Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I missed the joke. What is the topic? That Romney is a rich, white kid who has never been out of his comfortable zone? No one is questioning that. What is the topic of this thread? That you have it on tape? "Crikey!, That's a big one!"
Oh yea, if you're white, you don't even have to wipe your own ass. Haven't you heard? IDIOT.
Romney after a hard day campaigning.
[
Except the Russians didn't "invade" Afghanistan, .
What a fucking surprise that a loon like you would be so far left as to play the apologist for the USSR. You're a fucking whack-job.
Obama has certainly used his position of authority to give favorable treatment to his own race.
that is racism my friend
has he? which race?
please... rant and rave and show us some more of that obama-deranged lunacy that's fired up the rabid right for the past 3 plus years.
my god are you ever stupid
You should ban yourself
Just pointing out that the legitimate, recognized government of Afghanistan, the one that had a seat in the United Nations and all the other countries of the world diplmoatically recognized, INVITED Soviet assistance.
Rush is not a doer, he is just a talker who gets other people to do for him.There has not been one iota of credible evidence stating so. Anybody who thinks so is called a birfer for a reason.
He has addressed the issue many times. Properly. He could get it notorised by Scalia himself and the con loons wouldn't be satisfied...
Rush would have to sign it for them.
Rush could lead by getting elected, well no, he's a felon.
You want to explain how Romney, saying he was born in Michigan, is racist?The fact we can elect a black man is a sign of how much progress we've made in the last 50 years.
The fact a guy like Romney can appeal to racists like Gatsby shows how far we have to go.
You want to explain how Romney, saying he was born in Michigan, is racist?The fact we can elect a black man is a sign of how much progress we've made in the last 50 years.
The fact a guy like Romney can appeal to racists like Gatsby shows how far we have to go.
This is what is meant by left wing nut job racism. You people promote it like breakfast cereal.
oh well, you didn't mind when Obama "evolved" to pander to homosexuals
Not at all. We are voting citizens, are we not?
so are these so called LOONY birthers you refer too.
and Romney was not pandering to them as much as Obama was to you..
but whatever
then stop playing it
To be totally accurate, he is playing the Race Card Card.
And that card belongs to you...
Democrats actually really are racist. Blacks need government more than other people, they aren't like us. And it's racist to deny it. That really is the race card.
On #3, are you really that stupid that you can't recognize when someone is mocking you or are you a dick who does know it and takes it seriously to be offended? I just pointed out liberals like to do that.
On #2, not sure what you were disagreeing with.
On #1, wow, got him in a typo, congratulations. Well played, you're a beast...
On #3....Willow has stated on several occasions that she is only voting for white candidates. No mocking, fact.
She also said she's voting for Romney because he's male. There's a point with the irrational where you stop trying to argue against it rationally.
OMIGOD! We can't have educated African Americans! What is he THINKING?????my god are you ever stupid
You should ban yourself
Not seeing any examples yet. Are they coming soon?
I would ask you if you were playing dumb, but I know it's not an act.
There have been plenty of threads about that subject on USMB try reading them
PS here is one example. Try to dodge this African-American Education Office: Obama Announces White House Initiative On Educational Excellence
No, they weren't terrorism. You have to be so mind numbingly specific with liberals, and then it isn't enough. But I'll waste one post actually making an argument and then I'll give it up in the next one when you still don't get it.
Terrorism is an attack which serves no purpose but to instill ... wait for it ... terror. It has no military value and no purpose other than the psychological impact of the attack. I can't believe I have to explain that.
Bin Laden was given to me as an example asking why his attack was not terrorism against the Russians in Afghanistan and it was against the US in NY. My answer did involve military attack against Russians and civilian attack against the US, so you took it to the mind numbing extreme I didn't say or mean that I was saying all attacks against the military are not terrorism and no attack against civilians are not terrorism. So, to address your examples, which if you give lucid replies to I will say serious and if you don't I'm not going to play catch the mouse with you.
Afghanistan - They were attacks against the Russian military who had invaded Afghanistan. Bin Laden was there fighting them to repel the invasion. A clear military objective. Tot terrorism.
NY - Bin Laden blew up a civilian office building in NY and murdered civilians. No military objective, no purpose but instilling terror. Terrorism.
Indians attacking whites. First, Joe in his bigotry lumps all Indians together as if they were the same, they weren't. But on the attacks against white civilians, the Indians who fought them were killing people who they viewed as invading their territory to drive them out. It was a clear military objective.
