S.C. school brat told friends before cop encounter: "Get yall phones out". She did it purposely.

[jknowgood]

Yeah don't' discipline her, maybe she will end up like the gentle giant. What the hell is wrong with you people?

Do you view what the cop did as mere discipline? What is wrong with you? Are all Conservatives just brutes?

No one deserves to be treated as that student was treated. She was not armed, she posed no threat. But flinging her to the floor by th neck is what you see as professional behavior by the cop in school and an acceptable form of discipline!

What the hell is wrong with you people?

They say other videos are out and when the cop touched her. She smacked him, if that is true she got what she deserved. Gangs in south Carolina are trying to recruit in our schools. **** them, we don't want to have the problem big cities have.

So you are not only satisfied with lowering the bar of comportment, but you encourage it. Where are the adults in your state? Where are your civic ethics?

We don't want a bunch of thugs walking around down here. Like the liberal shit holes like baltimore.

So your thugs wear badges?

No, they act like that girl did.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Again you lie. She was dragged not thrown across the room.

Just another lying ass Marxist.

Lets take a look:
Deputy Ben Fields throws Spring Valley High School girl ...

Dragged, then thrown. JimBowie1958 is intentionally being obtuse.

 

[Nosmo King]

Do you view what the cop did as mere discipline? What is wrong with you? Are all Conservatives just brutes?

No one deserves to be treated as that student was treated. She was not armed, she posed no threat. But flinging her to the floor by th neck is what you see as professional behavior by the cop in school and an acceptable form of discipline!

What the hell is wrong with you people?

They say other videos are out and when the cop touched her. She smacked him, if that is true she got what she deserved. Gangs in south Carolina are trying to recruit in our schools. **** them, we don't want to have the problem big cities have.

So you are not only satisfied with lowering the bar of comportment, but you encourage it. Where are the adults in your state? Where are your civic ethics?

We don't want a bunch of thugs walking around down here. Like the liberal shit holes like baltimore.

So your thugs wear badges?

No, they act like that girl did.

No. No they don't. The girl was not violent. The girl was a victim of a rogue cop with a massive chip on his shoulder. A cop who failed in his duty and his behavior.

Can it be that there are just lousy cops? Can it be that cops use their power in an abusive manner? Can cops be wrong? Or is it just easier to blame the victims of police brutality? Is that an easier rationalization for you to make?

 

[bucs90]

They say other videos are out and when the cop touched her. She smacked him, if that is true she got what she deserved. Gangs in south Carolina are trying to recruit in our schools. **** them, we don't want to have the problem big cities have.

So you are not only satisfied with lowering the bar of comportment, but you encourage it. Where are the adults in your state? Where are your civic ethics?

We don't want a bunch of thugs walking around down here. Like the liberal shit holes like baltimore.

So your thugs wear badges?

No, they act like that girl did.

No. No they don't. The girl was not violent. The girl was a victim of a rogue cop with a massive chip on his shoulder. A cop who failed in his duty and his behavior.

Can it be that there are just lousy cops? Can it be that cops use their power in an abusive manner? Can cops be wrong? Or is it just easier to blame the victims of police brutality? Is that an easier rationalization for you to make?

When she started resisting and trying to punch...she brought the toss on herself.

 

[LoneLaugher]

And this is the culture that has so deeply infected the "black community": A child who refuses to do what she's told multiple times is the hero. The decay continues. American Blacks continue to be victimized by those who claim to "care".
.

You nailed it. And by creating an atmosphere where it is impossible to learn in chaotic class rooms the hopes of blacks to succeed are destroyed.

Worst of all, these people know it. They're not stupid. And they don't care. They're willing to sacrifice American Blacks, especially their kids, for political advantage.
.

You and Jm Bowie. Two peas in a pod.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Can I ask a serious question...why do you pretend she was not thrown when you have seen the same videos and gif s I have seen that show the Gorilla tossing the child ...why do you do such hopeless lying ? do you actually somehow believe she was not thrown ? you do not trust your eyes is that it...

