Rx for the Democrats

[martybegan]

More data...

The only two female presidential candidates in history -- both of whom were eminently qualified -- both lost to the reality TV show host pig of a man ranked by historians as the worst president in history.

The one man who ran against him -- the milquetoast Joe Biden -- smashed him by getting the most votes in the history of anything.

They were both hard lefty asshats.

And when the final tally is in for 2024, we may have questions about the number of votes in 2020.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

They were both hard lefty asshats.

That's of course false and absurd.

You would say the same thing about any Democrat, including the one that smashed the orange rapist by 7 million votes just a few years ago.

 

[martybegan]

That's of course false and absurd.

You would say the same thing about any Democrat, including the one that smashed the orange rapist by 7 million votes just a few years ago.

Biden was an empty shell by then.

Bill Clinton was a Pragmatist.

Obama was lefty, but not as bad as Hillary or Harris.

 

[midcan5]

The problem the democrats have is they are not mean enough. What do I mean. Trump is a convicted rapist- did you ever hear that during the election? He is a tax cheat... Nah...

He is a draft dodger? Same question? He lies constantly? etc etc etc Instead the democrats assumed Americans were educated noble people with values. Huh! Of course not - Americans especially in certain areas of the country simply hate the other. The other may be nationality, ethnicity, religion etc etc etc

The republicans had Fox among other biased, bigoted, so called news sources. Many love someone to hate, people of mixed heritage fit the bill. And a woman too. You know she'd lose like Hillary. Wake up Dems.


'A Federal Judge Has Gone to Great Lengths to Make Clear Trump Really Did Rape E. Jean Carroll

A federal judge has gone to great lengths to make clear Trump really did rape E. Jean Carroll

Why state-level legal minutiae impacts what words are used to describe the former president's criminal conduct.

www.motherjones.com

 

[martybegan]

The problem the democrats have is they are not mean enough. What do I mean. Trump is a convicted rapist- did you ever hear that during the election? He is a tax cheat... Nah...

He is a draft dodger? Same question? He lies constantly? etc etc etc Instead the democrats assumed Americans were educated noble people with values. Huh! Of course not - Americans especially in certain areas of the country simply hate the other. The other may be nationality, ethnicity, religion etc etc etc

The republicans had Fox among other biased, bigoted, so called news sources. Many love someone to hate, people of mixed heritage fit the bill. And a woman too. You know she'd lose like Hillary. Wake up Dems.


'A Federal Judge Has Gone to Great Lengths to Make Clear Trump Really Did Rape E. Jean Carroll

A federal judge has gone to great lengths to make clear Trump really did rape E. Jean Carroll

Why state-level legal minutiae impacts what words are used to describe the former president's criminal conduct.

www.motherjones.com

You morons still don't get that people see all of this as a lawfare dog pile.

That, and you still refuse to debate topics on the merits, and just default to calling people, racist, sexists, homophobic, transphobic, etc etc etc.

 

[dblack]

The problem the democrats have is they are not mean enough. What do I mean.

Beats me.

Trump is a convicted rapist- did you ever hear that during the election? He is a tax cheat... Nah...

Only over and over and over again. In fact, that's really the only kind of thing either party has - just fear mongering about the "other" side.

We fall for it, so that's all they bother with.

 

[Mac-7]

The problem the democrats have is they are not mean enough. What do I mean. Trump is a convicted rapist- did you ever hear that during the election? He is a tax cheat... Nah...

He is a draft dodger? Same question? He lies constantly? etc etc etc Instead the democrats assumed Americans were educated noble people with values. Huh! Of course not - Americans especially in certain areas of the country simply hate the other. The other may be nationality, ethnicity, religion etc etc etc

The republicans had Fox among other biased, bigoted, so called news sources. Many love someone to hate, people of mixed heritage fit the bill. And a woman too. You know she'd lose like Hillary. Wake up Dems.


'A Federal Judge Has Gone to Great Lengths to Make Clear Trump Really Did Rape E. Jean Carroll

A federal judge has gone to great lengths to make clear Trump really did rape E. Jean Carroll

Why state-level legal minutiae impacts what words are used to describe the former president's criminal conduct.

www.motherjones.com

The alleged rape was 20 years ago and based only on the woman’s say so

It never should have gone to trial

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The alleged rape was 20 years ago and based only on the woman’s say so

It never should have gone to trial

It's almost as if you have no education or experience in any relevant field and have no idea what you are talking about, while judges do.

 

[martybegan]

It's almost as if you have no education or experience in any relevant field and have no idea what you are talking about, while judges do.

Appeal to authority.

And judges can be biased, as these clods were.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Appeal to authority.

And judges can be biased, as these clods were.

Yes, appeal to authority is sometimes valid.

Like when some idiot who barely passed high school science denies climate science.

Appeal to authority correctly leads us to reject the moron's claims prima facie.

As is happening here. And in reality. Go check. The fat orange charity thief is now a rapist as a matter of public record, and he has a huge check to write.

And you of course could not argue bias on the part of the judge if your life depended on it.

Don't worry. Trump's DOJ lawyers couldn't, either.

 

[Mac-7]

It's almost as if you have no education or experience in any relevant field and have no idea what you are talking about, while judges do.

Many judges are dumb as dirt in spite of their impressive diplomas on the wall

I remember a case where DNA testing proved that the 5 or 6 children he was paying child support for were not his

The judge said nevermind he has to pay for them till they are 18 anyway

Thats an insane ruling that only an idiot could make

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Many judges are dumb as dirt in spite of their impressive diplomas on the wall

Name 5 and explain why, for each. See you in never.

This is all vapid chin wagging. Just shit you are making up as you go, like a child fudging his way through a book report for a book he never read.

 

[Mac-7]

Name 5 and explain why, for each. See you in never.

This is all vapid chin wagging. Just shit you are making up as you go, like a child fudging his way through a book report for a book he never read.

I’m not going to play Go Fetch with you

 

[martybegan]

Yes, appeal to authority is sometimes valid.

Like when some idiot who barely passed high school science denies climate science.

Appeal to authority correctly leads us to reject the moron's claims prima facie.

As is happening here. And in reality. Go check. The fat orange charity thief is now a rapist as a matter of public record, and he has a huge check to write.

And you of course could not argue bias on the part of the judge if your life depended on it.

Don't worry. Trump's DOJ lawyers couldn't, either.

No, it gives you an excuse to not actually think for yourself and instead latch on to some hack's viewpoint.

All that work on lawfare, and he still won. That must put sand in your vagina.

The appeals court will sort it out, in all of these cases. They now know the people aren't falling for it anymore.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Many judges are dumb as dirt in spite of their impressive diplomas on the wall

I remember a case where DNA testing proved that the 5 or 6 children he was paying child support for were not his

The judge said nevermind he has to pay for them till they are 18 anyway

Thats an insane ruling that only an idiot could make

You do raise an interesting idea that's probably for another thread.

Do we have a problem with incompetent judges being appointed for all the wrong reasons?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I’m not going to play Go Fetch with you

I wasn't expecting you to do so. I know you couldn't name 1 and say why, if your life depended on it. Me neither. Well, maybe one somewhat obvious one.

 

[marvin martian]

Why Democrats must seriously reconsider the progressive strategy

The Democratic Party’s obsession with “woke” culture is not just a distraction — it’s a strategic error. It alienates moderates, especially in battleground states, and pushes voters into the arms of a party that promises cultural conservatism as a bulwark against a changing society.

But these voters don’t just want a return to traditionalism — they want answers. They want jobs, affordable housing, and a sense that the government is looking out for them. When they don’t get that from the left, they turn to a right-wing party that at least gives them something to rally behind, even if it’s rooted in fear and division.

And you still voted for them

 

[marvin martian]

The Republicans don't have answers for jobs or affordable housing. Kind of seem like you're just complaining that a majority of Americans prefer bigotry.

Says the KKK supporter.

 

[Mac-7]

You do raise an interesting idea that's probably for another thread.

Do we have a problem with incompetent judges being appointed for all the wrong reasons?

Many local judges are elected and often due to voter apathy stay on the bench for decades no matter how bad they are

 

[dblack]

Democrats won't learn anything from this election, just like they didn't learn anything from 2016, because there's no need. People will get sick of Trump and the Republicans, and the Dems will get their turn once again. Wash, rinse, repeat.

The duopoly is a power sharing arrangement between two corrupt, entrenched parties. Each party is happy to "lose" every term or two, as long as their retain their privileged position. There's no need for them to offer competent leadership. As long as they block out any real competition, they can keep their charade up and running. The question is, how long will we keep falling for it?