Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where did the universe come from? Science likes to pretend it has all the answers, or will at least have them in the future. The problem is that something like the origins of life and the universe cannot be experimented on, since they happened in the past. Science cannot answer these questions, and they never will. That's why they make stuff up.Mmmhmm.
Where did the necessary chemicals come from in the first place?
No, science does not like to pretend it has all the answers, or will at least have them in the future. You clearly know nothing about science.Where did the universe come from? Science likes to pretend it has all the answers, or will at least have them in the future. The problem is that something like the origins of life and the universe cannot be experimented on, since they happened in the past. Science cannot answer these questions, and they never will. That's why they make stuff up.Mmmhmm.
Where did the necessary chemicals come from in the first place?
Science cannot prove with empirical certitude how life rose, but it can make informed guesses.The problem is that something like the origins of life and the universe cannot be experimented on, since they happened in the past. Science cannot answer these questions, and they never will. That's why they make stuff up.
That's what an informed guess is. It means they don't know. They have no way of knowing. So they make stuff up.Science cannot prove with empirical certitude how life rose, but it can make informed guesses.The problem is that something like the origins of life and the universe cannot be experimented on, since they happened in the past. Science cannot answer these questions, and they never will. That's why they make stuff up.
And that is different than just making things up.
No, that is not what an informed guess is, dude.That's what an informed guess is. It means they don't know. They have no way of knowing. So they make stuff up.Science cannot prove with empirical certitude how life rose, but it can make informed guesses.The problem is that something like the origins of life and the universe cannot be experimented on, since they happened in the past. Science cannot answer these questions, and they never will. That's why they make stuff up.
And that is different than just making things up.
You don't know much about science. If they cannot do repeatable experiments on something, it's nothing but a WAG. Know what a wag is?No, that is not what an informed guess is, dude.That's what an informed guess is. It means they don't know. They have no way of knowing. So they make stuff up.Science cannot prove with empirical certitude how life rose, but it can make informed guesses.The problem is that something like the origins of life and the universe cannot be experimented on, since they happened in the past. Science cannot answer these questions, and they never will. That's why they make stuff up.
And that is different than just making things up.
I am bailing on this discussion.
See ya.
Seems like a few of you thought this was funny. Would you care to elaborate, or is mocking laughter all you've got?Here is a scientific discussion of the requirements for life and why a naturalistic origin is, quite simply, impossible. The more science learns about life, the more absurd it looks for a naturalistic origin.
Origin of life - creation.com
That's what an informed guess is. It means they don't know. They have no way of knowing. So they make stuff up.Science cannot prove with empirical certitude how life rose, but it can make informed guesses.The problem is that something like the origins of life and the universe cannot be experimented on, since they happened in the past. Science cannot answer these questions, and they never will. That's why they make stuff up.
And that is different than just making things up.
You don't know much about science. If they cannot do repeatable experiments on something, it's nothing but a WAG. Know what a wag is?No, that is not what an informed guess is, dude.That's what an informed guess is. It means they don't know. They have no way of knowing. So they make stuff up.Science cannot prove with empirical certitude how life rose, but it can make informed guesses.The problem is that something like the origins of life and the universe cannot be experimented on, since they happened in the past. Science cannot answer these questions, and they never will. That's why they make stuff up.
And that is different than just making things up.
I am bailing on this discussion.
See ya.
God created the Laws of Physics...
...and evolution.
Do you know anything about information theory, and how it applies to living systems? DNA contains something called complex specified information. This is something that observation shows comes only from intelligent minds. Since DNA contains such information, it requires intelligence in order to exist. Nature is not capable of creating it.That's what an informed guess is. It means they don't know. They have no way of knowing. So they make stuff up.Science cannot prove with empirical certitude how life rose, but it can make informed guesses.The problem is that something like the origins of life and the universe cannot be experimented on, since they happened in the past. Science cannot answer these questions, and they never will. That's why they make stuff up.
And that is different than just making things up.
They take what they do know, and form intelligent, informed guesses.
The entire premise of "It is too complex" is not debunking anything. Its like that nonsense about the human eye being too complicated to have evolved. You actually have to ignore science for that idea to work.
Do you know anything about information theory, and how it applies to living systems? DNA contains something called complex specified information. This is something that observation shows comes only from intelligent minds. Since DNA contains such information, it requires intelligence in order to exist. Nature is not capable of creating it.That's what an informed guess is. It means they don't know. They have no way of knowing. So they make stuff up.Science cannot prove with empirical certitude how life rose, but it can make informed guesses.The problem is that something like the origins of life and the universe cannot be experimented on, since they happened in the past. Science cannot answer these questions, and they never will. That's why they make stuff up.