Lebanon and the Cole were attacks also on the military in a region of the world the people who attacked them felt did not belong there. They were for a purpose, not terrorism.
Attacks on the military are almost always not terrorism. The one I could think of that could be argued was the radical Muslim who opened fire in the cafeteria in North Carolina, it's hard to see a military objective in that.
Attacks on civilians can be, it depends ... wait for it ... why they did it. Note I did not argue right or wrong, just whether it's actually "terrorism" or not. Seriously, I can't believe you guys don't know what "terrorism" is. Then again, sadly I can believe it. Terrorism for liberals is like all words, the definition of the word changes based on what suits the interests of liberalism.
Your "argument" as it were is simply that bombing military targets is not terrorism.
I feel no need to argue such a point. It's absurd.
You also don't have to argue that point because it's not what I said, see red. See argument in red. Anyway, you've proven my point also that you're a dumb ass who can't follow a simple argument and it's a waste of time to try, so I'm giving it up. See my point in blue.
Your "argument" is absurd. The USS Cole and the bombings in Lebanon weren't terrorism? That's funny.
Please, add that to your platform right next to the claim that Apartheid was civilized.
Just pointing out that the legitimate, recognized government of Afghanistan, the one that had a seat in the United Nations and all the other countries of the world diplmoatically recognized, INVITED Soviet assistance.
Study more than the summary of the first thing that pops up on your google search, 'professor.'
What you two simpletons don't understand is that "terrorism" doesn't mean "bad." It has an actual definition. What's funny is how you think you're the intelligent party when you can't understand words past that they mean "good" or "bad."
Bombing the Cole was bad (it was), terrorism is bad, ergo bombing the Cole was terrorism. It's as deep as it goes. Actually shooting a missile at a military ship in the middle east has a clear military objective. Terrorism, by definition, doesn't. It wasn't terrorism, it was a military attack.
Here's a total mind fuck for you. The attack on the Cole wasn't terrorism, but it was still "bad." I mean wow, you two will be trying to figure that one out for months...
Oh really?
Rather than making me repeat the discussion why don't you read the last couple pages so you know what my argument is.
You want to explain how Romney, saying he was born in Michigan, is racist?The fact we can elect a black man is a sign of how much progress we've made in the last 50 years.
The fact a guy like Romney can appeal to racists like Gatsby shows how far we have to go.
This is what is meant by left wing nut job racism. You people promote it like breakfast cereal.
The fact that we produce so many Joeb's who can get a guy like Obama elected shows how far we've slid. He doesn't even care that my top pick for VP was Condi Rice. He just wants to throw the racism slurs b/c that's what racists do.
You want to explain how Romney, saying he was born in Michigan, is racist?The fact we can elect a black man is a sign of how much progress we've made in the last 50 years.
The fact a guy like Romney can appeal to racists like Gatsby shows how far we have to go.
This is what is meant by left wing nut job racism. You people promote it like breakfast cereal.
You want to explain how Romney, saying he was born in Michigan, is racist?The fact we can elect a black man is a sign of how much progress we've made in the last 50 years.
The fact a guy like Romney can appeal to racists like Gatsby shows how far we have to go.
This is what is meant by left wing nut job racism. You people promote it like breakfast cereal.
The fact that we produce so many Joeb's who can get a guy like Obama elected shows how far we've slid. He doesn't even care that my top pick for VP was Condi Rice. He just wants to throw the racism slurs b/c that's what racists do.
Not at all. We are voting citizens, are we not?
so are these so called LOONY birthers you refer too.
and Romney was not pandering to them as much as Obama was to you..
but whatever
Yes they are....and we can laugh at them....and that Romney is pandering to loonies.
You want to explain how Romney, saying he was born in Michigan, is racist?
This is what is meant by left wing nut job racism. You people promote it like breakfast cereal.
The fact that we produce so many Joeb's who can get a guy like Obama elected shows how far we've slid. He doesn't even care that my top pick for VP was Condi Rice. He just wants to throw the racism slurs b/c that's what racists do.
So easy to say now. Isn't it?
You want to explain how Romney, saying he was born in Michigan, is racist?The fact we can elect a black man is a sign of how much progress we've made in the last 50 years.
The fact a guy like Romney can appeal to racists like Gatsby shows how far we have to go.
This is what is meant by left wing nut job racism. You people promote it like breakfast cereal.
