Rudy Giuliani: The gift that keeps on giving

and remember, they claim liberalism isn't a mental disorder. Here's some of that green spew from those oh so SANE frikken people on the left. dear gawd: we should be very afraid these people vote FOR OUR LIVES.

SNIP:
WaPo’s Milbank: Walker Disqualified as WH Contender Because He Didn’t Condemn Giuliani
By Aaron Goldstein on 2.20.15 | 4:19PM

Dana Milbank of The Washington Post is throwing a hissy fit at Scott Walker because he didn't condemn former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani for saying that President Obama doesn't love America.

Giuliani made his remarks at a dinner where Walker was the guest of honor.

Milbank tut-tuts:

That dinner Wednesday, at New York’s 21 Club, is where Giuliani challenged Obama’s love of country. Even the former mayor preceded his outrageous allegation by saying, “I know this is a horrible thing to say . . . ”

Walker surely knew it was horrible, too, but he refused to say so — and in this failure he displayed a cowardice unworthy of a man who would be president.

But let's go back to Labor Day 2011 when President Obama spoke at a union rally in Detroit in which he was introduced by Teamsters President Jimmy Hoffa, Jr. The younger Hoffa accused the Tea Party of starting "a war on workers". Hoffa declared, "President Obama, this is your army. We are ready to march…Everybody here’s got a vote…Let’s take these sons of bitches out and give America back to an America where we belong.”

Did Obama condemn Hoffa for his language? On the contrary, Obama made a point of saying he was proud of Hoffa in his speech.

Surely, Milbank no doubt Obama to task for his cowardice for not condemning Hoffa. Well, no.

Indeed, it was just last November that Milbank told Laura Ingraham lthat the Tea Party is a "virus" that is "spreading like Ebola in West Africa."

Like most liberal journalists, Dana Milbank holds Republicans to a high standard that he does not have for President Obama much less himself.

As for Scott Walker, he will do just fine without Dana Milbank's approval.

ALL of the slap down here: lol
WaPo s Milbank Walker Disqualified as WH Contender Because He Didn t Condemn Giuliani The American Spectator

When given the chance to condemn inflammatory rhetoric, John McCain chose to condemn it

When given the same chance, Walker chose to "punt"

Not presidential material

"Presidential material" is decided by elections, not dumbass Leftwats.
 
Scott Walker says he doesn't know if President Obama loves his country

Add that to he doesn't know about evolution

And people say his lack of education doesn't matter

Is there something wrong with being undecided on the issue of evolution? Both creationism and evolution are theories, so why does everyone have to be a true believer of one or the other? You Leftists making a big issue out of Walker not wanting to discuss evolution with flaming Left wing bigots like you only proves him RIGHT.

God is a theory, Evolution is a FACT

A candidate for highest office should know that

No, evolution is not a fact. You're religious beliefs aren't facts, they're just your beliefs. Don't push them on everyone else.

And a candidate for highest office doesn't need to answer that question, or where he stands on contraceptives, or whatever else you Leftwats come up with that have nothing to do with what's going on in this country.

The issue that evolution occurs is supported by biological, fossil and DNA evidence...it is a fact
How and why it occurs is a theory

The fact that the uneducated Walker doesn't understand that shows he is not Presdential material
 
That is the kind of rhetoric that Democrats love to hear. Shows how petty and childish all Republicans are
Now, every candidate can be asked if they agree

Actually, it shows how honest someone can be. Yes, honesty, something you nothing of.

Oh, and at least we haven't had a president who hasn't held interviews with nutcases who bathe in milk and Froot Loops.
 
and remember, they claim liberalism isn't a mental disorder. Here's some of that green spew from those oh so SANE frikken people on the left. dear gawd: we should be very afraid these people vote FOR OUR LIVES.

