Science moves closer to biblical creation.

Why didn't God write about the dinosaurs?? Is that the question? I'm gobsmacked.
I'll dumb it down for ya then, even though I was asking no one in particular. Are dinosaurs clearly mentioned in the Bible? If so, where? If not, why not?

Could it beeeeee.. SATAN!:omg:
 
Last edited:
I'll dumb it down for ya then, even though I was asking no one in particular. Are dinosaurs clearly mentioned in the Bible? If so, where? If not, why not?

Could it beeeeee.. SATAN!:omg:

Dinosaurs aren't mentioned in the Bible. Just leviathan and behemoth.
 
Dinosaurs aren't mentioned in the Bible. Just leviathan and behemoth.
That's been my assessment as well.

Leviathan:

Destruction_of_Leviathan.png


Both:

Lev-Beh-Ziz.jpg
 
Many apparently disagree. The popular images sure don't help, but clearly not dinosaurs in any case.

If the earth is only 6000 years old, they would have to claim man lived with dinosaurs.
 
If the earth is only 6000 years old, they would have to claim man lived with dinosaurs.
Both creationists and Christians, at the very least, yes. But more to my point, the gods would have to know about them very clearly. If the Bible were literally "God's word" then "God" was mighty ignorant of her past. And if it were just people responsible, "the inspired word of God" was also mighty ignorant given what we all can now easily see came before, i.e. the various dinosaurs, none of which resemble any of the textual suggestions nor images drawn therefrom. Even provided the people saw fossil remains and had developed some understanding of their origins. Birds with bent beaks, hooves, and a tail? the Loch-Ness monster,.. WTF?
 
Last edited:
Is there any compelling reason to believe that the Bible's authors were actually aware that dinosaurs had existed before them? If goddidit as someone declared above, why wouldn't she clearly mention the dinosaurs anywhere?
The Bible brings brevity to new levels. We can fill in many blanks however, using reasonable assumptions.
 
Both creationists and Christians, at the very least, yes. But more to my point, the gods would have to know about them very clearly. If the Bible were literally "God's word" then "God" was mighty ignorant of her past. And if it were just people responsible, "the inspired word of God" was also mighty ignorant given what we all can now easily see came before, i.e. the various dinosaurs, none of which resemble any of the textual suggestions nor images drawn therefrom. Even provided the people saw fossil remains and had developed some understanding of their origins. Birds with bent beaks, hooves, and a tail? the Loch-Ness monster,.. WTF?
The Bible isn't concerned with rehearsing billions of years of earth's past history. We can construct a reasonable history using geologic discoveries combined with some scriptural accounts.
 
The Bible isn't concerned with rehearsing billions of years of earth's past history. We can construct a reasonable history using geologic discoveries combined with some scriptural accounts.

You mean that the dinosaurs died out 60 million years ago?
 
The Bible brings brevity to new levels. We can fill in many blanks however, using reasonable assumptions.
Brevity? You've got to be kidding. And, yeah, the reasonable assumption obviously being the authors knew nothing of the dinosaurs and neither did your supposed gods. Yet birds are living dinosaurs. You and your Bible can go fish.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom