What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rush Limbaugh must be destroyed according to another right wing talk show host.

Iceweasel

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2013
Messages
43,342
Reaction score
6,442
Points
1,870
Location
Washington State
The two parties are one in the same, progressive party. To hell with the progressive party.


No.Your party finally completely turned to shit, so you want to claim both parties are the same. You never made that claim before your party started blowing up.
The party didn't blow up, the GOP has majority control over congress, governors and state legislators. You have a serious case of stupidity.

The Dems have moved so far left a socialist could have won the ticket so they have changed much more than the Republicans.

Half of your own party claims your nominee is a progressive, and a large part of your leadership actively oppose your nominee. Your party has blown up.
The Dems are pretty divided, do you remember the primaries or was that too many bong hits ago? There have always been more conservative GOP members and always at odds with the establishment ones. But thanks for your deep heart felt concerns.

Yes. We had a vigorous primary competition. You had a playground fight, complete with childish accusations and nothing more than insults.
Unlike the steamy turds you regularly deposit here, right? Your election was rigged though, lol.
 
OP
oreo

oreo

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
18,102
Reaction score
2,922
Points
290
Location
rocky mountains
Agreed--and it's clear that Rush Limbaugh has extreme prejudice regarding women-aka misogyny (dislike of, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against women)-
Thanks cookie head.I always wondered what the word meant. LOL

No, he isn't a misogynist. I've listened for over 20 years. Making fun of Hillary as a body part is poking fun at libs that are going for the vagina vote, like they did for the black vote. Makes them feeeeeeel good.
Well, it makes your MessiahRushie an Alinskyite by his own definition of a follower of Alinsky.

January 24, 2007

RUSH: One of the techniques that Alinsky has advocated be used against people you need to destroy is ridicule, because there's no response to it. When you get ridiculed and made fun of, that's the toughest thing to have a response because everybody's laughing at you... In order to execute the strategeries and the policies of Saul Alinsky, you cannot have a soul, you cannot have a conscience, because your sole objective is to destroy people and ruin them.


Let's just say he and the others have been very successful at shattering the Republican party into pieces by continually violating Reagan's 11th commandment--"thou shall not speak ill of a fellow Republican."

You know if Ronald Reagan were alive and running today, Limbaugh would have already labeled him an Establishment candidate, and his followers would be attacking him with Rino comments and other nasty remarks. And that is the TRUTH.
Well no. He talks very favorably about Reagan. You can't get anything right.


That's the point. Rush Limbaugh praises Ronald Reagan to no end--and that's what makes me want to vomit. Because if Ronald Reagan were alive and running today--there is no DOUBT that Limbaugh would have already labeled him an establishment candidate, and his migit minons aka the Tea Party and anti establishment groupies would have gone out on attack.

1. Reagan legalized millions of illegals in this country in the 80's. IOW he was all for immigration reform. (something Limbaugh and his midget minions are 100% against)
2. Reagan had to work with a hostile congress for 8 years--meaning he was forced to "negotiate" with democrats every single day. (There is no compromise that suits Rush Limbaugh and his midget minions.)
3. Reagan never campaigned on social issues--(abortion) or U.S. Supreme Court decided issues. He avoided those issues like the black plague and probably would have told the extreme Evangelicals in the party to their sonogram requirements up their own ass's. He wasn't going to go out on attack of the largest voting block in this country over Planned Parenthood, or answer what is legal legitimate rape questions. Which is what destroyed you in 2012, and why Obama got a second term.
Why Romney Lost And Republicans Keep Losing
The GOP's woman problem goes beyond Trump

And this is why Rush Limbaugh and his midget minions would have NEVER supported Ronald Reagan today--they would have hated him, and Reagan would have hated them right back.

In fact if Ronald Reagan were alive and in the oval office when Ted Cruz called Mitch McConnell a liar on the U.S. Senate floor he would have gone down there and booted his ass all the way back to Canada. He hated discourse within the Republican party.

This is no longer the party of Lincoln or Reagan. It has been hijacked by the Reich wing, it is now the Trump party. Full of anger, ignorance, bigotry, misogyny and extremism and their 2016 platform represents them well.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/19/opinion/the-most-extreme-republican-platform-in-memory.html?_r=1

And it couldn't be better explained than in a 3 minute video from a friend and former staffer of RONALD REAGAN.

 
Last edited:

Rustic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Messages
58,769
Reaction score
5,891
Points
1,940
The GOP establishment needs to die forever, they do no good whatsoever for anybody… LOL


It's going to happen. In order for the Republican party to survive- the Tea Party and these Right wing talk shows will need to be crushed.

Only then will the Republican party be able to rebuild. If not, the next Republican President hasn't been born yet--which is something G.W. Bush stated: That he's worried he is the last Republican President.
Report: Bush worried he would be 'last Republican president'

All of this is explained in the below article--the rise and fall of ring wing talk show hosts.
It's long but very informative.

"I think the conservative media is the worst thing that has ever happened to the Republican Party on a national level," he said. "Now, this is not Rush's fault, but if you look at the presidential elections before Rush Limbaugh became nationally syndicated, I believe Republicans won five out of six," he said. "After Rush Limbaugh became truly nationally syndicated ... if you start in 1996 and what I anticipate will happen in 2016 , Republicans will have lost five of the seven presidential elections once he became syndicated." Ziegler said that if there is no price to pay for Trump's most enthusiastic backers in the conservative press, then "it's over."
The conservative establishment that needs to be gotten rid of is the conservative media establishment. Sean Hannity needs to go. Bill O'Reilly needs to go. Sadly, Rush Limbaugh needs to go," he said."
Donald Trump broke the conservative media
The two parties are one in the same, progressive party. To hell with the progressive party.


No.Your party finally completely turned to shit, so you want to claim both parties are the same. You never made that claim before your party started blowing up.
I have always said all career politicians are of the same absolute corrupt party, the progressive party. Every fault of the federal government is the career politician… LOL

If you say so, but why does the right always claim that the next election will determine if our country will still exist. Every election you always say to vote republican and everything will be fine, but vote Democratic, and the world as we know it will end. That doesn't sound like you believe they are both the same.
I did not vote in the last two presidential elections, because there was no conservative running.
 

