Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yes.[QUOTE ="asara, post: 9945525, member: 19762"]Dear child,Sassy? I guess, but my sassyness was in response to your post, which I viewed as an attempt confuse the facts.Then pay attention to constructive criticism and don't be so sassy in replying to such. Sorry about your mom.Wrong, you arrogant twit. To say "white lesbian couple" is quite enough for any sane person to infer that you're speaking of two white females engaged in an intimate partnership. There is no need to say "same-sex-lesbian-white couple".
This is the least of your problems though. You should retain a tutor for purposes of learning how to write sensibly and correctly.
".... it should of not made any difference"...? Jesus! Why don't you go ask your mommy if you can of a cookie?
Figure that one out, pea brain.
As long as your only argument is as stated, I am happy.
Ask my mother? She is dead, for future reference, I am sure you will need to know so that your personal attacks are accurate. Further I responded on my cell so there could be mistakes, because of such.
Either way, thanks for the help, to be more articulate is my goal.
I guess I did not to reply as such. But a little color don't hurt nothing.
My first post was a simple truth. Same Sex Lesbians is a redundant term. My second post was in response to your sassy reply. All is well. Let's leave it that way.
...and that should have been written....But a little color doesn't hurt anything.......or..... But a little color hurts nothing.
Cheers!
First and foremost, callin me "child", is arrogance.
Second, my last, "poor" writing was me being a troll, you did not catch that?
Third, your desire to focus on my use of the term, lesbian is telling.
The only way homosexuals can further the agenda is to control what can be said, the homosexual activists use terminology that does not describe what they advocate.
They do not want free speech.
Lesbian same-sex couples is redundant?
"Same-sex", means homosexual females?
What are two same-sex homosexual men called?
No.
A lesbian couple consists of two females...by definition...they are same-sex. There is no need to say same sex lesbians. It is redundant.
A gay couple consists of two males...by definition...they are same-sex. There is no need to say same sex gay couple.
If that those are not true, then LGBT cannot mean Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transexual...as it has for YEARS!
Lesbians are homosexual females.
Gays are homosexual males.
Bisexuals can be either sex.
Transexuals started life one way and switched to the other.
Just admit you were redundant and move on.
I care...and more people should care. It is not beside the point. The LGBT front aspires to redefine itself to attain acceptance as part of the "norm"...just as Atheists love to redefine "atheism"...and liberals love to redefine "liberalism". All of the above, LGBT, Atheists, Liberals...are abnormal. Not unacceptable, but abnormal. They just don't have enough sense to admit it and they strive to change it.Yes.[QUOTE ="asara, post: 9945525, member: 19762"]Dear child,Sassy? I guess, but my sassyness was in response to your post, which I viewed as an attempt confuse the facts.Then pay attention to constructive criticism and don't be so sassy in replying to such. Sorry about your mom.
I guess I did not to reply as such. But a little color don't hurt nothing.
My first post was a simple truth. Same Sex Lesbians is a redundant term. My second post was in response to your sassy reply. All is well. Let's leave it that way.
...and that should have been written....But a little color doesn't hurt anything.......or..... But a little color hurts nothing.
Cheers!
First and foremost, callin me "child", is arrogance.
Second, my last, "poor" writing was me being a troll, you did not catch that?
Third, your desire to focus on my use of the term, lesbian is telling.
The only way homosexuals can further the agenda is to control what can be said, the homosexual activists use terminology that does not describe what they advocate.
They do not want free speech.
Lesbian same-sex couples is redundant?
"Same-sex", means homosexual females?
What are two same-sex homosexual men called?
No.
A lesbian couple consists of two females...by definition...they are same-sex. There is no need to say same sex lesbians. It is redundant.
A gay couple consists of two males...by definition...they are same-sex. There is no need to say same sex gay couple.
If that those are not true, then LGBT cannot mean Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transexual...as it has for YEARS!
Lesbians are homosexual females.
Gays are homosexual males.
Bisexuals can be either sex.
Transexuals started life one way and switched to the other.
Just admit you were redundant and move on.
Who cares??? This is besides the point, and according to the LGBT community, there are apparently MANY different genders. Lol. Also, they think there are no genders.
Not only are the confused about their OWN sexuality, but apparently about sexuality and gender in general.
I care...and more people should care. It is not beside the point. The LGBT front aspires to redefine itself to attain acceptance as part of the "norm"...just as Atheists love to redefine "atheism"...and liberals love to redefine "liberalism". All of the above, LGBT, Atheists, Liberals...are abnormal. Not unacceptable, but abnormal. They just don't have enough sense to admit it and they strive to change it.Yes.[QUOTE ="asara, post: 9945525, member: 19762"]Dear child,Sassy? I guess, but my sassyness was in response to your post, which I viewed as an attempt confuse the facts.
I guess I did not to reply as such. But a little color don't hurt nothing.
My first post was a simple truth. Same Sex Lesbians is a redundant term. My second post was in response to your sassy reply. All is well. Let's leave it that way.
