Roger Stone's only crime was helping Trump get elected...

[Asclepias]

Who was caught lying about Trump/Russia collusion?

You mean who wasnt caught? Drumpf lied on national TV when he said the meeting was about adoption.

The Russia Meeting at Trump Tower Was to Discuss Adoption. Then It Wasn’t. How Accounts Have Shifted.

You better pull up your pants and go running to Mueller. Apparently he either hasn't heard about this or realizes, unlike you, that it's based on nothing but bullshit.

Your link is from Aug 2018 NYT Opinion piece. It's 2019 now and Trump is President. Isn't it about time to let go of the past and the hatred? Oh Yeah, there is no "Drumpf" in the news but, I understand, you are consumed with hatred and make up juvenile names for non-existent "monsters in the closet." Good luck with that. Just accept Trump. He's our President. Do you live in America? I bet you're Russian.

I dont have to run to Mueller. He is methodically crawling up Drumpfs ass with a microscope as we speak so he actually knows more than anyone else about it. Dont get all pissy with me because Drumpf lied. You wanted a liar for a POTUS and you got him. Now deal with it as his friends all get sent to prison that helped him collude with the Russians.

 

[Leo123]

I dont have to run to Mueller. He is methodically crawling up Drumpfs ass with a microscope as we speak so he actually knows more than anyone else about it. Dont get all pissy with me because Drumpf lied. You wanted a liar for a POTUS and you got him. Now deal with it as his friends all get sent to prison that helped him collude with the Russians.

Come on now, you have TDS....let it go......You'll feel better. Mueller has nothing. Your fantasy is collapsing....Deal with it.

 

[bripat9643]

You have no clue about the series of events involved in the investigation or what evidence they have. You are making biased assumptions based on spun up narratives. That’s not a smart way to go about it

It is a bullshit witch hunt based on an already discredited dossier. There is and was no Trump/Russia collusion. Try looking at Hillary, lots of evidence there.

Mueller's investigation has roots from Papodopolus bragging to an australian diplomat, and firing of Comey, not the dossier.

no collusion? Giuliani admitted there was, and Trump's team had over a 100 contacts with russia.

There was no crime in the first place. Mueller is heading an investigation looking for a crime that never existed except in the minds of TDSers and the radical left-wing press.

Of course there was a crime. Russian interference in the election was a crime. Emails were stolen and then published. There was lie after lie about contacts with Russians and if the Trump campaign or anybody associated with the campaigned conspired with the Russians that is also a crime. I’ve heard the no crime no evidence BS. They are nothing more than diversions and talking points

We're talking about crimes committed by the Trump campaign. There were none. Period. You have no evidence the emails were stolen. No one has ever produced any evidence for that. There was one meeting with "a Russian," not "the Russians."

What is "also a crime?"

You're conjuring up a huge criminal conspiracy out of nothing. This witch hunt is a big nothing.

 

[bripat9643]

Who was caught lying about Trump/Russia collusion?

You mean who wasnt caught? Drumpf lied on national TV when he said the meeting was about adoption.

The Russia Meeting at Trump Tower Was to Discuss Adoption. Then It Wasn’t. How Accounts Have Shifted.

You better pull up your pants and go running to Mueller. Apparently he either hasn't heard about this or realizes, unlike you, that it's based on nothing but bullshit.

Your link is from Aug 2018 NYT Opinion piece. It's 2019 now and Trump is President. Isn't it about time to let go of the past and the hatred? Oh Yeah, there is no "Drumpf" in the news but, I understand, you are consumed with hatred and make up juvenile names for non-existent "monsters in the closet." Good luck with that. Just accept Trump. He's our President. Do you live in America? I bet you're Russian.

I dont have to run to Mueller. He is methodically crawling up Drumpfs ass with a microscope as we speak so he actually knows more than anyone else about it. Dont get all pissy with me because Drumpf lied. You wanted a liar for a POTUS and you got him. Now deal with it as his friends all get sent to prison that helped him collude with the Russians.