Rustic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Messages
58,769
Reaction score
5,891
Points
1,940
Agreed--and it's clear that Rush Limbaugh has extreme prejudice regarding women-aka misogyny (dislike of, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against women)-
Thanks cookie head.I always wondered what the word meant. LOL

No, he isn't a misogynist. I've listened for over 20 years. Making fun of Hillary as a body part is poking fun at libs that are going for the vagina vote, like they did for the black vote. Makes them feeeeeeel good.
Well, it makes your MessiahRushie an Alinskyite by his own definition of a follower of Alinsky.

January 24, 2007

RUSH: One of the techniques that Alinsky has advocated be used against people you need to destroy is ridicule, because there's no response to it. When you get ridiculed and made fun of, that's the toughest thing to have a response because everybody's laughing at you... In order to execute the strategeries and the policies of Saul Alinsky, you cannot have a soul, you cannot have a conscience, because your sole objective is to destroy people and ruin them.


Let's just say he and the others have been very successful at shattering the Republican party into pieces by continually violating Reagan's 11th commandment--"thou shall not speak ill of a fellow Republican."

You know if Ronald Reagan were alive and running today, Limbaugh would have already labeled him an Establishment candidate, and his followers would be attacking him with Rino comments and other nasty remarks. And that is the TRUTH.
Well no. He talks very favorably about Reagan. You can't get anything right.


That's the point. Rush Limbaugh praises Ronald Reagan to no end--and that's what makes me want to vomit. Because if Ronald Reagan were alive and running today--there is no DOUBT that Limbaugh would have already labeled him an establishment candidate, and his migit minons aka the Tea Party and anti establishment groupies would have gone out on attack.

1. Reagan legalized millions of illegals in this country in the 80's. IOW he was all for immigration reform. (something Limbaugh and his midget minions are 100% against)
2. Reagan had to work with a hostile congress for 8 years--meaning he was forced to "negotiate" with democrats every single day. (There is no compromise that suits Rush Limbaugh and his midget minions.)
3. Reagan never campaigned on social issues--(abortion) or U.S. Supreme Court decided issues. He avoided those issues like the black plague and probably would have told the extreme Evangelicals in the party to shove it up their ass's, He wasn't going to go out on attack of the largest voting block in this country over Planned Parenthood, or answer what is legal legitimate rape questions. This is what destroyed you in 2012, and why Obama got a second term.

And this is why Rush Limbaugh and his midget minions would have NEVER supported Ronald Reagan today--they would have hated him, and Reagan would have hated them right back.

This is no longer the party of Lincoln or Reagan. It has been hijacked by the Reich wing, it is now the Trump party. Full of anger, ignorance, bigotry, misogyny and extremism and their 2016 platform represents them well.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/19/opinion/the-most-extreme-republican-platform-in-memory.html?_r=1

And it couldn't be better explained than in a 3 minute video from a friend and former staffer of RONALD REAGAN.

Reagan was just a career politician, adding to the debt... Lol
 
OP
oreo

oreo

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
18,102
Reaction score
2,922
Points
290
Location
rocky mountains
It's going to happen. In order for the Republican party to survive- the Tea Party and these Right wing talk shows will need to be crushed.

Only then will the Republican party be able to rebuild. If not, the next Republican President hasn't been born yet--which is something G.W. Bush stated: That he's worried he is the last Republican President.
Report: Bush worried he would be 'last Republican president'

All of this is explained in the below article--the rise and fall of ring wing talk show hosts.
It's long but very informative.

Donald Trump broke the conservative media
The two parties are one in the same, progressive party. To hell with the progressive party.


No.Your party finally completely turned to shit, so you want to claim both parties are the same. You never made that claim before your party started blowing up.
I have always said all career politicians are of the same absolute corrupt party, the progressive party. Every fault of the federal government is the career politician… LOL

If you say so, but why does the right always claim that the next election will determine if our country will still exist. Every election you always say to vote republican and everything will be fine, but vote Democratic, and the world as we know it will end. That doesn't sound like you believe they are both the same.
I did not vote in the last two presidential elections, because there was no conservative running.


There isn't one running now either.

images
 

Rustic

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2015
Messages
58,769
Reaction score
5,891
Points
1,940
The two parties are one in the same, progressive party. To hell with the progressive party.


No.Your party finally completely turned to shit, so you want to claim both parties are the same. You never made that claim before your party started blowing up.
I have always said all career politicians are of the same absolute corrupt party, the progressive party. Every fault of the federal government is the career politician… LOL

If you say so, but why does the right always claim that the next election will determine if our country will still exist. Every election you always say to vote republican and everything will be fine, but vote Democratic, and the world as we know it will end. That doesn't sound like you believe they are both the same.
I did not vote in the last two presidential elections, because there was no conservative running.


There isn't one running now either.

images
This is true, but at least he is not a career politician. The lowest of all lifeforms
 

Papageorgio

The Ultimate Winner
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
58,184
Reaction score
16,643
Points
2,220
Location
PNW
Rush in his prime couldn't stop Clinton, twice. Rush couldn't stop Obama twice and yet you idiots think that he could have stopped Trump? How stupid are you people?
That is because his influence is limited to within the GOP only. Clinton and Obama are not in the GOP, Trump is!

Great excuse, he has never influenced the majority of Republicsns I knew, I think you make crap up. I haven't heard a Rush program in over 15 years, and the only reason I listened to him was because he was entertaining and that is all he has ever claimed he has done, entertained to get ratings. You nutters are delusional.
 

Papageorgio

The Ultimate Winner
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
58,184
Reaction score
16,643
Points
2,220
Location
PNW
Now according to to the left wingnuts, Rush was going to be gone way back when he insulted Fluke.
By his own accounting he has lost half of his audience his Fluke lies, but he also claims his audience is growing even though his own numbers say the opposite! Now he said he would be removing himself if he lost only 20% of his audience, but surprise, surprise, the liar lied about that too as he is still here after losing half his audience.

I don't know what his numbers are, I don't care what he says, he seems to influence your life more than my life.
 