SNIP:
WaPo’s Milbank: Walker Disqualified as WH Contender Because He Didn’t Condemn Giuliani
By Aaron Goldstein on 2.20.15 | 4:19PM

Dana Milbank of The Washington Post is throwing a hissy fit at Scott Walker because he didn't condemn former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani for saying that President Obama doesn't love America.

Giuliani made his remarks at a dinner where Walker was the guest of honor.

Milbank tut-tuts:

That dinner Wednesday, at New York’s 21 Club, is where Giuliani challenged Obama’s love of country. Even the former mayor preceded his outrageous allegation by saying, “I know this is a horrible thing to say . . . ”

Walker surely knew it was horrible, too, but he refused to say so — and in this failure he displayed a cowardice unworthy of a man who would be president.

But let's go back to Labor Day 2011 when President Obama spoke at a union rally in Detroit in which he was introduced by Teamsters President Jimmy Hoffa, Jr. The younger Hoffa accused the Tea Party of starting "a war on workers". Hoffa declared, "President Obama, this is your army. We are ready to march…Everybody here’s got a vote…Let’s take these sons of bitches out and give America back to an America where we belong.”

Did Obama condemn Hoffa for his language? On the contrary, Obama made a point of saying he was proud of Hoffa in his speech.

Surely, Milbank no doubt Obama to task for his cowardice for not condemning Hoffa. Well, no.

Indeed, it was just last November that Milbank told Laura Ingraham lthat the Tea Party is a "virus" that is "spreading like Ebola in West Africa."

Like most liberal journalists, Dana Milbank holds Republicans to a high standard that he does not have for President Obama much less himself.

As for Scott Walker, he will do just fine without Dana Milbank's approval.

ALL of the slap down here: lol
WaPo s Milbank Walker Disqualified as WH Contender Because He Didn t Condemn Giuliani The American Spectator

When given the chance to condemn inflammatory rhetoric, John McCain chose to condemn it

When given the same chance, Walker chose to "punt"

Not presidential material

"Presidential material" is decided by elections, not dumbass Leftwats.
No shit Sherlock

And the evidence against the failed Governor of Wisconsin is piling up

I think I'll punt
 
Great cover

Shows how out of touch conservatives are

Yes, the TRUTH always is a LIE to you Pond Scum! How many times have we been told that this CU*T is the Obomanations BRAIN???

B-RCmZUCAAAPsil.jpg
 
That is the kind of rhetoric that Democrats love to hear. Shows how petty and childish all Republicans are
Now, every candidate can be asked if they agree

Actually, it shows how honest someone can be. Yes, honesty, something you nothing of.

Oh, and at least we haven't had a president who hasn't held interviews with nutcases who bathe in milk and Froot Loops.

Yes it is great to see the honesty to show the hatred you have within
 
and remember, they claim liberalism isn't a mental disorder. Here's some of that green spew from those oh so SANE frikken people on the left. dear gawd: we should be very afraid these people vote FOR OUR LIVES.

SNIP:
WaPo’s Milbank: Walker Disqualified as WH Contender Because He Didn’t Condemn Giuliani
By Aaron Goldstein on 2.20.15 | 4:19PM

Dana Milbank of The Washington Post is throwing a hissy fit at Scott Walker because he didn't condemn former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani for saying that President Obama doesn't love America.

Giuliani made his remarks at a dinner where Walker was the guest of honor.

Milbank tut-tuts:

That dinner Wednesday, at New York’s 21 Club, is where Giuliani challenged Obama’s love of country. Even the former mayor preceded his outrageous allegation by saying, “I know this is a horrible thing to say . . . ”

Walker surely knew it was horrible, too, but he refused to say so — and in this failure he displayed a cowardice unworthy of a man who would be president.

But let's go back to Labor Day 2011 when President Obama spoke at a union rally in Detroit in which he was introduced by Teamsters President Jimmy Hoffa, Jr. The younger Hoffa accused the Tea Party of starting "a war on workers". Hoffa declared, "President Obama, this is your army. We are ready to march…Everybody here’s got a vote…Let’s take these sons of bitches out and give America back to an America where we belong.”

