geauxtohell
Choose your weapon.
And Ron Paul never proposed such a thing, did he?
Are we back on Ron Paul?
No. I have no problem with Ron Paul's thoughts on the War on Drugs, with the exception that I wouldn't leave the legalization of heroin, cocaine, and meth up to the states.
It's just the other 70% of what he says that I can't stand.
I never thought we left this topic, but I haven't read all the pages. Isn't this thread about him and his stance on drugs?
Why would leaving the legislation of heroin, cocaine, and meth up to the states? Do you honestly believe that states would flat out legalize these drugs?
A funny thing about meth is that it can be argued that it was a creation due to the War on Drugs. The War on Drug gave addicts the incentive to devise cheaper and more effective ways to get high and to get around the system. That in the absence of the War on Drugs, the incentive to create meth would not be there. Of course, this is just a hypothetical argument.
Many people cannot stand the ideas of sound money, a different foreign policy based on trade and diplomacy, restoring American values, and liberty. His message is not for everyone.
Hurray for Ron Paul!
Happy?