"Science be damned!" Let's have Oil rule our lives!

It's more like what the climate activist, scientists and experts had to say when Senator Kennedy questioned them about the climate budget and expected results.

He basically asked them if they had any expectation we would see any measurable benefit from the 50 trillion we were supposed to spend over the next 35 years, and their answer was "No". :auiqs.jpg:
Why are Democrats so angry and obnoxious about CO2. Why don't they simply stop breathing out that gas?
 
It's more like what the climate activist, scientists and experts had to say when Senator Kennedy questioned them about the climate budget and expected results.

He basically asked them if they had any expectation we would see any measurable benefit from the 50 trillion we were supposed to spend over the next 35 years, and their answer was "No". :auiqs.jpg:
The last thing they want to fix is the climate, that butt ***** their entire scam. Just like homelessness and poverty can’t be fixed or their checks stop coming in.
 
We were supposed to be out of oil by the time I got my license. That really pissed me off. Yet somehow 44 years later I’ve been able to drive a couple million miles.

Never trust these alarmist retards.
Back in the day when Peak Oil was taken seriously lib greenies could say they were worried about an energy shortage

Now they fear that we wont run out of oil, aka fossil fuel, soon enough
 
The last thing they want to fix is the climate, that butt ***** their entire scam. Just like homelessness and poverty can’t be fixed or their checks stop coming in.
You can collect millions of dollars if you toe the line that man causes climate to change. But no money at all for science that proves how wrong that is.
 
It's more like what the climate activist, scientists and experts had to say when Senator Kennedy questioned them about the climate budget and expected results.

He basically asked them if they had any expectation we would see any measurable benefit from the 50 trillion we were supposed to spend over the next 35 years, and their answer was "No". :auiqs.jpg:
But the climate freaks want to spend the $50 trillion anyway
 
But the climate freaks want to spend the $50 trillion anyway

Well, it is not the first time those freaks have attempted to use goofy ideas and dreams to loot the National Treasury "for the sake of humanity". :auiqs.jpg:
 
I am not going to discuss the actual issue about Climate change.
Then why did you start a thread on it, dumbf*ck?

LOL

Hit and run! If you can't take the heat then get the f*ck out of the kitchen you FAGAt!


Suffice it to say that Climate Experts say it is a problem. I am sure you know better.
Are these the same experts whose computer "models" claimed Glacier National Park would be glacier free by 2020? Shit models!

It isn't matter of who are what "knows better" you FAGAt. It's a matter of them punching in data into a computer to get it to say what they want it to say. I'm sure they could have punched plenty of data into "models" that showed GNP wouldn't be melted down by 2020 but they did not cite a single one. Why? Gullible f*ckers like you lapping up the bullshit they want you to lap up! The people who have difficulty predicting the weather tomorrow must be taken with grain of salt when they tell you with exact certainty what the temperature is going to be a decade from now, 2 decades from now, several decades from now!


The bottom line though, it that restrictions against man-made carbon-dioxide is a positive and will not make things worse but it could make it better.

It's simple you kook. Go ahead and produce an energy source that can win the market and improve the economy. You find that and you kooks will be done with fossil fuels. We'll all be done. Instead of that you fools are bumbling around here in electric cars that need to be plugged in for hours after just a hundred or so miles The whole time you're totally oblivious to the fact that the dirtiest fossil fuel of all, coal, is likely providing the electricity that you're using to charge the damn thing! You dumbasses can't win on your merits to you are trying to kneecap the economy to get there. Dummy
 
It's more like what the climate activist, scientists and experts had to say when Senator Kennedy questioned them about the climate budget and expected results.

He basically asked them if they had any expectation we would see any measurable benefit from the 50 trillion we were supposed to spend over the next 35 years, and their answer was "No". :auiqs.jpg:
Link to that info, please
 
Link to that info, please

Link, ****, here's a video of him raking some Olympian and Climate Activist over the coals during the hearings.
You can follow the "tags" and find him doing the same thing in the hearings to Congress members, and Experts, but I provided this one because it is kind of funny watching this poor fella crawfish. :auiqs.jpg:

 
Then why did you start a thread on it, dumbf*ck?

The Op was about Trump withdrawing the regulations and restrictions on that issue, and not about whether Climate change is real or not!
LOL

Hit and run! If you can't take the heat then get the f*ck out of the kitchen you FAGAt!



Are these the same experts whose computer "models" claimed Glacier National Park would be glacier free by 2020? Shit models!

One stated outlook being mistaken, does not make the overall outlook incorrect. I am surprised in your answer, because if that was true, then you should be withdrawing your support for Trump, given that he has already proven wrong on many issues
It isn't matter of who are what "knows better" you FAGAt. It's a matter of them punching in data into a computer to get it to say what they want it to say. I'm sure they could have punched plenty of data into "models" that showed GNP wouldn't be melted down by 2020 but they did not cite a single one. Why? Gullible f*ckers like you lapping up the bullshit they want you to lap up! The people who have difficulty predicting the weather tomorrow must be taken with grain of salt when they tell you with exact certainty what the temperature is going to be a decade from now, 2 decades from now, several decades from now!