OP
oreo

oreo

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
18,102
Reaction score
2,922
Points
290
Location
rocky mountains
No.Your party finally completely turned to shit, so you want to claim both parties are the same. You never made that claim before your party started blowing up.
I have always said all career politicians are of the same absolute corrupt party, the progressive party. Every fault of the federal government is the career politician… LOL

If you say so, but why does the right always claim that the next election will determine if our country will still exist. Every election you always say to vote republican and everything will be fine, but vote Democratic, and the world as we know it will end. That doesn't sound like you believe they are both the same.
I did not vote in the last two presidential elections, because there was no conservative running.


There isn't one running now either.

images
This is true, but at least he is not a career politician. The lowest of all lifeforms


So you've nominated a Rino--LOL. One who has a very long history of supporting liberal policies. A man with no honor, no respect, no dignity and the only loyalty he has ever shown anyone is to himself and Russia. The most incompetent, unqualified, dangerous candidate in this nations history.
Donald Trump is a unique threat to American democracy
A neuroscientist explains: Trump has a mental disorder that makes him a dangerous world leader



Tea-Party-Quacks.jpg
 

Papageorgio

The Ultimate Winner
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
58,184
Reaction score
16,643
Points
2,220
Location
PNW
The two parties are one in the same, progressive party. To hell with the progressive party.


No.Your party finally completely turned to shit, so you want to claim both parties are the same. You never made that claim before your party started blowing up.
I have always said all career politicians are of the same absolute corrupt party, the progressive party. Every fault of the federal government is the career politician… LOL

If you say so, but why does the right always claim that the next election will determine if our country will still exist. Every election you always say to vote republican and everything will be fine, but vote Democratic, and the world as we know it will end. That doesn't sound like you believe they are both the same.
I did not vote in the last two presidential elections, because there was no conservative running.


There isn't one running now either.

That what I have been saying, he likes Krugmans economic plan. He is to the left of Clinton on some issues. Clinton is such liar and a suck up to Wall St., big corporations and the rich, who in their right mind could vote for either of these phonies.
 

Papageorgio

The Ultimate Winner
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
58,184
Reaction score
16,643
Points
2,220
Location
PNW
Pity it won't fit on a bumper strip,

Will anyone 'fess up to having read the entire rant?


Rush Limbaugh just admitted:

1. That he is an "entertainer."
2. That it is not his job to vet Presidential candidates, and or to inform you of any of their fallacies.
3. That he is only on the micro-phone to entertain, not inform.
4. That he could care less if the Republican party gets hit by a 200 foot high Tsunami.
5. That he does this for ratings and profits.

And that the very worst thing that could happen to those obscene profit breaks is that Hillary Clinton LOSES this election and he has nothing to talk about for the next 4 to 8 years.

You think he is the "face" of the Republican party--would never tell you a lie, or never mislead you into believing something that wasn't true. Never twist a fact to suit the Reich wing hyperbole. He has become your worst enemy--along with all the rest. This is the outcome of mixing "entertainment" politics with ratings & profits, and very stupid people who have turned them into factual based information and news.

rushlimbaugh.jpg

I haven't listened to Rush since 2001, back then he said he was just an entertainer and was in it for ratings and profit. Now according to to the left wingnuts, Rush was going to be gone way back when he insulted Fluke.

Also Oreo, your link doesnt directly link to his article. So it makes it difficult to see who the op'ed writer is. No credit is given. As far as Rush being the cause of Trump, that is the stupidest BS I have heard in a long time. He couldn't stop Obama twice, in his prime couldn't stop Clinton twice and yet he would be able to stop Trump.

What stupid idiotic article, no logic involved, just another blowhard radio talk show host.


Pity it won't fit on a bumper strip,

Will anyone 'fess up to having read the entire rant?


Rush Limbaugh just admitted:

1. That he is an "entertainer."
2. That it is not his job to vet Presidential candidates, and or to inform you of any of their fallacies.
3. That he is only on the micro-phone to entertain, not inform.
4. That he could care less if the Republican party gets hit by a 200 foot high Tsunami.
5. That he does this for ratings and profits.

And that the very worst thing that could happen to those obscene profit breaks is that Hillary Clinton LOSES this election and he has nothing to talk about for the next 4 to 8 years.

You think he is the "face" of the Republican party--would never tell you a lie, or never mislead you into believing something that wasn't true. Never twist a fact to suit the Reich wing hyperbole. He has become your worst enemy--along with all the rest. This is the outcome of mixing "entertainment" politics with ratings & profits, and very stupid people who have turned them into factual based information and news.

rushlimbaugh.jpg

I haven't listened to Rush since 2001, back then he said he was just an entertainer and was in it for ratings and profit. Now according to to the left wingnuts, Rush was going to be gone way back when he insulted Fluke.

Also Oreo, your link doesnt directly link to his article. So it makes it difficult to see who the op'ed writer is. No credit is given. As far as Rush being the cause of Trump, that is the stupidest BS I have heard in a long time. He couldn't stop Obama twice, in his prime couldn't stop Clinton twice and yet he would be able to stop Trump.

What stupid idiotic article, no logic involved, just another blowhard radio talk show host.


I turned him off years ago too. It got to where it was ridiculous, because spending time on political boards, it became very clear how much he was (not telling the whole story) in order to spin it to the right. So Rush Limbaugh and all the others became useless to me--and more like an adult cartoon version of the children's "Lil Einstein" show.

Sandra Fluke--Yeah he helped with the War on Women--& conservatives looked the other way. But to completely sell your conservative sole to promote a fraud may be different this time. We'll see.

But clearly he admits this:
1. That he is an "entertainer."
2. That it is not his job to vet Presidential candidates, and or to inform his audience of any of their fallacies.
3. That he is only on the micro-phone to entertain, not inform.
4. That he could care less if the Republican party gets hit by a 200 foot high Tsunami.
5. That he does this for ratings and profits.

