…
.that human beings would be along soon.
1.There’s another way to put that: government school grads will bridle if that were to be put in terms of the existence of God, or a Creator, but when
scientists point out that far too many examples of the universe seemingly designed to support the survival of humanity……it boils down to just that.
2. Freeman John Dyson (
15 December 1923 –
28 February 2020) was an English-born American
physicist,
mathematician, and futurist, famous for his work in quantum mechanics, nuclear weapons design and policy, and the search for extraterrestrial intelligence. He was the winner of the
Templeton Prize in the year 2000.
Freeman Dyson - Wikiquote
“The more I examine the universe and the details of its architecture, the more evidence I find that the universe in some sense must have known we were coming.”―
Freeman John Dyson
3. If one were subject to, and subscribed to, government school indoctrination, the subtext was how terrible America is, and how imperative it is to destroy our heritage, tradition and,
most of all, religion. The name for this attempt is
‘neo-Marxism.’ And atheism is your entrée into acceptance. But the
facts revealed by physicists such as Dyson refute that….
but you won’t be taught that anywhere but here.
4. Another physicist, an American one, Alan Lightman, wrote in Harper’s Magazine The accidental universe: Science's crisis of faith, http://www.harpers.org/archive/2011/12/0083720, which included the following:
“Theoretical physicists, on the other hand, are not satisfied with observing the universe. They want to know why. They want to explain all the properties of the universe in terms of a few fundamental principles and parameters. These fundamental principles, in turn, lead to the “laws of nature,” which govern the behavior of all matter and energy.
…according to various calculations, if the values of some of the fundamental parameters of our universe were a little larger or a little smaller, life could not have arisen. For example, if the nuclear force were a few percentage points stronger than it actually is, then all the hydrogen atoms in the infant universe would have fused with other hydrogen atoms to make helium, and there would be no hydrogen left. No hydrogen means no water. Although we are far from certain about what conditions are necessary for life, most biologists believe that water is necessary.
On the other hand, if the nuclear force were substantially weaker than what it actually is, then the complex atoms needed for biology could not hold together.
As another example, if the relationship between the strengths of the gravitational force and the electromagnetic force were not close to what it is, then the cosmos would not harbor any stars that explode and spew out life-supporting chemical elements into space or any other stars that form planets. Both kinds of stars are required for the emergence of life. The strengths of the basic forces and certain other fundamental parameters in our universe appear to be “fine-tuned” to allow the existence of life.
The recognition of this fine tuning led British physicist Brandon Carter to articulate what he called the anthropic principle, which states that the universe must have the parameters it does because we are here to observe it. Actually, the word anthropic, from the Greek for “man,” is a misnomer: if these fundamental parameters were much different from what they are, it is not only human beings who would not exist. No life of any kind would exist.”
Of course you atheists can ignore the facts.....the science.....or, just have an epiphany.
