Sanders Is Drawing Crowds BIG Crowds

[The Rabbi]

Not the right of a child to be born and not the right of someone who doesn't want to attend or participate in a same sex marriage either.

It's about distributing rights to certain favored groups while taking them from others.

Bigots should be stripped of all rights! You should not be allowed to vote, own a gun or enter into any contract or shop in any business.

It's really that simple, people like you are a problem for humanity!

Didnt you ever take an oath to protect and uphold the Constitution?

 

[Wry Catcher]

It's ok Liberals, you can dump Hillary. You know you want to. You know you can't stand her.

Just do it. Don't let fear rule you.

Thanks for posting a source on Trump, I'll read it if it's on line.

Why would Sen. Sanders opinion on SSM and Abortion impact your vote - both are now settled law?

Citizen United is now settled law and yet you scream like a child against it and rail on people who criticize roe v wade and ssm. You're a fine example of a hypocrite.

Um, CU's repeal moved our nation much closer to a plutocracy, and oligarchy of the rich and power elite (apples);

Roe and SSM were about rights, restoring rights to citizens, thus a nation of the people, by the people & for the people (oranges).

Rights were taken away from the unborn.

Got it. Now it's past time to take away your rights - it's not really because I'm intolerant of bigots, I simply reserve my right to take away their rights.

You obviously have neither the intellect or the cajones.

I have both.

 

[Meathead]

It's ok Liberals, you can dump Hillary. You know you want to. You know you can't stand her.

Just do it. Don't let fear rule you.

Citizen United is now settled law and yet you scream like a child against it and rail on people who criticize roe v wade and ssm. You're a fine example of a hypocrite.

Um, CU's repeal moved our nation much closer to a plutocracy, and oligarchy of the rich and power elite (apples);

Roe and SSM were about rights, restoring rights to citizens, thus a nation of the people, by the people & for the people (oranges).

Rights were taken away from the unborn.

Got it. Now it's past time to take away your rights - it's not really because I'm intolerant of bigots, I simply reserve my right to take away their rights.

You obviously have neither the intellect or the cajones.

I have both.

Sorry kid. You're milquetoast. A regular pajama boy judging from you last post.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Not the right of a child to be born and not the right of someone who doesn't want to attend or participate in a same sex marriage either.

It's about distributing rights to certain favored groups while taking them from others.

Bigots should be stripped of all rights! You should not be allowed to vote, own a gun or enter into any contract or shop in any business.

It's really that simple, people like you are a problem for humanity!

Didnt you ever take an oath to protect and uphold the Constitution?

Yep; have you?

Sad you're not smart enough to understand the point made in rebuttal to the fish.

 

[The Rabbi]

Not the right of a child to be born and not the right of someone who doesn't want to attend or participate in a same sex marriage either.

It's about distributing rights to certain favored groups while taking them from others.

Bigots should be stripped of all rights! You should not be allowed to vote, own a gun or enter into any contract or shop in any business.

It's really that simple, people like you are a problem for humanity!

Didnt you ever take an oath to protect and uphold the Constitution?

Yep; have you?

Sad you're not smart enough to understand the point made in rebuttal to the fish.

So you have violated your oath, which advocates ignoring the 1A to the Constitution. No shock there. Perhaps you could joing the Communist Party or something.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Not the right of a child to be born and not the right of someone who doesn't want to attend or participate in a same sex marriage either.

It's about distributing rights to certain favored groups while taking them from others.

Bigots should be stripped of all rights! You should not be allowed to vote, own a gun or enter into any contract or shop in any business.

It's really that simple, people like you are a problem for humanity!

Didnt you ever take an oath to protect and uphold the Constitution?

Yep; have you?

Sad you're not smart enough to understand the point made in rebuttal to the fish.

So you have violated your oath, which advocates ignoring the 1A to the Constitution. No shock there. Perhaps you could joing the Communist Party or something.

As I wrote, you're too dumb to understand sarcasm. Or, maybe you do and you simply proved once again you're a liar. Of course you know I know you are both a liar and dumb.

