California Democrats Pass ‘Stop Nick Shirley Act’ to Criminalize Investigative Journalism and Shield Immigrant Services Fraud from Scrutiny

[jknowgood]

Having been humiliated by the massive fraud that democrats tried to hide as taxpayers were stuck with the financial burden of fraud and theft by Somali’s (and others), the California politburo has now decided to protect fraud and theft by making it illegal to investigate such fraud and theft.

Hooray for the California politicians. They want more fraud and theft.

What are They Hiding? — Radical California Democrats Pass ‘Stop Nick Shirley Act’ to Criminalize Investigative Journalism and Shield Massive Immigrant Services Fraud from Scrutiny | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

The radical Left in Sacramento has finally done it.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

In a move straight out of a totalitarian playbook, the California Assembly Judiciary Committee voted 11-2 on Monday to advance AB 2624, the so-called “Stop Nick Shirley Act,” a disgusting Democrat power grab designed to make it illegal for brave citizen journalists like Nick Shirley to expose the rampant fraud bleeding American taxpayers dry in immigrant service centers.

How fascist of them.

 

[jknowgood]

No, they did not. Right in your OP you quoted, "the California Assembly Judiciary Committee." They voted to advance it which means it can be considered in the full assembly.

Either way, it's an obvious First Amendment violation and won't hold up in court.

They will find a liberal judge to say it's constitutional.

 

[jknowgood]

Passed by the the California Assembly Judiciary Committee.

Since judges now have more power than the president himself.

 

[jknowgood]

The fact that it’s even being legally considered is already beyond the pale.
Remember, our top democrat legal scholars don’t even know what a woman is.

Shumer is talking about replacing the American flag with the *** flag.

 

[DonGlock26]

Of course it won’t hold up in court. Democrats wouldn’t do anything illegal.

Harboring and aiding & abetting illegal aliens is, you know, illegal, except in “sanctuary cities and states” such as California.

Right there in your comment you acknowledge that “the California Assembly Judiciary Committee voted to advance it”.

Game, set, match.

 

[the watcher]

I would think that Minnesota would like to see this go Federal.

 

[SeaMajor7]

It seems to me that the fact that these FREAKS even are considering such legislation is an outright admission that they are indeed up to their eyeballs in MASSIVE FRAUD.

No?

 

[SweetTea]

No comments from our resident Democrats on this? Like sanctuary cities and ensuring that only citizens vote, they don’t seem to care as long as it benefits their beloved party.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Remember some places have some pretty strict rules on recording people (two party consent) that can impact investigative journalism even without this new law, California being one of them.

Open PUBLIC recording is protected by the First Amendment. Not the same as secretly recording someone

 

[martybegan]

Open PUBLIC recording is protected by the First Amendment. Not the same as secretly recording someone

True, but you know California would love to extend it to things like OKeefe does in Restaurants and bars where only he knows the recording is going on.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Lefties HATE when you discover AND STOP AND PROSECUTE AND SENTENCE them for fraud,

They go after the evil bad people who exposed the fraud like Shirley.

TAXES ARE NOT HIGH ENOUGH BECAUSE COMMIE FRAUD NEEDS TO BE FINANCED!

Former head of Minnesota non-profit gets nearly 42-year prison sentence for fraud

Aimee Bock ran Feeding Our Future, which claimed to help provide millions of meals to children during the pandemic

www.theguardian.com

 

[ColonelAngus]

You know you are a POS when you cannot even bring yourself to admit that stealing $242 million in TAXPAYER MONEY INTENDED TO FEED STARVING CHILDREN IS BAD.

It is not mental illness, you are just a BAG OF CRAP.