Now you and I know this and have known it for years. But there is a whole different group of people--(Tea party, anti establishment groupies) that do not know this--and have depended on Rush Limbaugh and others, including those on FOX News to be TRUTHERS and deliver critical information to them, so they can make WISE decisions. Wise decisions not only on the issues, but on the candidates they select. For proof of that, just look on this board. It's very easy to see that most of the right wingers on this board are just parrots of right wing talk show hosts. No critical thinking involved. Just parrots. If Rush Limbaugh says "polly want a cracker" they're going to be on here repeating it over and over--and they'll go to the grave believing that polly wants a cracker.

We'll see if this backfires on all of them, but if it doesn't--then we can color the conservative movement and the Republican party gone forever. Because as another article states: If there is no price to pay--from those who have promoted Donald Trump, and or not stood for TRUTH, then we can expect this to happen again and again.

That's the problem.

I don't know of any Republicans that think is serious, they listen to him for entertainment and money. I'm glad he found the key to big money.
 
OP
oreo

oreo

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
18,102
Reaction score
2,922
Points
290
Location
rocky mountains
Pity it won't fit on a bumper strip,

Will anyone 'fess up to having read the entire rant?


Rush Limbaugh just admitted:

1. That he is an "entertainer."
2. That it is not his job to vet Presidential candidates, and or to inform you of any of their fallacies.
3. That he is only on the micro-phone to entertain, not inform.
4. That he could care less if the Republican party gets hit by a 200 foot high Tsunami.
5. That he does this for ratings and profits.

And that the very worst thing that could happen to those obscene profit breaks is that Hillary Clinton LOSES this election and he has nothing to talk about for the next 4 to 8 years.

You think he is the "face" of the Republican party--would never tell you a lie, or never mislead you into believing something that wasn't true. Never twist a fact to suit the Reich wing hyperbole. He has become your worst enemy--along with all the rest. This is the outcome of mixing "entertainment" politics with ratings & profits, and very stupid people who have turned them into factual based information and news.

rushlimbaugh.jpg

I haven't listened to Rush since 2001, back then he said he was just an entertainer and was in it for ratings and profit. Now according to to the left wingnuts, Rush was going to be gone way back when he insulted Fluke.

Also Oreo, your link doesnt directly link to his article. So it makes it difficult to see who the op'ed writer is. No credit is given. As far as Rush being the cause of Trump, that is the stupidest BS I have heard in a long time. He couldn't stop Obama twice, in his prime couldn't stop Clinton twice and yet he would be able to stop Trump.

What stupid idiotic article, no logic involved, just another blowhard radio talk show host.


Pity it won't fit on a bumper strip,

Will anyone 'fess up to having read the entire rant?


Rush Limbaugh just admitted:

1. That he is an "entertainer."
2. That it is not his job to vet Presidential candidates, and or to inform you of any of their fallacies.
3. That he is only on the micro-phone to entertain, not inform.
4. That he could care less if the Republican party gets hit by a 200 foot high Tsunami.
5. That he does this for ratings and profits.

And that the very worst thing that could happen to those obscene profit breaks is that Hillary Clinton LOSES this election and he has nothing to talk about for the next 4 to 8 years.

You think he is the "face" of the Republican party--would never tell you a lie, or never mislead you into believing something that wasn't true. Never twist a fact to suit the Reich wing hyperbole. He has become your worst enemy--along with all the rest. This is the outcome of mixing "entertainment" politics with ratings & profits, and very stupid people who have turned them into factual based information and news.

rushlimbaugh.jpg

I haven't listened to Rush since 2001, back then he said he was just an entertainer and was in it for ratings and profit. Now according to to the left wingnuts, Rush was going to be gone way back when he insulted Fluke.

Also Oreo, your link doesnt directly link to his article. So it makes it difficult to see who the op'ed writer is. No credit is given. As far as Rush being the cause of Trump, that is the stupidest BS I have heard in a long time. He couldn't stop Obama twice, in his prime couldn't stop Clinton twice and yet he would be able to stop Trump.

What stupid idiotic article, no logic involved, just another blowhard radio talk show host.


I turned him off years ago too. It got to where it was ridiculous, because spending time on political boards, it became very clear how much he was (not telling the whole story) in order to spin it to the right. So Rush Limbaugh and all the others became useless to me--and more like an adult cartoon version of the children's "Lil Einstein" show.

Sandra Fluke--Yeah he helped with the War on Women--& conservatives looked the other way. But to completely sell your conservative sole to promote a fraud may be different this time. We'll see.

But clearly he admits this:
1. That he is an "entertainer."
2. That it is not his job to vet Presidential candidates, and or to inform his audience of any of their fallacies.
3. That he is only on the micro-phone to entertain, not inform.
4. That he could care less if the Republican party gets hit by a 200 foot high Tsunami.
5. That he does this for ratings and profits.

Now you and I know this and have known it for years. But there is a whole different group of people--(Tea party, anti establishment groupies) that do not know this--and have depended on Rush Limbaugh and others, including those on FOX News to be TRUTHERS and deliver critical information to them, so they can make WISE decisions. Wise decisions not only on the issues, but on the candidates they select. For proof of that, just look on this board. It's very easy to see that most of the right wingers on this board are just parrots of right wing talk show hosts. No critical thinking involved. Just parrots. If Rush Limbaugh says "polly want a cracker" they're going to be on here repeating it over and over--and they'll go to the grave believing that polly wants a cracker.

We'll see if this backfires on all of them, but if it doesn't--then we can color the conservative movement and the Republican party gone forever. Because as another article states: If there is no price to pay--from those who have promoted Donald Trump, and or not stood for TRUTH, then we can expect this to happen again and again.

That's the problem.

I don't know of any Republicans that think is serious, they listen to him for entertainment and money. I'm glad he found the key to big money.


Disagree there is whole segment of people who will refuse to watch any other network except FOX News, will only listen to right wing talk shows, and only read the Drudge report. That's the bubble they live in.

"If you look at the presidential elections before Rush Limbaugh became nationally syndicated, I believe Republicans won five out of six," he said. "After Rush Limbaugh became truly nationally syndicated ... if you start in 1996 and what I anticipate will happen in 2016, Republicans will have lost five of the seven presidential elections once he became syndicated."