 

[Wry Catcher]

It's ok Liberals, you can dump Hillary. You know you want to. You know you can't stand her.

Just do it. Don't let fear rule you.

Um, CU's repeal moved our nation much closer to a plutocracy, and oligarchy of the rich and power elite (apples);

Roe and SSM were about rights, restoring rights to citizens, thus a nation of the people, by the people & for the people (oranges).

Rights were taken away from the unborn.

Got it. Now it's past time to take away your rights - it's not really because I'm intolerant of bigots, I simply reserve my right to take away their rights.

You obviously have neither the intellect or the cajones.

I have both.

Sorry kid. You're milquetoast. A regular pajama boy judging from you last post.

Good thing you're not a judge.

Do you always resort to name calling, or only when you can't come up with a thoughtful rebuttal, and are dumbfounded?

It seems you are dumbfounded quite often, given your record.

 

[The Rabbi]

Not the right of a child to be born and not the right of someone who doesn't want to attend or participate in a same sex marriage either.

It's about distributing rights to certain favored groups while taking them from others.

Bigots should be stripped of all rights! You should not be allowed to vote, own a gun or enter into any contract or shop in any business.

It's really that simple, people like you are a problem for humanity!

Didnt you ever take an oath to protect and uphold the Constitution?

Yep; have you?

Sad you're not smart enough to understand the point made in rebuttal to the fish.

So you have violated your oath, which advocates ignoring the 1A to the Constitution. No shock there. Perhaps you could joing the Communist Party or something.

As I wrote, you're too dumb to understand sarcasm. Or, maybe you do and you simply proved once again you're a liar. Of course you know I know you are both a liar and dumb.

So every stupid thing you say should be attributed to sarcasm? I'm down with that.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Bigots should be stripped of all rights! You should not be allowed to vote, own a gun or enter into any contract or shop in any business.

It's really that simple, people like you are a problem for humanity!

Didnt you ever take an oath to protect and uphold the Constitution?

Yep; have you?

Sad you're not smart enough to understand the point made in rebuttal to the fish.

So you have violated your oath, which advocates ignoring the 1A to the Constitution. No shock there. Perhaps you could joing the Communist Party or something.

As I wrote, you're too dumb to understand sarcasm. Or, maybe you do and you simply proved once again you're a liar. Of course you know I know you are both a liar and dumb.

So every stupid thing you say should be attributed to sarcasm? I'm down with that.

Idiot-gram ^^^

 

[The Rabbi]

Didnt you ever take an oath to protect and uphold the Constitution?

Yep; have you?

Sad you're not smart enough to understand the point made in rebuttal to the fish.

So you have violated your oath, which advocates ignoring the 1A to the Constitution. No shock there. Perhaps you could joing the Communist Party or something.

As I wrote, you're too dumb to understand sarcasm. Or, maybe you do and you simply proved once again you're a liar. Of course you know I know you are both a liar and dumb.

So every stupid thing you say should be attributed to sarcasm? I'm down with that.

Idiot-gram ^^^

That's <<Idiot-gram>>m right?

 

[amrchaos]

I'm all for Sandeers stance on the screwing of the working Middle Class. There aren't too many economists who would disagree with the factual numbers that show the transfer of wealth upwards.
I even have a couple of friends who where part of the Tea Party movement in it's infant stages who now support Sanders. When the TP used the term "We the People", they thought it was in referece to the working class but in their own words, it meant Big Business and the wealthy.
I know there's a lot of anger at the American system that certainly helps the wealthy and hurts the working class, as facts do show. Sooner or later there will be a huge public reaction to this situation. You can only kick somebody so long before they react.
My problem that I have with Sanders are his positions on abortion and gay marriages.
Would that sway me in a general election? well, that depends on who's on the tickets as I lean towards the center.
I read an interesting article in Forbes that I encourage posters to read @ Forbes.com.
"Does Donald Trump Have A Point"

" In an article on socialism in the Encyclopedia Britannica, Prof. G. D. H. Cole, a leading theoretician and historian of the British Labor Party, declares: The distinction between socialism as distinguished by various Labor and Socialist parties of Europe and the New World, and communism, as represented by the Russians and minority parties in other countries is one of tactics-and-strategy rather than one of objective. Communism is indeed only socialism pursued by revolutionary means and making its revolutionary method a canon of faith...."

