Runaway landslide Victory for Hillary Clinton. Red State newspapers endorsing her.

[oreo]

This is turning out to be a run away election cycle for Hillary Clinton.

When you have DEEP red state newspapers now falling in line to endorse Hillary Clinton, it's very easy to see that Donald Trump is going to get hit by a freight train and dragged a 100 miles on election night. Not only will he lose the White House but with this kind of momentum going against him at the top of the ticket, Republicans are certain to lose the Senate, and even hanging onto the house is now questionable.

"For the first time in its 126-year history, The Arizona Republic has endorsed a Democratic candidate for president. The paper's editorial board said Hillary Clinton is "the only choice to move America ahead."
"Since The Arizona Republic began publication in 1890, we have never endorsed a Democrat over a Republican for president. Never.

This reflects a deep philosophical appreciation for conservative ideals and Republican principles," the paper's editorial board wrote. "This year is different." The editorial said Clinton's temperament and experience prepare her for office, while it questioned Donald Trump for not releasing his tax returns, asking "whose hand do you want on the nuclear button?"
The Arizona Republic endorses Hillary Clinton

Two weeks ago it was the Dallas Morning News that endorsed Hillary Clinton, having not endorsed a Democrat for President in the last 75 years.

We don't come to this decision easily. This newspaper has not recommended a Democrat for the nation's highest office since before World War II — if you're counting, that's more than 75 years and nearly 20 elections. The party's over-reliance on government and regulation to remedy the country's ills is at odds with our belief in private-sector ingenuity and innovation. Our values are more about individual liberty, free markets and a strong national defense.

We've been critical of Clinton's handling of certain issues in the past. But unlike Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton has experience in actual governance, a record of service and a willingness to delve into real policy.

Resume vs. resume, judgment vs. judgment, this election is no contest.

In Clinton's eight years in the U.S. Senate, she displayed reach and influence in foreign affairs. Though conservatives like to paint her as nakedly partisan, on Capitol Hill she gained respect from Republicans for working across the aisle: Two-thirds of her bills had GOP co-sponsors and included common ground with some of Congress' most conservative lawmakers.

As President Barack Obama's first secretary of state, she helped make tough calls on the Middle East and the complex struggle against radical Islamic terrorism. It's no accident that hundreds of Republican foreign policy hands back Clinton. She also has the support of dozens of top advisers from previous Republican administrations, including Henry Paulson, John Negroponte, Richard Armitage and Brent Scowcroft. Also on this list is Jim Glassman, the founding executive director of the George W. Bush Institute in Dallas.

Clinton has remained dogged by questions about her honesty, her willingness to shade the truth. Her use of a private email server while secretary of state is a clear example of poor judgment. She should take additional steps to divorce allegations of influence peddling from the Clinton Foundation. And she must be more forthright with the public by holding news conferences, as opposed to relying on a shield of carefully scripted appearances and speeches.

Those are shortcomings. But they pale in comparison to the litany of evils some opponents accuse her of. Treason? Murder? Her being cleared of crimes by investigation after investigation has no effect on these political hyenas; they refuse to see anything but conspiracies and cover-ups. We recommend Hillary Clinton for president | Editorials | Dallas News

So when the finger pointing starts, point your finger here first.



Then you can point your finger at all those reich wing talk show hosts that you're attached to the hip at on FOX News also. That gave this Chimpanzee nominee an unprecedented (2 billion in free news coverage) throughout the debates, while they have filled your veins with 3 or more daily hours of reich wing hyperbole, half truths and enough conspiracy theories to fill the capital building from floor to ceiling. It's THESE PEOPLE that are responsible for shattering the Republican party into pieces, by continually violating Reagan's 11th commandment--"thou shall not speak ill of a fellow Republican." Basically eating their own for nothing more than ratings and those obscene profit breaks. Now there's your REAL conspiracy.