Every video I have seen the girl was dragged. Maybe we are talking about two different incidents?

Maybe you are just a pathological liar?

You are just a stubborn lying **** head look at the ******* video asshole

Not lying at all, the cop did not throw that thug one foot, much less across the god damned room, you lying baboon.

He threw the young lady. It's plain to see. Take a poll on it. Ya ******* dishonest shit.

 

[ClosedCaption]

They want us all to believe that this guy got the name Officer Slam for no reason.

 

[Nosmo King]

So you are not only satisfied with lowering the bar of comportment, but you encourage it. Where are the adults in your state? Where are your civic ethics?

We don't want a bunch of thugs walking around down here. Like the liberal shit holes like baltimore.

So your thugs wear badges?

No, they act like that girl did.

No. No they don't. The girl was not violent. The girl was a victim of a rogue cop with a massive chip on his shoulder. A cop who failed in his duty and his behavior.

Can it be that there are just lousy cops? Can it be that cops use their power in an abusive manner? Can cops be wrong? Or is it just easier to blame the victims of police brutality? Is that an easier rationalization for you to make?

When she started resisting and trying to punch...she brought the toss on herself.

In the video I watched, it looks as if she punched the cop's hand with her throat.

Are cops in school supposed to meet out beatings in the guise of discipline?

 

[bucs90]

We don't want a bunch of thugs walking around down here. Like the liberal shit holes like baltimore.

So your thugs wear badges?

No, they act like that girl did.

No. No they don't. The girl was not violent. The girl was a victim of a rogue cop with a massive chip on his shoulder. A cop who failed in his duty and his behavior.

Can it be that there are just lousy cops? Can it be that cops use their power in an abusive manner? Can cops be wrong? Or is it just easier to blame the victims of police brutality? Is that an easier rationalization for you to make?

When she started resisting and trying to punch...she brought the toss on herself.

In the video I watched, it looks as if she punched the cop's hand with her throat.

Are cops in school supposed to meet out beatings in the guise of discipline?

Right hand. She punched his upper chest trying to hit his face.

Who got beaten?? I never saw him strike her. In fact....she was completely uninjured....UNTIL 2 days later when the NAACP got her a lawyer and told her "Yo...you need to be hurt."

 

[sealybobo]

I hope she's going to get in trouble too or is she now the victim?

In this case she is, and she has the injuries to prove it apparently.

I mean being charged and suspended. She resisted arrest and there was a reason they called a cop. Being roughed up when being arrested isn't the punishment for the crime you committed

She wasn't under arrest, and the cop worked the school for a living, supposedly there to protect the kids but obviously not.

Do you people ever read up on this crap first?

No I get it. I'm not the type of person who can't see both sides of an argument. I totally get it. Someone with that temper maybe shouldn't be a school cop. BUT, maybe someone like that should be. And maybe we should have come down hard on the kid and send a message that you must respect the law. I think we sent the wrong message. I'm a liberal and I'm even sick of PC.

So she should get suspended or expelled. Look at what she caused. Yes, she started all this. Don't forget that. Your parents spanked you so you don't run in front of a car or touch the iron. She deserved some rug burns. Yea it was startling but that's what happens when a cop takes you down. It's not nice. Its not meant to be. Do what the officer says.

 

[sealybobo]

I hope she's going to get in trouble too or is she now the victim?

In this case she is, and she has the injuries to prove it apparently.

I mean being charged and suspended. She resisted arrest and there was a reason they called a cop. Being roughed up when being arrested isn't the punishment for the crime you committed

There is no evidence to indicate Officer Slam was there to make an arrest or that the student knew she was being arrested. In her mind Officer Slam was just doing the bidding of the teacher and administrator. Neither the administrator nor Officer Slam informed her that the situation was transitioning from an administrative to a legal situation.

If what he did wasn't proper protocol, that's a different thing. Then he should get suspended or expelled too. But so should she. And her family shouldn't be able to sue for a dime. She started it.

