Religions don't kill people...people use religion as an excuse to kill people.
True, and that''s why Islam isn't a religion; it demands death of all who don't submit to the Caliphate. It's a political ideology, not a religion. This is what makes it so appealing to the mentally ill, particularly homosexuals and other sociopaths, and as an ideology based on criminal activity, it dictates death to any who leave the crime family. It's the perfect organized crime syndicate philosophy.
When the murderous warlord created it, the entire purpose was to guarantee his warriors would be bound to his will and continue to rape, murder and pillage their way through the region. All he did was to borrow bits and pieces of true religions, grafted it on to his agenda of hatred and voila'!
Islam is a totalitarian, supremacist ideology that demand eternal war by its followers until all submit before it. That we call this evil screed a religion prevents us for seeing it for what it is because of our excessive deference for religion in general. We don't do that for any other type of ideology, just religion. Since we call it a religion, however, those lacking in intelligence, education or common sense indulge in their various childish defenses by treating it as if it were no different than Christianity. These utter morons only do it because they have trained each other to do it, and will go to the most ridiculous extremes in trying to paint them the same in order to defend Islam.
"Oh, you tell me Mohammad ordered his followers to rape women in front of their captive husbands before killing the men? But, but, but, but I just saw a Christian jaywalk the other day!
The utter lack of any ability to distinguish between having an open mind and having a giant gaping hole in their heads is a characteristic of its neurotic defenders in the West, who have been sold the idea that if they adopt certain pseudo-intellectual fashions then they are 'enlightened' by association and repeating nonsense spouted by other morons they get to pretend they're 'sophisticates' or something without really having to work and develop independent intellects themselves.
Mr Libertarian himself, Thomas Jefferson, suffered from no such false logical weaknesses and imbecility.
Every society has a right to fix the fundamental principles of its association, and to say to all individuals, that if they contemplate pursuits beyond the limits of these principles and involving dangers which the society chooses to avoid, they must go somewhere else for their exercise; that we want no citizens, and still less ephemeral and pseudo-citizens, on such terms. We may exclude them from our territory, as we do persons infected with disease.
Thomas Jefferson to William H. Crawford, 1816
"NAMBLA" logic - an extreme absolutist position which demands that for logical consistencies sake that certain gross crimes be allowed, in order that no one might feel restrained./-Stirling S. Newberry