Why would anyone need billions to defeat “poor soldiers”. Careful as you back pedal, lib.Of course we would. What a silly thing for you to write.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why would anyone need billions to defeat “poor soldiers”. Careful as you back pedal, lib.Of course we would. What a silly thing for you to write.
Nope. No wars and no support for allies. Putin would have spanked that ass.
Why do you say that?You are such a poor thinker.
Aha... because you don't understand. Sit down, pay attention to what you read, and be quiet.,
Putin is trying to reconstitute the soviet union, Hitler was trying to rule the world, not even close to the same.Why not? Putin’s. We have a major military power invading a weaker nation.
Every single time (at least once or twice a century) when the Europeans are going East - the Russians beat them and come West. So was with Hitler, so was with Napoleon and Charles XII. The current "NATO expansion" isn't an exception.Putin is re-doing Hitler by coming west.
NATO is not attacking Russia. Russia is attacking Ukraine. You have a problem understanding which way "west" is.Every single time (at least once or twice a century) when the Europeans are going East - the Russians beat them and come West. So was with Hitler, so was with Napoleon and Charles XII. The current "NATO expansion" isn't an exception.
NATO is attacking Russia. And at this point your facilitation definitely became a participation. I do understand which way "west" is. There were a lot of western invasions in Russia, and your current aggression is not really different from others in the past. And the solution of the western problem will, likely, be the same - your cities burned, your soldiers killed, your land became Russian.NATO is not attacking Russia. Russia is attacking Ukraine. You have a problem understanding which way "west" is.
The pleasure is all mine. But making the situation a bit clearer and transparent for both sides benefit not only Russia but, I believe, the USA, too. As we see at results of the voting - many members don't think that millions of Americans should die in the vain attempt to allow Biden stay in power (or in the vain attempt to save Neo-Nazie Kievan regime).Putin thanks you for your service.
Wow, talk about deluded. Is it that hard to accept who started the current conflict?NATO is attacking Russia. (snip)...There were a lot of western invasions in Russia, and your current aggression
Russia invaded Ukraine. NATO has not attacked Russia. No one wants to invade your utter shithole of a country. You are a moron Russobot who eats dogshit for breakfast.NATO is attacking Russia.
The same question I can ask you. It was NATO who started the current conflict.Wow, talk about deluded. Is it that hard to accept who started the current conflict?
talk talk talk. Moscow is a priority target for US nukes.The same question I can ask you. It was NATO who started the current conflict.
Because Ukraine attacked DPR and LPR.Russia invaded Ukraine.
It has. The long range weapons were launched by NATO personnel.NATO has not attacked Russia.
At least twice in the century western Barbarians invade Russia. And no - the goal of capturing certain Russian regions is pretty official.No one wants to invade your utter shithole of a country.
And who are you then? Anyway, we are not discussing my intellectual abilities (which are definitely superior to yours), we are discussing the possible US strategies (at what point the US will be coerced into peace on the Russian terms?)You are a moron Russobot who eats dogshit for breakfast.
.. and let's not forget what President Trump is reported to have said to Putin during his 1st term:Moscow is a priority target for US nukes.
No problem. Moscow is well defended and expendable. Napoleon burnt Moscow down, but lost the war. Biden and/or Trump can try to burn Moscow, too, but in this case they will lose the war.talk talk talk. Moscow is a priority target for US nukes.
Words are cheap. And talking about the actual capabilities, the USA can't "hit Moscow really hard" and survive after that... and let's not forget what President Trump is reported to have said to Putin during his 1st term:
"I said, 'Vladimir, 'if you go after Ukraine, I am going to hit you so hard, you're not even going to believe it. I'm going to hit you right in the middle of fricking Moscow,'" Trump purportedly said. "I said, 'We're friends. I don't want to do it, but I have no choice.' He goes, 'No way.' I said, 'Way.'"
![]()
Russia responds to Donald Trump's alleged threat to strike Moscow
"I said, 'Vladimir, if you go after Ukraine, I am going to hit you so hard,'" the former president said in an interview.www.newsweek.com
..and yet Putin is all talk. He better not test us. A single US nuclear SUB could turn Russia into a wasteland within hours.but in this case they will lose the war.