Saudi prince: Maybe the Palestinians should’ve taken the deals they were offered

[Sixties Fan]

No. It's an uncomfortable fact that you’re unable and unwilling to address because your Islamist agenda is on the defensive.

1948 was just the first time Arabs-Moslems attempted to further their goal of destroying Israel. Why don’t you lecture us with some Koran verses?

What does that have to do with the land taken in 1948?

Was land taken after the Arab-Islamist invasion?

Doesn't matter. None of those countries won or lost any land.

Neither Jordan, nor Egypt won any land in 1948?

You don't say?
You have no idea what happened with some of the Mandate of Palestine in 1948? None at all?

 

[P F Tinmore]

What does that have to do with the land taken in 1948?

Was land taken after the Arab-Islamist invasion?

Doesn't matter. None of those countries won or lost any land.

Neither Jordan, nor Egypt won any land in 1948?

You don't say?
You have no idea what happened with some of the Mandate of Palestine in 1948? None at all?

I know that contrary to popular bullshit, nobody won or lost the 1948 war.

 

[Shusha]

Was land taken after the Arab-Islamist invasion?

Doesn't matter. None of those countries won or lost any land.

Neither Jordan, nor Egypt won any land in 1948?

You don't say?
You have no idea what happened with some of the Mandate of Palestine in 1948? None at all?

I know that contrary to popular bullshit, nobody won or lost the 1948 war.

Lol. Here's a hint. Some people HAVE a sovereign nation. And some people don't. Now we might have different definitions of 'win' but .... shrug.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Was land taken after the Arab-Islamist invasion?

Doesn't matter. None of those countries won or lost any land.

Neither Jordan, nor Egypt won any land in 1948?

You don't say?
You have no idea what happened with some of the Mandate of Palestine in 1948? None at all?

I know that contrary to popular bullshit, nobody won or lost the 1948 war.

This is what I answered to, and you did not understand what we are talking about

<<Doesn't matter. None of those countries won or lost any land.>>

We are talking about Countries.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Doesn't matter. None of those countries won or lost any land.

Neither Jordan, nor Egypt won any land in 1948?

You don't say?
You have no idea what happened with some of the Mandate of Palestine in 1948? None at all?

I know that contrary to popular bullshit, nobody won or lost the 1948 war.

This is what I answered to, and you did not understand what we are talking about

<<Doesn't matter. None of those countries won or lost any land.>>

We are talking about Countries.

Indeed.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Neither Jordan, nor Egypt won any land in 1948?

You don't say?
You have no idea what happened with some of the Mandate of Palestine in 1948? None at all?

I know that contrary to popular bullshit, nobody won or lost the 1948 war.

This is what I answered to, and you did not understand what we are talking about

<<Doesn't matter. None of those countries won or lost any land.>>

We are talking about Countries.

Indeed.

The "Country of Palestine" neither won, nor lost any land. Because it does not exist, yet.
Jordan and Egypt won land in 1948.
Jordan and Egypt lost land in 1967.

Had the Palestinians accepted any of the offers I posted about, they would have one now. They would be a country.

 

[USAF 2023]

UN Resolution 242 tells Israel to get off that land. International law also states, you cannot hold onto land seized in a war. There is nothing to negotiate. All Israel needs to do, is stop breaking the law.

If someone robs a bank, the cops don't negotiate with the robber, a deal that would allow him to keep part of the money.

Your position is absurd! And not a single country on the planet agrees with you.

Don't forget the land illegally taken by war in 1948.

Don’t forget the land invaded by Arabs-Moslems who crossed the frontier and were driven back.

Irrelevant.

No. It's an uncomfortable fact that you’re unable and unwilling to address because your Islamist agenda is on the defensive.

1948 was just the first time Arabs-Moslems attempted to further their goal of destroying Israel. Why don’t you lecture us with some Koran verses?

What does that have to do with the land taken in 1948?

Yawn.... Here we go again., The claim that Israel does not have the Right to Exist.

 

[P F Tinmore]

You don't say?
You have no idea what happened with some of the Mandate of Palestine in 1948? None at all?

I know that contrary to popular bullshit, nobody won or lost the 1948 war.

This is what I answered to, and you did not understand what we are talking about

<<Doesn't matter. None of those countries won or lost any land.>>

We are talking about Countries.

Indeed.

The "Country of Palestine" neither won, nor lost any land. Because it does not exist, yet.
Jordan and Egypt won land in 1948.
Jordan and Egypt lost land in 1967.

Had the Palestinians accepted any of the offers I posted about, they would have one now. They would be a country.

The "Country of Palestine" neither won, nor lost any land. Because it does not exist, yet.

Who says? Link?

 

[Sixties Fan]

You don't say?
You have no idea what happened with some of the Mandate of Palestine in 1948? None at all?