Whenever you morons can't support your claims, you always say "Mueller has the evidence." You are free to make virtually any accusation, no matter how absurd, with producing a shred of evidence. Whenever you spout the "Mueller has the evidence" mantra, you prove beyond doubt that you're nothing but a shameless lying douchebag.

 

[bripat9643]

What the **** does "interfering with a national election" entail? Is publishing factual information "interfering?" What is the scope of this so-called crime?

For the last time, Neither Stone nor Wikileaks stole anything.

Ask our intelligence angencies who all agree that crimes were committed

They do? Where?

Uh, everywhere. Boy you are clueless, do you pay attention to anything?

Here is a link to a Republican led senate committee agreeing with the intelligence report. Do a simple google search and find quotes, interviews, videos, reports and whatever else you want to see first hand. You can’t hide from it. You lose again

Senate panel agrees with intelligence finding that Russia interfered in election, backed Trump

Establishment Senate douchebags wrote a report that agrees with Mueller? What makes you believe they were ever Trump's allies?

You said "our intelligence angencies [sic] who all agree that crimes were committed." So where's the evidence for that?

Also why does it matter if the congressmen were allies of Trump? If the evidence supports certain facts then shouldn’t those fact be acknowledged despite the political implications? Just because somebody can objectively acknowledge that the facts point towards Russian interference, that doesn’t make them enemies of the President. That is idiotlogic

It matters because you implied that they were allies of Trump. You're such a ******* douchebag. You haven't reported any facts from the Senate report. I doubt that there are any in it. It's purely a political document.

Again, we aren't discussing Russian interference, an accusation that no one disputes. We are discussing so-called "collusion." You keep trying to change the subject because you know Mueller has drilled a dry hole. There never was any evidence of "collusion."

 

[bripat9643]

What the **** does "interfering with a national election" entail? Is publishing factual information "interfering?" What is the scope of this so-called crime?

For the last time, Neither Stone nor Wikileaks stole anything.

Ask our intelligence angencies who all agree that crimes were committed

They do? Where?

Uh, everywhere. Boy you are clueless, do you pay attention to anything?

Here is a link to a Republican led senate committee agreeing with the intelligence report. Do a simple google search and find quotes, interviews, videos, reports and whatever else you want to see first hand. You can’t hide from it. You lose again

Senate panel agrees with intelligence finding that Russia interfered in election, backed Trump

Establishment Senate douchebags wrote a report that agrees with Mueller? What makes you believe they were ever Trump's allies?

You said "our intelligence angencies [sic] who all agree that crimes were committed." So where's the evidence for that?

Go to YouTube and look up congressional hearings where the heads of our intel agencies all say on camera the Russian collusion thing happened. Look up the report that was filed stating the same thing. Go educate yourself with the facts so you don’t sound like such a dumbass

"The Russian thing?" What the **** is the "Russian thing?" Quote a single one of these douchebags, other than Clapper and Brennan, who says they believe in the "Russian thing."

BTW, you are able to post links to videos, aren't you? If you have video evidence, then post a link to it. Otherwise, shut the **** up.

 

[bripat9643]

You have no clue about the series of events involved in the investigation or what evidence they have. You are making biased assumptions based on spun up narratives. That’s not a smart way to go about it

It is a bullshit witch hunt based on an already discredited dossier. There is and was no Trump/Russia collusion. Try looking at Hillary, lots of evidence there.

Mueller's investigation has roots from Papodopolus bragging to an australian diplomat, and firing of Comey, not the dossier.

no collusion? Giuliani admitted there was, and Trump's team had over a 100 contacts with russia.

There was no crime in the first place. Mueller is heading an investigation looking for a crime that never existed except in the minds of TDSers and the radical left-wing press.

If there was no crime committed why is everyone lying about it?

Who's lying about what crime?

 

[bripat9643]

Who was caught lying about Trump/Russia collusion?

You mean who wasnt caught? Drumpf lied on national TV when he said the meeting was about adoption.

The Russia Meeting at Trump Tower Was to Discuss Adoption. Then It Wasn’t. How Accounts Have Shifted.

