Here's another lunatic, who suggests the death penalty for global warming skeptics and the Pope:
Progressive Professor Demands Death Penalty for Global Warming Skeptics and the Pope
Harmless professor?
Yes, for now.
The Pope isn't a Global Warming Skeptic. He has come out in full support of fighting the faux "Global Warming" and making it a top priority of the Vatican. There are many articles about it - I'm surprised you don't know this, Blackrook.
The papal warning on global warming
It's a clear, strong statement from a religious leader with 1.2 billion followers who is also a global statesman and, you can't help but notice, a trained chemist. That's because his letter, the first ever papal encyclical devoted entirely to the environment, quickly gets into the nitty-gritty of climate science. In the early pages of the 184-page document, released Thursday, Francis explains the greenhouse effect, notes that volcanic activity is also a factor in global warming and warns of the destruction of species and rising seas.
In his call for a "cultural revolution" to protect the earth, Francis shocks and shames his audience while pushing nations to reduce emissions of the carbon dioxide gases responsible for global warming. He presses for a deal on carbon reductions, to be negotiated at a U.N. climate summit in Paris in December, and takes a shot at Western consumerism for its wasteful habits.
_______
Pope Francis is a trained Chemist. The Scientists supporting the false reports on Global Warming must be thrilled.
Pope: 'Revolution' needed to fight climate change - CNN.com
CNN)As a former teacher, Pope Francis knows how to deliver a stern lecture. On Thursday, he gave one for the ages.
While slamming a slew of modern trends -- the heedless worship of technology, our addiction to fossil fuels and compulsive consumerism -- the Pope said humanity's "reckless" behavior has pushed the planet to a perilous "breaking point."
"Doomsday predictions," the Pope warned, "can no longer be met with irony or disdain."
Citing the scientific consensus that global warming is disturbingly real, Francis left little doubt about who to blame.
Big businesses, energy companies, short-sighted politicians, scurrilous scientists, laissez faire economists, indifferent individuals, callous Christians and myopic media professionals. Scarcely any area of society escaped his withering criticism.
Pope Francis Ties Human Trafficking To Global Warming, Recruits Mayors To Fight Both
A two-day symposium on modern day slavery and climate change continues Wednesday at the Vatican with Walsh expecting to take the podium. Monday the assembly heard from Pope Francis, who encouraged the mayors to do all they can to compel their respective governments to cut carbon emissions and save the planet.
In the spiritual fight against climate change, the pope is not alone
Pope Francis will be in Paris, too, fighting for the actions he deems morally necessary to care for our “one single human family.” On that note, he is not the only faith leader who’s got climate on the mind. Here’s what the world’s other major religions have to say about the subject.
ISLAM (1.6 BILLION FOLLOWERS)
Environmental consciousness first
took root in Islam in the 1970s, with many “green Muslims” turning to passages in the Koran that discussed the sacredness of nature. It wasn’t until 2009, however, that Sheikh Ali Gomaa, the Gran Mufti of Egypt—nicknamed the "Green Mufti"—
announced a seven-year plan to make Islam more environmentally friendly.
____________________
Does it get any more ridiculous than this? Unfortunately? Yes. This man who calls himself the Pope is reported to be now teaching his followers there is no such thing as a literal hell, that they should not take the bible "literally" (how else should one take God's Word??!) that atheists can go to heaven on their good works (no need to be born again - Believe on Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior and repent of their sins) and that all religions including followers of Islam, New Age, Hinduism are going to heaven. The Blasphemy this man teaches is disgusting. He is a false teacher and with all the evidence provided even to those in the legal profession - yet they refuse to examine the evidence but would rather condemn it without examination in order to remain eternally ignorant of the truth! oh! the irony of it all...... 