I know that contrary to popular bullshit, nobody won or lost the 1948 war.

This is what I answered to, and you did not understand what we are talking about

<<Doesn't matter. None of those countries won or lost any land.>>

We are talking about Countries.

Indeed.

The "Country of Palestine" neither won, nor lost any land. Because it does not exist, yet.
Jordan and Egypt won land in 1948.
Jordan and Egypt lost land in 1967.

Had the Palestinians accepted any of the offers I posted about, they would have one now. They would be a country.

The "Country of Palestine" neither won, nor lost any land. Because it does not exist, yet.

Who says? Link?

You seem to be the only one who does not know that.

Go and look up the "Country" of Palestine before WWI yourself.

 

[P F Tinmore]

I know that contrary to popular bullshit, nobody won or lost the 1948 war.

This is what I answered to, and you did not understand what we are talking about

<<Doesn't matter. None of those countries won or lost any land.>>

We are talking about Countries.

Indeed.

The "Country of Palestine" neither won, nor lost any land. Because it does not exist, yet.
Jordan and Egypt won land in 1948.
Jordan and Egypt lost land in 1967.

Had the Palestinians accepted any of the offers I posted about, they would have one now. They would be a country.

The "Country of Palestine" neither won, nor lost any land. Because it does not exist, yet.

Who says? Link?

You seem to be the only one who does not know that.

Go and look up the "Country" of Palestine before WWI yourself.

Decisions of international and national tribunals
The U.S. State Department Digest of International Law says that the terms of the Treaty of Lausanne provided for the application of the principles of state succession to the "A" Mandates. The Treaty of Versailles (1920) provisionally recognized the former Ottoman communities as independent nations. It also required Germany to recognize the disposition of the former Ottoman territories and to recognize the new states laid down within their boundaries. The Treaty of Lausanne required the newly created states that acquired the territory to pay annuities on the Ottoman public debt, and to assume responsibility for the administration of concessions that had been granted by the Ottomans. A dispute regarding the status of the territories was settled by an Arbitrator appointed by the Council of the League of Nations. It was decided that Palestine and Transjordan were newly created states according to the terms of the applicable post-war treaties. In its Judgment No. 5, The Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions, the Permanent Court of International Justice also decided that Palestine was responsible as the successor state for concessions granted by Ottoman authorities. The Courts of Palestine and Great Britain decided that title to the properties shown on the Ottoman Civil list had been ceded to the government of Palestine as an allied successor state.[25]

State of Palestine: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

 

[Sixties Fan]

This is what I answered to, and you did not understand what we are talking about

<<Doesn't matter. None of those countries won or lost any land.>>

We are talking about Countries.

Indeed.

The "Country of Palestine" neither won, nor lost any land. Because it does not exist, yet.
Jordan and Egypt won land in 1948.
Jordan and Egypt lost land in 1967.

Had the Palestinians accepted any of the offers I posted about, they would have one now. They would be a country.

The "Country of Palestine" neither won, nor lost any land. Because it does not exist, yet.

Who says? Link?

You seem to be the only one who does not know that.

Go and look up the "Country" of Palestine before WWI yourself.

Decisions of international and national tribunals
The U.S. State Department Digest of International Law says that the terms of the Treaty of Lausanne provided for the application of the principles of state succession to the "A" Mandates. The Treaty of Versailles (1920) provisionally recognized the former Ottoman communities as independent nations. It also required Germany to recognize the disposition of the former Ottoman territories and to recognize the new states laid down within their boundaries. The Treaty of Lausanne required the newly created states that acquired the territory to pay annuities on the Ottoman public debt, and to assume responsibility for the administration of concessions that had been granted by the Ottomans. A dispute regarding the status of the territories was settled by an Arbitrator appointed by the Council of the League of Nations. It was decided that Palestine and Transjordan were newly created states according to the terms of the applicable post-war treaties. In its Judgment No. 5, The Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions, the Permanent Court of International Justice also decided that Palestine was responsible as the successor state for concessions granted by Ottoman authorities. The Courts of Palestine and Great Britain decided that title to the properties shown on the Ottoman Civil list had been ceded to the government of Palestine as an allied successor state.[25]

State of Palestine: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Oh, yeah..... the Treaty you just don't understand.

 

[USAF 2023]

Was land taken after the Arab-Islamist invasion?

Doesn't matter. None of those countries won or lost any land.

Neither Jordan, nor Egypt won any land in 1948?

You don't say?
You have no idea what happened with some of the Mandate of Palestine in 1948? None at all?

I know that contrary to popular bullshit, nobody won or lost the 1948 war.

Sorry; Israel Won, the Arabs lost !

 

[Hollie]

This is what I answered to, and you did not understand what we are talking about

<<Doesn't matter. None of those countries won or lost any land.>>

We are talking about Countries.