But in the 1990s, the conservative press was not very hostile to politicians on the right. In its formative era, the conservative-media movement mostly played friendly with Republicans.

For the most part, Republicans and the conservative media existed symbiotically. Republicans used their newfound apparatus as a vehicle to drive home their message to supporters. Simultaneously, the conservative news media sought to lock in its audience by characterizing the mainstream press as an industry comprising dishonest liberals — something with which the GOP was more than happy to go along.

"What it became, essentially, was they were preaching this is the only place you can get news. This is the only place you can trust. All other media outlets are lying to you. So you need to come to us," said Ted Newton, president of Gravity Strategic Communications and former communications adviser to 2012 Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney.

"And so in an attempt to capture an audience, they almost made them slaves to those news outlets. So there is a whole group of people who will only watch Fox, who will only read Breitbart. And they are living in a bubble," he added.

Toward the end of President George W. Bush's second term, the symbiotic relationship showed signs of souring. Establishment figures inside the GOP supported immigration reform and a bailout at the height of the 2008 recession. Conservative talkers didn't.

As the years progressed, it became increasingly clear the entertainment wing of the party had seized control. Republicans tried to play friendly with them, giving credence to the industry by lavishing praise, submitting editorials, and granting access, but more and more they were whipped by media figures on the right for supposedly not being conservative enough."
Donald Trump broke the conservative media

Which created this:

phonies_590_419.jpg


Rush Limbaugh has been a huge promoter of this attitude, along with all the others in the right wing political entertainment arena.

That has now resulted in this.

635730056916765487-2015.07.20.trumponmccain-v2.jpg
 
Last edited:

Papageorgio

The Ultimate Winner
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
58,184
Reaction score
16,643
Points
2,220
Location
PNW
Pity it won't fit on a bumper strip,

Will anyone 'fess up to having read the entire rant?


Rush Limbaugh just admitted:

1. That he is an "entertainer."
2. That it is not his job to vet Presidential candidates, and or to inform you of any of their fallacies.
3. That he is only on the micro-phone to entertain, not inform.
4. That he could care less if the Republican party gets hit by a 200 foot high Tsunami.
5. That he does this for ratings and profits.

And that the very worst thing that could happen to those obscene profit breaks is that Hillary Clinton LOSES this election and he has nothing to talk about for the next 4 to 8 years.

You think he is the "face" of the Republican party--would never tell you a lie, or never mislead you into believing something that wasn't true. Never twist a fact to suit the Reich wing hyperbole. He has become your worst enemy--along with all the rest. This is the outcome of mixing "entertainment" politics with ratings & profits, and very stupid people who have turned them into factual based information and news.

rushlimbaugh.jpg

I haven't listened to Rush since 2001, back then he said he was just an entertainer and was in it for ratings and profit. Now according to to the left wingnuts, Rush was going to be gone way back when he insulted Fluke.

Also Oreo, your link doesnt directly link to his article. So it makes it difficult to see who the op'ed writer is. No credit is given. As far as Rush being the cause of Trump, that is the stupidest BS I have heard in a long time. He couldn't stop Obama twice, in his prime couldn't stop Clinton twice and yet he would be able to stop Trump.

What stupid idiotic article, no logic involved, just another blowhard radio talk show host.


Pity it won't fit on a bumper strip,

Will anyone 'fess up to having read the entire rant?


Rush Limbaugh just admitted:

1. That he is an "entertainer."
2. That it is not his job to vet Presidential candidates, and or to inform you of any of their fallacies.
3. That he is only on the micro-phone to entertain, not inform.
4. That he could care less if the Republican party gets hit by a 200 foot high Tsunami.
5. That he does this for ratings and profits.

And that the very worst thing that could happen to those obscene profit breaks is that Hillary Clinton LOSES this election and he has nothing to talk about for the next 4 to 8 years.

You think he is the "face" of the Republican party--would never tell you a lie, or never mislead you into believing something that wasn't true. Never twist a fact to suit the Reich wing hyperbole. He has become your worst enemy--along with all the rest. This is the outcome of mixing "entertainment" politics with ratings & profits, and very stupid people who have turned them into factual based information and news.

rushlimbaugh.jpg

I haven't listened to Rush since 2001, back then he said he was just an entertainer and was in it for ratings and profit. Now according to to the left wingnuts, Rush was going to be gone way back when he insulted Fluke.

Also Oreo, your link doesnt directly link to his article. So it makes it difficult to see who the op'ed writer is. No credit is given. As far as Rush being the cause of Trump, that is the stupidest BS I have heard in a long time. He couldn't stop Obama twice, in his prime couldn't stop Clinton twice and yet he would be able to stop Trump.

What stupid idiotic article, no logic involved, just another blowhard radio talk show host.


I turned him off years ago too. It got to where it was ridiculous, because spending time on political boards, it became very clear how much he was (not telling the whole story) in order to spin it to the right. So Rush Limbaugh and all the others became useless to me--and more like an adult cartoon version of the children's "Lil Einstein" show.

Sandra Fluke--Yeah he helped with the War on Women--& conservatives looked the other way. But to completely sell your conservative sole to promote a fraud may be different this time. We'll see.

But clearly he admits this:
1. That he is an "entertainer."
2. That it is not his job to vet Presidential candidates, and or to inform his audience of any of their fallacies.
3. That he is only on the micro-phone to entertain, not inform.
4. That he could care less if the Republican party gets hit by a 200 foot high Tsunami.
5. That he does this for ratings and profits.

Now you and I know this and have known it for years. But there is a whole different group of people--(Tea party, anti establishment groupies) that do not know this--and have depended on Rush Limbaugh and others, including those on FOX News to be TRUTHERS and deliver critical information to them, so they can make WISE decisions. Wise decisions not only on the issues, but on the candidates they select. For proof of that, just look on this board. It's very easy to see that most of the right wingers on this board are just parrots of right wing talk show hosts. No critical thinking involved. Just parrots. If Rush Limbaugh says "polly want a cracker" they're going to be on here repeating it over and over--and they'll go to the grave believing that polly wants a cracker.