And speaking of Republicans--here is a REAL one! A long time friend and former staffer of RONALD REAGAN that says it all in a 3 minute video.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Sure, bucs90.

Sure

 

[SmokeALib]

Libstains getting desperate. Searching for threads of hope to keep getting free shit.

 

[IsaacNewton]

Once Trump loses when is the 'revolution' starting cons? You like to threaten people so you have a plan, right?

Or is it just more cowardly rambling, the type Trump engages in daily.

 

[NLT]

@ the OP

 

[BlindBoo]

@ the OP

I hope she wins Texas. Just so she can dick whip Lyin Ted with Bill's dick.

 

[ColonelAngus]

This is turning out to be a run away election cycle for Hillary Clinton.

When you have DEEP red state newspapers now falling in line to endorse Hillary Clinton, it's very easy to see that Donald Trump is going to get hit by a freight train and dragged a 100 miles on election night. Not only will he lose the White House but with this kind of momentum going against him at the top of the ticket, Republicans are certain to lose the Senate, and even hanging onto the house is now questionable.

"For the first time in its 126-year history, The Arizona Republic has endorsed a Democratic candidate for president. The paper's editorial board said Hillary Clinton is "the only choice to move America ahead."
"Since The Arizona Republic began publication in 1890, we have never endorsed a Democrat over a Republican for president. Never.

This reflects a deep philosophical appreciation for conservative ideals and Republican principles," the paper's editorial board wrote. "This year is different." The editorial said Clinton's temperament and experience prepare her for office, while it questioned Donald Trump for not releasing his tax returns, asking "whose hand do you want on the nuclear button?"
The Arizona Republic endorses Hillary Clinton

Two weeks ago it was the Dallas Morning News that endorsed Hillary Clinton, having not endorsed a Democrat for President in the last 75 years.

We don't come to this decision easily. This newspaper has not recommended a Democrat for the nation's highest office since before World War II — if you're counting, that's more than 75 years and nearly 20 elections. The party's over-reliance on government and regulation to remedy the country's ills is at odds with our belief in private-sector ingenuity and innovation. Our values are more about individual liberty, free markets and a strong national defense.

We've been critical of Clinton's handling of certain issues in the past. But unlike Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton has experience in actual governance, a record of service and a willingness to delve into real policy.

Resume vs. resume, judgment vs. judgment, this election is no contest.

In Clinton's eight years in the U.S. Senate, she displayed reach and influence in foreign affairs. Though conservatives like to paint her as nakedly partisan, on Capitol Hill she gained respect from Republicans for working across the aisle: Two-thirds of her bills had GOP co-sponsors and included common ground with some of Congress' most conservative lawmakers.

As President Barack Obama's first secretary of state, she helped make tough calls on the Middle East and the complex struggle against radical Islamic terrorism. It's no accident that hundreds of Republican foreign policy hands back Clinton. She also has the support of dozens of top advisers from previous Republican administrations, including Henry Paulson, John Negroponte, Richard Armitage and Brent Scowcroft. Also on this list is Jim Glassman, the founding executive director of the George W. Bush Institute in Dallas.

Clinton has remained dogged by questions about her honesty, her willingness to shade the truth. Her use of a private email server while secretary of state is a clear example of poor judgment. She should take additional steps to divorce allegations of influence peddling from the Clinton Foundation. And she must be more forthright with the public by holding news conferences, as opposed to relying on a shield of carefully scripted appearances and speeches.

Those are shortcomings. But they pale in comparison to the litany of evils some opponents accuse her of. Treason? Murder? Her being cleared of crimes by investigation after investigation has no effect on these political hyenas; they refuse to see anything but conspiracies and cover-ups. We recommend Hillary Clinton for president | Editorials | Dallas News

So when the finger pointing starts, point your finger here first.



