You just don't get it. All I said was I can relate 100,000 years to 6,000 that we had so far. You can't even explain what happens to Earth in a million years. Evolution needs billions of years which no one can observe so it is stupid and a bunch of lies. Otherwise, you'd have solid evidence such as transitional fossils. Like I said, you believe in bullshit because atheists and their evolution are the s-word and can't figure things out.
You choose to ignore the evidence.
Potassium-40 decays to Argon-40 with a half life of 1.25 billion years. Countless examples of K40 and A40 have been found. If the earth were only 6000 years old the daughter product, Argon-40 would not exist in situ at all.
Why would I do that? You have no evidence. For example, you state singularity but where did the infinite energy come from?
You should already know that it was a trick by Satan. We know the devil likes to hide and this is how he was able to take dominion of the world. Could he done the same trick through Darwin? Darwinism led to social Darwinism, eugenics, Hitler, Nazism, and the Holocaust. Coincidence? I think not.
This is why I want the atheists to find out for themselves. They are stupid as shit though. The only way they'll learn is by fire and brimstone, but then it will be too late. The Earth is covered by 3/4 water genius. What other planet is like that hahahahahahahahahahaha?
That's a great point and I had to look it up. In fact, I touched upon it earlier with asking about relativism since it's difficult for a creationist to relate to Darwin or evolutionary times. The rebuttal lies with we do not know the amount Potassium-40 there was in the beginning. Instead, the creation scientists have done experiments with rocks from Mt. St. Helens and have discovered volcanic rocks dated to hundreds of thousands of years using your method, but the rocks were about ten years old.
I already debunked that argument. Not if they don't know what was there to start with? As for the rest, it's stupid like you.
This is just so stupid. You either have zero understanding of radiation at all, or you do and you are just trolling your little heart out. Or maybe you are just here to lie to yourself "out loud"?
It's you who probably has gotten AIDS already you fruitcake.
Hahahahahahahaha. I caught you in your lie and now your feelings are hurt.
First, your side can't explain the 3/4 water but the Bible has. Back then, the pre-flood Earth had different topography and didn't have the elevations that we have today. A global flood would be able to cover a flatter pre-flood Earth. It states in the Bible that the Earth as it was back then perished due to the mass changes in topography. The higher elevations that you bring up were created then. The evidence for this is that the Himalayas and Mt. Everest and other high elevations are comprised of ocean-bottom sediments. The flood helped formed these higher elevations and topography. Otherwise, you can't explain how it happened. Evolutionary glaciers and such taking long time are all BS. Today's Earth topography happened rapidly. See how science backs up the Bible and not evolution?
I already stated that those things require faith. Those are religious aspects and not scientific ones. Regarding science, you can't explain our origins nor how the universe and Earth came to be. You can't explain where the energy came from. You can't even explain how space and time started. You can't explain why the chicken came before the egg. This was proven already.