We'll see if this backfires on all of them, but if it doesn't--then we can color the conservative movement and the Republican party gone forever. Because as another article states: If there is no price to pay--from those who have promoted Donald Trump, and or not stood for TRUTH, then we can expect this to happen again and again.

That's the problem.

I don't know of any Republicans that think is serious, they listen to him for entertainment and money. I'm glad he found the key to big money.


Disagree there is whole segment of people who will refuse to watch any other network except FOX News, will only listen to right wing talk shows, and only read the Drudge report. That's the bubble they live in.

"If you look at the presidential elections before Rush Limbaugh became nationally syndicated, I believe Republicans won five out of six," he said. "After Rush Limbaugh became truly nationally syndicated ... if you start in 1996 and what I anticipate will happen in 2016, Republicans will have lost five of the seven presidential elections once he became syndicated."

But in the 1990s, the conservative press was not very hostile to politicians on the right. In its formative era, the conservative-media movement mostly played friendly with Republicans.

For the most part, Republicans and the conservative media existed symbiotically. Republicans used their newfound apparatus as a vehicle to drive home their message to supporters. Simultaneously, the conservative news media sought to lock in its audience by characterizing the mainstream press as an industry comprising dishonest liberals — something with which the GOP was more than happy to go along.

"What it became, essentially, was they were preaching this is the only place you can get news. This is the only place you can trust. All other media outlets are lying to you. So you need to come to us," said Ted Newton, president of Gravity Strategic Communications and former communications adviser to 2012 Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney.

"And so in an attempt to capture an audience, they almost made them slaves to those news outlets. So there is a whole group of people who will only watch Fox, who will only read Breitbart. And they are living in a bubble," he added.

Toward the end of President George W. Bush's second term, the symbiotic relationship showed signs of souring. Establishment figures inside the GOP supported immigration reform and a bailout at the height of the 2008 recession. Conservative talkers didn't.

As the years progressed, it became increasingly clear the entertainment wing of the party had seized control. Republicans tried to play friendly with them, giving credence to the industry by lavishing praise, submitting editorials, and granting access, but more and more they were whipped by media figures on the right for supposedly not being conservative enough."
Donald Trump broke the conservative media

Which created this:

phonies_590_419.jpg


Rush Limbaugh has been a huge promoter of this attitude, along with all the others in the right wing political entertainment arena.

That has now resulted in this.

635730056916765487-2015.07.20.trumponmccain-v2.jpg

Like I said, I don't know of any Republicans that take Limbaugh seriously, so I disagree with you and the left wing media.
 

Indeependent

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2013
Messages
73,632
Reaction score
28,469
Points
2,250
Those supporting Trump are definitely not friends of the Neo-Con, pig ass Rush.
 

pwjohn

Gold Member
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
4,938
Reaction score
422
Points
130
Location
Buttlick Kentucky
"Radio legend Rush Limbaugh, as he has on millions of conservatives, has had a major impact on my life. My late grandfather’s obsession with his show in the early 1990’s led me become an avid listener and to then change my career path from sports-casting to that of a “conservative radio talk show host.” At one point, I was even being groomed to fill in for Rush, but for a number of reasons, that never worked out (probably for the best, especially for him!).

I have never met or even spoken to Rush, but I have emailed with him on many occasions. I correctly warned him that he would eventually be taken off the powerhouse station I worked for in Los Angeles (KFI-AM), and even gave him golf “lessons” via email, which he seemed to appreciate. My current radio show, nationally syndicated on Sunday nights, probably would not have happened without Rush forwarding an email I sent to him on to an associate who set me up with a syndicator.

All politics aside, there has never been a more amazing unscripted broadcaster than Rush Limbaugh (Howard Stern wouldn’t even be close without great guests). What he has been able to maintain after the loss of his hearing is perhaps the most underrated achievement in the history of the medium.

With all of that said, I am very angry with Rush Limbaugh and have lost an enormous amount of respect for him. Last week I was widely quoted in this exposé on the conservative media where I lamented that Rush, sadly, needs be dethroned from his lofty position atop its ranks. It is becoming very clear that a large percentage of his shrinking audience feels exactly the same way.

The reason for this is that if there was one man who could have stopped the Trump trainwreck from handing Hillary Clinton the presidency and possibly destroying the Republican party, it was Rush. No one else had the credibility and the reach within the GOP base to scold the emerging temper tantrum and keep conservative eyes on the bigger picture.

Rush’s responsibility (as at least he led us to believe) was to see all dangers to the movement and do his best to destroy them. However, when faced with the Trump Trojan horse entering the gates to the kingdom, not only did he hardly fire a shot, he practically held the door open and then laughed as the carnage ensued.

Did he criticize Trump during the primaries? Sure. But only mildly, just as he did with all of the other candidates in the bloated field ripe for a celebrity con-artist to overtake it with less than a majority of support. Trump was an existential threat to the entire conservative movement and perhaps the country itself. This was not the time to hide behind some silly “I don’t endorse in a primary” rule or a desire to pretend to be “fair” as to not offend a significant portion of his already dwindling audience.

The Rush Limbaugh I used to admire would have immediately seen the obvious danger of the Trump candidacy and snuffed it out before it could even catch fire. Instead, he mostly stood back and watched the raging inferno engulf all that he had built and everything he claims to believe in.

Sean Hannity selling his soul to Trump for a few ratings points didn’t surprise me, but Rush doing nothing at all to stop him really did. Hannity is not a smart guy, but Rush is. To whom much is given, much is expected, and Rush Limbaugh came up tiny when the conservative movement needed him most.

So now, Rush is in a very difficult spot. Much of his audience is now fully able to see the betrayal that the conservative media inflicted upon their customers for their own entertainment and ratings gain. This has become crystalized by Trump’s recent apparent reversal on much of his plan to deport all of the illegal immigrants currently in the country.

I’m a big believer that if you wait long enough and keep your eyes pierced the truth will always eventually come out. That’s exactly what happened Monday when Rush was blindsided and demolished by caller “Rick from Los Angeles,” who took him and the rest of the “conservative” media to task for allowing Trump to “con” the base about what he would really do on illegal immigration. The most telling moment was at the very end when Rush, apparently by mistake, jumps to the obviously guilt-ridden conclusion that the caller was primarily blaming him (the caller probably was, but was just too polite to say it directly).

