Savage Out of Control Cops Brutally Beats Man and Kills Protective Dog While At It

[BS Filter]

They decided not to charge him with a crime.

Ok, but at least they know his name. What's the name of the cop that shot Babbit?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

And you cheer on cops who kill unarmed Black men

I do. There is no law that states police or armed citizens cannot kill an unarmed attacker or suspect.

 

[BS Filter]

As if this is normative. All the stats show that white men are killed more by police than blacks. It's the social, political and MSM narrative that is being pushed in front of everyone.

You can pound the truth into these pawns every day, but they're propaganda parrots and just keep repeating the script.

 

[Blues Man]

The cop will be prosecuted and punished. What about the cop who killed Babbit?

What about him?

I think he was acting in the defense of others since Babbit was going to open the doors for a violent mob

 

[Blues Man]

I do. There is no law that states police or armed citizens cannot kill an unarmed attacker or suspect.

So then you have no problem with that unarmed rioter in the Capitol getting shot?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Well post it from the article.

The officials claimed Mr Barlow “charged at a deputy, refused to follow commands, and grabbed one deputy’s baton.” All this is also seen in the body cam footage. But the police say that the Indigenous man’s dog, a pit bull, was shot after he ordered it to attack the officers. However, none of this can be seen or overheard in the video footage.

The police have charged Mr Barlow with crimes including obstruction and resisting officers, threatening criminal intent, assault with a deadly weapon non-firearm, violation of parole, and battery on a peace officer.

 

[BS Filter]

What about him?

I think he was acting in the defense of others since Babbit was going to open the doors for a violent mob

BLM is violent, antifa is violent. How many were shot by cops?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

So then you have no problem with that unarmed rioter in the Capitol getting shot?

Not if it's in the constraints of the law. As a CCW holder in my state, our laws pretty much mirrors those around the country for licensed citizens and police officers alike. The law reads:

A CCW holder can use deadly force if they believe they (or others) are in jeopardy of serious bodily harm or death. Take note there is no requirement that the suspect or attacker use a deadly weapon.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Didin't you watch the video? The guy is clearly drunk which is against the law. Most drunks, walking around town are a danger to themselves and or others. And this one had a pitbull with him. You can try, all day to excuse this man's actions, but the police had every right to confront and arrest.

The problem with some people is personal culpability. This man could have clearly chosen not to drink. But he made a poor decision. Then the next bad choice is talking a pitbull with him. Then the next bad choice was leaving his dwelling intoxicated. The next bad choice is when confronted, he became belligerent and combative. But for some, oh, this is clearly racism and the cops fault. Bullshit.

So the penalty for walking around drunk with a dog is ICU.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

The officials claimed Mr Barlow “charged at a deputy, refused to follow commands, and grabbed one deputy’s baton.” All this is also seen in the body cam footage. But the police say that the Indigenous man’s dog, a pit bull, was shot after he ordered it to attack the officers. However, none of this can be seen or overheard in the video footage.

The police have charged Mr Barlow with crimes including obstruction and resisting officers, threatening criminal intent, assault with a deadly weapon non-firearm, violation of parole, and battery on a peace officer.

So what are they investigating? Why hasn't the man been charged with a crime? Why are we just supposed to take the officer's word for it?

 

[LibertyKid]

So the penalty for walking around drunk with a dog is ICU.

Um, that's not what happened. Did you watch the video? At this point, all I can ascertain from you're responses and conversation is this:
1. You're a troll who likes to argue for the sake of arguing regardless of facts and own personal opinion of the situation and enjoys perpetrating reactions even if you agree with the person's stance you're arguing against.
2. You might be on the spectrum somehow as you clearly are unable to have reasonable discourse.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Um, that's not what happened. Did you watch the video? At this point, all I can ascertain from you're responses and conversation is this:
1. You're a troll who likes to argue for the sake of arguing regardless of facts and own personal opinion of the situation and enjoys perpetrating reactions even if you agree with the person's stance you're arguing against.
2. You might be on the spectrum somehow as you clearly are unable to have reasonable discourse.

So tell me what this drunk patron did that required him being put in the ICU.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

So what are they investigating? Why hasn't the man been charged with a crime? Why are we just supposed to take the officer's word for it?

It is being investigated like all police matters so what's your complaint? Again, I didn't see the video but from what others are saying, the video supports most of what was in the article and the claim by officers. He started trouble with police and they reacted properly.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

So the penalty for walking around drunk with a dog is ICU.

No, the penalty for walking around with a dog is public intoxication, drunk and disorderly. Fighting with the cops, trying to disarm one of them, assault on a police officer can land you in the ICU and I support it.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

It is being investigated like all police matters so what's your complaint?

Let's see if it is swept under the rug like most of them are.

Again, I didn't see the video but from what others are saying, the video supports most of what was in the article and the claim by officers. He started trouble with police and they reacted properly.

So disorderly conduct gets you a sentence of being put in the ICU.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Let's see if it is swept under the rug like most of them are.

It should be as this is a non-story. A drunken irate suspect fought with police officers and they had to beat him into submission. If this guy were not of Indian descent, nobody would have even heard of the story. But the media knows you are puppets, and as such, only move when your strings are pulled.

So disorderly conduct gets you a sentence of being put in the ICU.

Do you have a major comprehension problem or does the liberal mind just block out things they don't want to see?

 

[Superbadbrutha]

It should be as this is a non-story.

Of course it shouldn't, who cares about a native American getting the hell.beat out of him.

A drunken irate suspect fought with police officers and they had to beat him into submission.

He wasn't the reason they were called, guy was yelling and seem agitated, what law had he broke that need police intervention? He charged at one of them, so he was tased, beaten, kicked, etc. and to you it's justified because he isn't white.

If this guy were not of Indian descent, nobody would have even heard of the story. But the media knows you are puppets, and as such, only move when your strings are pulled.

Now it's the media's fault, had he been white he would have rec'd a ride home.

Do you have a major comprehension problem or does the liberal mind just block out things they don't want to see?

I see the man in the ICU for Jaywalking at best.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

View attachment 520927

Yet it's alright for a Capitol police officer to murder a unarmed female protestor.

*****SMILE*****

Actually you are anti police when they are attacked by Trump Humpers.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

Actually you are anti police when they are attacked by Trump Humpers.

If that's how you feel then release Derek Chauvin and compensate him for his time in prison.

*****SMILE*****

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Of course it shouldn't, who cares about a native American getting the hell.beat out of him.

What does his heritage have to do with this? Not a damn thing. We all live under the same laws in this country.

He wasn't the reason they were called, guy was yelling and seem agitated, what law had he broke that need police intervention? He charged at one of them, so he was tased, beaten, kicked, etc. and to you it's justified because he isn't white.

It's justified because he attacked police officers and refused to back down, even tried to get his dog to attack them, which any dog would regardless, especially such a violent animal like a pitbull. What did you want the cops to do, let him go and maybe this manic will attack an innocent on the street? He had to be restrained, and police do whatever it takes to restrain him.

Now it's the media's fault, had he been white he would have rec'd a ride home.

Just pointing out this happens all the time, but never reported if it's a white guy because whites are civilized and respect law and order. They know if they post a story about the exact same thing happening to a white, we other whites would say "good for him, the guy was acting like an asshole and deserved it."

I see the man in the ICU for Jaywalking at best.

Well there you go. The problem is your liberal mind blocks out things you don't want to see. The video is there if you are a YouTube member, the article is there, and the charges against the drunken bum are all listed. But your defective liberal mind screens all that out and only sees jaywalking.