Dayton3
Gold Member
- May 3, 2009
- 3,407
- 1,306
- 198
worries about mistaken convictions. However remote.OK, what made you switch from being pro-death to being pro-life?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
worries about mistaken convictions. However remote.OK, what made you switch from being pro-death to being pro-life?
Not according to the courts.a life of torture... nice.
Why do you think the probability of the government making such mistakes is remote?worries about mistaken convictions. However remote.
Is this based on a feeling or a principle of yours?solitary confinement has been challenged as cruel punishment, yet some assholes belong there.
Because our criminal justice system for all its flaws has layer after layer of reduncy to prevent mistakes such as that.Why do you thinkahe probability of the government making such mistakes is remote?
if you're such an incorrigible asshole that you can't be around other assholes then solitary is your last ride.Is this based on a feeling or a principle of yours?
So you believe government basically does a good job of managing things then?Because our criminal justice system for all its flaws has layer after layer of reduncy to prevent mistakes such as that.
Most criminal prosecutions are at the local level so I would have to say the level of government competence varies a great deal.So you believe government basically does a good job of managing things then?
What do you attribute to the variations?Most criminal prosecutions are at the local level so I would have to say the level of government competence varies a great deal.
Too many to go into in a single thread on a discussion board. But one major one in my opinion would be the variations in resources available at the local level.What do you attribute to the variations?
I can dig it.Too many to go into in a single thread on a discussion board. But one major one in my opinion would be the variations in resources available at the local level.
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.Roof had asked the court to decide how to handle disputes over mental illness-related evidence between capital defendants and their attorneys. The justices did not comment Tuesday in turning away the appeal.
Cowards.
Same way Hunter Biden did.Anytime a member of our "well regulated militia" shoots someone, they seem to plead mental illness if they don't kill themselves first.
Which begs the question...how do they amass their arsenal if they are mentally ill?
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
It's obvious the mentally incapacitated defense failed or was persued.Him getting out and the courts addressing a valid question are two very different things. While he is never getting out, his legal question is one the courts should have addressed.
It's obvious the mentally incapacitated defense failed.
Simple.
Looks like it was considered:Being as how it was not argued by attorney's we will never know. I doubt very seriously it would have but Hinckley's lawyers pulled it off. By not addressing it, they simply muck things up going forward.
Make a ruling on the question. Then it's answered.
That is 'cruel and unusual' punishment. Death is closure for everyone.Agreed though I'm no longer for the death penalty. Too much chance of a false conviction. I prefer life in prison in solitary confinement.
But if a mistake is made you can't reverse a death sentence. If someone gets life in prison even in solitary you can let them out of prison and compensate them for their "trouble".That is 'cruel and unusual' punishment. Death is closure for everyone.