You better pull up your pants and go running to Mueller. Apparently he either hasn't heard about this or realizes, unlike you, that it's based on nothing but bullshit.

Your link is from Aug 2018 NYT Opinion piece. It's 2019 now and Trump is President. Isn't it about time to let go of the past and the hatred? Oh Yeah, there is no "Drumpf" in the news but, I understand, you are consumed with hatred and make up juvenile names for non-existent "monsters in the closet." Good luck with that. Just accept Trump. He's our President. Do you live in America? I bet you're Russian.

I dont have to run to Mueller. He is methodically crawling up Drumpfs ass with a microscope as we speak so he actually knows more than anyone else about it. Dont get all pissy with me because Drumpf lied. You wanted a liar for a POTUS and you got him. Now deal with it as his friends all get sent to prison that helped him collude with the Russians.

First you claim you don't have to go running to Mueller, and the next thing you do is go running to Mueller

 

[justoffal]

Helping somebody get elected is not a crime. Breaking the law is a crime and he broke several laws. Why are these basic things so hard for some people to grasp?

But you can't really name the laws that he broke before the FBI started questioning him.
His biggest crime was not remembering an email here or there.

First of all you do t know what intel the FBI had when they started the investigation. Second, the eveidemce that we have seen about his relationships with Wikileaks and know statements is plenty of reason to question him. If he lied or co tradicted himself during questioning that warrants digging deeper. Why is he lying? Lastly if a crime is uncovered in this process they have every right to act on it. I don’t see what your issue is?

There is no reason to question him since no crimes are being investigated.

Would you consider stealing emails and interfering with a national election a crime as our intel agencies all have?

What the **** does "interfering with a national election" entail? Is publishing factual information "interfering?" What is the scope of this so-called crime?

For the last time, Neither Stone nor Wikileaks stole anything.

From hence forth I shall be referring to
The Mueller false-vestigation as

THE "INSURANCE POLICY " COUP.

JO

 

[dudmuck]

But you can't really name the laws that he broke before the FBI started questioning him.
His biggest crime was not remembering an email here or there.

First of all you do t know what intel the FBI had when they started the investigation. Second, the eveidemce that we have seen about his relationships with Wikileaks and know statements is plenty of reason to question him. If he lied or co tradicted himself during questioning that warrants digging deeper. Why is he lying? Lastly if a crime is uncovered in this process they have every right to act on it. I don’t see what your issue is?

There is no reason to question him since no crimes are being investigated.

Would you consider stealing emails and interfering with a national election a crime as our intel agencies all have?

What the **** does "interfering with a national election" entail? Is publishing factual information "interfering?" What is the scope of this so-called crime?

For the last time, Neither Stone nor Wikileaks stole anything.

From hence forth I shall be referring to
The Mueller false-vestigation as

THE "INSURANCE POLICY " COUP.

JO

A former DOJ corruption prosecutor says that Junior will be indicted. Not speculation, based on inside info.

 

[mudwhistle]

First of all you do t know what intel the FBI had when they started the investigation. Second, the eveidemce that we have seen about his relationships with Wikileaks and know statements is plenty of reason to question him. If he lied or co tradicted himself during questioning that warrants digging deeper. Why is he lying? Lastly if a crime is uncovered in this process they have every right to act on it. I don’t see what your issue is?

There is no reason to question him since no crimes are being investigated.

Would you consider stealing emails and interfering with a national election a crime as our intel agencies all have?

What the **** does "interfering with a national election" entail? Is publishing factual information "interfering?" What is the scope of this so-called crime?

For the last time, Neither Stone nor Wikileaks stole anything.

From hence forth I shall be referring to
The Mueller false-vestigation as

THE "INSURANCE POLICY " COUP.

JO

A former DOJ corruption prosecutor says that Junior will be indicted. Not speculation, based on inside info.

I think if Mueller tries that he'll be hit so hard with a lawsuit his head will spin.

 

[ThisIsMe]

...all the rest is bullshit.

