Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome Birthers to the Romney Campaign!
So if the Communists endorse Obama, then you'll admit he's a Marxist, right? Or do only the Republicans get stuck with this logic?
I think it's more of, does Obama do a shout out to the communists, should we take that into account.
Like Romney did a shout out to the Birther-nuts.
[youtube]cht3bitxknI[/youtube]
And what's the topic -- that Mittens thinks it's wise to pander to the far-right birther loons in his party?
It's almost like he's trying to lose the election.
Hey Look, Independents! I'm pandering to the Loony Birthers!
oh well, you didn't mind when Obama "evolved" to pander to homosexuals
When Osama attacked the Russian ... military ... it wasn't terrorism. When Osama blew up buildings and murdered civilians in the streets it was. That confuses you?
So the attack on the USS Cole wasn't terrorism?
The bombing of the barracks in Lebanon wasn't terrorism?
I'm not certain he's the confused one here.
Hey Look, Independents! I'm pandering to the Loony Birthers!
oh well, you didn't mind when Obama "evolved" to pander to homosexuals
Not at all. We are voting citizens, are we not?
Things I've learned on this board (changing daily!)
1. The 2010 elections were an electoral college landslide for Republicans (Rottweiler)
2. South Africa was a "prosperous" and "civilized" country under Apartheid. (Uncensored)
3. Willowtree is going "to vote for Romney because he's white."
Yeah, socialism with Christians is like oil and water. We know deep down you want to bomb local churches, nutjob.
We got a fundie here!
Everyone act accordingly.
Point and laugh?
(PS only losers randomly play the racist card)
then stop playing it
The fact we can elect a black man is a sign of how much progress we've made in the last 50 years.
And then we see that same black man destroy at least 20 years of racial progress.
No one asked to see Mitt's birth certificate because he's white. We all know that. However, we have repeatedly asked to see his tax returns.
Things I've learned on this board (changing daily!)
1. The 2010 elections were an electoral college landslide for Republicans (Rottweiler)
2. South Africa was a "prosperous" and "civilized" country under Apartheid. (Uncensored)
3. Willowtree is going "to vote for Romney because he's white."
On #3, are you really that stupid that you can't recognize when someone is mocking you or are you a dick who does know it and takes it seriously to be offended? I just pointed out liberals like to do that.
On #2, not sure what you were disagreeing with.
On #1, wow, got him in a typo, congratulations. Well played, you're a beast...
(PS only losers randomly play the racist card)
then stop playing it
To be totally accurate, he is playing the Race Card Card.
Things I've learned on this board (changing daily!)
1. The 2010 elections were an electoral college landslide for Republicans (Rottweiler)
2. South Africa was a "prosperous" and "civilized" country under Apartheid. (Uncensored)
3. Willowtree is going "to vote for Romney because he's white."
On #3, are you really that stupid that you can't recognize when someone is mocking you or are you a dick who does know it and takes it seriously to be offended? I just pointed out liberals like to do that.
On #2, not sure what you were disagreeing with.
On #1, wow, got him in a typo, congratulations. Well played, you're a beast...
On #3....Willow has stated on several occasions that she is only voting for white candidates. No mocking, fact.
Mormonism got Romney out of serving the nation, if you can't serve in the military because of your religion, how then can you serve as commander in chief of that same army?
Right. And how did he do that, exactly?
Obama has certainly used his position of authority to give favorable treatment to his own race.
that is racism my friend
has he? which race?
please... rant and rave and show us some more of that obama-deranged lunacy that's fired up the rabid right for the past 3 plus years.
When Osama attacked the Russian ... military ... it wasn't terrorism. When Osama blew up buildings and murdered civilians in the streets it was. That confuses you?
So the attack on the USS Cole wasn't terrorism?
The bombing of the barracks in Lebanon wasn't terrorism?
I'm not certain he's the confused one here.
No, they weren't terrorism. You have to be so mind numbingly specific with liberals, and then it isn't enough. But I'll waste one post actually making an argument and then I'll give it up in the next one when you still don't get it.
Terrorism is an attack which serves no purpose but to instill ... wait for it ... terror. It has no military value and no purpose other than the psychological impact of the attack. I can't believe I have to explain that.
Bin Laden was given to me as an example asking why his attack was not terrorism against the Russians in Afghanistan and it was against the US in NY. My answer did involve military attack against Russians and civilian attack against the US, so you took it to the mind numbing extreme I didn't say or mean that I was saying all attacks against the military are not terrorism and no attack against civilians are not terrorism. So, to address your examples, which if you give lucid replies to I will say serious and if you don't I'm not going to play catch the mouse with you.
Afghanistan - They were attacks against the Russian military who had invaded Afghanistan. Bin Laden was there fighting them to repel the invasion. A clear military objective. Tot terrorism.
NY - Bin Laden blew up a civilian office building in NY and murdered civilians. No military objective, no purpose but instilling terror. Terrorism.
Indians attacking whites. First, Joe in his bigotry lumps all Indians together as if they were the same, they weren't. But on the attacks against white civilians, the Indians who fought them were killing people who they viewed as invading their territory to drive them out. It was a clear military objective.
Lebanon and the Cole were attacks also on the military in a region of the world the people who attacked them felt did not belong there. They were for a purpose, not terrorism.
Attacks on the military are almost always not terrorism. The one I could think of that could be argued was the radical Muslim who opened fire in the cafeteria in North Carolina, it's hard to see a military objective in that.
Attacks on civilians can be, it depends ... wait for it ... why they did it. Note I did not argue right or wrong, just whether it's actually "terrorism" or not. Seriously, I can't believe you guys don't know what "terrorism" is. Then again, sadly I can believe it. Terrorism for liberals is like all words, the definition of the word changes based on what suits the interests of liberalism.
Obama has certainly used his position of authority to give favorable treatment to his own race.
that is racism my friend
has he? which race?
please... rant and rave and show us some more of that obama-deranged lunacy that's fired up the rabid right for the past 3 plus years.
my god are you ever stupid
You should ban yourself
Things I've learned on this board (changing daily!)
1. The 2010 elections were an electoral college landslide for Republicans (Rottweiler)
2. South Africa was a "prosperous" and "civilized" country under Apartheid. (Uncensored)
3. Willowtree is going "to vote for Romney because he's white."
On #3, are you really that stupid that you can't recognize when someone is mocking you or are you a dick who does know it and takes it seriously to be offended? I just pointed out liberals like to do that.
On #2, not sure what you were disagreeing with.
Mormonism got Romney out of serving the nation, if you can't serve in the military because of your religion, how then can you serve as commander in chief of that same army?
then Obama is not qualified b/c he had no military service either