Exposed more dramatically on his conservative flank than at any other time I have ever heard of, Rush pathetically claimed that he never attacked Trump for making an obviously false promise on illegal immigration because he never took Trump “seriously” on the matter. Of course, you would think that it would have been the obligation of “America’s Truth Detector” to point that out about a hundred times during the primaries, but Rush never did.

Forced into a corner, Rush then inadvertently let his audience in on his own “con.” You see he’s just a radio host, he admitted. Just an entertainer. It wasn’t his job to take out Trump. That was the responsibility of the other fifteen candidates (who couldn’t get access to a large conservative audience because Trump was being given massive amounts of free advertising in exchange for the ratings he provided).

That’s all fine, and, to be fair, Rush has relied on that excuse to get out of jams in the past, but this situation was different. This was the 100-year storm and the guy who has made many millions of dollars pretending to be manning the lighthouse, never even bothered to warn his seaside town. In fact, he seemed to even revel in, and benefit from (his contract was just renewed), its destruction.

For that abdication of responsibility, as much as it literally pains me to say it, Rush himself must be destroyed if conservatism is to survive this disaster. How ironic that it took a caller to his show (where Rush has said for decades that the only purpose of a caller is to make him look good) to finally make that sad reality all too clear."
Caller to Limbaugh Show Exposes That Rush Knows He Blew It with Donald Trump

It's going to be very interesting to see the morning after the election just how many will still believe they are still listening to Mr. Talent on Loan from Gawwwwd-d. But, let's face it there are a whole lot of supposedly conservative talk show hosts that have sold their soles for ratings and those obscene profit breaks. Sean Hannity, Ann Colter, Bill O'Reilly, Michael Savage & Laura Ingram. Less but not least, Sarah Palin who shows up every now and then to promote this Chimpanzee. In fact, the only time I am going to turn them on is the morning after the election to see what kind of bullshit excuse they're going to use.

These people are responsible for shattering the Republican party into pieces, by delivering 3 or more daily hours of ring wing hyperbole, half truths, misconceptions and enough conspiracy theories to fill the capital building from floor to ceiling. They have continually violated Reagan's 11th commandment by attacking their own. Referring to good Republicans as Establishment & Rino's. This is no longer the party of Lincoln or Reagan it is now the Trump party because of them. The party of anger, ignorance, bigotry, misogyny & extremism. Their 2016 platform is even more extreme and divisive than ever.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/19/opinion/the-most-extreme-republican-platform-in-memory.html?_r=1


I truly hope that Trump takes them all down the toilet with him. Frankly, as a former Republican I am following the advice of a friend and former staffer of Ronald Reagan. You should too.



Tea-Party-Quacks.jpg


What is it with these 50 page long cock & bull narratives! Fuck that shit b
 
OP
oreo

oreo

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
18,102
Reaction score
2,922
Points
290
Location
rocky mountains
"Radio legend Rush Limbaugh, as he has on millions of conservatives, has had a major impact on my life. My late grandfather’s obsession with his show in the early 1990’s led me become an avid listener and to then change my career path from sports-casting to that of a “conservative radio talk show host.” At one point, I was even being groomed to fill in for Rush, but for a number of reasons, that never worked out (probably for the best, especially for him!).

I have never met or even spoken to Rush, but I have emailed with him on many occasions. I correctly warned him that he would eventually be taken off the powerhouse station I worked for in Los Angeles (KFI-AM), and even gave him golf “lessons” via email, which he seemed to appreciate. My current radio show, nationally syndicated on Sunday nights, probably would not have happened without Rush forwarding an email I sent to him on to an associate who set me up with a syndicator.

All politics aside, there has never been a more amazing unscripted broadcaster than Rush Limbaugh (Howard Stern wouldn’t even be close without great guests). What he has been able to maintain after the loss of his hearing is perhaps the most underrated achievement in the history of the medium.

With all of that said, I am very angry with Rush Limbaugh and have lost an enormous amount of respect for him. Last week I was widely quoted in this exposé on the conservative media where I lamented that Rush, sadly, needs be dethroned from his lofty position atop its ranks. It is becoming very clear that a large percentage of his shrinking audience feels exactly the same way.

The reason for this is that if there was one man who could have stopped the Trump trainwreck from handing Hillary Clinton the presidency and possibly destroying the Republican party, it was Rush. No one else had the credibility and the reach within the GOP base to scold the emerging temper tantrum and keep conservative eyes on the bigger picture.

Rush’s responsibility (as at least he led us to believe) was to see all dangers to the movement and do his best to destroy them. However, when faced with the Trump Trojan horse entering the gates to the kingdom, not only did he hardly fire a shot, he practically held the door open and then laughed as the carnage ensued.

Did he criticize Trump during the primaries? Sure. But only mildly, just as he did with all of the other candidates in the bloated field ripe for a celebrity con-artist to overtake it with less than a majority of support. Trump was an existential threat to the entire conservative movement and perhaps the country itself. This was not the time to hide behind some silly “I don’t endorse in a primary” rule or a desire to pretend to be “fair” as to not offend a significant portion of his already dwindling audience.

The Rush Limbaugh I used to admire would have immediately seen the obvious danger of the Trump candidacy and snuffed it out before it could even catch fire. Instead, he mostly stood back and watched the raging inferno engulf all that he had built and everything he claims to believe in.

Sean Hannity selling his soul to Trump for a few ratings points didn’t surprise me, but Rush doing nothing at all to stop him really did. Hannity is not a smart guy, but Rush is. To whom much is given, much is expected, and Rush Limbaugh came up tiny when the conservative movement needed him most.

So now, Rush is in a very difficult spot. Much of his audience is now fully able to see the betrayal that the conservative media inflicted upon their customers for their own entertainment and ratings gain. This has become crystalized by Trump’s recent apparent reversal on much of his plan to deport all of the illegal immigrants currently in the country.

