Russia Threatens No Cooperation Regarding Iran Nuke Weapons Program

[Chips Rafferty]

Gunny, please add Chips to the posters that make the board look bad:

True, the socialist worker and it's recommendations seem all you can muster, when they have something related to one of your rants.

But it's not against any of the rules, neither are personal attacks on family members, though imo there should be limits.

Go away and whip us up a batch of Brownies, you stupid, pseudo intellectual vibrator test pilot!

 

[Bern80]

Go away and whip us up a batch of Brownies, you stupid, pseudo intellectual vibrator test pilot!

Edward is that you? Come out from behind there. Or did he lend his copy of "How to debate like a 12 year old"?

You have yet to answer the basic question posed in this thread. How is a defensive missile system a threat to Russia?

 

[Chips Rafferty]

You're so wrong on so many levels I hardly know where to start. I guess first would be your continual attacks on the US and presuming to know our intent is solely imperial. That you would go so far as to include a US first strike in your "logic" is about as absurd as it gets. If we wanted to kick Russia's ass it'd already have been done, and if we were going to use the nukes we'd have done so long ago.

A key hole in your theory is that it would benefit the US in NO way to do so.

The fact you try to justify the actions of a nation that has been nothing but hostile to every other nation it has ever come in contact with for at least the past millenia is even MORE ridiculous.

And quite simply, if we, the US, are doing something that benefits the US and its allies, screw what the detractors have to say. With Putin being the nimrod with his finger on the button of whatever remaining nukes Russia hasn't sold on the black market or is giving away for free to religious idiots that have no problem with annihilating the entire world if it doesn't bow to them, I'd want a defensive missile system too.

That you would go so far as to include a US first strike in your "logic" is about as absurd as it gets.

The scope of the destruction, not the weapon used in an attack [against the US or US interests], would affect a U.S. decision on whether to respond with nuclear weapons."

....and from TODAYS news.

Bush Reaffirms Strike-First Policy
Says U.S. Can Launch 'Pre-emptive' War; Calls Iran Biggest Challenge

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/03/16/politics/main1409079.shtml

I know you don’t read any of the links I posts Gunny. You wouldn’t come out with such uniformed statements if you did.

But do try and read these….