Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He didn't compare unions to ISIS he compared doing something to the Unions, as the current president refuses to do anything to ISIS, BUT he will.... thanks for playing!![]()
He didn't compare unions to ISIS he compared doing something to the Unions, as the current president refuses to do anything to ISIS, BUT he will.... thanks for playing!![]()
Because allowing them to control the narrative is what always sinks the republicans.He didn't compare unions to ISIS he compared doing something to the Unions, as the current president refuses to do anything to ISIS, BUT he will.... thanks for playing!![]()
What if he did? They only ones bitch are the extreme left wing nutters, who gives a fuck what the irrelevant think. They will always be on the outside looking in.
LOL...as if the teaper nutters are any different with their nonsense. The Tea Party sinks the GOP. Conservative values stand on their own...there is nothing the liberals can say that can sink a ship if its foundations are solid.Because allowing them to control the narrative is what always sinks the republicans.He didn't compare unions to ISIS he compared doing something to the Unions, as the current president refuses to do anything to ISIS, BUT he will.... thanks for playing!![]()
What if he did? They only ones bitch are the extreme left wing nutters, who gives a fuck what the irrelevant think. They will always be on the outside looking in.
What matters is not the truth but rather what people think the truth is. Do you really think that voters not belonging to either party (IOW those that actually elect presidents) take such a statement and think they should vote for the man that said it?
Easy to say, "I spoke of success after success" and then not name any.Indeed, I spoke of success after success when I spoke of Walker and compared him to Reagan. Were you released from a psychiatric facility during the Reagan administration? You might want to talk to JoeB about that.I don't think so. I think accepting their policies when those policies are obviously destructive is both psychotic and retarded.So your think the whining about Walker and Reagan is psychotic in nature?Yea, because throwing mentally ill people out into the streets was such a good idea.Scott Walker has had one success after another despite everything Dems and unions through at him. He is Reaganesque in his ability to solicit whining from the left.
Ronald Reagan s shameful legacy Violence the homeless mental illness - Salon.com
President Reagan never understood mental illness. Like Richard Nixon, he was a product of the Southern California culture that associated psychiatry with Communism. Two months after taking office, Reagan was shot by John Hinckley, a young man with untreated schizophrenia. Two years later, Reagan called Dr. Roger Peele, then director of St. Elizabeths Hospital, where Hinckley was being treated, and tried to arrange to meet with Hinckley, so that Reagan could forgive him. Peele tactfully told the president that this was not a good idea. Reagan was also exposed to the consequences of untreated mental illness through the two sons of Roy Miller, his personal tax advisor. Both sons developed schizophrenia; one committed suicide in 1981, and the other killed his mother in 1983. Despite such personal exposure, Reagan never exhibited any interest in the need for research or better treatment for serious mental illness.
But the one issue that took center stage in the 1980s, and directed public attention to deinstitutionalization, was the problem of mentally ill homeless persons.
During the 1980s, an additional 40,000 beds in state mental hospitals were shut down.
--------------------------
That's Reagan's legacy and the Right wing feels it's a very, very good one.
Glad I could clear that up.
Notice you don't say a thing about their policies?
You are so right. Look at these people. They are simply frightening. Right wingers should pull their kids from school to keep them "safe".He didn't compare unions to ISIS he compared doing something to the Unions, as the current president refuses to do anything to ISIS, BUT he will.... thanks for playing!![]()
His statement goes over liberal heads. Too nuanced for their tiny brains to grasp. He is talking about he isn't afraid to tackle whatever problems we are facing. Let's face it, unions are downright mean thugs when they want to be and they are experts in intimidating people or outright threatening them to get their way. He didn't hesitate to take them on. And he won't let political correctness stop him from calling a terrorist a terrorist. He won't offer ISIS any damn jobs or sympathize with them, either.