JimBowie1958
Old Fogey
- Sep 25, 2011
- 63,590
- 16,776
- 2,220
No, the dignity of work is over his head.Don't you have a toilet to clean ?Johnson played his Trump Humper role well, lie and deny is the Trump way.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, the dignity of work is over his head.Don't you have a toilet to clean ?Johnson played his Trump Humper role well, lie and deny is the Trump way.
Ron Johnson wants “the trout?”
What do you mean? It’s on video. You don’t believe video now?Sure he did.....chuck asked Ron about a quote that he actually said to the NYTimes a few days ago. Oh the horror!!lil Chucky was asking dumbass questions based on faulty lefty talking points designed to illicit a particular response from Johnson for the Dimwingers to use as a sound bite.What stunt do you think he was playing? Ron wouldnt answer the questions. Kept swerving off on different narratives. PatheticOh.....you claim that it's not possible for the Liberal Hack Asshole that is paid to advocate for Democrats on the news is incapable of pulling a stunt like this on one of his Republican guests?That’s not possible, he was the interviewer
Are you really this stupid, or are you just playing dumb?
Johnson wasn't playing his stupid game, and lil Chucky flew off the handle and let the spittle fly.
Uhh did you listen to the interview? What was Todd’s first question? And how did Ron answer it?He answered the fucking questions, but not the way the little faggot wanted him to. So UPCHUCK started arguing with him.What stunt do you think he was playing? Ron wouldnt answer the questions. Kept swerving off on different narratives. PatheticOh.....you claim that it's not possible for the Liberal Hack Asshole that is paid to advocate for Democrats on the news is incapable of pulling a stunt like this on one of his Republican guests?That’s not possible, he was the interviewerStrange.....that's what UPCHUCK TODD was doing.I don’t care which side the interviewee is on. When they can’t answer questions directly and when they are constantly changing the subject and filibustering, it just makes them look bad
Are you really this stupid, or are you just playing dumb?
I saw the video.What do you mean? It’s on video. You don’t believe video now?Sure he did.....chuck asked Ron about a quote that he actually said to the NYTimes a few days ago. Oh the horror!!lil Chucky was asking dumbass questions based on faulty lefty talking points designed to illicit a particular response from Johnson for the Dimwingers to use as a sound bite.What stunt do you think he was playing? Ron wouldnt answer the questions. Kept swerving off on different narratives. PatheticOh.....you claim that it's not possible for the Liberal Hack Asshole that is paid to advocate for Democrats on the news is incapable of pulling a stunt like this on one of his Republican guests?
Are you really this stupid, or are you just playing dumb?
Johnson wasn't playing his stupid game, and lil Chucky flew off the handle and let the spittle fly.
The problem with his question is it comes from liberal talking-points, not from facts. Upchuck talks about "Frozen Money" when there never was any frozen money. As a matter of fact the Ukraine never knew about "Frozen Money" until the media or the Democrats brought it up.Uhh did you listen to the interview? What was Todd’s first question? And how did Ron answer it?He answered the fucking questions, but not the way the little faggot wanted him to. So UPCHUCK started arguing with him.What stunt do you think he was playing? Ron wouldnt answer the questions. Kept swerving off on different narratives. PatheticOh.....you claim that it's not possible for the Liberal Hack Asshole that is paid to advocate for Democrats on the news is incapable of pulling a stunt like this on one of his Republican guests?That’s not possible, he was the interviewerStrange.....that's what UPCHUCK TODD was doing.
Are you really this stupid, or are you just playing dumb?
Ron didn’t answer Todd’s question, he diverted to a different narrative and then yelled over Todd when he tried to get back on track. That’s not a respectable way to act.I saw the video.What do you mean? It’s on video. You don’t believe video now?Sure he did.....chuck asked Ron about a quote that he actually said to the NYTimes a few days ago. Oh the horror!!lil Chucky was asking dumbass questions based on faulty lefty talking points designed to illicit a particular response from Johnson for the Dimwingers to use as a sound bite.What stunt do you think he was playing? Ron wouldnt answer the questions. Kept swerving off on different narratives. Pathetic
Johnson wasn't playing his stupid game, and lil Chucky flew off the handle and let the spittle fly.
Ron Johnson is on the subcommittee investigating Russian interference and he knows the deal. Upchuck refused to listen to his answers. Called them Fox News conspiracy theories. He only wanted him to answer his question the way he wanted....without any explanation. That's called a "Leading Question".