...and that should have been written....But a little color doesn't hurt anything.......or..... But a little color hurts nothing.
Cheers!
First and foremost, callin me "child", is arrogance.
Second, my last, "poor" writing was me being a troll, you did not catch that?
Third, your desire to focus on my use of the term, lesbian is telling.
The only way homosexuals can further the agenda is to control what can be said, the homosexual activists use terminology that does not describe what they advocate.
They do not want free speech.
Lesbian same-sex couples is redundant?
"Same-sex", means homosexual females?
What are two same-sex homosexual men called?
No.
A lesbian couple consists of two females...by definition...they are same-sex. There is no need to say same sex lesbians. It is redundant.
A gay couple consists of two males...by definition...they are same-sex. There is no need to say same sex gay couple.
If that those are not true, then LGBT cannot mean Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transexual...as it has for YEARS!
Lesbians are homosexual females.
Gays are homosexual males.
Bisexuals can be either sex.
Transexuals started life one way and switched to the other.
Just admit you were redundant and move on.
Who cares??? This is besides the point, and according to the LGBT community, there are apparently MANY different genders. Lol. Also, they think there are no genders.
Not only are the confused about their OWN sexuality, but apparently about sexuality and gender in general.
How do you come up with such a ridiculous idea, you have serious gender identity problem, huh.So the new conservative consensus is that parents adopting a child are racists if they choose to adopt a child of their own race?
lolol. That's priceless.
Somehow the quotes got screwed up in that post.I care...and more people should care. It is not beside the point. The LGBT front aspires to redefine itself to attain acceptance as part of the "norm"...just as Atheists love to redefine "atheism"...and liberals love to redefine "liberalism". All of the above, LGBT, Atheists, Liberals...are abnormal. Not unacceptable, but abnormal. They just don't have enough sense to admit it and they strive to change it.Yes.[QUOTE ="asara, post: 9945525, member: 19762"]Dear child,Sassy? I guess, but my sassyness was in response to your post, which I viewed as an attempt confuse the facts.
I guess I did not to reply as such. But a little color don't hurt nothing.
My first post was a simple truth. Same Sex Lesbians is a redundant term. My second post was in response to your sassy reply. All is well. Let's leave it that way.
...and that should have been written....But a little color doesn't hurt anything.......or..... But a little color hurts nothing.
Cheers!
First and foremost, callin me "child", is arrogance.
Second, my last, "poor" writing was me being a troll, you did not catch that?
Third, your desire to focus on my use of the term, lesbian is telling.
The only way homosexuals can further the agenda is to control what can be said, the homosexual activists use terminology that does not describe what they advocate.
They do not want free speech.
Lesbian same-sex couples is redundant?
"Same-sex", means homosexual females?
What are two same-sex homosexual men called?
No.
A lesbian couple consists of two females...by definition...they are same-sex. There is no need to say same sex lesbians. It is redundant.
A gay couple consists of two males...by definition...they are same-sex. There is no need to say same sex gay couple.
If that those are not true, then LGBT cannot mean Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transexual...as it has for YEARS!
Lesbians are homosexual females.
Gays are homosexual males.
Bisexuals can be either sex.
Transexuals started life one way and switched to the other.
Just admit you were redundant and move on.
Who cares??? This is besides the point, and according to the LGBT community, there are apparently MANY different genders. Lol. Also, they think there are no genders.
Not only are the confused about their OWN sexuality, but apparently about sexuality and gender in general.
Somehow the quotes got screwed up in that post.I care...and more people should care. It is not beside the point. The LGBT front aspires to redefine itself to attain acceptance as part of the "norm"...just as Atheists love to redefine "atheism"...and liberals love to redefine "liberalism". All of the above, LGBT, Atheists, Liberals...are abnormal. Not unacceptable, but abnormal. They just don't have enough sense to admit it and they strive to change it.Yes.[QUOTE ="asara, post: 9945525, member: 19762"]Dear child,
My first post was a simple truth. Same Sex Lesbians is a redundant term. My second post was in response to your sassy reply. All is well. Let's leave it that way.
...and that should have been written....But a little color doesn't hurt anything.......or..... But a little color hurts nothing.
Cheers!
First and foremost, callin me "child", is arrogance.
Second, my last, "poor" writing was me being a troll, you did not catch that?
Third, your desire to focus on my use of the term, lesbian is telling.
The only way homosexuals can further the agenda is to control what can be said, the homosexual activists use terminology that does not describe what they advocate.
They do not want free speech.
Lesbian same-sex couples is redundant?
"Same-sex", means homosexual females?
What are two same-sex homosexual men called?
No.
A lesbian couple consists of two females...by definition...they are same-sex. There is no need to say same sex lesbians. It is redundant.
A gay couple consists of two males...by definition...they are same-sex. There is no need to say same sex gay couple.
If that those are not true, then LGBT cannot mean Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transexual...as it has for YEARS!
Lesbians are homosexual females.