If kids don't have to respect authority, screw it. I'm getting a gun and a ccw permit asap.

 

[sealybobo]

Hey, you dumbassed POS, Kenny was NOT the girl the pig attacked. She was a witness to the pig's assault.

Lies like this OP are why the Right are the scum of the Earth!!!

She was a witness to the little ***** planning on defying the law.

The "planning" is nothing but another lie from the worthless lying scum on the Right.

The SUPREME COURT has ruled that taking video of police is a constitutional right. The girl had a constitutional right to tell other students to video Officer Slam and to video him herself.

Did she have a right to refuse the rightful order of a police officer? Seems many on here believe she did.

All of us have a right to question what appears to us to be an unlawful order from a police officer. That is why a specific protocol and procedure is used when making an arrest. Failure to follow those procedures and protocol and specified in numerous SCOTUS rulings can, and do leading to invalidating an arrest.

I mean being charged and suspended. She resisted arrest and there was a reason they called a cop. Being roughed up when being arrested isn't the punishment for the crime you committed

There is no evidence to indicate Officer Slam was there to make an arrest or that the student knew she was being arrested. In her mind Officer Slam was just doing the bidding of the teacher and administrator. Neither the administrator nor Officer Slam informed her that the situation was transitioning from an administrative to a legal situation.

Actually, there is . It doesn't matter what she thought. I matters what he was there to do and that was to arrest her under SC Code of Laws 17-16-420. It's called disturbing school.

You say there is no evidence to indicate she was being arrested but you've determined she wasn't informed of the situation transitioning. The sad thing is that you make that claim, get this, without evidence.

There is no evidence or even claim that the officer was there to make an arrest. The decision to charge the students with a crime was made after the incident. The evidence to this is the video and again, the fact that the claim of a warning of an arrest was not claimed.

There is no evidence of your claim they didn't inform her. You're saying they didn't do something you can't prove they didn't do.

You are claiming the student disregarded Officer Slam and is thus, guilty of a crime. In America even racist people like you have to live with a simple American constitutional right that demands a person, even a black teenager, is innocent until proven guilty. She nor anyone else has to prove her innocence, you and the other racist attacking her have to prove her guilt. So far no legal authority is even attempting to make the claims you are attempting to make.

If she gets off this time we will just wait for her to commit another crime down the road just like we did with OJ and just like we will do with George Zimmerman when he eventually snaps again.

 

[sealybobo]

The cause doesn't matter a damn. We weren't paying him to throw teenage girls across the floor, and now we aren't paying him because he did.

Again you lie. She was dragged not thrown across the room.

Just another lying ass Marxist.

She was manhandled. If I were the cop on duty, I would have done the same thing. Shown those kids not to mess with the law. Maybe he went a little farther than I would have but that's why he is losing his job. He did go A LITTLE too far. Not much though.

But I would be nice as hell to the students behaving themselves. I would be their friend. If he wasn't that kind of cop, he shouldn't be in schools. Maybe a prison guard though.

 

[Camp]

She was a witness to the little ***** planning on defying the law.

The "planning" is nothing but another lie from the worthless lying scum on the Right.

The SUPREME COURT has ruled that taking video of police is a constitutional right. The girl had a constitutional right to tell other students to video Officer Slam and to video him herself.

Did she have a right to refuse the rightful order of a police officer? Seems many on here believe she did.

All of us have a right to question what appears to us to be an unlawful order from a police officer. That is why a specific protocol and procedure is used when making an arrest. Failure to follow those procedures and protocol and specified in numerous SCOTUS rulings can, and do leading to invalidating an arrest.

There is no evidence to indicate Officer Slam was there to make an arrest or that the student knew she was being arrested. In her mind Officer Slam was just doing the bidding of the teacher and administrator. Neither the administrator nor Officer Slam informed her that the situation was transitioning from an administrative to a legal situation.

Actually, there is . It doesn't matter what she thought. I matters what he was there to do and that was to arrest her under SC Code of Laws 17-16-420. It's called disturbing school.