Which question are you talking about?The problem with his question is it comes from liberal talking-points, not from facts. Upchuck talks about "Frozen Money" when there never was any frozen money. As a matter of fact the Ukraine never knew about "Frozen Money" until the media or the Democrats brought it up.Uhh did you listen to the interview? What was Todd’s first question? And how did Ron answer it?He answered the fucking questions, but not the way the little faggot wanted him to. So UPCHUCK started arguing with him.What stunt do you think he was playing? Ron wouldnt answer the questions. Kept swerving off on different narratives. PatheticOh.....you claim that it's not possible for the Liberal Hack Asshole that is paid to advocate for Democrats on the news is incapable of pulling a stunt like this on one of his Republican guests?That’s not possible, he was the interviewer
Are you really this stupid, or are you just playing dumb?
He answered the question. I know this because I just looked at the interview. Upchuck didn't want an explanation. He just wanted a specific answer and Johnson felt the question assumed facts that were not in the record.Ron didn’t answer Todd’s question, he diverted to a different narrative and then yelled over Todd when he tried to get back on track. That’s not a respectable way to act.I saw the video.What do you mean? It’s on video. You don’t believe video now?Sure he did.....chuck asked Ron about a quote that he actually said to the NYTimes a few days ago. Oh the horror!!lil Chucky was asking dumbass questions based on faulty lefty talking points designed to illicit a particular response from Johnson for the Dimwingers to use as a sound bite.
Johnson wasn't playing his stupid game, and lil Chucky flew off the handle and let the spittle fly.
Ron Johnson is on the subcommittee investigating Russian interference and he knows the deal. Upchuck refused to listen to his answers. Called them Fox News conspiracy theories. He only wanted him to answer his question the way he wanted....without any explanation. That's called a "Leading Question".
What was the question and what are you calling an answer?He answered the question. I know this because I just looked at the interview. Upchuck didn't want an explanation. He just wanted a specific answer and Johnson felt the question assumed facts that were not in the record.Ron didn’t answer Todd’s question, he diverted to a different narrative and then yelled over Todd when he tried to get back on track. That’s not a respectable way to act.I saw the video.What do you mean? It’s on video. You don’t believe video now?Sure he did.....chuck asked Ron about a quote that he actually said to the NYTimes a few days ago. Oh the horror!!
Ron Johnson is on the subcommittee investigating Russian interference and he knows the deal. Upchuck refused to listen to his answers. Called them Fox News conspiracy theories. He only wanted him to answer his question the way he wanted....without any explanation. That's called a "Leading Question".
What was the question and what are you calling an answer?He answered the question. I know this because I just looked at the interview. Upchuck didn't want an explanation. He just wanted a specific answer and Johnson felt the question assumed facts that were not in the record.Ron didn’t answer Todd’s question, he diverted to a different narrative and then yelled over Todd when he tried to get back on track. That’s not a respectable way to act.I saw the video.What do you mean? It’s on video. You don’t believe video now?Sure he did.....
Ron Johnson is on the subcommittee investigating Russian interference and he knows the deal. Upchuck refused to listen to his answers. Called them Fox News conspiracy theories. He only wanted him to answer his question the way he wanted....without any explanation. That's called a "Leading Question".
i have watched it. Todd asks about a statement Ron made about trumps dealings with Ukraine and Ron ignores the question to bring up FBI corruption from 2016. What is it you think was asked and answered?What was the question and what are you calling an answer?He answered the question. I know this because I just looked at the interview. Upchuck didn't want an explanation. He just wanted a specific answer and Johnson felt the question assumed facts that were not in the record.Ron didn’t answer Todd’s question, he diverted to a different narrative and then yelled over Todd when he tried to get back on track. That’s not a respectable way to act.I saw the video.What do you mean? It’s on video. You don’t believe video now?
Ron Johnson is on the subcommittee investigating Russian interference and he knows the deal. Upchuck refused to listen to his answers. Called them Fox News conspiracy theories. He only wanted him to answer his question the way he wanted....without any explanation. That's called a "Leading Question".
Fuck off....
Watch the video and figure out what the stupid question was.
The question was stupid.
He didn't ignore the question. This is an example of selective listening.i have watched it. Todd asks about a statement Ron made about trumps dealings with Ukraine and Ron ignores the question to bring up FBI corruption from 2016. What is it you think was asked and answered?What was the question and what are you calling an answer?He answered the question. I know this because I just looked at the interview. Upchuck didn't want an explanation. He just wanted a specific answer and Johnson felt the question assumed facts that were not in the record.Ron didn’t answer Todd’s question, he diverted to a different narrative and then yelled over Todd when he tried to get back on track. That’s not a respectable way to act.I saw the video.