Then you can point your finger at all those reich wing talk show hosts that you're attached to the hip at on FOX News also. That gave this Chimpanzee nominee an unprecedented (2 billion in free news coverage) throughout the debates, while they have filled your veins with 3 or more daily hours of reich wing hyperbole, half truths and enough conspiracy theories to fill the capital building from floor to ceiling. It's THESE PEOPLE that are responsible for shattering the Republican party into pieces, by continually violating Reagan's 11th commandment--"thou shall not speak ill of a fellow Republican." Basically eating their own for nothing more than ratings and those obscene profit breaks. Now there's your REAL conspiracy.

And speaking of Republicans--here is a REAL one! A long time friend and former staffer of RONALD REAGAN that says it all in a 3 minute video.

What is the final electoral count going to be?

 

[Indeependent]

This is turning out to be a run away election cycle for Hillary Clinton.

When you have DEEP red state newspapers now falling in line to endorse Hillary Clinton, it's very easy to see that Donald Trump is going to get hit by a freight train and dragged a 100 miles on election night. Not only will he lose the White House but with this kind of momentum going against him at the top of the ticket, Republicans are certain to lose the Senate, and even hanging onto the house is now questionable.

"For the first time in its 126-year history, The Arizona Republic has endorsed a Democratic candidate for president. The paper's editorial board said Hillary Clinton is "the only choice to move America ahead."
"Since The Arizona Republic began publication in 1890, we have never endorsed a Democrat over a Republican for president. Never.

This reflects a deep philosophical appreciation for conservative ideals and Republican principles," the paper's editorial board wrote. "This year is different." The editorial said Clinton's temperament and experience prepare her for office, while it questioned Donald Trump for not releasing his tax returns, asking "whose hand do you want on the nuclear button?"
The Arizona Republic endorses Hillary Clinton

Two weeks ago it was the Dallas Morning News that endorsed Hillary Clinton, having not endorsed a Democrat for President in the last 75 years.

We don't come to this decision easily. This newspaper has not recommended a Democrat for the nation's highest office since before World War II — if you're counting, that's more than 75 years and nearly 20 elections. The party's over-reliance on government and regulation to remedy the country's ills is at odds with our belief in private-sector ingenuity and innovation. Our values are more about individual liberty, free markets and a strong national defense.

We've been critical of Clinton's handling of certain issues in the past. But unlike Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton has experience in actual governance, a record of service and a willingness to delve into real policy.

Resume vs. resume, judgment vs. judgment, this election is no contest.

In Clinton's eight years in the U.S. Senate, she displayed reach and influence in foreign affairs. Though conservatives like to paint her as nakedly partisan, on Capitol Hill she gained respect from Republicans for working across the aisle: Two-thirds of her bills had GOP co-sponsors and included common ground with some of Congress' most conservative lawmakers.

As President Barack Obama's first secretary of state, she helped make tough calls on the Middle East and the complex struggle against radical Islamic terrorism. It's no accident that hundreds of Republican foreign policy hands back Clinton. She also has the support of dozens of top advisers from previous Republican administrations, including Henry Paulson, John Negroponte, Richard Armitage and Brent Scowcroft. Also on this list is Jim Glassman, the founding executive director of the George W. Bush Institute in Dallas.

Clinton has remained dogged by questions about her honesty, her willingness to shade the truth. Her use of a private email server while secretary of state is a clear example of poor judgment. She should take additional steps to divorce allegations of influence peddling from the Clinton Foundation. And she must be more forthright with the public by holding news conferences, as opposed to relying on a shield of carefully scripted appearances and speeches.

Those are shortcomings. But they pale in comparison to the litany of evils some opponents accuse her of. Treason? Murder? Her being cleared of crimes by investigation after investigation has no effect on these political hyenas; they refuse to see anything but conspiracies and cover-ups. We recommend Hillary Clinton for president | Editorials | Dallas News

So when the finger pointing starts, point your finger here first.



