPICE FRAUD IS BAD”?

These minions of the commie borg are fully assimilated into the hivemind and only do what they are told.

And that really shows, AGAIN, that all the shit they supposedly care about, ie helping this or that person or group,

is just shit talk.
 
And that really shows, AGAIN, that all the shit they supposedly care about, ie helping this or that person or group,

is just shit talk.
Absolutely. That is the greater very important point. Their “concern” about these “vulnerable” groups is nothing but a thin facade to obscure their corruption and quest for money and power.

“DONATIONS” to the CLINTON FOUNDATION drop 95% as soon as she loses 2016. 😂🤔

So much corruption.
 
Absolutely. That is the greater very important point their concern about these “vulnerable” groups is nothing but a thin facade to obscure their corruption and quest for money and power.

“DONATIONS” to the CLINTON FOUNDATION drop 95% as soon as she loses 2016. 😂🤔

So much corruption.

If the media weren't completely corrupt, I could see them doing a line of stories on the people that were supposed to be helped by all that money, and how bad off they are now, because that help never got to them.
 
If the media weren't completely corrupt, I could see them doing a line of stories on the people that were supposed to be helped by all that money, and how bad off they are now, because that help never got to them.
No no no…those exposing and stopping the fraud are RACIST! :aargh:
 
No no no…those exposing and stopping the fraud are RACIST! :aargh:

I really think that in their minds, the act of a white person saying something negative about a black person or people,

is more of a crime than the actual theft of millions of dollars.
 
I really think that in their minds, the act of a white person saying something negative about a black person or people,

is more of a crime than the actual theft of millions of dollars.
Think about how RACIST it actually is to NOT be honest about someone BECAUSE OF THIER SKIN COLOR.

That IS RACISM,

“SURE, BILLIONS OF DOLLARS WERE STOLEN, BUT THEY ARE BLACK…SO IT IS OK.” 😂
 
Think about how RACIST it actually is to NOT be honest about someone BECAUSE OF THIER SKIN COLOR.

That IS RACISM,

“SURE, BILLIONS OF DOLLARS WERE STOLEN, BUT THEY ARE BLACK…SO IT IS OK.” 😂

Lefties really don't think.

They see WHITE GUY, and that guy is assumed to be the OPPRESSOR.

And that is the end of their thinking.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom