Russia Will Nuke Germany & the UK if Ukraine War Continues


The big rat in the woodpile is that there is such a thing as the "exchange rate".

"If we trade with ourselves, we have the money and the goods." A. Lincoln
Yes I know what an exchange rate is, the dollar's has dropped by 10% so we get less for a dollar than we used to.
 
They consume less because they have far less money to spend per capita.
Americans don't have any money, they owe it all to other countries who have lent money.
It isn’t about being greedy, it is about affluence. Many of the left in this country don’t even realize that they are affluent relative to many/most other countries. They figure that not having the most recent iPhone is evidence of being poor.
That "affluence" is based on debt, the US (American people) owe 38 trillion dollars, I wouldn't personally call that affluence, perhaps living high on the hog? or sponger?
 
Americans don't have any money, they owe it all to other countries who have lent money.

That "affluence" is based on debt, the US (American people) owe 38 trillion dollars, I wouldn't personally call that affluence, perhaps living high on the hog? or sponger?

We aren’t talking about government debt here. Most countries have that. We are talking about how much money a person has to spend every month. Our taxes are generally lower, our salaries are generally higher and the cost of products relative to income is generally lower in the US than in Europe or Socialists countries. I know that I live better in the US than I would in any Socialist country unless I was a member of the elite class.
 
We aren’t talking about government debt here. Most countries have that. We are talking about how much money a person has to spend every month. Our taxes are generally lower, our salaries are generally higher and the cost of products relative to income is generally lower in the US than in Europe or Socialists countries. I know that I live better in the US than I would in any Socialist country unless I was a member of the elite class.
Americans pay far more for health care than any other country, so that eats into this supposed higher wages. So that's one product that is very costly.

Socialism pertains to state ownership of a nations industries. The UK for example, its' health service is government owned, every prescription costs about 10 dollars, fixed, no matter what the medicine is.

Socialism is intelligent use of resources, USPS is socialized in the US, school buses are socialized, the police are socialized.

If you want to advocate for Police Insurance, privatize law enforcement go right ahead, I'm sure most maga cult members would love that idea (since many of them are poor hillbillies).
 
Last edited:
Haven't they threatened this like 20 times now?
 
Yes I know what an exchange rate is, the dollar's has dropped by 10% so we get less for a dollar than we used to.
The weakness is that there is a currency exchange at all.
 
Americans pay far more for health care than any other country, so that eats into this supposed higher wages. So that's one product that is very costly.
And it's about to get worse. As other opportunities for good paying jobs decline the healthcare industry offers such. It's the fastest growing segment of the economy now due the need for medical personnel, the result of the abysmal ignorance and apathy concerning personal health and safely. Soon most of one's income will be devoted to paying medical/insurance costs.
 
What country are you from? Your avatar looks Russian.

Putin has $billions, he has a wife and a mistress, he could retire to his yacht and enjoy life instead of trying to win a war and keep his economy from collapsing.
I lived in Russia for more than 30 years. In my opinion, this doesn't work with Putin. He (for the most part) has started this war, or at least he said it was his decision (he often tries to diffuse responsibility, as he did with the mobilization, when he said the generals made the decision, or with the withdrawal of troops from Kherson, when he didn't even say so directly, and Surovikin was the one "making" the decision). But this war is now affecting the Russian elite. If before this war Russian oligarchs would travel to Europe or the US and have their feet practically kissed right at the plane's steps, now their property is being taken away, their accounts are being frozen, and they must receive something in return from Putin so that it will be clear why they are suffering losses. Putin has nothing to offer in return, but for now Putin has enough force to hold on to power.
 
Additionally Putin might well have emasculated NATO too, a long held dream by the USSR and later Russia.
And now we see that Finland and Sweden have joined NATO, NATO (Europe) has launched programs to finance the military-industrial complex, Russia has suffered serious losses in its fleet and strategic aviation and long-range airborne early warning aircraft (and these will not be replaced in the near future).
And in four years, Russia has not even been able to liberate/capture the Donetsk region.
 
War is underway.
The West made a strategic mistake when divided the world into 2 camps:1. The West. 2. Those who are opposite. And called them "russian agents".

But after the publications of Epstein's files, many in the world believe that the WEST is run by degenerate pedophilic elites.

And now, for world, the choice is: to be a "Russian agent" or to become an accomplice of pedophiles.
What would you choose?
 
Top Putin advisor warns that if the Ukraine war continues like this, Russia will nuke Germany and the UK.

Since Germany and the UK are on the fast track towards becoming Islamic nations which will snuff out their respective Jewish populations, I don't see a problem with them being nuked.
 

I don't know anything about the Finnish language, I've never been interested in it, but Russia (if we're talking about the Russian Empire) never granted Finland independence. Finland gained it due to the collapse of the Russian Empire, and the USSR tried to seize Finland back in 1939 (the Winter War).
 
No it it not.
Yes, the USSR had plans to annex Finland, since before the revolution this country was part of the Russian Empire. A puppet government of Finland was created, headed by Kuusinen, which was supposed to lead Finland and begin the process of "voluntary" accession of the Finns to the USSR.
 
15th post
Why wasn't it annexed in 1945? Who could have prevented it?
I don't understand what you're trying to refute. The USSR started a war with Finland and organized a puppet government. Why Stalin ultimately refused to include Finland into the USSR, I don't know—you can't ask the dead. Perhaps because the Finns put up fierce resistance, and the USSR suffered heavy losses in that war, they deemed it inadvisable to have potential separatists within the country.
And your original tweet is completely manipulative and false.
 
I don't understand what you're trying to refute. The USSR started a war with Finland and organized a puppet government. Why Stalin ultimately refused to include Finland into the USSR, I don't know—you can't ask the dead. Perhaps because the Finns put up fierce resistance, and the USSR suffered heavy losses in that war, they deemed it inadvisable to have potential separatists within the country.
And your original tweet is completely manipulative and false.
In another words, Russian leaders saw independent, but neutral Finland as better option than Finland as a part of Russia.
Elimination of separatists on the annexed lands is an ugly thing and really inconvenient for decent people.

But, Finland as a part of a hostile alliance is worse option than its annexation with further elimination of all potential separatists.
 
The last german chancellor who fought against the Russians was ultimately identified by his teeth.
 
Back
Top Bottom