Ron Johnson is on the subcommittee investigating Russian interference and he knows the deal. Upchuck refused to listen to his answers. Called them Fox News conspiracy theories. He only wanted him to answer his question the way he wanted....without any explanation. That's called a "Leading Question".
Fuck off....
Watch the video and figure out what the stupid question was.
The question was stupid.
Haha. No, we never heard the answer because he never answered it. It’s called diversion and distraction.He didn't ignore the question. This is an example of selective listening.i have watched it. Todd asks about a statement Ron made about trumps dealings with Ukraine and Ron ignores the question to bring up FBI corruption from 2016. What is it you think was asked and answered?What was the question and what are you calling an answer?He answered the question. I know this because I just looked at the interview. Upchuck didn't want an explanation. He just wanted a specific answer and Johnson felt the question assumed facts that were not in the record.Ron didn’t answer Todd’s question, he diverted to a different narrative and then yelled over Todd when he tried to get back on track. That’s not a respectable way to act.
Fuck off....
Watch the video and figure out what the stupid question was.
The question was stupid.
- The question was silly and was a leading question
- Ron Johnson tried to explain the background of the reason for his comments and Upchuck called it Fox News propaganda...which is a bunch of leftist BS
- Upchuck was calling Ron Johnson a liar. I would have told him to go fuck himself.
Also you never heard the answer because of Upchuck Todd's constant arguing. Upchuck didn't want to hear the facts of the case because his closed liberal mind didn't allow him to believe it was possible.......or it was simply not allowed to be discussed on the air. When it comes to Communist countries this is called censorship. Something fascists like Upchuck believe in whole-heartedly.
Haha. No, we never heard the answer because he never answered it. It’s called diversion and distraction.He didn't ignore the question. This is an example of selective listening.i have watched it. Todd asks about a statement Ron made about trumps dealings with Ukraine and Ron ignores the question to bring up FBI corruption from 2016. What is it you think was asked and answered?What was the question and what are you calling an answer?He answered the question. I know this because I just looked at the interview. Upchuck didn't want an explanation. He just wanted a specific answer and Johnson felt the question assumed facts that were not in the record.
Fuck off....
Watch the video and figure out what the stupid question was.
The question was stupid.
- The question was silly and was a leading question
- Ron Johnson tried to explain the background of the reason for his comments and Upchuck called it Fox News propaganda...which is a bunch of leftist BS
- Upchuck was calling Ron Johnson a liar. I would have told him to go fuck himself.
Also you never heard the answer because of Upchuck Todd's constant arguing. Upchuck didn't want to hear the facts of the case because his closed liberal mind didn't allow him to believe it was possible.......or it was simply not allowed to be discussed on the air. When it comes to Communist countries this is called censorship. Something fascists like Upchuck believe in whole-heartedly.
then Don’t read it. It’s a free country.Haha. No, we never heard the answer because he never answered it. It’s called diversion and distraction.He didn't ignore the question. This is an example of selective listening.i have watched it. Todd asks about a statement Ron made about trumps dealings with Ukraine and Ron ignores the question to bring up FBI corruption from 2016. What is it you think was asked and answered?What was the question and what are you calling an answer?
Fuck off....
Watch the video and figure out what the stupid question was.
The question was stupid.
- The question was silly and was a leading question
- Ron Johnson tried to explain the background of the reason for his comments and Upchuck called it Fox News propaganda...which is a bunch of leftist BS
- Upchuck was calling Ron Johnson a liar. I would have told him to go fuck himself.
Also you never heard the answer because of Upchuck Todd's constant arguing. Upchuck didn't want to hear the facts of the case because his closed liberal mind didn't allow him to believe it was possible.......or it was simply not allowed to be discussed on the air. When it comes to Communist countries this is called censorship. Something fascists like Upchuck believe in whole-heartedly.
Slap yer' boner down for Chuck Todd, will ya'?
This crap is getting old!
then Don’t read it. It’s a free country.Haha. No, we never heard the answer because he never answered it. It’s called diversion and distraction.He didn't ignore the question. This is an example of selective listening.i have watched it. Todd asks about a statement Ron made about trumps dealings with Ukraine and Ron ignores the question to bring up FBI corruption from 2016. What is it you think was asked and answered?Fuck off....
Watch the video and figure out what the stupid question was.
The question was stupid.
- The question was silly and was a leading question
- Ron Johnson tried to explain the background of the reason for his comments and Upchuck called it Fox News propaganda...which is a bunch of leftist BS
- Upchuck was calling Ron Johnson a liar. I would have told him to go fuck himself.
Also you never heard the answer because of Upchuck Todd's constant arguing. Upchuck didn't want to hear the facts of the case because his closed liberal mind didn't allow him to believe it was possible.......or it was simply not allowed to be discussed on the air. When it comes to Communist countries this is called censorship. Something fascists like Upchuck believe in whole-heartedly.