Indeed.

The "Country of Palestine" neither won, nor lost any land. Because it does not exist, yet.
Jordan and Egypt won land in 1948.
Jordan and Egypt lost land in 1967.

Had the Palestinians accepted any of the offers I posted about, they would have one now. They would be a country.

The "Country of Palestine" neither won, nor lost any land. Because it does not exist, yet.

Who says? Link?

You seem to be the only one who does not know that.

Go and look up the "Country" of Palestine before WWI yourself.

Decisions of international and national tribunals
The U.S. State Department Digest of International Law says that the terms of the Treaty of Lausanne provided for the application of the principles of state succession to the "A" Mandates. The Treaty of Versailles (1920) provisionally recognized the former Ottoman communities as independent nations. It also required Germany to recognize the disposition of the former Ottoman territories and to recognize the new states laid down within their boundaries. The Treaty of Lausanne required the newly created states that acquired the territory to pay annuities on the Ottoman public debt, and to assume responsibility for the administration of concessions that had been granted by the Ottomans. A dispute regarding the status of the territories was settled by an Arbitrator appointed by the Council of the League of Nations. It was decided that Palestine and Transjordan were newly created states according to the terms of the applicable post-war treaties. In its Judgment No. 5, The Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions, the Permanent Court of International Justice also decided that Palestine was responsible as the successor state for concessions granted by Ottoman authorities. The Courts of Palestine and Great Britain decided that title to the properties shown on the Ottoman Civil list had been ceded to the government of Palestine as an allied successor state.[25]

State of Palestine: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Oh my. Yet another thread with Tinmore screeching about the Treaty of Lausanne inventing his mythical “country of Pally’land”.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Doesn't matter. None of those countries won or lost any land.

Neither Jordan, nor Egypt won any land in 1948?

You don't say?
You have no idea what happened with some of the Mandate of Palestine in 1948? None at all?

I know that contrary to popular bullshit, nobody won or lost the 1948 war.

Sorry; Israel Won, the Arabs lost !

Israeli bullshit.

Link.

 

[P F Tinmore]

What does that have to do with the land taken in 1948?

Was land taken after the Arab-Islamist invasion?

Doesn't matter. None of those countries won or lost any land.

Neither Jordan, nor Egypt won any land in 1948?

You don't say?
You have no idea what happened with some of the Mandate of Palestine in 1948? None at all?

The Mandate was merely an administration. It left.

 

[rylah]

Was land taken after the Arab-Islamist invasion?

Doesn't matter. None of those countries won or lost any land.

Neither Jordan, nor Egypt won any land in 1948?

You don't say?
You have no idea what happened with some of the Mandate of Palestine in 1948? None at all?

The Mandate was merely an administration. It left.

bin Salman enters.
Arabs already tried to cede the land to a King from Mecca in 1919, I'm just saying don't whine when You get what You initially demanded, and that a king from Mecca is going to behave like he has a mandate on You...

P F Tinmore
Just saying there's historic justice in the irony.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Indeed.

The "Country of Palestine" neither won, nor lost any land. Because it does not exist, yet.
Jordan and Egypt won land in 1948.
Jordan and Egypt lost land in 1967.

Had the Palestinians accepted any of the offers I posted about, they would have one now. They would be a country.

The "Country of Palestine" neither won, nor lost any land. Because it does not exist, yet.

Who says? Link?

You seem to be the only one who does not know that.

Go and look up the "Country" of Palestine before WWI yourself.

Decisions of international and national tribunals
The U.S. State Department Digest of International Law says that the terms of the Treaty of Lausanne provided for the application of the principles of state succession to the "A" Mandates. The Treaty of Versailles (1920) provisionally recognized the former Ottoman communities as independent nations. It also required Germany to recognize the disposition of the former Ottoman territories and to recognize the new states laid down within their boundaries. The Treaty of Lausanne required the newly created states that acquired the territory to pay annuities on the Ottoman public debt, and to assume responsibility for the administration of concessions that had been granted by the Ottomans. A dispute regarding the status of the territories was settled by an Arbitrator appointed by the Council of the League of Nations. It was decided that Palestine and Transjordan were newly created states according to the terms of the applicable post-war treaties. In its Judgment No. 5, The Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions, the Permanent Court of International Justice also decided that Palestine was responsible as the successor state for concessions granted by Ottoman authorities. The Courts of Palestine and Great Britain decided that title to the properties shown on the Ottoman Civil list had been ceded to the government of Palestine as an allied successor state.[25]

State of Palestine: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Oh, yeah..... the Treaty you just don't understand.

So I should believe an internet troll over all those posted above? Not!

 

[rylah]

The "Country of Palestine" neither won, nor lost any land. Because it does not exist, yet.
Jordan and Egypt won land in 1948.
Jordan and Egypt lost land in 1967.