Then you can point your finger at all those reich wing talk show hosts that you're attached to the hip at on FOX News also. That gave this Chimpanzee nominee an unprecedented (2 billion in free news coverage) throughout the debates, while they have filled your veins with 3 or more daily hours of reich wing hyperbole, half truths and enough conspiracy theories to fill the capital building from floor to ceiling. It's THESE PEOPLE that are responsible for shattering the Republican party into pieces, by continually violating Reagan's 11th commandment--"thou shall not speak ill of a fellow Republican." Basically eating their own for nothing more than ratings and those obscene profit breaks. Now there's your REAL conspiracy.

And speaking of Republicans--here is a REAL one! A long time friend and former staffer of RONALD REAGAN that says it all in a 3 minute video.

A CONSERVATIVE publication anti-Trump!?
NFW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Indeependent]

This is turning out to be a run away election cycle for Hillary Clinton.

When you have DEEP red state newspapers now falling in line to endorse Hillary Clinton, it's very easy to see that Donald Trump is going to get hit by a freight train and dragged a 100 miles on election night. Not only will he lose the White House but with this kind of momentum going against him at the top of the ticket, Republicans are certain to lose the Senate, and even hanging onto the house is now questionable.

"For the first time in its 126-year history, The Arizona Republic has endorsed a Democratic candidate for president. The paper's editorial board said Hillary Clinton is "the only choice to move America ahead."
"Since The Arizona Republic began publication in 1890, we have never endorsed a Democrat over a Republican for president. Never.

This reflects a deep philosophical appreciation for conservative ideals and Republican principles," the paper's editorial board wrote. "This year is different." The editorial said Clinton's temperament and experience prepare her for office, while it questioned Donald Trump for not releasing his tax returns, asking "whose hand do you want on the nuclear button?"
The Arizona Republic endorses Hillary Clinton

Two weeks ago it was the Dallas Morning News that endorsed Hillary Clinton, having not endorsed a Democrat for President in the last 75 years.

We don't come to this decision easily. This newspaper has not recommended a Democrat for the nation's highest office since before World War II — if you're counting, that's more than 75 years and nearly 20 elections. The party's over-reliance on government and regulation to remedy the country's ills is at odds with our belief in private-sector ingenuity and innovation. Our values are more about individual liberty, free markets and a strong national defense.

We've been critical of Clinton's handling of certain issues in the past. But unlike Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton has experience in actual governance, a record of service and a willingness to delve into real policy.

Resume vs. resume, judgment vs. judgment, this election is no contest.

In Clinton's eight years in the U.S. Senate, she displayed reach and influence in foreign affairs. Though conservatives like to paint her as nakedly partisan, on Capitol Hill she gained respect from Republicans for working across the aisle: Two-thirds of her bills had GOP co-sponsors and included common ground with some of Congress' most conservative lawmakers.

As President Barack Obama's first secretary of state, she helped make tough calls on the Middle East and the complex struggle against radical Islamic terrorism. It's no accident that hundreds of Republican foreign policy hands back Clinton. She also has the support of dozens of top advisers from previous Republican administrations, including Henry Paulson, John Negroponte, Richard Armitage and Brent Scowcroft. Also on this list is Jim Glassman, the founding executive director of the George W. Bush Institute in Dallas.

Clinton has remained dogged by questions about her honesty, her willingness to shade the truth. Her use of a private email server while secretary of state is a clear example of poor judgment. She should take additional steps to divorce allegations of influence peddling from the Clinton Foundation. And she must be more forthright with the public by holding news conferences, as opposed to relying on a shield of carefully scripted appearances and speeches.

Those are shortcomings. But they pale in comparison to the litany of evils some opponents accuse her of. Treason? Murder? Her being cleared of crimes by investigation after investigation has no effect on these political hyenas; they refuse to see anything but conspiracies and cover-ups. We recommend Hillary Clinton for president | Editorials | Dallas News

So when the finger pointing starts, point your finger here first.