In The Communist Manifesto, Marx and Engels stated that communist ends can be attained "only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions."
Manly, "The Twenty Year Revolution"
Books Mises Institute


So....stipulated that you are a socialist.....how about communist?
Do you draw the line at starving 7 million Kulaks?

An easier and straightforward way is to watch "Socialism for Dummies" in the political satire board.

On the issue of "Is Bernie Sanders a socialist?"


He is a Democratic Socialist. It is a type of ideology in the socialist tradition.

By the way, you can you tube Bernie admits he is a socialist and receive several different conversations.

Does that upset you, Wrycatcher? If it does, then you do not understand how Modern liberalism is related to socialism.

To be honest, that is the biggest disconnect the American left has--where some of their ideological roots are.

 

[gipper]

Citizen United is now settled law and yet you scream like a child against it and rail on people who criticize roe v wade and ssm. You're a fine example of a hypocrite.

Um, CU's repeal moved our nation much closer to a plutocracy, and oligarchy of the rich and power elite (apples);

Roe and SSM were about rights, restoring rights to citizens, thus a nation of the people, by the people & for the people (oranges).

Rights were taken away from the unborn.

Citizen United is now settled law and yet you scream like a child against it and rail on people who criticize roe v wade and ssm. You're a fine example of a hypocrite.

Um, CU's repeal moved our nation much closer to a plutocracy, and oligarchy of the rich and power elite (apples);

Roe and SSM were about rights, restoring rights to citizens, thus a nation of the people, by the people & for the people (oranges).

Rights were taken away from the unborn.

Citizen United is now settled law and yet you scream like a child against it and rail on people who criticize roe v wade and ssm. You're a fine example of a hypocrite.

Um, CU's repeal moved our nation much closer to a plutocracy, and oligarchy of the rich and power elite (apples);

Roe and SSM were about rights, restoring rights to citizens, thus a nation of the people, by the people & for the people (oranges).

Rights were taken away from the unborn.

So you support age appropraite sex education in the public schools, including the use of contraceptives which reduce the likelihood of an unwanted pregnancy and the transmission of STD's.

That's good, now how about the CHIPS Program, where Democrats support health insurance from birth to age 18 for certain families to be extended to all parents of children from birth to age 18. Do you support that too?

What about providing a free public education beginning well before K. and extending to at least grades 13 & 14 (prep. for a University degree or a polytechnical curriculum directed to job in the 21st Century)? Do you support this too?

That's what pragmatic people support, those who can't think support the current iteration of the Republican Party, or default to Libertarian fantasy.

So what banner do you fly, the one with a lighted light bulb, or the one with an ostrich?

BTW, abortion has been around as long as prostitution - get over it and work to make unwanted pregnancy a rare occurrence.

How does one WORK to prevent something that is easily prevented?

Let's first discuss what won't work:

• A "Just say NO!" campaign
• Guilt
• Fear
• Ignorance

Supporing (works toward) an age appropriate sexual education segment as part of a general curriculum focused on each students long term personal responsibility for their own health.

Some topics:

• Nutrition
• Exercise
• Mental Health
• Addiction (tobacco, alcohol, legal and illegal drugs
• Communicable disease, including STD's
• Touching - appropriate and inappropriate
• Sexual Feelings
• How pregnancy occurs
• Prevention of pregnancy (contraceptives)

Damn....this is REALLY difficult...

...for a leftist.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Um, CU's repeal moved our nation much closer to a plutocracy, and oligarchy of the rich and power elite (apples);

Roe and SSM were about rights, restoring rights to citizens, thus a nation of the people, by the people & for the people (oranges).

Rights were taken away from the unborn.