Had the Palestinians accepted any of the offers I posted about, they would have one now. They would be a country.

The "Country of Palestine" neither won, nor lost any land. Because it does not exist, yet.

Who says? Link?

You seem to be the only one who does not know that.

Go and look up the "Country" of Palestine before WWI yourself.

Decisions of international and national tribunals
The U.S. State Department Digest of International Law says that the terms of the Treaty of Lausanne provided for the application of the principles of state succession to the "A" Mandates. The Treaty of Versailles (1920) provisionally recognized the former Ottoman communities as independent nations. It also required Germany to recognize the disposition of the former Ottoman territories and to recognize the new states laid down within their boundaries. The Treaty of Lausanne required the newly created states that acquired the territory to pay annuities on the Ottoman public debt, and to assume responsibility for the administration of concessions that had been granted by the Ottomans. A dispute regarding the status of the territories was settled by an Arbitrator appointed by the Council of the League of Nations. It was decided that Palestine and Transjordan were newly created states according to the terms of the applicable post-war treaties. In its Judgment No. 5, The Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions, the Permanent Court of International Justice also decided that Palestine was responsible as the successor state for concessions granted by Ottoman authorities. The Courts of Palestine and Great Britain decided that title to the properties shown on the Ottoman Civil list had been ceded to the government of Palestine as an allied successor state.[25]

State of Palestine: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Oh, yeah..... the Treaty you just don't understand.

So I should believe an internet troll over all those posted above? Not!

Believe is the main word here.
I would say even religious about it.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Who says? Link?

You seem to be the only one who does not know that.

Go and look up the "Country" of Palestine before WWI yourself.

Decisions of international and national tribunals
The U.S. State Department Digest of International Law says that the terms of the Treaty of Lausanne provided for the application of the principles of state succession to the "A" Mandates. The Treaty of Versailles (1920) provisionally recognized the former Ottoman communities as independent nations. It also required Germany to recognize the disposition of the former Ottoman territories and to recognize the new states laid down within their boundaries. The Treaty of Lausanne required the newly created states that acquired the territory to pay annuities on the Ottoman public debt, and to assume responsibility for the administration of concessions that had been granted by the Ottomans. A dispute regarding the status of the territories was settled by an Arbitrator appointed by the Council of the League of Nations. It was decided that Palestine and Transjordan were newly created states according to the terms of the applicable post-war treaties. In its Judgment No. 5, The Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions, the Permanent Court of International Justice also decided that Palestine was responsible as the successor state for concessions granted by Ottoman authorities. The Courts of Palestine and Great Britain decided that title to the properties shown on the Ottoman Civil list had been ceded to the government of Palestine as an allied successor state.[25]

State of Palestine: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Oh, yeah..... the Treaty you just don't understand.

So I should believe an internet troll over all those posted above? Not!

Believe is the main word here.
I would say even religious about it.

Still no links, huh?

 

[Sixties Fan]

You seem to be the only one who does not know that.

Go and look up the "Country" of Palestine before WWI yourself.

Decisions of international and national tribunals
The U.S. State Department Digest of International Law says that the terms of the Treaty of Lausanne provided for the application of the principles of state succession to the "A" Mandates. The Treaty of Versailles (1920) provisionally recognized the former Ottoman communities as independent nations. It also required Germany to recognize the disposition of the former Ottoman territories and to recognize the new states laid down within their boundaries. The Treaty of Lausanne required the newly created states that acquired the territory to pay annuities on the Ottoman public debt, and to assume responsibility for the administration of concessions that had been granted by the Ottomans. A dispute regarding the status of the territories was settled by an Arbitrator appointed by the Council of the League of Nations. It was decided that Palestine and Transjordan were newly created states according to the terms of the applicable post-war treaties. In its Judgment No. 5, The Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions, the Permanent Court of International Justice also decided that Palestine was responsible as the successor state for concessions granted by Ottoman authorities. The Courts of Palestine and Great Britain decided that title to the properties shown on the Ottoman Civil list had been ceded to the government of Palestine as an allied successor state.[25]

State of Palestine: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia

Oh, yeah..... the Treaty you just don't understand.

So I should believe an internet troll over all those posted above? Not!

Believe is the main word here.
I would say even religious about it.

Still no links, huh?

There are no links to what does not exist, except in your Christian mind.

You do not like the Jews being sovereign of any of their ancient land.

You do not like that the Arabs have failed again and again in destroying Israel and returning the Jews you the only role you think
they were born for. Under Christian and Muslim feet.

It is none of Israel's business, and none of any Jew's business either, that your preferred world is one where Jews have no power at all.

The Balfour Declaration changed that.

The Mandate for Palestine changed that, as well

Israel's Declaration of Independence solidified it.

Israel grows stronger because of haters like you.

Am Israel Chai.