Sean Penn on Charley Kirk and the health care CEO who was shot

Votto

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
68,798
Reaction score
77,407
Points
3,605

As we all know, Sean is far left of the political spectrum, and as such, had nothing in common with Charlie Kirk.

Though Penn also said he didn’t follow Kirk’s work, he said he suspected the conservative podcaster was ā€œone of these people who certainly I disagree with on almost everything.ā€

ā€œI didn’t get the sense that he was one of these snake oil salesmen. I think we need that guy. We need that debate,ā€ he continued. ā€œWe’ve gotta fight it out and find a compromise. These things do come into fashion, and the way we kill the fashion of it is people of conscience on both sides recognizing that if somebody really believes something, that’s your friend.ā€

But Sean said something even more profound.

After Penn was asked whether his answer depends on what someone believes, he clarified: ā€œ I’m not talking about some sociopathic Nazism. I’m talking about if somebody believes that a human being starts at conception, if you can’t understand that concept, you’re just stupid. And if you’re not willing to tolerate the concept as a concept that’s held as deeply as I may have a belief that, I don’t know, let the woman decide. All of these are valid opinions. What’s the consensus in society, civilly? This murderer who shot the insurance executive? I’m no fan of health insurance companies, but Jesus, man, is that the best argument you got?ā€

So, this is the issue. When someone reaches the sociopathic form of Nazism, debate ends. But who determines this? Maybe after murdering some 6 million Jews? I think that would be a good place to start. I think we can all agree that the only way to deal with the actual Nazi regime was to hang them from an end of a rope after their reign of terror. But the shooter viewed Charlie as a Nazi, convinced by the media and the DNC, but how many people did Charlie and Trump murder?

In fact, how many here think Charlie was a Nazi like the shooter?

And I keep finding threads on here saying ICE is the Gestapo.

So long as this continues, people will die and debate is stopped.

It is so bad that people can't even mention Charlies name at work or online in fear of the "crazies" who go ape shit crazy on them.

As for the health care CEO, I'm sure Sean Penn thinks that that shooting was completely unrelated to the shooting of Charlie, but that simply is not the case. The shooter of the CEO was fed up with corporations running health care policies and wanted government run health care no doubt. But did the shooter know that the government turns more people down for health care related requests than private companies?

Probably not.

Again, this is the fault of the Left-wing media that is inciting these loons to violence, and all based upon pure ignorance and baseless lies. such as Charlie being a Nazi.
 
What did CK accomplish?
You tell me, what drove people to react like this regarding the life of Charlie Kirk?

1759155459121.webp
 
15th post
That's right, it was really Bibi Netanyahu, but just remember that Bibi had MAGA parents, so there is that.

:auiqs.jpg:
Bibi himself was not the shooter. He was the puppet master, but not the shooter.
 
Shame on you you sick twisted little man!
I can tell you lack any knowledge of what exactly rhetorical propaganda is...

Rhetorical propaganda involves using persuasive communication to promote a specific viewpoint, often through biased or misleading information to achieve a particular agenda or ideology. While propaganda uses rhetoric, it differs by manipulating people into thinking a certain way rather than encouraging thoughtful consideration.
 
Back
Top Bottom