You say there is no evidence to indicate she was being arrested but you've determined she wasn't informed of the situation transitioning. The sad thing is that you make that claim, get this, without evidence.

There is no evidence or even claim that the officer was there to make an arrest. The decision to charge the students with a crime was made after the incident. The evidence to this is the video and again, the fact that the claim of a warning of an arrest was not claimed.

There is no evidence of your claim they didn't inform her. You're saying they didn't do something you can't prove they didn't do.

You are claiming the student disregarded Officer Slam and is thus, guilty of a crime. In America even racist people like you have to live with a simple American constitutional right that demands a person, even a black teenager, is innocent until proven guilty. She nor anyone else has to prove her innocence, you and the other racist attacking her have to prove her guilt. So far no legal authority is even attempting to make the claims you are attempting to make.

If she gets off this time we will just wait for her to commit another crime down the road just like we did with OJ and just like we will do with George Zimmerman when he eventually snaps again.

There is a major difference. OJ and Zimmerman were adults and the student in question is still a youth and at the age where she can be helped and taught. You are comparing grown adult men to a teenage girls, and what appears to be an immature and confused one. With adults we take an attitude that they need to be punished or removed from society for safety. That doesn't always happen, but we rarely take that position with children, even teenage ones. Our position with kids is that they need education and rehab and professional help before the reach the age of adulthood. The racist jerks commenting here don't want that kind of treatment given to the the teenage girl who happens to be a black child.

 

[bucs90]

The "planning" is nothing but another lie from the worthless lying scum on the Right.

The SUPREME COURT has ruled that taking video of police is a constitutional right. The girl had a constitutional right to tell other students to video Officer Slam and to video him herself.

Did she have a right to refuse the rightful order of a police officer? Seems many on here believe she did.

All of us have a right to question what appears to us to be an unlawful order from a police officer. That is why a specific protocol and procedure is used when making an arrest. Failure to follow those procedures and protocol and specified in numerous SCOTUS rulings can, and do leading to invalidating an arrest.

Actually, there is . It doesn't matter what she thought. I matters what he was there to do and that was to arrest her under SC Code of Laws 17-16-420. It's called disturbing school.

You say there is no evidence to indicate she was being arrested but you've determined she wasn't informed of the situation transitioning. The sad thing is that you make that claim, get this, without evidence.

There is no evidence or even claim that the officer was there to make an arrest. The decision to charge the students with a crime was made after the incident. The evidence to this is the video and again, the fact that the claim of a warning of an arrest was not claimed.

There is no evidence of your claim they didn't inform her. You're saying they didn't do something you can't prove they didn't do.

You are claiming the student disregarded Officer Slam and is thus, guilty of a crime. In America even racist people like you have to live with a simple American constitutional right that demands a person, even a black teenager, is innocent until proven guilty. She nor anyone else has to prove her innocence, you and the other racist attacking her have to prove her guilt. So far no legal authority is even attempting to make the claims you are attempting to make.

If she gets off this time we will just wait for her to commit another crime down the road just like we did with OJ and just like we will do with George Zimmerman when he eventually snaps again.

There is a major difference. OJ and Zimmerman were adults and the student in question is still a youth and at the age where she can be helped and taught. You are comparing grown adult men to a teenage girls, and what appears to be an immature and confused one. With adults we take an attitude that they need to be punished or removed from society for safety. That doesn't always happen, but we rarely take that position with children, even teenage ones. Our position with kids is that they need education and rehab and professional help before the reach the age of adulthood. The racist jerks commenting here don't want that kind of treatment given to the the teenage girl who happens to be a black child.

Wasn't she 18?? If she was 10...hell yes it would be 100% wrong.

 

[Asclepias]

So your thugs wear badges?

No, they act like that girl did.

No. No they don't. The girl was not violent. The girl was a victim of a rogue cop with a massive chip on his shoulder. A cop who failed in his duty and his behavior.

Can it be that there are just lousy cops? Can it be that cops use their power in an abusive manner? Can cops be wrong? Or is it just easier to blame the victims of police brutality? Is that an easier rationalization for you to make?

When she started resisting and trying to punch...she brought the toss on herself.

In the video I watched, it looks as if she punched the cop's hand with her throat.

Are cops in school supposed to meet out beatings in the guise of discipline?

Right hand. She punched his upper chest trying to hit his face.

Who got beaten?? I never saw him strike her. In fact....she was completely uninjured....UNTIL 2 days later when the NAACP got her a lawyer and told her "Yo...you need to be hurt."

Thats what happens when someone attempts to put you in a choke hold. You defend yourself. Looks like the teenage girl was braver than the feral chimp that lost his job for being a chimp about the situation.

 

[Asclepias]

The SUPREME COURT has ruled that taking video of police is a constitutional right. The girl had a constitutional right to tell other students to video Officer Slam and to video him herself.

Did she have a right to refuse the rightful order of a police officer? Seems many on here believe she did.

All of us have a right to question what appears to us to be an unlawful order from a police officer. That is why a specific protocol and procedure is used when making an arrest. Failure to follow those procedures and protocol and specified in numerous SCOTUS rulings can, and do leading to invalidating an arrest.

There is no evidence or even claim that the officer was there to make an arrest. The decision to charge the students with a crime was made after the incident. The evidence to this is the video and again, the fact that the claim of a warning of an arrest was not claimed.

There is no evidence of your claim they didn't inform her. You're saying they didn't do something you can't prove they didn't do.

You are claiming the student disregarded Officer Slam and is thus, guilty of a crime. In America even racist people like you have to live with a simple American constitutional right that demands a person, even a black teenager, is innocent until proven guilty. She nor anyone else has to prove her innocence, you and the other racist attacking her have to prove her guilt. So far no legal authority is even attempting to make the claims you are attempting to make.

If she gets off this time we will just wait for her to commit another crime down the road just like we did with OJ and just like we will do with George Zimmerman when he eventually snaps again.

There is a major difference. OJ and Zimmerman were adults and the student in question is still a youth and at the age where she can be helped and taught. You are comparing grown adult men to a teenage girls, and what appears to be an immature and confused one. With adults we take an attitude that they need to be punished or removed from society for safety. That doesn't always happen, but we rarely take that position with children, even teenage ones. Our position with kids is that they need education and rehab and professional help before the reach the age of adulthood. The racist jerks commenting here don't want that kind of treatment given to the the teenage girl who happens to be a black child.

Wasn't she 18?? If she was 10...hell yes it would be 100% wrong.

No stupid. She was 16. Even if she was 18 it doesnt make a difference.

 

[Skylar]

The SUPREME COURT has ruled that taking video of police is a constitutional right. The girl had a constitutional right to tell other students to video Officer Slam and to video him herself.

Did she have a right to refuse the rightful order of a police officer? Seems many on here believe she did.

All of us have a right to question what appears to us to be an unlawful order from a police officer. That is why a specific protocol and procedure is used when making an arrest. Failure to follow those procedures and protocol and specified in numerous SCOTUS rulings can, and do leading to invalidating an arrest.

There is no evidence or even claim that the officer was there to make an arrest. The decision to charge the students with a crime was made after the incident. The evidence to this is the video and again, the fact that the claim of a warning of an arrest was not claimed.

There is no evidence of your claim they didn't inform her. You're saying they didn't do something you can't prove they didn't do.

You are claiming the student disregarded Officer Slam and is thus, guilty of a crime. In America even racist people like you have to live with a simple American constitutional right that demands a person, even a black teenager, is innocent until proven guilty. She nor anyone else has to prove her innocence, you and the other racist attacking her have to prove her guilt. So far no legal authority is even attempting to make the claims you are attempting to make.

If she gets off this time we will just wait for her to commit another crime down the road just like we did with OJ and just like we will do with George Zimmerman when he eventually snaps again.

