kyzr
Diamond Member
Its okay to have "open borders" as long as it doesn't affect my neighborhood. Typical Democrats.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sorry, BB, I'm a girl. I think the law that says Immigrants are welcome, get on the list for admittance was the very best we had. Others who break the law need to realize, that in order to come here, you have to obey our laws. That is, register, wait your turn.Well Mien Fuhrer, first you need to build a big wall around the city, then you can start dumping all the undesirables inside. Otherwise they'll escape to the good countryside.
You can determine their final disposition later.
Nope, he still isn't. But you're still engaging in negative waves.It’s what this entire thread is about, cupcake. Though it’s far from the only example of Trump being a pussy.That's not the point and you know it too don't you.Okay then when was this policy enactedNo he didn't.That would be a good rebuttal if Trump hadn’t pussed outOh, no he ain't, but you've entitled yourself to engage in negative waves.![]()
Careful there, Gramps! If you keep calling her name's like that she'll have no choice but to turn into a racist for real!
Again, you are dealing in fantasy. Back on earth in reality what you say will happen just isn’t a possibility. There is a whole different point of view and with the way our politics work in this country this idea is not going to ever happen and is not going to be the great wake up call you pretend like it isNo, if the sanctuary cities put their money where their mouths are, they might see the light that making others pay for their intolerable indignities has a consequential price.You think this is brilliant?! How do you see it playing out? Flood the sanctuary cities and then they will suddenly realize the error in their ways and then they will magically come together in support of Trumps immigration policies and everything will be right in the world?!https://www.washingtonpost.com
In an ideal world we just ship them home BUT since that isn't an option this is a great idea. Flood sanctuary cities with more of them than they can handle.
Keep dreaming Gramps. It’s a cheap gotchya attempt that will only fuel each sides base to yell louder and fight harder. It’s not good for America. The drama continues.
You don’t think California and sanctuary cities have experienced illegal immigrants? Come on, wake upOh, they will get rid of their responsibilities, one way or another, because unsustainable ideas have a consequence. Let them experience it for themselves.Really? You actually think that will happen?No, if the sanctuary cities put their money where their mouths are, they might see the light that making others pay for their intolerable indignities has a consequential price.You think this is brilliant?! How do you see it playing out? Flood the sanctuary cities and then they will suddenly realize the error in their ways and then they will magically come together in support of Trumps immigration policies and everything will be right in the world?!https://www.washingtonpost.com
In an ideal world we just ship them home BUT since that isn't an option this is a great idea. Flood sanctuary cities with more of them than they can handle.
Keep dreaming Gramps. It’s a cheap gotchya attempt that will only fuel each sides base to yell louder and fight harder. It’s not good for America. The drama continues.
Pelosi fumes over White House plan to release immigrant detainees in sanctuary cities
Clip: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, whose office called the idea “despicable.”
So sending illegal brown people to her district is OFF FUCKING LIMITS YO!
Of course I don't actually believe that makes her a racist but it does prove she is one big ass two faced hypocritical bitch.
Now imagine if Trump had tied the word despicable to illegals, can you imagine the lefts outrage? Oh wait! He said something similar you say? And they still hold it against him you say?
Obvious double standard is obvious
I don't think the drug lords running some of those countries want to deal with serial killers. It's cheaper to send them to the USA, and their revenge against us is never-ending for stopping their profits from going through the roof.
Thousands of new ones every few days? No, no they haven't. And if you don't think that would be an eye opener for the LEGAL TAX PAYING RESIDENTS then it's YOU who needs a wake up call.You don’t think California and sanctuary cities have experienced illegal immigrants? Come on, wake upOh, they will get rid of their responsibilities, one way or another, because unsustainable ideas have a consequence. Let them experience it for themselves.Really? You actually think that will happen?No, if the sanctuary cities put their money where their mouths are, they might see the light that making others pay for their intolerable indignities has a consequential price.You think this is brilliant?! How do you see it playing out? Flood the sanctuary cities and then they will suddenly realize the error in their ways and then they will magically come together in support of Trumps immigration policies and everything will be right in the world?!https://www.washingtonpost.com
In an ideal world we just ship them home BUT since that isn't an option this is a great idea. Flood sanctuary cities with more of them than they can handle.
Keep dreaming Gramps. It’s a cheap gotchya attempt that will only fuel each sides base to yell louder and fight harder. It’s not good for America. The drama continues.
Trump should release them in her home town right near her housePelosi fumes over White House plan to release immigrant detainees in sanctuary cities
Clip: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, whose office called the idea “despicable.”
So sending illegal brown people to her district is OFF FUCKING LIMITS YO!
Of course I don't actually believe that makes her a racist but it does prove she is one big ass two faced hypocritical bitch.
Now imagine if Trump had tied the word despicable to illegals, can you imagine the lefts outrage? Oh wait! He said something similar you say? And they still hold it against him you say?
Obvious double standard is obvious
fa·ve·lait's going to turn the whole place into a favella.Anyone think this might adversely affect the CA Real estate and employment markets?
Thanks for clarification, BB. Acknowledged and accepted, of course. I think our dear President tries to wake the sleeping from their slumber on certain issues, and he does get a response. That's better than endless napping (denial) every time confronted with a decision.Sorry, BB, I'm a girl. I think the law that says Immigrants are welcome, get on the list for admittance was the very best we had. Others who break the law need to realize, that in order to come here, you have to obey our laws. That is, register, wait your turn.Well Mien Fuhrer, first you need to build a big wall around the city, then you can start dumping all the undesirables inside. Otherwise they'll escape to the good countryside.
You can determine their final disposition later.
I'm sorry I was thinking of Herr Trumps' policy.
Wasn't he was talking about dumping the asylum seekers in Democratic controlled cities, not legal immigrants?
Why stop with dumping them? They obviously know how to walk. They'll just move out of the cities. If you're gonna dump them, best to wall them in so the can't infect the rest of the country. We can determine what to do with them later. A final solution if you will!
</sarcasm>
[URL='https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump' said:Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump][/URL]
1h Due to the fact that Democrats are unwilling to change our very dangerous immigration laws, we are indeed, as reported, giving strong considerations to placing Illegal Immigrants in Sanctuary Cities only....