Then you can point your finger at all those reich wing talk show hosts that you're attached to the hip at on FOX News also. That gave this Chimpanzee nominee an unprecedented (2 billion in free news coverage) throughout the debates, while they have filled your veins with 3 or more daily hours of reich wing hyperbole, half truths and enough conspiracy theories to fill the capital building from floor to ceiling. It's THESE PEOPLE that are responsible for shattering the Republican party into pieces, by continually violating Reagan's 11th commandment--"thou shall not speak ill of a fellow Republican." Basically eating their own for nothing more than ratings and those obscene profit breaks. Now there's your REAL conspiracy.

And speaking of Republicans--here is a REAL one! A long time friend and former staffer of RONALD REAGAN that says it all in a 3 minute video.

What is the final electoral count going to be?

78,000 Clinton, -20,000 Trump.

 

[RodISHI]

Rightwing or Leftwing newspaper endorsements really do not mean jack other than who they are selling out the most ads to.

 

[Auld Phart]

Rightwing or Leftwing newspaper endorsements really do not mean jack other than who they are selling out the most ads to.

Does anyone still read newspapers?

 

[ClosedCaption]

Libstains getting desperate. Searching for threads of hope to keep getting free shit.

Lets all have a good laugh

#TrumpWon

Remember when republicans tried to use Twitter as the certified brain trust of political discussions?

 

[NLT]

@ the OP

I hope she wins Texas. Just so she can dick whip Lyin Ted with Bill's dick.

Dream on Baby booboo

 

[Auld Phart]

@ the OP

I hope she wins Texas. Just so she can dick whip Lyin Ted with Bill's dick.

Would she recognize Bills dick if she saw it?

 

[Rustic]

This is turning out to be a run away election cycle for Hillary Clinton.

When you have DEEP red state newspapers now falling in line to endorse Hillary Clinton, it's very easy to see that Donald Trump is going to get hit by a freight train and dragged a 100 miles on election night. Not only will he lose the White House but with this kind of momentum going against him at the top of the ticket, Republicans are certain to lose the Senate, and even hanging onto the house is now questionable.

"For the first time in its 126-year history, The Arizona Republic has endorsed a Democratic candidate for president. The paper's editorial board said Hillary Clinton is "the only choice to move America ahead."
"Since The Arizona Republic began publication in 1890, we have never endorsed a Democrat over a Republican for president. Never.

This reflects a deep philosophical appreciation for conservative ideals and Republican principles," the paper's editorial board wrote. "This year is different." The editorial said Clinton's temperament and experience prepare her for office, while it questioned Donald Trump for not releasing his tax returns, asking "whose hand do you want on the nuclear button?"
The Arizona Republic endorses Hillary Clinton

Two weeks ago it was the Dallas Morning News that endorsed Hillary Clinton, having not endorsed a Democrat for President in the last 75 years.

We don't come to this decision easily. This newspaper has not recommended a Democrat for the nation's highest office since before World War II — if you're counting, that's more than 75 years and nearly 20 elections. The party's over-reliance on government and regulation to remedy the country's ills is at odds with our belief in private-sector ingenuity and innovation. Our values are more about individual liberty, free markets and a strong national defense.

We've been critical of Clinton's handling of certain issues in the past. But unlike Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton has experience in actual governance, a record of service and a willingness to delve into real policy.

Resume vs. resume, judgment vs. judgment, this election is no contest.

In Clinton's eight years in the U.S. Senate, she displayed reach and influence in foreign affairs. Though conservatives like to paint her as nakedly partisan, on Capitol Hill she gained respect from Republicans for working across the aisle: Two-thirds of her bills had GOP co-sponsors and included common ground with some of Congress' most conservative lawmakers.

As President Barack Obama's first secretary of state, she helped make tough calls on the Middle East and the complex struggle against radical Islamic terrorism. It's no accident that hundreds of Republican foreign policy hands back Clinton. She also has the support of dozens of top advisers from previous Republican administrations, including Henry Paulson, John Negroponte, Richard Armitage and Brent Scowcroft. Also on this list is Jim Glassman, the founding executive director of the George W. Bush Institute in Dallas.

