Science Proves the Bible Again

[LittleNipper]

And so they record the evidence, take their photos, and present their hypothesis.

And then you examine the evidence in light of all the other evidence. You forgot that part. And all the evidence points in the same direction. Oh yeah, that's why you "forgot" that other part.

Oh yes, and Creationists view the Bible as additional evidence --- you clearly are only concerned with that of your colleagues own making. And the Bible and GOD point in a more logical direction. They answer the question, "WHY?"

And I forgot nothing. those scientists were unsure. Plus the Lord designed a planet, a solar system, a universe. He painted it at the place He desired to begin. And a world wide Flood after the Fall would have churned everything up and contaminated the data. So as everything began to settle various strata would have be laid and various animals would have been buried different ways at different times in the history of the FLOOD.

However, GOD also left those footprints and evolutionists hate them and try their best to ignore them. And when that fails they try to re-evaluate them as not human. And I actually, believe they may even attempt to destroy evidence they don't like, or at the very least present only their own interpretation without eluding to other possibilities...

 

[LittleNipper]

The text of the Bible is thousands of years old, yet it remains perfectly accurate in everything it says. This is especially noteworthy in the field of science. The science which backs up the Bible are many: The law of biogenesis, the law of thermodynamics, countless stars (God would cause Abraham’s descendants to multiply so that they would be as countless as the stars of the sky.), ship engineering (the instructions of how to build a very large ship are in the Bible from God to Noah), sewage and waste disposal, blood the liquid of life, germs, labor fever and dealing with dead bodies, quarantine, laws of food consumption, sexually transmitted diseases, circumcision, global flood, archaeological accuracy and more are in the Bible and science backs it up. Just fall to your knees and give it up now.

Science and the Bible.

Yes, the Bibles are the only books you ever need to read.... assuming you want to forever be ignorant.

Bible: Science and History

Have you studied the entire Bible?

 

[Hollie]

The text of the Bible is thousands of years old, yet it remains perfectly accurate in everything it says. This is especially noteworthy in the field of science. The science which backs up the Bible are many: The law of biogenesis, the law of thermodynamics, countless stars (God would cause Abraham’s descendants to multiply so that they would be as countless as the stars of the sky.), ship engineering (the instructions of how to build a very large ship are in the Bible from God to Noah), sewage and waste disposal, blood the liquid of life, germs, labor fever and dealing with dead bodies, quarantine, laws of food consumption, sexually transmitted diseases, circumcision, global flood, archaeological accuracy and more are in the Bible and science backs it up. Just fall to your knees and give it up now.

Science and the Bible.

Yes, the Bibles are the only books you ever need to read.... assuming you want to forever be ignorant.

Bible: Science and History

Have you studied the entire Bible?

Which one?

 

[Hollie]

And so they record the evidence, take their photos, and present their hypothesis.

And then you examine the evidence in light of all the other evidence. You forgot that part. And all the evidence points in the same direction. Oh yeah, that's why you "forgot" that other part.

Oh yes, and Creationists view the Bible as additional evidence --- you clearly are only concerned with that of your colleagues own making. And the Bible and GOD point in a more logical direction. They answer the question, "WHY?"

And I forgot nothing. those scientists were unsure. Plus the Lord designed a planet, a solar system, a universe. He painted it at the place He desired to begin. And a world wide Flood after the Fall would have churned everything up and contaminated the data. So as everything began to settle various strata would have be laid and various animals would have been buried different ways at different times in the history of the FLOOD.

However, GOD also left those footprints and evolutionists hate them and try their best to ignore them. And when that fails they try to re-evaluate them as not human. And I actually, believe they may even attempt to destroy evidence they don't like, or at the very least present only their own interpretation without eluding to other possibilities...

You hyper-religious types sure do like your conspiracy theories.

But, it's possible you're correct. It's a secret I expect you to keep to yourself but it's a well known fact that atheist archeologists are out and about at night, under cover of darkness armed with their rakes and shovels planting fossils in the ground just to antagonize christians.

 

[LittleNipper]

And so they record the evidence, take their photos, and present their hypothesis.

And then you examine the evidence in light of all the other evidence. You forgot that part. And all the evidence points in the same direction. Oh yeah, that's why you "forgot" that other part.

Oh yes, and Creationists view the Bible as additional evidence --- you clearly are only concerned with that of your colleagues own making. And the Bible and GOD point in a more logical direction. They answer the question, "WHY?"

And I forgot nothing. those scientists were unsure. Plus the Lord designed a planet, a solar system, a universe. He painted it at the place He desired to begin. And a world wide Flood after the Fall would have churned everything up and contaminated the data. So as everything began to settle various strata would have be laid and various animals would have been buried different ways at different times in the history of the FLOOD.

However, GOD also left those footprints and evolutionists hate them and try their best to ignore them. And when that fails they try to re-evaluate them as not human. And I actually, believe they may even attempt to destroy evidence they don't like, or at the very least present only their own interpretation without eluding to other possibilities...

You hyper-religious types sure do like your conspiracy theories.

But, it's possible you're correct. It's a secret I expect you to keep to yourself but it's a well known fact that atheist archeologists are out and about at night, under cover of darkness armed with their rakes and shovels planting fossils in the ground just to antagonize Christians.

I personally know a man whose son had a atheist science teacher in High School who gave this son a load of grief. The father went to the school and suggested that he present Intelligent Design to the class. The school administrator said that such was not a part of their core values... So, the conspiracy is very much out in plane sight for anyone to consider...

 

[LittleNipper]

How would an evolutionist explain this: The 400 million year old hammer

 

[Hollie]

How would an evolutionist explain this: The 400 million year old hammer

How would a religionist explain this: Conspiracy the 400 million year old hammer.

Did You read the title of the silly link you posted?

 

[bripat9643]

The text of the Bible is thousands of years old, yet it remains perfectly accurate in everything it says. This is especially noteworthy in the field of science. The science which backs up the Bible are many: The law of biogenesis, the law of thermodynamics, countless stars (God would cause Abraham’s descendants to multiply so that they would be as countless as the stars of the sky.), ship engineering (the instructions of how to build a very large ship are in the Bible from God to Noah), sewage and waste disposal, blood the liquid of life, germs, labor fever and dealing with dead bodies, quarantine, laws of food consumption, sexually transmitted diseases, circumcision, global flood, archaeological accuracy and more are in the Bible and science backs it up. Just fall to your knees and give it up now.

Science and the Bible.

The Bible says that rabbits chew their cud. Is that perfectly accurate?

The Bible informed the Jews about germs? Really? Then why did the constantly die of infections and communicable diseases?

Most of what the Bible says about nature is bullshit.

 

[bripat9643]

Obvious fraud. Why would anyone remove human 100 million year old fossil footprints from the bedrock?

TO PRESERVE THEM AND STUDY THEM


its obvious you didnt watch the video

Wrong. It's because you can't fake them if they are still attached to the bedrock. Once a block is removed from the strata, you have destroyed whatever provenance it had.

So, how exactly does your hypothesis reflect on the removal of fossils from their surrounding strata? Does this not then destroy whatever provenance that they had according to what your BELIEVE?

When fossil dinosaurs are excavated, each bone is photographed in situ and the location is fully documented. The bones have to be excavated in order to see them all and to reconstruct the skeleton of the animal. Generally, foot prints are not excavated because their location is important information. When you excavate fossil footprints you destroy a lot of important information.

And so they record the evidence, take their photos, and present their hypothesis. What makes you believe they are not as diligent as any other professional. Do I perceive bias on your part? Creationists cannot be bias and yet "evolutionists" can be?

No paleontologist would remove fossil footprints from the bedrock unless they were in danger of being destroyed.

You claim they followed proper scientific procedure. Then where are the photos of the footprints in situ?

 

[progressive hunter]

TO PRESERVE THEM AND STUDY THEM


its obvious you didnt watch the video

Wrong. It's because you can't fake them if they are still attached to the bedrock. Once a block is removed from the strata, you have destroyed whatever provenance it had.

So, how exactly does your hypothesis reflect on the removal of fossils from their surrounding strata? Does this not then destroy whatever provenance that they had according to what your BELIEVE?

When fossil dinosaurs are excavated, each bone is photographed in situ and the location is fully documented. The bones have to be excavated in order to see them all and to reconstruct the skeleton of the animal. Generally, foot prints are not excavated because their location is important information. When you excavate fossil footprints you destroy a lot of important information.

And so they record the evidence, take their photos, and present their hypothesis. What makes you believe they are not as diligent as any other professional. Do I perceive bias on your part? Creationists cannot be bias and yet "evolutionists" can be?

No paleontologist would remove fossil footprints from the bedrock unless they were in danger of being destroyed.

You claim they followed proper scientific procedure. Then where are the photos of the footprints in situ?

since it was a river bed they were in danger

and if you watch the video and maybe go to the website you would see what you want


its your self imposed ignorance thats the problem

 

[progressive hunter]

The text of the Bible is thousands of years old, yet it remains perfectly accurate in everything it says. This is especially noteworthy in the field of science. The science which backs up the Bible are many: The law of biogenesis, the law of thermodynamics, countless stars (God would cause Abraham’s descendants to multiply so that they would be as countless as the stars of the sky.), ship engineering (the instructions of how to build a very large ship are in the Bible from God to Noah), sewage and waste disposal, blood the liquid of life, germs, labor fever and dealing with dead bodies, quarantine, laws of food consumption, sexually transmitted diseases, circumcision, global flood, archaeological accuracy and more are in the Bible and science backs it up. Just fall to your knees and give it up now.