Did Obama condemn Hoffa for his language? On the contrary, Obama made a point of saying he was proud of Hoffa in his speech.

Surely, Milbank no doubt Obama to task for his cowardice for not condemning Hoffa. Well, no.

Indeed, it was just last November that Milbank told Laura Ingraham lthat the Tea Party is a "virus" that is "spreading like Ebola in West Africa."

Like most liberal journalists, Dana Milbank holds Republicans to a high standard that he does not have for President Obama much less himself.

As for Scott Walker, he will do just fine without Dana Milbank's approval.

ALL of the slap down here: lol
WaPo s Milbank Walker Disqualified as WH Contender Because He Didn t Condemn Giuliani The American Spectator

When given the chance to condemn inflammatory rhetoric, John McCain chose to condemn it

When given the same chance, Walker chose to "punt"

Not presidential material

"Presidential material" is decided by elections, not dumbass Leftwats.
No shit Sherlock

And the evidence against the failed Governor of Wisconsin is piling up

I think I'll punt

Actually not. He won two elections and one recall election. I'd say that's pretty much a success. Can't speak to the failures of the Left in the state of Wisconsin, I mean, you had Democratic state senators fleeing to a neighboring state to keep from voting for a bill ending collective bargaining. Yes, you guys make a mockery out of elected office wherever you go.
 
and remember, they claim liberalism isn't a mental disorder. Here's some of that green spew from those oh so SANE frikken people on the left. dear gawd: we should be very afraid these people vote FOR OUR LIVES.

SNIP:
WaPo’s Milbank: Walker Disqualified as WH Contender Because He Didn’t Condemn Giuliani
By Aaron Goldstein on 2.20.15 | 4:19PM

Dana Milbank of The Washington Post is throwing a hissy fit at Scott Walker because he didn't condemn former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani for saying that President Obama doesn't love America.

Giuliani made his remarks at a dinner where Walker was the guest of honor.

Milbank tut-tuts:

That dinner Wednesday, at New York’s 21 Club, is where Giuliani challenged Obama’s love of country. Even the former mayor preceded his outrageous allegation by saying, “I know this is a horrible thing to say . . . ”

Walker surely knew it was horrible, too, but he refused to say so — and in this failure he displayed a cowardice unworthy of a man who would be president.

But let's go back to Labor Day 2011 when President Obama spoke at a union rally in Detroit in which he was introduced by Teamsters President Jimmy Hoffa, Jr. The younger Hoffa accused the Tea Party of starting "a war on workers". Hoffa declared, "President Obama, this is your army. We are ready to march…Everybody here’s got a vote…Let’s take these sons of bitches out and give America back to an America where we belong.”

Did Obama condemn Hoffa for his language? On the contrary, Obama made a point of saying he was proud of Hoffa in his speech.

Surely, Milbank no doubt Obama to task for his cowardice for not condemning Hoffa. Well, no.

Indeed, it was just last November that Milbank told Laura Ingraham lthat the Tea Party is a "virus" that is "spreading like Ebola in West Africa."

Like most liberal journalists, Dana Milbank holds Republicans to a high standard that he does not have for President Obama much less himself.

As for Scott Walker, he will do just fine without Dana Milbank's approval.

ALL of the slap down here: lol
WaPo s Milbank Walker Disqualified as WH Contender Because He Didn t Condemn Giuliani The American Spectator

When given the chance to condemn inflammatory rhetoric, John McCain chose to condemn it

When given the same chance, Walker chose to "punt"

Not presidential material

"Presidential material" is decided by elections, not dumbass Leftwats.
No shit Sherlock

And the evidence against the failed Governor of Wisconsin is piling up

I think I'll punt

No, it's not, but you can post anything you like from the Teacher's and the Unions he's bitch slapped continually!