And that is different than just making things up.
They take what they do know, and form intelligent, informed guesses.
The entire premise of "It is too complex" is not debunking anything. Its like that nonsense about the human eye being too complicated to have evolved. You actually have to ignore science for that idea to work.
Even viruses, the simplest form of life, have DNA.Do you know anything about information theory, and how it applies to living systems? DNA contains something called complex specified information. This is something that observation shows comes only from intelligent minds. Since DNA contains such information, it requires intelligence in order to exist. Nature is not capable of creating it.That's what an informed guess is. It means they don't know. They have no way of knowing. So they make stuff up.Science cannot prove with empirical certitude how life rose, but it can make informed guesses.The problem is that something like the origins of life and the universe cannot be experimented on, since they happened in the past. Science cannot answer these questions, and they never will. That's why they make stuff up.
And that is different than just making things up.
They take what they do know, and form intelligent, informed guesses.
The entire premise of "It is too complex" is not debunking anything. Its like that nonsense about the human eye being too complicated to have evolved. You actually have to ignore science for that idea to work.
Do all living cells contain complex DNA?
All non parasitic life has DNA.Do you know anything about information theory, and how it applies to living systems? DNA contains something called complex specified information. This is something that observation shows comes only from intelligent minds. Since DNA contains such information, it requires intelligence in order to exist. Nature is not capable of creating it.That's what an informed guess is. It means they don't know. They have no way of knowing. So they make stuff up.Science cannot prove with empirical certitude how life rose, but it can make informed guesses.The problem is that something like the origins of life and the universe cannot be experimented on, since they happened in the past. Science cannot answer these questions, and they never will. That's why they make stuff up.
And that is different than just making things up.
They take what they do know, and form intelligent, informed guesses.
The entire premise of "It is too complex" is not debunking anything. Its like that nonsense about the human eye being too complicated to have evolved. You actually have to ignore science for that idea to work.
Do all living cells contain complex DNA?
I believe that viruses contain RNA. Not DNA. Technically, they are not alive, since they cannot reproduce without a living host.Even viruses, the simplest form of life, have DNA.Do you know anything about information theory, and how it applies to living systems? DNA contains something called complex specified information. This is something that observation shows comes only from intelligent minds. Since DNA contains such information, it requires intelligence in order to exist. Nature is not capable of creating it.That's what an informed guess is. It means they don't know. They have no way of knowing. So they make stuff up.Science cannot prove with empirical certitude how life rose, but it can make informed guesses.
And that is different than just making things up.
They take what they do know, and form intelligent, informed guesses.
The entire premise of "It is too complex" is not debunking anything. Its like that nonsense about the human eye being too complicated to have evolved. You actually have to ignore science for that idea to work.
Do all living cells contain complex DNA?
Actually it can have both depending on the type of virus.I believe that viruses contain RNA. Not DNA. Technically, they are not alive, since they cannot reproduce without a living host.Even viruses, the simplest form of life, have DNA.Do you know anything about information theory, and how it applies to living systems? DNA contains something called complex specified information. This is something that observation shows comes only from intelligent minds. Since DNA contains such information, it requires intelligence in order to exist. Nature is not capable of creating it.That's what an informed guess is. It means they don't know. They have no way of knowing. So they make stuff up.
They take what they do know, and form intelligent, informed guesses.
The entire premise of "It is too complex" is not debunking anything. Its like that nonsense about the human eye being too complicated to have evolved. You actually have to ignore science for that idea to work.
Do all living cells contain complex DNA?
That's single strand DNA. As far as I know, there are no viruses that contain normal double helix DNA. In either case, they cannot survive without a host. Not sure why that's relevant. I forgot what what this topic was about anyway.Actually it can have both depending on the type of virus.I believe that viruses contain RNA. Not DNA. Technically, they are not alive, since they cannot reproduce without a living host.Even viruses, the simplest form of life, have DNA.Do you know anything about information theory, and how it applies to living systems? DNA contains something called complex specified information. This is something that observation shows comes only from intelligent minds. Since DNA contains such information, it requires intelligence in order to exist. Nature is not capable of creating it.They take what they do know, and form intelligent, informed guesses.
The entire premise of "It is too complex" is not debunking anything. Its like that nonsense about the human eye being too complicated to have evolved. You actually have to ignore science for that idea to work.
Do all living cells contain complex DNA?
Virus - Wikipedia