Clinton has remained dogged by questions about her honesty, her willingness to shade the truth. Her use of a private email server while secretary of state is a clear example of poor judgment. She should take additional steps to divorce allegations of influence peddling from the Clinton Foundation. And she must be more forthright with the public by holding news conferences, as opposed to relying on a shield of carefully scripted appearances and speeches.

Those are shortcomings. But they pale in comparison to the litany of evils some opponents accuse her of. Treason? Murder? Her being cleared of crimes by investigation after investigation has no effect on these political hyenas; they refuse to see anything but conspiracies and cover-ups. We recommend Hillary Clinton for president | Editorials | Dallas News

So when the finger pointing starts, point your finger here first.



Then you can point your finger at all those reich wing talk show hosts that you're attached to the hip at on FOX News also. That gave this Chimpanzee nominee an unprecedented (2 billion in free news coverage) throughout the debates, while they have filled your veins with 3 or more daily hours of reich wing hyperbole, half truths and enough conspiracy theories to fill the capital building from floor to ceiling. It's THESE PEOPLE that are responsible for shattering the Republican party into pieces, by continually violating Reagan's 11th commandment--"thou shall not speak ill of a fellow Republican." Basically eating their own for nothing more than ratings and those obscene profit breaks. Now there's your REAL conspiracy.

And speaking of Republicans--here is a REAL one! A long time friend and former staffer of RONALD REAGAN that says it all in a 3 minute video.

All those newspapers are progressive

 

[NYcarbineer]

This is turning out to be a run away election cycle for Hillary Clinton.

When you have DEEP red state newspapers now falling in line to endorse Hillary Clinton, it's very easy to see that Donald Trump is going to get hit by a freight train and dragged a 100 miles on election night. Not only will he lose the White House but with this kind of momentum going against him at the top of the ticket, Republicans are certain to lose the Senate, and even hanging onto the house is now questionable.

"For the first time in its 126-year history, The Arizona Republic has endorsed a Democratic candidate for president. The paper's editorial board said Hillary Clinton is "the only choice to move America ahead."
"Since The Arizona Republic began publication in 1890, we have never endorsed a Democrat over a Republican for president. Never.

This reflects a deep philosophical appreciation for conservative ideals and Republican principles," the paper's editorial board wrote. "This year is different." The editorial said Clinton's temperament and experience prepare her for office, while it questioned Donald Trump for not releasing his tax returns, asking "whose hand do you want on the nuclear button?"
The Arizona Republic endorses Hillary Clinton

Two weeks ago it was the Dallas Morning News that endorsed Hillary Clinton, having not endorsed a Democrat for President in the last 75 years.

We don't come to this decision easily. This newspaper has not recommended a Democrat for the nation's highest office since before World War II — if you're counting, that's more than 75 years and nearly 20 elections. The party's over-reliance on government and regulation to remedy the country's ills is at odds with our belief in private-sector ingenuity and innovation. Our values are more about individual liberty, free markets and a strong national defense.

We've been critical of Clinton's handling of certain issues in the past. But unlike Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton has experience in actual governance, a record of service and a willingness to delve into real policy.

Resume vs. resume, judgment vs. judgment, this election is no contest.

In Clinton's eight years in the U.S. Senate, she displayed reach and influence in foreign affairs. Though conservatives like to paint her as nakedly partisan, on Capitol Hill she gained respect from Republicans for working across the aisle: Two-thirds of her bills had GOP co-sponsors and included common ground with some of Congress' most conservative lawmakers.

As President Barack Obama's first secretary of state, she helped make tough calls on the Middle East and the complex struggle against radical Islamic terrorism. It's no accident that hundreds of Republican foreign policy hands back Clinton. She also has the support of dozens of top advisers from previous Republican administrations, including Henry Paulson, John Negroponte, Richard Armitage and Brent Scowcroft. Also on this list is Jim Glassman, the founding executive director of the George W. Bush Institute in Dallas.