Helping somebody get elected is not a crime. Breaking the law is a crime and he broke several laws. Why are these basic things so hard for some people to grasp?

What’s does it have to do with Russia collusion?

Possibly a lot if he was conspiring with Wikileaks but we shall see how the trial goes. You do admit he broke the law right? If in the course of the investigation they found that he murdered somebody do you think it should be ignored by authorities because it doesn’t have anything to do with Russian collusion? What a silly argument.

So you're admitting this is an open ended general investigation. It's simply the left hoping they can find something to pin on trump.

That's fine, however, we need to do this for every presidential, Senate, and house member. Tha would be the right way to do it.


Next time a Democrat wins the presidency, well see if numerous open ended investigations ensue for the duration of their presidency..

I think they started by investigation election interference and the many crimes associated with that. Then as they questioned and dug deeper they found Trump people lying over and over again which is why many of them are in hot water. They have been very tight lipped so who knows what else they are sitting on. You are repeating tired talking points that don’t align with reality, do yourself a favor and stop doing that

But, from what I understand, all the things they are in hot water for have nothing to do with the investigation of Russian collusion.

Yes, it is possible to find other crimes committed during the investigation of another matter, but you cannot open an investigation just for the purpose of trying to see if you can find things on someone.

The way the post i responded to was worded, it almost sounded like they were inferring that an open ended investigation be conducted. If I misunderstood, then my apologies.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Instead of just admitting you can't prove a thing you claim,

That doesn't make any sense, either. My only claim was that he was charged with a serious crime. And if you don't know that for a fact, you shouldn't even be commenting on this topic.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So the process is to arrest someone who has committed no crime,

Dang this is dumb. For one, it's a fantasy you just made up and could not possibly know the truth of. Second, people get arrested when they are charged with crimes. Yes, that's the "plan". It always is. I think you guys are drunk or something.

 

[justoffal]

Helping somebody get elected is not a crime. Breaking the law is a crime and he broke several laws. Why are these basic things so hard for some people to grasp?

What’s does it have to do with Russia collusion?

Possibly a lot if he was conspiring with Wikileaks but we shall see how the trial goes. You do admit he broke the law right? If in the course of the investigation they found that he murdered somebody do you think it should be ignored by authorities because it doesn’t have anything to do with Russian collusion? What a silly argument.

So you're admitting this is an open ended general investigation. It's simply the left hoping they can find something to pin on trump.

That's fine, however, we need to do this for every presidential, Senate, and house member. Tha would be the right way to do it.


Next time a Democrat wins the presidency, well see if numerous open ended investigations ensue for the duration of their presidency..

I think they started by investigation election interference and the many crimes associated with that. Then as they questioned and dug deeper they found Trump people lying over and over again which is why many of them are in hot water. They have been very tight lipped so who knows what else they are sitting on. You are repeating tired talking points that don’t align with reality, do yourself a favor and stop doing that

But, from what I understand, all the things they are in hot water for have nothing to do with the investigation of Russian collusion.

Yes, it is possible to find other crimes committed during the investigation of another matter, but you cannot open an investigation just for the purpose of trying to see if you can find things on someone.

The way the post i responded to was worded, it almost sounded like they were inferring that an open ended investigation be conducted. If I misunderstood, then my apologies.

Unfortunately the writ authored by Rosenstein was so open ended as to be
Legally irrelevant. It should never have made muster In front of any real judge. Yet it did

Jo

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

What’s does it have to do with Russia collusion?

Possibly a lot if he was conspiring with Wikileaks but we shall see how the trial goes. You do admit he broke the law right? If in the course of the investigation they found that he murdered somebody do you think it should be ignored by authorities because it doesn’t have anything to do with Russian collusion? What a silly argument.

So you're admitting this is an open ended general investigation. It's simply the left hoping they can find something to pin on trump.

That's fine, however, we need to do this for every presidential, Senate, and house member. Tha would be the right way to do it.


Next time a Democrat wins the presidency, well see if numerous open ended investigations ensue for the duration of their presidency..