Um, CU's repeal moved our nation much closer to a plutocracy, and oligarchy of the rich and power elite (apples);

Roe and SSM were about rights, restoring rights to citizens, thus a nation of the people, by the people & for the people (oranges).

Rights were taken away from the unborn.

Um, CU's repeal moved our nation much closer to a plutocracy, and oligarchy of the rich and power elite (apples);

Roe and SSM were about rights, restoring rights to citizens, thus a nation of the people, by the people & for the people (oranges).

Rights were taken away from the unborn.

So you support age appropraite sex education in the public schools, including the use of contraceptives which reduce the likelihood of an unwanted pregnancy and the transmission of STD's.

That's good, now how about the CHIPS Program, where Democrats support health insurance from birth to age 18 for certain families to be extended to all parents of children from birth to age 18. Do you support that too?

What about providing a free public education beginning well before K. and extending to at least grades 13 & 14 (prep. for a University degree or a polytechnical curriculum directed to job in the 21st Century)? Do you support this too?

That's what pragmatic people support, those who can't think support the current iteration of the Republican Party, or default to Libertarian fantasy.

So what banner do you fly, the one with a lighted light bulb, or the one with an ostrich?

BTW, abortion has been around as long as prostitution - get over it and work to make unwanted pregnancy a rare occurrence.

How does one WORK to prevent something that is easily prevented?

Let's first discuss what won't work:

• A "Just say NO!" campaign
• Guilt
• Fear
• Ignorance

Supporting (works toward) an age appropriate sexual education segment as part of a general curriculum focused on each students long term personal responsibility for their own health.

Some topics:

• Nutrition
• Exercise
• Mental Health
• Addiction (tobacco, alcohol, legal and illegal drugs
• Communicable disease, including STD's
• Touching - appropriate and inappropriate
• Sexual Feelings
• How pregnancy occurs
• Prevention of pregnancy (contraceptives)

Damn....this is REALLY difficult...

...for a leftist.

You need not try to be glib, you're not smart enough.

 

[Mad Scientist]

#DumpHillarysFatAss

 

[Flash]

Ron Paul always drew enormous crowds when he was campaigning. However, that didn't translate into much in any national level or most of the time even on the state level.

Bernie Sanders may just luck out and get the nomination because The Hildabeast is self destructing.

If he wins the Moon Bat nomination I suspect after the beating the Moon Bats took in 2014 and the fact that he is a far Left lunatic I would be looking for a repeat of the 1972 or 1988 election.

He will get the greedy union vote and the Marxist college professors along with some of their confused students but even as screwed up as this country is now I don't think he has chance in hell of winning.

Blacks are sure not going to turn out for him like they did for their soul brother.

 

[Wry Catcher]

I'm all for Sandeers stance on the screwing of the working Middle Class. There aren't too many economists who would disagree with the factual numbers that show the transfer of wealth upwards.
I even have a couple of friends who where part of the Tea Party movement in it's infant stages who now support Sanders. When the TP used the term "We the People", they thought it was in referece to the working class but in their own words, it meant Big Business and the wealthy.
I know there's a lot of anger at the American system that certainly helps the wealthy and hurts the working class, as facts do show. Sooner or later there will be a huge public reaction to this situation. You can only kick somebody so long before they react.
My problem that I have with Sanders are his positions on abortion and gay marriages.
Would that sway me in a general election? well, that depends on who's on the tickets as I lean towards the center.
I read an interesting article in Forbes that I encourage posters to read @ Forbes.com.
"Does Donald Trump Have A Point"

" In an article on socialism in the Encyclopedia Britannica, Prof. G. D. H. Cole, a leading theoretician and historian of the British Labor Party, declares: The distinction between socialism as distinguished by various Labor and Socialist parties of Europe and the New World, and communism, as represented by the Russians and minority parties in other countries is one of tactics-and-strategy rather than one of objective. Communism is indeed only socialism pursued by revolutionary means and making its revolutionary method a canon of faith...."