Clinton has remained dogged by questions about her honesty, her willingness to shade the truth. Her use of a private email server while secretary of state is a clear example of poor judgment. She should take additional steps to divorce allegations of influence peddling from the Clinton Foundation. And she must be more forthright with the public by holding news conferences, as opposed to relying on a shield of carefully scripted appearances and speeches.

Those are shortcomings. But they pale in comparison to the litany of evils some opponents accuse her of. Treason? Murder? Her being cleared of crimes by investigation after investigation has no effect on these political hyenas; they refuse to see anything but conspiracies and cover-ups. We recommend Hillary Clinton for president | Editorials | Dallas News

So when the finger pointing starts, point your finger here first.



Then you can point your finger at all those reich wing talk show hosts that you're attached to the hip at on FOX News also. That gave this Chimpanzee nominee an unprecedented (2 billion in free news coverage) throughout the debates, while they have filled your veins with 3 or more daily hours of reich wing hyperbole, half truths and enough conspiracy theories to fill the capital building from floor to ceiling. It's THESE PEOPLE that are responsible for shattering the Republican party into pieces, by continually violating Reagan's 11th commandment--"thou shall not speak ill of a fellow Republican." Basically eating their own for nothing more than ratings and those obscene profit breaks. Now there's your REAL conspiracy.

And speaking of Republicans--here is a REAL one! A long time friend and former staffer of RONALD REAGAN that says it all in a 3 minute video.

They're getting flooded with death threats at the Arizona Republic for endorsing Clinton.

Big surprise.

 

[ScienceRocks]

This is turning out to be a run away election cycle for Hillary Clinton.

When you have DEEP red state newspapers now falling in line to endorse Hillary Clinton, it's very easy to see that Donald Trump is going to get hit by a freight train and dragged a 100 miles on election night. Not only will he lose the White House but with this kind of momentum going against him at the top of the ticket, Republicans are certain to lose the Senate, and even hanging onto the house is now questionable.

"For the first time in its 126-year history, The Arizona Republic has endorsed a Democratic candidate for president. The paper's editorial board said Hillary Clinton is "the only choice to move America ahead."
"Since The Arizona Republic began publication in 1890, we have never endorsed a Democrat over a Republican for president. Never.

This reflects a deep philosophical appreciation for conservative ideals and Republican principles," the paper's editorial board wrote. "This year is different." The editorial said Clinton's temperament and experience prepare her for office, while it questioned Donald Trump for not releasing his tax returns, asking "whose hand do you want on the nuclear button?"
The Arizona Republic endorses Hillary Clinton

Two weeks ago it was the Dallas Morning News that endorsed Hillary Clinton, having not endorsed a Democrat for President in the last 75 years.

We don't come to this decision easily. This newspaper has not recommended a Democrat for the nation's highest office since before World War II — if you're counting, that's more than 75 years and nearly 20 elections. The party's over-reliance on government and regulation to remedy the country's ills is at odds with our belief in private-sector ingenuity and innovation. Our values are more about individual liberty, free markets and a strong national defense.

We've been critical of Clinton's handling of certain issues in the past. But unlike Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton has experience in actual governance, a record of service and a willingness to delve into real policy.

Resume vs. resume, judgment vs. judgment, this election is no contest.

In Clinton's eight years in the U.S. Senate, she displayed reach and influence in foreign affairs. Though conservatives like to paint her as nakedly partisan, on Capitol Hill she gained respect from Republicans for working across the aisle: Two-thirds of her bills had GOP co-sponsors and included common ground with some of Congress' most conservative lawmakers.

As President Barack Obama's first secretary of state, she helped make tough calls on the Middle East and the complex struggle against radical Islamic terrorism. It's no accident that hundreds of Republican foreign policy hands back Clinton. She also has the support of dozens of top advisers from previous Republican administrations, including Henry Paulson, John Negroponte, Richard Armitage and Brent Scowcroft. Also on this list is Jim Glassman, the founding executive director of the George W. Bush Institute in Dallas.