Gays are homosexual males.
Bisexuals can be either sex.
Transexuals started life one way and switched to the other.
Just admit you were redundant and move on.
Who cares??? This is besides the point, and according to the LGBT community, there are apparently MANY different genders. Lol. Also, they think there are no genders.
Not only are the confused about their OWN sexuality, but apparently about sexuality and gender in general.
The only problem I have is they demand children be taught homosexuality as well as their demand to adopt or buy heterosexual children.Somehow the quotes got screwed up in that post.I care...and more people should care. It is not beside the point. The LGBT front aspires to redefine itself to attain acceptance as part of the "norm"...just as Atheists love to redefine "atheism"...and liberals love to redefine "liberalism". All of the above, LGBT, Atheists, Liberals...are abnormal. Not unacceptable, but abnormal. They just don't have enough sense to admit it and they strive to change it.Yes.[QUOTE ="asara, post: 9945525, member: 19762"]First and foremost, callin me "child", is arrogance.
Second, my last, "poor" writing was me being a troll, you did not catch that?
Third, your desire to focus on my use of the term, lesbian is telling.
The only way homosexuals can further the agenda is to control what can be said, the homosexual activists use terminology that does not describe what they advocate.
They do not want free speech.
Lesbian same-sex couples is redundant?
"Same-sex", means homosexual females?
What are two same-sex homosexual men called?
No.
A lesbian couple consists of two females...by definition...they are same-sex. There is no need to say same sex lesbians. It is redundant.
A gay couple consists of two males...by definition...they are same-sex. There is no need to say same sex gay couple.
If that those are not true, then LGBT cannot mean Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transexual...as it has for YEARS!
Lesbians are homosexual females.
Gays are homosexual males.
Bisexuals can be either sex.
Transexuals started life one way and switched to the other.
Just admit you were redundant and move on.
Who cares??? This is besides the point, and according to the LGBT community, there are apparently MANY different genders. Lol. Also, they think there are no genders.
Not only are the confused about their OWN sexuality, but apparently about sexuality and gender in general.
I don't care how they (LGBT community) want to see themselves, but I grow tired of hearing about their silly ideas about gender and sexuality. Just because they're confused, doesn't mean they need to project it onto the rest of us!
The only problem I have is they demand children be taught homosexuality as well as their demand to adopt or buy heterosexual children.Somehow the quotes got screwed up in that post.I care...and more people should care. It is not beside the point. The LGBT front aspires to redefine itself to attain acceptance as part of the "norm"...just as Atheists love to redefine "atheism"...and liberals love to redefine "liberalism". All of the above, LGBT, Atheists, Liberals...are abnormal. Not unacceptable, but abnormal. They just don't have enough sense to admit it and they strive to change it.Yes.
No.
A lesbian couple consists of two females...by definition...they are same-sex. There is no need to say same sex lesbians. It is redundant.
A gay couple consists of two males...by definition...they are same-sex. There is no need to say same sex gay couple.
If that those are not true, then LGBT cannot mean Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transexual...as it has for YEARS!
Lesbians are homosexual females.
Gays are homosexual males.
Bisexuals can be either sex.
Transexuals started life one way and switched to the other.
Just admit you were redundant and move on.
Who cares??? This is besides the point, and according to the LGBT community, there are apparently MANY different genders. Lol. Also, they think there are no genders.
Not only are the confused about their OWN sexuality, but apparently about sexuality and gender in general.
I don't care how they (LGBT community) want to see themselves, but I grow tired of hearing about their silly ideas about gender and sexuality. Just because they're confused, doesn't mean they need to project it onto the rest of us!
No civil rights for children, as in the OP.
Children need teaching, they learn much from parents, from a mother and a father. As far as a child's sexuality that is a not really a point to consider, not for me, I am only concerned with what kids want.The only problem I have is they demand children be taught homosexuality as well as their demand to adopt or buy heterosexual children.Somehow the quotes got screwed up in that post.I care...and more people should care. It is not beside the point. The LGBT front aspires to redefine itself to attain acceptance as part of the "norm"...just as Atheists love to redefine "atheism"...and liberals love to redefine "liberalism". All of the above, LGBT, Atheists, Liberals...are abnormal. Not unacceptable, but abnormal. They just don't have enough sense to admit it and they strive to change it.Who cares??? This is besides the point, and according to the LGBT community, there are apparently MANY different genders. Lol. Also, they think there are no genders.
Not only are the confused about their OWN sexuality, but apparently about sexuality and gender in general.
I don't care how they (LGBT community) want to see themselves, but I grow tired of hearing about their silly ideas about gender and sexuality. Just because they're confused, doesn't mean they need to project it onto the rest of us!
No civil rights for children, as in the OP.
I don't think it's right that they try to confuse the children that way either. Children are impressionable!
I don't know as if we can determine whether or not babies/children are heterosexual/homosexual or not though, as I don't think they've a matured sense of even who they are yet, never mind their sexuality.
