Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I believe it was formatting. No big deal. Already done. And in a prior post I’ve now tried to discuss what I think you’re asking.I don't know why it's not working, tried twice....I suggest you google Mulford Act.
But what about the GOP under Reagan AND the NRA eliminating open carry in California?I believe it was formatting. No big deal. Already done. And in a prior post I’ve now tried to discuss what I think you’re asking.
Our usual hostility aside, I would welcome your correction to how I’ve tried to frame what I think you’re asking.
Ok. I’ll bite. Was that the “point” you were attempting to make?But what about the GOP under Reagan AND the NRA eliminating open carry in California?
So what? some states have open carry some do not it is not an onus on ownership.But what about the GOP under Reagan AND the NRA eliminating open carry in California?
It probably will get thrown out by the courts at some point.
But that might take years.
Like abortion rights, shouldn't we let the state decide?
California just enacted a new law which requires gun owners to carry insurance.
San Jose is first U.S. city to mandate gun owners carry insurance and pay a fee — The Mercury News
"The point is we can reduce a lot of harm and tragedy and pain, even if we're not going to magically make a gun fall out of the hands of the crook," said Mayor Sam Liccardo.apple.news
My question is whether this new law will survive a Constitutional challenge.
it is one thing to require licensed drivers and car owners to have insurance, since under the law driving is a privilege and not a right. The privilege is conditioned on insurance in order to register a car.
Having a gun is a guaranteed Constitutional RIGHT. For that reason, I can foresee a very interesting legal dispute over the validity of this new California law.
I already told your partisan hack ass that any freedom supporter does not like the Milford Act. Support for the NRA is seriously waning in favor of the no-compromise Gun Owners of America.But what about the GOP under Reagan AND the NRA eliminating open carry in California?
I already told your partisan hack ass that any freedom supporter does not like the Milford Act. Support for the NRA is seriously waning in favor of the no-compromise Gun Owners of America
You still haven't answered.But what about the GOP under Reagan AND the NRA eliminating open carry in California?
your wasting your time....jones bad mouths people but doesnt have the balls to confront those he is bad mouthing...Once again Adam_Clayton_Asshole;
You can’t even admit when you’re wrong. You are not just a liar and an asshole, but also a very unpersuasive little troll. You retard. You suck ass at your job. Or maybe sucking ass is your job. Either way.
California just enacted a new law which requires gun owners to carry insurance.
Marty! How dare you ask legitimate questions! I’m all shocked and aghast.100% unconstitutional.
Is there even such an insurance in existence, and what is the cost of it on a monthly basis?
So they can give you the right to an abortion but not take it away?State Constitutions can not violate Federal Supremacy which means they must adhere to the US Constitution at minimum. Each State has the authority to expand upon civil rights but not take any away.
The pursuit of happiness.Show me where it says "abortion is a right" in the Constitution. I can show you where RKBA is explicitly listed and given to the people.
We're talking what's Constitutional, Last I checked abortion is not mentioned anywhere in the Constitution.So they can give you the right to an abortion but not take it away?
That's called interpretation.The pursuit of happiness.