Science and the Bible.

The Bible says that rabbits chew their cud. Is that perfectly accurate?

The Bible informed the Jews about germs? Really? Then why did the constantly die of infections and communicable diseases?

Most of what the Bible says about nature is bullshit.

dying of infections has nothing to do with it, and communicable disease means they ignored the warning

your comments are getting pathetic and dishonest

 

[bripat9643]

Wrong. It's because you can't fake them if they are still attached to the bedrock. Once a block is removed from the strata, you have destroyed whatever provenance it had.

So, how exactly does your hypothesis reflect on the removal of fossils from their surrounding strata? Does this not then destroy whatever provenance that they had according to what your BELIEVE?

When fossil dinosaurs are excavated, each bone is photographed in situ and the location is fully documented. The bones have to be excavated in order to see them all and to reconstruct the skeleton of the animal. Generally, foot prints are not excavated because their location is important information. When you excavate fossil footprints you destroy a lot of important information.

And so they record the evidence, take their photos, and present their hypothesis. What makes you believe they are not as diligent as any other professional. Do I perceive bias on your part? Creationists cannot be bias and yet "evolutionists" can be?

No paleontologist would remove fossil footprints from the bedrock unless they were in danger of being destroyed.

You claim they followed proper scientific procedure. Then where are the photos of the footprints in situ?

since it was a river bed they were in danger

and if you watch the video and maybe go to the website you would see what you want


its your self imposed ignorance thats the problem

Many fossil foot prints are in river beds.

Who authorized them to remove the fossils? It obviously wasn't their property.

 

[bripat9643]

The text of the Bible is thousands of years old, yet it remains perfectly accurate in everything it says. This is especially noteworthy in the field of science. The science which backs up the Bible are many: The law of biogenesis, the law of thermodynamics, countless stars (God would cause Abraham’s descendants to multiply so that they would be as countless as the stars of the sky.), ship engineering (the instructions of how to build a very large ship are in the Bible from God to Noah), sewage and waste disposal, blood the liquid of life, germs, labor fever and dealing with dead bodies, quarantine, laws of food consumption, sexually transmitted diseases, circumcision, global flood, archaeological accuracy and more are in the Bible and science backs it up. Just fall to your knees and give it up now.

Science and the Bible.

The Bible says that rabbits chew their cud. Is that perfectly accurate?

The Bible informed the Jews about germs? Really? Then why did the constantly die of infections and communicable diseases?

Most of what the Bible says about nature is bullshit.

dying of infections has nothing to do with it, and communicable disease means they ignored the warning

your comments are getting pathetic and dishonest

What "warning?" Can you quote the text where god warned people about cleanliness and antiseptic practices to prevent the transmission of infection and communicable diseases?

 

[progressive hunter]

So, how exactly does your hypothesis reflect on the removal of fossils from their surrounding strata? Does this not then destroy whatever provenance that they had according to what your BELIEVE?

When fossil dinosaurs are excavated, each bone is photographed in situ and the location is fully documented. The bones have to be excavated in order to see them all and to reconstruct the skeleton of the animal. Generally, foot prints are not excavated because their location is important information. When you excavate fossil footprints you destroy a lot of important information.

And so they record the evidence, take their photos, and present their hypothesis. What makes you believe they are not as diligent as any other professional. Do I perceive bias on your part? Creationists cannot be bias and yet "evolutionists" can be?

No paleontologist would remove fossil footprints from the bedrock unless they were in danger of being destroyed.

You claim they followed proper scientific procedure. Then where are the photos of the footprints in situ?

since it was a river bed they were in danger

and if you watch the video and maybe go to the website you would see what you want


its your self imposed ignorance thats the problem

Many fossil foot prints are in river beds.

Who authorized them to remove the fossils? It obviously wasn't their property.

you just surpassed pathetic

 

[bripat9643]

When fossil dinosaurs are excavated, each bone is photographed in situ and the location is fully documented. The bones have to be excavated in order to see them all and to reconstruct the skeleton of the animal. Generally, foot prints are not excavated because their location is important information. When you excavate fossil footprints you destroy a lot of important information.

And so they record the evidence, take their photos, and present their hypothesis. What makes you believe they are not as diligent as any other professional. Do I perceive bias on your part? Creationists cannot be bias and yet "evolutionists" can be?

