- Aug 4, 2009
- 281,557
- 143,956
- 2,615
Yeah, that's another mistake he made: He let the cat of out the bag.
Its like having a Steinway Grand Piano in your living room, but when you sit down to play, all you know is Chop Sticks
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yeah, that's another mistake he made: He let the cat of out the bag.
Their communications suck, totally, so they lack the ability to shape and control the battlefield in space (length, breadth & depth) much less time or vertical altitude, often making them cannon fodder.
Well you might be right!We had always assumed that Soviet/Russian nuclear power was a one for one equal of our own
Given the demonstration of how backward the Russian military is in combat, it may no longer be true that they can compete with us on a nuclear conflict
I don’t think that NATO wants bases in Finland or Sweden as a condition of joining.Putin claims that if Finland or Sweden bring bases and weaponry to Russia's borders, Russia will react. Otherwise he sees no threat to Russia.
Russia is willing to defend the country on two fronts.
I do but it's too far off to be a point of contention at this point in time.I don’t think that NATO wants bases in Finland or Sweden as a condition of joining.
Yes, but most likely already there in Finland and being shared with the US.More likely to see listening devices and surveillance
A fractured Nato. Maybe you have information I don't have, but I seriously doubt that.End result is that Trump left Putin a fractured NATO and now they are much stronger
I'm sure Russia is suffering some consequences but I'm also sure the Russian people are still very willing to suffer.Meanwhile, Russia is much weaker economically and militarily
And again! Why is the Russian military so fucking stupid?
And again! Why is the Russian military so fucking stupid?
Lavrov disavows nuclear weapons threats, says NATO is at war with Russia
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said that Russia does not threaten anyone with nuclear weapons and does not believe that it is at war with NATO. According to "European Pravda", he said this in an interview with the Saudi TV channel Al-Arabiya. Lavrov said Russia did not threaten to use nuclear weapons when he spoke about the possibility of nuclear war.
"We've never played with such dangerous things. We all have to insist... There can never be a nuclear war. But in order to ensure that this happens, the West must discipline speakers such as our Ukrainian and Polish colleagues who do not see the danger in playing with such statements," Lavrov said. He also said that it is not Russia that believes that it is at war with NATO, but vice versa. "Unfortunately, it seems that NATO believes that it is at war with Russia. The leaders of NATO and the EU, many of them in Britain, the United States, Poland, France, Germany, and the EU's top diplomat, rudely, publicly and constantly say, "Putin must lose, Russia must fail." When someone uses such terminology, he probably considers himself at war with someone who wants defeat," the Russian Foreign Minister said.
He said that Russia knows the routes of arms supplies to Ukraine and these cargoes of the Russian Federation consider "fair targets of the special operation" as soon as they arrive on the territory of Ukraine. As reported, Lavrov in communication with the media also said that Moldova is "dragged into NATO" and this is "not in favor of its security."
ÐавÑов вÑдÑÑеÑÑивÑÑ Ð²Ñд погÑоз ÑдеÑÐ½Ð¾Ñ Ð·Ð±ÑоÑÑ Ñ ÐºÐ°Ð¶Ðµ, Ñо Ñе ÐÐТРвоÑÑ Ð· РоÑÑÑÑ
Міністр закордонних справ Росії Сєргєй Лавров заявив, що РФ нікому не погрожує ядерною зброєю та не вважає, що воює з НАТО.www.eurointegration.com.ua
The incompetence is unbelievable.
It’s said the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again while expecting a different result. If that’s the case … Russia qualifies.
We saw it in the early days of the war in Hostomel airport northwest of Kyiv. Russia made an unsupported airborne landing on the base. Got wiped out. Tried it again. Same result. There may have been a third attempt, but the airport wasn’t captured until the spearhead of Russia’s attack, on the ground, arrived a few days later.We’re currently seeing it on Snake Island, of “Russia warship, go fuck yourself” fame. Over the past week, Russian forces have been wiped out several times (here, here, here, and here), and yet last night we saw Russian troops landing there once again. (Russia state media tried to claim that it was Ukrainians who were defeated on the island … using the Ukrainian armed forces video (with their logo on the top right corner) featuring the Bayraktar TB-2 drone interface, of which Russia has none. The destruction of the ship, when Ukraine has no navy, was a nice touch of hilarity.)
But nothing is as dramatic as the saga of the riverside crossing at Bilohorivka, where Russia didn’t just suffer one disastrous river-crossing attempt, but three of them over the past few days.
Ukraine Update: Russia's river-crossing debacle is beyond belief
It’s said the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again while expecting a different result. If that’s the case … Russia qualifies. We saw it in the early days of the war in Hostomel airport northwest of Kyiv. Russia made an...www.dailykos.com
Somebody with a clue figured out there was and is no tactical advantage on the ground for even tactical nukes, but but it might start a regime change war, they can't possibly win if they do it.Well, well, how Russia's tune has changed. They must have realized that none of their nuclear weapons actually work and are missing an unlimited number of expensive parts only made in the west lol
We are hoping for Russia’s defeat. The only people NOT hoping for Ukrainian victory are people like you who are steadfastly anti-American despite all the USA has done for Canada and how dependent you are on us. Of course that’s probably why you are anti-American; you resent feeling inferior, but you are and always have been. If you hadn’t been protected by the UK for two hundred years, Canada wouldn’t even exist. You’d be part of the USA.Aside from the confidence building US propaganda, there's never been any doub that the US is the superior force. It's only baffling and a bit amusing why the propagandists are needing to solidify the fact!
Could it be that the real message is to have Americans believe that Russia is just as incapable with their nuclear arsenal?
There's not much doubt that the current propaganda blitz is nearly completely an effort to build confidence in the American people for one reason.
That is, dispel any possibility entering American minds that their country could be bringing on trouble that is always going to be the unspeakable!
Beware! You only get one chance to get it right. Reports on Russia taking large hits, if in fact they really are, should be cringe worthy.
Don't wish for Russia's defeat!
You should read Putin's remarks at RT.com on the expansion of Nato to two more countries.