Scientists Discover a Self-Replicating Protein Structure, And It Could Have Built The First Life on

[alang1216]

No logic is involved here, just your faith. Own it.

False. By faith I believe that the imperatives of logic are reliable. Please explain why you believe they're not. Thanks.

By faith you believe the creation of the universe is somehow connected to a man who lived and died on Earth some 2,000 years ago. That is highly illogical.

Why is that illogical, alang?

Complete and total absence of evidence. Or do you have something that connects an act of creation 14 or so billion years ago with events that took place 2,000 years ago.

 

[Ringtone]

Complete and total absence of evidence. Or do you have something that connects an act of creation 14 or so billion years ago with events that took place 2,000 years ago.

We've already been over this. You don't accept the ramifications of the evidence per the imperatives of logic, mathematics and science. Remember? And you never offer any coherent refutation of those ramifications. Remember? You don't do the imperatives of logic, mathematics and science at all. You just do slogan speak. Remember?

 

[Hollie]

Complete and total absence of evidence. Or do you have something that connects an act of creation 14 or so billion years ago with events that took place 2,000 years ago.

We've already been over this. You don't accept the ramifications of the evidence per the imperatives of logic, mathematics and science. Remember? And you never offer any coherent refutation of those ramifications. Remember? You don't do the imperatives of logic, mathematics and science at all. You just do slogan speak. Remember?

The ramifications of the imperatives of logic, mathematics and science point toward a natural world as opposed to your fantasy world of magic and supernaturalism.

 

[alang1216]

Complete and total absence of evidence. Or do you have something that connects an act of creation 14 or so billion years ago with events that took place 2,000 years ago.

We've already been over this. You don't accept the ramifications of the evidence per the imperatives of logic, mathematics and science. Remember? And you never offer any coherent refutation of those ramifications. Remember? You don't do the imperatives of logic, mathematics and science at all. You just do slogan speak. Remember?

We have and you have yet to provide an answer to my question: do you have something that connects an act of creation 14 or so billion years ago with events that took place 2,000 years ago? All your "imperatives of logic, mathematics and science" you claim point to a creator, you offered no logic, mathematics or science to make the connection between a creator of the universe and Yahweh.

Or you can do the opposite, prove Erebus was not the creator of the universe as Greek mythology holds:

Once there was Light and Day, Gaea, the earth appeared. Then Erebus slept with Night, who gave birth to Ether, the heavenly light, and to Day the earthly light.​