I’m a big believer that if you wait long enough and keep your eyes pierced the truth will always eventually come out. That’s exactly what happened Monday when Rush was blindsided and demolished by caller “Rick from Los Angeles,” who took him and the rest of the “conservative” media to task for allowing Trump to “con” the base about what he would really do on illegal immigration. The most telling moment was at the very end when Rush, apparently by mistake, jumps to the obviously guilt-ridden conclusion that the caller was primarily blaming him (the caller probably was, but was just too polite to say it directly).

Exposed more dramatically on his conservative flank than at any other time I have ever heard of, Rush pathetically claimed that he never attacked Trump for making an obviously false promise on illegal immigration because he never took Trump “seriously” on the matter. Of course, you would think that it would have been the obligation of “America’s Truth Detector” to point that out about a hundred times during the primaries, but Rush never did.

Forced into a corner, Rush then inadvertently let his audience in on his own “con.” You see he’s just a radio host, he admitted. Just an entertainer. It wasn’t his job to take out Trump. That was the responsibility of the other fifteen candidates (who couldn’t get access to a large conservative audience because Trump was being given massive amounts of free advertising in exchange for the ratings he provided).

That’s all fine, and, to be fair, Rush has relied on that excuse to get out of jams in the past, but this situation was different. This was the 100-year storm and the guy who has made many millions of dollars pretending to be manning the lighthouse, never even bothered to warn his seaside town. In fact, he seemed to even revel in, and benefit from (his contract was just renewed), its destruction.

For that abdication of responsibility, as much as it literally pains me to say it, Rush himself must be destroyed if conservatism is to survive this disaster. How ironic that it took a caller to his show (where Rush has said for decades that the only purpose of a caller is to make him look good) to finally make that sad reality all too clear."
Caller to Limbaugh Show Exposes That Rush Knows He Blew It with Donald Trump

It's going to be very interesting to see the morning after the election just how many will still believe they are still listening to Mr. Talent on Loan from Gawwwwd-d. But, let's face it there are a whole lot of supposedly conservative talk show hosts that have sold their soles for ratings and those obscene profit breaks. Sean Hannity, Ann Colter, Bill O'Reilly, Michael Savage & Laura Ingram. Less but not least, Sarah Palin who shows up every now and then to promote this Chimpanzee. In fact, the only time I am going to turn them on is the morning after the election to see what kind of bullshit excuse they're going to use.

These people are responsible for shattering the Republican party into pieces, by delivering 3 or more daily hours of ring wing hyperbole, half truths, misconceptions and enough conspiracy theories to fill the capital building from floor to ceiling. They have continually violated Reagan's 11th commandment by attacking their own. Referring to good Republicans as Establishment & Rino's. This is no longer the party of Lincoln or Reagan it is now the Trump party because of them. The party of anger, ignorance, bigotry, misogyny & extremism. Their 2016 platform is even more extreme and divisive than ever.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/19/opinion/the-most-extreme-republican-platform-in-memory.html?_r=1


I truly hope that Trump takes them all down the toilet with him. Frankly, as a former Republican I am following the advice of a friend and former staffer of Ronald Reagan. You should too.



Tea-Party-Quacks.jpg


What is it with these 50 page long cock & bull narratives! Fuck that shit b

I don't expect a Trump supporter to have the reading skills to get through an article such as this. They typically have the attention span of a knat--so reading doesn't suit them well. Which is one of the reasons they depend on political entertainment shows to spoon feed contorted right wing hyperbole to them.
 
OP
oreo

oreo

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
18,102
Reaction score
2,922
Points
290
Location
rocky mountains
It's now on youtube.

 
OP
oreo

oreo

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
18,102
Reaction score
2,922
Points
290
Location
rocky mountains
They're going hard after FOX News and Limbaugh.

"Of the 2016 election’s lightning storm of shocks, few will have more lasting political consequence than the discrediting of the main media organs of movement conservatism.

Fox News — the “fair and balanced” alternative to the liberal media, the voice of traditional values, the never-ceasing hum in the background of American conservatism — has been revealed as the personal fiefdom of a Donald Trump shill and as an institution apparently operating (according to one lawsuit) “like a sex-fueled, Playboy Mansion-like cult, steeped in intimidation, indecency and misogyny.” While Fox News is not going away, it will need to be relaunched and rebranded as the network of Bret Baier and Megyn Kelly (both fine journalists), rather than of angry white television personalities who employ perpetual outrage as a business model.

Speaking of which, a similar unveiling has occurred with the right’s defining radio personality, Rush Limbaugh. It is difficult to overestimate Limbaugh’s influence on two generations of intensely loyal listeners. Steve Forbes has called him “part of the trinity that made modern conservatism,” in the company of Ronald Reagan and William F. Buckley.

In this campaign cycle, Limbaugh fully embraced right-wing populism, including defending Trump’s hard line on immigration and mass deportation — a position Limbaugh once described as “standing up for the American way of life.” During the recent six-day period in which Trump moderated his immigration stand and essentially embraced Jeb Bush’s views, Limbaugh fielded a call from “Rick in Los Angeles,” who was angry at Trump for adopting a position he had savaged other Republicans for holding. “This is going to enrage you,” Limbaugh replied. “I can choose a path here to try to mollify you. I never took him seriously on this.”

It is an admission of astounding cynicism. Trump began his campaign by stereotyping Mexicans as rapists and proposing the forced expulsion of 11 million people — an extreme, inhumane, politically self-destructive policy that Limbaugh urged his listeners to support as a matter of principle. But Limbaugh, it turns out, was in on the joke. He knew it was part of a show, much like his own, in which incitement builds an audience."
How Donald Trump has discredited much of conservative media

images
 

Papageorgio

The Ultimate Winner
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
58,184
Reaction score
16,643
Points
2,220
Location
PNW
RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED! RUSH MUST BE DESTROYED!
 

JakeStarkey

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2009
Messages
168,037
Reaction score
16,502
Points
2,165
Rush is an entertainer, the most powerful one on Republic shock media, and, yes, he allowed Trump to begin the destruction of Republican mainstream conservatism.

Why?

It's obvious: Rush wants GOP conservatism reconstructed in his own image.
 

đź’˛ Amazon Deals đź’˛

Forum List

Top