There is a major difference. OJ and Zimmerman were adults and the student in question is still a youth and at the age where she can be helped and taught. You are comparing grown adult men to a teenage girls, and what appears to be an immature and confused one. With adults we take an attitude that they need to be punished or removed from society for safety. That doesn't always happen, but we rarely take that position with children, even teenage ones. Our position with kids is that they need education and rehab and professional help before the reach the age of adulthood. The racist jerks commenting here don't want that kind of treatment given to the the teenage girl who happens to be a black child.

Wasn't she 18?? If she was 10...hell yes it would be 100% wrong.

Niya Kenny, the girl you mistook for the one in the video is 18. The girl being dragged and tossed about is a minor. Which is why her name hasn't been released by the police or school.

 

[sealybobo]

The "planning" is nothing but another lie from the worthless lying scum on the Right.

The SUPREME COURT has ruled that taking video of police is a constitutional right. The girl had a constitutional right to tell other students to video Officer Slam and to video him herself.

Did she have a right to refuse the rightful order of a police officer? Seems many on here believe she did.

All of us have a right to question what appears to us to be an unlawful order from a police officer. That is why a specific protocol and procedure is used when making an arrest. Failure to follow those procedures and protocol and specified in numerous SCOTUS rulings can, and do leading to invalidating an arrest.

Actually, there is . It doesn't matter what she thought. I matters what he was there to do and that was to arrest her under SC Code of Laws 17-16-420. It's called disturbing school.

You say there is no evidence to indicate she was being arrested but you've determined she wasn't informed of the situation transitioning. The sad thing is that you make that claim, get this, without evidence.

There is no evidence or even claim that the officer was there to make an arrest. The decision to charge the students with a crime was made after the incident. The evidence to this is the video and again, the fact that the claim of a warning of an arrest was not claimed.

There is no evidence of your claim they didn't inform her. You're saying they didn't do something you can't prove they didn't do.

You are claiming the student disregarded Officer Slam and is thus, guilty of a crime. In America even racist people like you have to live with a simple American constitutional right that demands a person, even a black teenager, is innocent until proven guilty. She nor anyone else has to prove her innocence, you and the other racist attacking her have to prove her guilt. So far no legal authority is even attempting to make the claims you are attempting to make.

If she gets off this time we will just wait for her to commit another crime down the road just like we did with OJ and just like we will do with George Zimmerman when he eventually snaps again.

There is a major difference. OJ and Zimmerman were adults and the student in question is still a youth and at the age where she can be helped and taught. You are comparing grown adult men to a teenage girls, and what appears to be an immature and confused one. With adults we take an attitude that they need to be punished or removed from society for safety. That doesn't always happen, but we rarely take that position with children, even teenage ones. Our position with kids is that they need education and rehab and professional help before the reach the age of adulthood. The racist jerks commenting here don't want that kind of treatment given to the the teenage girl who happens to be a black child.

They all need to learn respect. I wonder how many of the kids in that class would have disrespected that cop and how many would not. When I was a kid, I would have done what the cop asked. For fear of him and my parents.

 

[Nosmo King]

So your thugs wear badges?

No, they act like that girl did.

No. No they don't. The girl was not violent. The girl was a victim of a rogue cop with a massive chip on his shoulder. A cop who failed in his duty and his behavior.

Can it be that there are just lousy cops? Can it be that cops use their power in an abusive manner? Can cops be wrong? Or is it just easier to blame the victims of police brutality? Is that an easier rationalization for you to make?

When she started resisting and trying to punch...she brought the toss on herself.

In the video I watched, it looks as if she punched the cop's hand with her throat.

Are cops in school supposed to meet out beatings in the guise of discipline?

Right hand. She punched his upper chest trying to hit his face.

Who got beaten?? I never saw him strike her. In fact....she was completely uninjured....UNTIL 2 days later when the NAACP got her a lawyer and told her "Yo...you need to be hurt."

Ah! She tried to punch him AS HE GRABBEDHER BY THE THROAT! Well, I would have to abandon everything I and our society thinks about police brutality to believe SHE initiated the physical situation.