I think they started by investigation election interference and the many crimes associated with that. Then as they questioned and dug deeper they found Trump people lying over and over again which is why many of them are in hot water. They have been very tight lipped so who knows what else they are sitting on. You are repeating tired talking points that don’t align with reality, do yourself a favor and stop doing that

But, from what I understand, all the things they are in hot water for have nothing to do with the investigation of Russian collusion.

Yes, it is possible to find other crimes committed during the investigation of another matter, but you cannot open an investigation just for the purpose of trying to see if you can find things on someone.

The way the post i responded to was worded, it almost sounded like they were inferring that an open ended investigation be conducted. If I misunderstood, then my apologies.

Unfortunately the writ authored by Rosenstein was so open ended as to be
Legally irrelevant. It should never have made muster In front of any real judge. Yet it did

Jo

Pure fantasy

 

[justoffal]

Possibly a lot if he was conspiring with Wikileaks but we shall see how the trial goes. You do admit he broke the law right? If in the course of the investigation they found that he murdered somebody do you think it should be ignored by authorities because it doesn’t have anything to do with Russian collusion? What a silly argument.

So you're admitting this is an open ended general investigation. It's simply the left hoping they can find something to pin on trump.

That's fine, however, we need to do this for every presidential, Senate, and house member. Tha would be the right way to do it.


Next time a Democrat wins the presidency, well see if numerous open ended investigations ensue for the duration of their presidency..

I think they started by investigation election interference and the many crimes associated with that. Then as they questioned and dug deeper they found Trump people lying over and over again which is why many of them are in hot water. They have been very tight lipped so who knows what else they are sitting on. You are repeating tired talking points that don’t align with reality, do yourself a favor and stop doing that

But, from what I understand, all the things they are in hot water for have nothing to do with the investigation of Russian collusion.

Yes, it is possible to find other crimes committed during the investigation of another matter, but you cannot open an investigation just for the purpose of trying to see if you can find things on someone.

The way the post i responded to was worded, it almost sounded like they were inferring that an open ended investigation be conducted. If I misunderstood, then my apologies.

Unfortunately the writ authored by Rosenstein was so open ended as to be
Legally irrelevant. It should never have made muster In front of any real judge. Yet it did

Jo

Pure fantasy

No....pure reality.... the writ authored by rosenstein Drew criticism from many parts of the legal world for it's open-ended witch hunt profile.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So you're admitting this is an open ended general investigation. It's simply the left hoping they can find something to pin on trump.

That's fine, however, we need to do this for every presidential, Senate, and house member. Tha would be the right way to do it.


Next time a Democrat wins the presidency, well see if numerous open ended investigations ensue for the duration of their presidency..

I think they started by investigation election interference and the many crimes associated with that. Then as they questioned and dug deeper they found Trump people lying over and over again which is why many of them are in hot water. They have been very tight lipped so who knows what else they are sitting on. You are repeating tired talking points that don’t align with reality, do yourself a favor and stop doing that

But, from what I understand, all the things they are in hot water for have nothing to do with the investigation of Russian collusion.

Yes, it is possible to find other crimes committed during the investigation of another matter, but you cannot open an investigation just for the purpose of trying to see if you can find things on someone.

The way the post i responded to was worded, it almost sounded like they were inferring that an open ended investigation be conducted. If I misunderstood, then my apologies.

Unfortunately the writ authored by Rosenstein was so open ended as to be
Legally irrelevant. It should never have made muster In front of any real judge. Yet it did

Jo

Pure fantasy

No....pure reality.... Austin by rosenstein Drew criticism how many pots of illegal world for it's open-ended witch hunt profile.

Yes, by devoted trumpkins. And others had other opinions.

 

[Lesh]

Stones "only crime was helping get Trump elected"?

Unfortunately there were a whole LIST of crimes involved in getting Trump elected

 

[Siete]

dipshit RW's whine about the legal system's due process thats been the same for decades .. and they want to run the country.

those f'n clowns crack me up ...