Jeff Crouere Media attacks on Scott Walker earns a failing grade New Hampshire NH Angle
 
That is the kind of rhetoric that Democrats love to hear. Shows how petty and childish all Republicans are
Now, every candidate can be asked if they agree

Actually, it shows how honest someone can be. Yes, honesty, something you nothing of.

Oh, and at least we haven't had a president who hasn't held interviews with nutcases who bathe in milk and Froot Loops.

Yes it is great to see the honesty to show the hatred you have within

Indeed, it shows how little of an argument you actually have when all you can play is the 'hate' card. No really. You are very intellectually dishonest.
 
The fact that the uneducated Walker doesn't understand that shows he is not Presdential material

The assertion that he isn't Presidential material is because he simply doesn't support Unions. The people in his state have spoken twice on that issue. Geez, stop pouting, child.

The issue at hand is Walkers disbelief of evolution and overall opposition to education

Worst Governor ever
 
BRIPAT9643 SAID:

“Then why are you and your ilk implying Giulliani doesn't have the "authority" to say whether Obama loves his country?”

You are indeed dense.

Giulliani's subjective, errant opinions are devoid of authority and merit – as a private citizen he's at liberty to express his opinion, provided he and others realize his opinion in this matter is factually wrong.
 
That is the kind of rhetoric that Democrats love to hear. Shows how petty and childish all Republicans are
Now, every candidate can be asked if they agree

Actually, it shows how honest someone can be. Yes, honesty, something you nothing of.

Oh, and at least we haven't had a president who hasn't held interviews with nutcases who bathe in milk and Froot Loops.

Yes it is great to see the honesty to show the hatred you have within

Indeed, it shows how little of an argument you actually have when all you can play is the 'hate' card. No really. You are very intellectually dishonest.
When you sink so low as declaring that the President of the United States does not love his country.......Yes, it shows your hatred
 
Great cover

Shows how out of touch conservatives are

Yes, the TRUTH always is a LIE to you Pond Scum! How many times have we been told that this CU*T is the Obomanations BRAIN???

B-RCmZUCAAAPsil.jpg
Cue Temper Tantrum......

Way to go Vigilante

Yes, bitch slapping the RightWingNut Is a temper tantrum....The hilarity!:badgrin::badgrin::badgrin:
Actually, your rapid misdirection of the topic being discussed shows your emotional failings
 
Great cover

Shows how out of touch conservatives are

Yes, the TRUTH always is a LIE to you Pond Scum! How many times have we been told that this CU*T is the Obomanations BRAIN???

B-RCmZUCAAAPsil.jpg
Cue Temper Tantrum......

Way to go Vigilante

Yes, bitch slapping the RightWingNut Is a temper tantrum....The hilarity!:badgrin::badgrin::badgrin:
Actually, your rapid misdirection of the topic being discussed shows your emotional failings

Your arrogance and stupidity lead me to believe you have a severe case of...

narcissistic-personality-disorder1.jpg
 
Sorry bout that,

1. In my expert opinion.
2.If he loved America, why did he release five terrorists for one deserter, and why hasn't the investigation about Bergdahl been released? Simple questions really, other Presidents of The United States of America who love this Nation, would never do that.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
 
Why are Rudy's comments merely "criticism" while responses are "attacks"?

Whoa, just hold on for a moment.

Why were Rudy's comments deemed and "attack"?

Can you show how Obama has demonstrated his love for America?


Why are Rudy's comments "voicing his opinion" while responses are "ammunition"?

What else would he be doing other than voicing his opinion? Why are certain opinions acceptable while others are not?

Just for the record, Obama provides 'ammunition' each time he opens his mouth.


Why is Rudy considered "America's Mayor" while the President of the United States considered a "King"?

If the shoe fits.

And why should insulting the President's patriotism be seen as noble and wise while those who refute that stand be seen as "low information" Leftists?

Actually, Obama started it. He was the one who began questioning the patriotism of a sitting president. Why do you see Obama as a perfect specimen of patriotism? Why is he above reproach and criticism?

 

Forum List

Back
Top