SCOTUS Lifts Injunction Against Most of Travel Ban.

[Weatherman2020]

Common sense.

Live Coverage from CBS News

 

[Weatherman2020]

And I meant that to say lifts injunction against travel ban.

 

[Bush92]

Well the Court of Death ruled against Texas. Another big win for the lesbians at NOW.
If Kennedy retires, Donald Trump's legacy is set - CNNPolitics.com

 

[MindWars]

The Supreme Court of the United States will wrap up its 2017 session today which will likely include a decision on Trump's controversial travel ban and potentially the retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy.


SCOTUS "Mostly" Reinstates Trump Travel Ban; Schedules October Hearing | Zero Hedge

------------------------------------

Well this ought to piss off the trendy liberal morons go ANTIFA haaa

 

[Preacher]

Supreme Court allows parts of Trump's travel ban to take effect

YES! Now the full one will take effect in October when it takes it up entirely.

 

[Auld Phart]

Case won't be heard til October, when they reconvene.

By then, there may be a new Justice.

(or two)

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Common sense.

Live Coverage from CBS News

The Leftists response incoming:

 

[miketx]

As I predicted. Now, Russia....

 

[dcbl]

damn, all this winning is starting to get old

who am I kidding?

W I N N I N G
I
N
N
I
N
G

 

[miketx]

Watch out for psycho libs with guns....Arm yourselves....

 

[miketx]

 

[Weatherman2020]

Case won't be heard til October, when they reconvene.

By then, there may be a new Justice.

(or two)

And since they took immediate action it is obvious in which direction the court is already leaning.

 

[TNHarley]

The Supreme Court on Monday said it would allow the Trump administration's controversial travel ban to largely go into effect, while setting a hearing on the entire executive order for October.

The court's decision means the justices will now wade into the biggest legal controversy of the Trump administration -- Trump's order temporarily restricting travel from six Muslim-majority countries.

"An American individual or entity that has a bona fide relationship with a particular person seeking to enter the country as a refugee can legitimately claim concrete hardship if that person is excluded,” the Court wrote. “As to these individuals and entities, we do not disturb the injunction. But when it comes to refugees who lack any such connection to the United States, for the reasons we have set out, the balance tips in favor of the Government’s compelling need to provide for the Nation’s security.”

The justices decided to review the broader constitutional issues over executive authority on immigration with oral arguments to be held in the Fall.

 

[TNHarley]

At this point, i only look at this as setting the record strait for the politically active judges in this country!

 

[mdk]

The meat of this case will be heard in the fall.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The judge who found against him was forced to reverse himself.

Congrats Mr. President.

 

[dcbl]

the fact that they have reinstated parts of the ban bodes well for the full decision

I expect some kind of minor setback, as I think SCOTUS wants to find a way to get an unanimous decision

But it looks good for the good guys right now!

I am almost tempted to trade a few IQ points just to log into Dem Underground and read the melts

Almost...

 

[tycho1572]

The lefties here are now frantically searching for their new marching orders.

 

[Weatherman2020]

At this point, i only look at this as setting the record strait for the politically active judges in this country!

There should be a mechanism to slap these judges hard for their crappy rulings and wasting the time of higher courts.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Breaking now

Supreme Court allows parts of travel ban to go into effect - CNNPolitics.com

Unanimous decision!