In The Communist Manifesto, Marx and Engels stated that communist ends can be attained "only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions."
Manly, "The Twenty Year Revolution"
Books Mises Institute


So....stipulated that you are a socialist.....how about communist?
Do you draw the line at starving 7 million Kulaks?

An easier and straightforward way is to watch "Socialism for Dummies" in the political satire board.

On the issue of "Is Bernie Sanders a socialist?"


He is a Democratic Socialist. It is a type of ideology in the socialist tradition.

By the way, you can you tube Bernie admits he is a socialist and receive several different conversations.

Does that upset you, Wrycatcher? If it does, then you do not understand how Modern liberalism is related to socialism.

To be honest, that is the biggest disconnect the American left has--where some of their ideological roots are.

 

[SillyWabbit]

hillary leads sanders by 40 points; even as left-wing nutjobs have crowned Trump the republican nominee based on his 11-point lead over the closest rival

the Left might as well have Colonel Sanders run

You know I think her poll numbers are crap. With her hate rating AND her distrust rating so high it just does not sound right.

I hope she doesn't turn out to be one of those Presidents who no one knows who voted for her. The only ******* reason she's in the race at all is because some folks feel she's owed it. I'm not sure I'd vote for any of these tools running now, but I damn sure wouldn't vote for Hillary. Oh well, time to take a shit.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

I'm all for Sandeers stance on the screwing of the working Middle Class. There aren't too many economists who would disagree with the factual numbers that show the transfer of wealth upwards.
I even have a couple of friends who where part of the Tea Party movement in it's infant stages who now support Sanders. When the TP used the term "We the People", they thought it was in referece to the working class but in their own words, it meant Big Business and the wealthy.
I know there's a lot of anger at the American system that certainly helps the wealthy and hurts the working class, as facts do show. Sooner or later there will be a huge public reaction to this situation. You can only kick somebody so long before they react.
My problem that I have with Sanders are his positions on abortion and gay marriages.
Would that sway me in a general election? well, that depends on who's on the tickets as I lean towards the center.
I read an interesting article in Forbes that I encourage posters to read @ Forbes.com.
"Does Donald Trump Have A Point"

Thanks for posting a source on Trump, I'll read it if it's on line.

Why would Sen. Sanders opinion on SSM and Abortion impact your vote - both are now settled law?

Citizen United is now settled law and yet you scream like a child against it and rail on people who criticize roe v wade and ssm. You're a fine example of a hypocrite.

Um, CU's repeal moved our nation much closer to a plutocracy, and oligarchy of the rich and power elite (apples);

Roe and SSM were about rights, restoring rights to citizens, thus a nation of the people, by the people & for the people (oranges).

Rights were taken away from the unborn.

I'm all for Sandeers stance on the screwing of the working Middle Class. There aren't too many economists who would disagree with the factual numbers that show the transfer of wealth upwards.
I even have a couple of friends who where part of the Tea Party movement in it's infant stages who now support Sanders. When the TP used the term "We the People", they thought it was in referece to the working class but in their own words, it meant Big Business and the wealthy.
I know there's a lot of anger at the American system that certainly helps the wealthy and hurts the working class, as facts do show. Sooner or later there will be a huge public reaction to this situation. You can only kick somebody so long before they react.
My problem that I have with Sanders are his positions on abortion and gay marriages.
Would that sway me in a general election? well, that depends on who's on the tickets as I lean towards the center.
I read an interesting article in Forbes that I encourage posters to read @ Forbes.com.
"Does Donald Trump Have A Point"

Thanks for posting a source on Trump, I'll read it if it's on line.

Why would Sen. Sanders opinion on SSM and Abortion impact your vote - both are now settled law?

Citizen United is now settled law and yet you scream like a child against it and rail on people who criticize roe v wade and ssm. You're a fine example of a hypocrite.

Um, CU's repeal moved our nation much closer to a plutocracy, and oligarchy of the rich and power elite (apples);

Roe and SSM were about rights, restoring rights to citizens, thus a nation of the people, by the people & for the people (oranges).

Rights were taken away from the unborn.