Slap yer' boner down for Chuck Todd, will ya'?
This crap is getting old!
Yes....he answered....but of course the reason for the statement was a false assumption by Upchuck.Haha. No, we never heard the answer because he never answered it. It’s called diversion and distraction.He didn't ignore the question. This is an example of selective listening.i have watched it. Todd asks about a statement Ron made about trumps dealings with Ukraine and Ron ignores the question to bring up FBI corruption from 2016. What is it you think was asked and answered?What was the question and what are you calling an answer?He answered the question. I know this because I just looked at the interview. Upchuck didn't want an explanation. He just wanted a specific answer and Johnson felt the question assumed facts that were not in the record.
Fuck off....
Watch the video and figure out what the stupid question was.
The question was stupid.
- The question was silly and was a leading question
- Ron Johnson tried to explain the background of the reason for his comments and Upchuck called it Fox News propaganda...which is a bunch of leftist BS
- Upchuck was calling Ron Johnson a liar. I would have told him to go fuck himself.
Also you never heard the answer because of Upchuck Todd's constant arguing. Upchuck didn't want to hear the facts of the case because his closed liberal mind didn't allow him to believe it was possible.......or it was simply not allowed to be discussed on the air. When it comes to Communist countries this is called censorship. Something fascists like Upchuck believe in whole-heartedly.
oh sorry, I must have missed the answer. What was it?Yes....he answered....but of course the reason for the statement was a false assumption by Upchuck.Haha. No, we never heard the answer because he never answered it. It’s called diversion and distraction.He didn't ignore the question. This is an example of selective listening.i have watched it. Todd asks about a statement Ron made about trumps dealings with Ukraine and Ron ignores the question to bring up FBI corruption from 2016. What is it you think was asked and answered?What was the question and what are you calling an answer?
Fuck off....
Watch the video and figure out what the stupid question was.
The question was stupid.
- The question was silly and was a leading question
- Ron Johnson tried to explain the background of the reason for his comments and Upchuck called it Fox News propaganda...which is a bunch of leftist BS
- Upchuck was calling Ron Johnson a liar. I would have told him to go fuck himself.
Also you never heard the answer because of Upchuck Todd's constant arguing. Upchuck didn't want to hear the facts of the case because his closed liberal mind didn't allow him to believe it was possible.......or it was simply not allowed to be discussed on the air. When it comes to Communist countries this is called censorship. Something fascists like Upchuck believe in whole-heartedly.
Military aid was not frozen because Trump wanted an investigation. Trump wanted to hold up the aid until he talked to the new Ukrainian president and felt him out. The last president was well known for his corruption. Trump wasn't about to give aid to someone he felt he couldn't trust.
BTW, DICKHEAD.....IT'S ABOUT TIME WE HAD A PRESIDENT THAT WASN'T WILLING TO JUST THROW MONEY AT A CORRUPT REGIME.
I told you his answer.oh sorry, I must have missed the answer. What was it?Yes....he answered....but of course the reason for the statement was a false assumption by Upchuck.Haha. No, we never heard the answer because he never answered it. It’s called diversion and distraction.He didn't ignore the question. This is an example of selective listening.i have watched it. Todd asks about a statement Ron made about trumps dealings with Ukraine and Ron ignores the question to bring up FBI corruption from 2016. What is it you think was asked and answered?Fuck off....
Watch the video and figure out what the stupid question was.
The question was stupid.
- The question was silly and was a leading question
- Ron Johnson tried to explain the background of the reason for his comments and Upchuck called it Fox News propaganda...which is a bunch of leftist BS
- Upchuck was calling Ron Johnson a liar. I would have told him to go fuck himself.
Also you never heard the answer because of Upchuck Todd's constant arguing. Upchuck didn't want to hear the facts of the case because his closed liberal mind didn't allow him to believe it was possible.......or it was simply not allowed to be discussed on the air. When it comes to Communist countries this is called censorship. Something fascists like Upchuck believe in whole-heartedly.
Military aid was not frozen because Trump wanted an investigation. Trump wanted to hold up the aid until he talked to the new Ukrainian president and felt him out. The last president was well known for his corruption. Trump wasn't about to give aid to someone he felt he couldn't trust.
BTW, DICKHEAD.....IT'S ABOUT TIME WE HAD A PRESIDENT THAT WASN'T WILLING TO JUST THROW MONEY AT A CORRUPT REGIME.
And I thought trump withheld the aid to get other UN countries to pay more. At least that was the first excuse... crumbled pretty fast though