Clinton has remained dogged by questions about her honesty, her willingness to shade the truth. Her use of a private email server while secretary of state is a clear example of poor judgment. She should take additional steps to divorce allegations of influence peddling from the Clinton Foundation. And she must be more forthright with the public by holding news conferences, as opposed to relying on a shield of carefully scripted appearances and speeches.

Those are shortcomings. But they pale in comparison to the litany of evils some opponents accuse her of. Treason? Murder? Her being cleared of crimes by investigation after investigation has no effect on these political hyenas; they refuse to see anything but conspiracies and cover-ups. We recommend Hillary Clinton for president | Editorials | Dallas News

So when the finger pointing starts, point your finger here first.



Then you can point your finger at all those reich wing talk show hosts that you're attached to the hip at on FOX News also. That gave this Chimpanzee nominee an unprecedented (2 billion in free news coverage) throughout the debates, while they have filled your veins with 3 or more daily hours of reich wing hyperbole, half truths and enough conspiracy theories to fill the capital building from floor to ceiling. It's THESE PEOPLE that are responsible for shattering the Republican party into pieces, by continually violating Reagan's 11th commandment--"thou shall not speak ill of a fellow Republican." Basically eating their own for nothing more than ratings and those obscene profit breaks. Now there's your REAL conspiracy.

And speaking of Republicans--here is a REAL one! A long time friend and former staffer of RONALD REAGAN that says it all in a 3 minute video.

They're getting flooded with death threats at the Arizona Republic for endorsing Clinton.

Big surprise.

The loserterian is the most vile and disgusting this country has to offer. Truly sub-human.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Newspapers are dinosaurs. No one cares anymore.

 

[oreo]

@ the OP

I think you're picture was a little backwards--LOL. In all focus polls right after the debate--Hillary Clinton won undecided voters big time. 67% to Trump's 27%

I have been around a long time and have watched a lot of Presidential debates, and have never seen a candidate have a full blown melt down on any debate stage. Hillary Clinton clocked Donald Trump. Every focus group (undecided voters) no contest--she won it all.

While I know we have Trump supporters and right wing talk shows hosts in absolute denial (doing everything they can to convince you that what you witnessed didn't happen) it did.

100 million viewers saw it all. It was clear it was a disaster for Trump. During the first 10 minutes of the debate Trump did his very best to act and look Presidential, up until the very second that Clinton "criticized" him over his tax/economic plan--and from then on it was downhill all the way. He interrupted her 51 times and she was more than content to let him ramble on and on and on, and that hole just got deeper and deeper and deeper. It was a rope a dope debate, and she had 100% control of it.

For those of you that are thinking he'll do better in the 2nd and 3rd debates, forget it. He cannot be controlled nor can he stand criticism of any kind and that's why he imploded. Trump is a narcissist and the very worst thing you can do to a narcissist is be critical of them or their policies. They will immediately lose focus & control and do everything they can, including using an entire debate to regain ground over their inflated view of their self importance. Here is a great article on this mental disability, and why you should NEVER give a narcissist unbridled power. And now for anyone thinking of voting for Trump. where a President gets 24/7 criticism coming from every direction, just what kind of a President would Donald Trump really make?
A neuroscientist explains: Trump has a mental disorder that makes him a dangerous world leader

So now the question will be easier to answer-- (what state will he win?) Arizona & Texas may be going blue this year with these endorsements.

You wanted Trump, now you OWN it and everything that comes with it.
You Wanted Trump, You’ve Got Him | The American Spectator

 

[easyt65]

There is a citizen-led revolt in this country, one people have called for against corrupt career politicians, whom Hillary is one of...and people are too stupid to see / understand that corrupt career GOP and the media who believe THEY help control the people are fighting for the status quo.

Can't help but laugh at the ignorance of some people.