I'm all for Sandeers stance on the screwing of the working Middle Class. There aren't too many economists who would disagree with the factual numbers that show the transfer of wealth upwards.
I even have a couple of friends who where part of the Tea Party movement in it's infant stages who now support Sanders. When the TP used the term "We the People", they thought it was in referece to the working class but in their own words, it meant Big Business and the wealthy.
I know there's a lot of anger at the American system that certainly helps the wealthy and hurts the working class, as facts do show. Sooner or later there will be a huge public reaction to this situation. You can only kick somebody so long before they react.
My problem that I have with Sanders are his positions on abortion and gay marriages.
Would that sway me in a general election? well, that depends on who's on the tickets as I lean towards the center.
I read an interesting article in Forbes that I encourage posters to read @ Forbes.com.
"Does Donald Trump Have A Point"

Thanks for posting a source on Trump, I'll read it if it's on line.

Why would Sen. Sanders opinion on SSM and Abortion impact your vote - both are now settled law?

Citizen United is now settled law and yet you scream like a child against it and rail on people who criticize roe v wade and ssm. You're a fine example of a hypocrite.

Um, CU's repeal moved our nation much closer to a plutocracy, and oligarchy of the rich and power elite (apples);

Roe and SSM were about rights, restoring rights to citizens, thus a nation of the people, by the people & for the people (oranges).

Rights were taken away from the unborn.

So you support age appropraite sex education in the public schools, including the use of contraceptives which reduce the likelihood of an unwanted pregnancy and the transmission of STD's.

That's good, now how about the CHIPS Program, where Democrats support health insurance from birth to age 18 for certain families to be extended to all parents of children from birth to age 18. Do you support that too?

What about providing a free public education beginning well before K. and extending to at least grades 13 & 14 (prep. for a University degree or a polytechnical curriculum directed to job in the 21st Century)? Do you support this too?

That's what pragmatic people support, those who can't think support the current iteration of the Republican Party, or default to Libertarian fantasy.

So what banner do you fly, the one with a lighted light bulb, or the one with an ostrich?

BTW, abortion has been around as long as prostitution - get over it and work to make unwanted pregnancy a rare occurrence.

Once again, you default to govt induced loving care.....which, in itself, is a fantasy but one that you engage in quite frequently. I have no problem with sex education in schools at age appropriate levels. You can't be arguing that our current free education works. We rank from the middle to the bottom in several categories. That you would be pleased with this degree of mediocrity doesn't surprise me though. Nothing of what you have stated is pragmatic. It's bizarre to actual fact but I guess quite soothing to someone who enjoys digging deep into the cool sand. You should come up for air every now and then to reality.

 

[SillyWabbit]

He FILLED the Portland area, that's right FILLED it. He is drawing bigger crowds than Hillary and his followers are more vocal then Hillary's. Everybody has been saying Trump shot his wad to early but more and more it looks like Hillary is the one suffering from pre-mature election.

"About 19,000 people cheered Sanders in the arena that is home to the NBA's Portland Trail Blazers. The rally had originally been scheduled at Veterans Memorial Coliseum, which has a capacity of about 12,000, but was moved in anticipation of large crowds."

A lot of people on this board have talked about how Obozo has polarized this country including myself. What better proof of that then the rise of Trump and Sanders? The 2016 election COULD prove to be the most decisive and attended and voted election in this country ever.

Bernie Sanders draws large crowd to Portland Oregon arena - Yahoo News

Pretty sad the state of geography knowledge. A number here are confusing Portland, Oregon and Seattle, Washington.

Portland, Maine, anyone?

 

[Wry Catcher]

I'm never upset by the arrogant ignorance coming from the contemporary right wing of the Republican Party, but thanks for your concern Armchaos.

The RED SCARE is nothing new, and is no more a threat to our nation today than it was in the 1950's.

In fact the greater threat our nation faces politically comes from the far right, while you were looking under your bed for a communist, the plutocrats and neo fascists obliterated what was once the model for self government, the democratic republic Mr. Franklin said we had if we could keep it.