No paleontologist would remove fossil footprints from the bedrock unless they were in danger of being destroyed.

You claim they followed proper scientific procedure. Then where are the photos of the footprints in situ?

since it was a river bed they were in danger

and if you watch the video and maybe go to the website you would see what you want


its your self imposed ignorance thats the problem

Many fossil foot prints are in river beds.

Who authorized them to remove the fossils? It obviously wasn't their property.

you just surpassed pathetic

How so? Is that you're way of saying you can't answer the question?

 

[progressive hunter]

And so they record the evidence, take their photos, and present their hypothesis. What makes you believe they are not as diligent as any other professional. Do I perceive bias on your part? Creationists cannot be bias and yet "evolutionists" can be?

No paleontologist would remove fossil footprints from the bedrock unless they were in danger of being destroyed.

You claim they followed proper scientific procedure. Then where are the photos of the footprints in situ?

since it was a river bed they were in danger

and if you watch the video and maybe go to the website you would see what you want


its your self imposed ignorance thats the problem

Many fossil foot prints are in river beds.

Who authorized them to remove the fossils? It obviously wasn't their property.

you just surpassed pathetic

How so? Is that you're way of saying you can't answer the question?

so who exactly has authority to give them permission???

and why do you still ask dumb questions instead of reading and watching the answers before asking???

again your self imposed ignorance is the problem

 

[bripat9643]

No paleontologist would remove fossil footprints from the bedrock unless they were in danger of being destroyed.

You claim they followed proper scientific procedure. Then where are the photos of the footprints in situ?

since it was a river bed they were in danger

and if you watch the video and maybe go to the website you would see what you want


its your self imposed ignorance thats the problem

Many fossil foot prints are in river beds.

Who authorized them to remove the fossils? It obviously wasn't their property.

you just surpassed pathetic

How so? Is that you're way of saying you can't answer the question?

so who exactly has authority to give them permission???

and why do you still ask dumb questions instead of reading and watching the answers before asking???

again your self imposed ignorance is the problem

I'm not going on a snipe hunt. It would be far simpler and easier for you to simply quote it.
I've done the same for you numerous times. Since you decline, I assume it doesn't exist.

You still have not quoted the text where god warned people about cleanliness and antiseptic practices to prevent the transmission of infection and communicable diseases?

 

[bripat9643]

No paleontologist would remove fossil footprints from the bedrock unless they were in danger of being destroyed.

You claim they followed proper scientific procedure. Then where are the photos of the footprints in situ?

since it was a river bed they were in danger

and if you watch the video and maybe go to the website you would see what you want


its your self imposed ignorance thats the problem

Many fossil foot prints are in river beds.

Who authorized them to remove the fossils? It obviously wasn't their property.

you just surpassed pathetic

How so? Is that you're way of saying you can't answer the question?

so who exactly has authority to give them permission???

and why do you still ask dumb questions instead of reading and watching the answers before asking???

again your self imposed ignorance is the problem

The land owners has that authority. If it's publicly owned, that would be the federal government.

 

[progressive hunter]

since it was a river bed they were in danger

and if you watch the video and maybe go to the website you would see what you want


its your self imposed ignorance thats the problem

Many fossil foot prints are in river beds.

Who authorized them to remove the fossils? It obviously wasn't their property.

you just surpassed pathetic

How so? Is that you're way of saying you can't answer the question?

so who exactly has authority to give them permission???

and why do you still ask dumb questions instead of reading and watching the answers before asking???

again your self imposed ignorance is the problem

I'm not going on a snipe hunt. It would be far simpler and easier for you to simply quote it.
I've done the same for you numerous times. Since you decline, I assume it doesn't exist.

You still have not quoted the text where god warned people about cleanliness and antiseptic practices to prevent the transmission of infection and communicable diseases?

your snipe hunt is your problem not mine

 

[progressive hunter]

since it was a river bed they were in danger

and if you watch the video and maybe go to the website you would see what you want


its your self imposed ignorance thats the problem

Many fossil foot prints are in river beds.

Who authorized them to remove the fossils? It obviously wasn't their property.

you just surpassed pathetic

How so? Is that you're way of saying you can't answer the question?

so who exactly has authority to give them permission???

and why do you still ask dumb questions instead of reading and watching the answers before asking???

again your self imposed ignorance is the problem

The land owners has that authority. If it's publicly owned, that would be the federal government.

the feds have no authority,,,and since his museum is in the same town and hes not in jail I can only assume he had permission

unless you have something that says different

wait a min,,,,first is was a science thing and now its a land owner thing,,,WTF???

whats next???