It's simple you kook. Go ahead and produce an energy source that can win the market and improve the economy. You find that and you kooks will be done with fossil fuels. We'll all be done. Instead of that you fools are bumbling around here in electric cars that need to be plugged in for hours after just a hundred or so miles The whole time you're totally oblivious to the fact that the dirtiest fossil fuel of all, coal, is likely providing the electricity that you're using to charge the damn thing! Dummy
The is by about money but about protecting this planet for all of humanity to be able to live in it
 
Oh my, Shanghai has slums? Tell me it ain't so Krus


shanghai-chinafebruary-8-2019-slum-600nw-1872159865.jpg
Thanks for showing pics that are 15 years and older, it just documents China's factual progress fantastically.

Your above Nanpu bridge photo is from before 2005, since the frontal cable anchor pillars were raised in about that time.

This is Nanpu Bridge in 2025 !!!
Nanpu.webp


As for your China coal and pollution story

China in 2025 reached about 1900 GW on renewable energy - USA about 400 GW, whilst the USA is still being the overall largest emitter of CO2 with rising emissions, China's CO2 has already peaked and was down 2% in 2025.
Whilst renewable energy accounts for about 32% of China's GDP - it isn't even 8 % in the USA.

And your pathological fraudster and narcissistic liar is continuing to take his MAGA dolts for a ride.
Whilst he feeds you Venezuela dreams on Oil - his administration:

According to the U.S. Solar Market Insight Q4 2025 report released today by the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) and Wood Mackenzie, 73% of all solar capacity installed this year has been built in states won by President Trump, including 8 of the top 10 states for new installations: Texas, Indiana, Florida, Arizona, Ohio, Utah, Kentucky and Arkansas. Utah surged into the top 10 solar states this quarter with two utility-scale projects coming online totaling over 1 GW of capacity.
 
Thanks for showing pics, that are 15 years old and more. The Nanpu Bridge pic you posted is from around 1995 since the front cable anchor towers are even not finished yet.

This is Nanpu Bridge from 2024

View attachment 1217695

Thanks for showing pics that are 15 years and older, it just documents China's factual progress fantastically.

Your above Nanpu bridge photo is from before 2005, since the frontal cable anchor pillars were raised in about that time.

This is Nanpu Bridge in 2025 !!!
View attachment 1217695

As for your China coal and pollution story

China in 2025 reached about 1900 GW on renewable energy - USA about 400 GW, whilst the USA is still being the overall largest emitter of CO2 with rising emissions, China's CO2 has already peaked and was down 2% in 2025.
Whilst renewable energy accounts for about 32% of China's GDP - it isn't even 8 % in the USA.

And your pathological fraudster and narcissistic liar is continuing to take his MAGA dolts for a ride.
Whilst he feeds you Venezuela dreams on Oil - his administration:

According to the U.S. Solar Market Insight Q4 2025 report released today by the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) and Wood Mackenzie, 73% of all solar capacity installed this year has been built in states won by President Trump, including 8 of the top 10 states for new installations: Texas, Indiana, Florida, Arizona, Ohio, Utah, Kentucky and Arkansas. Utah surged into the top 10 solar states this quarter with two utility-scale projects coming online totaling over 1 GW of capacity.

whilst the USA is still being the overall largest emitter of CO2 with rising emissions, China's CO2 has already peaked and was down 2% in 2025.

Link?
 
According to the U.S. Solar Market Insight Q4 2025 report released today by the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) and Wood Mackenzie, 73% of all solar capacity installed this year has been built in states won by President Trump, including 8 of the top 10 states for new installations: Texas, Indiana, Florida, Arizona, Ohio, Utah, Kentucky and Arkansas. Utah surged into the top 10 solar states this quarter with two utility-scale projects coming online totaling over 1 GW of capacity.

It's not like Texas has any kind of shortage of empty assed land with little more than scrawny mesquite trees and dirt. :auiqs.jpg:
I am guessing you haven't crossed West Texas.

texas.webp


And for goodness sakes, where in the world could they ever find a place to put a solar farm in Utah. :auiqs.jpg:


utah.webp
 
Last edited:
15th post
It's not like Texas has any kind of shortage of empty assed land with little more than scrawny mesquite trees and dirt. :auiqs.jpg:
I am guessing you haven't cross West Texas.
You guessed wrong - been a dozen times and more through Oklahoma, Texas and New Mexico, due to Sheppard AFB, (JBSA), Altus AFB, Fort Sill, and e.g White Sands (WSMR), and Holloman AFB.
 
You guessed wrong - been a dozen times and more through Oklahoma, Texas and New Mexico, due to Sheppard AFB, (JBSA), Altus AFB, Fort Sill, and e.g White Sands (WSMR), and Holloman AFB.

Then you should have known where the numbers come from, and why they look the way they do.
Sorry for the mistake, it was a guess and I didn't know you were just stupid. :auiqs.jpg:
 
Back
Top Bottom