Rittenhouse

[Flash]

Maybe you guys should wall yourselves off from us, socially, militarily and most importantly ECONOMICALLY. Stop sponging off our defense, economy and medical establishment. Canada has never stood on its own for its entire history. First it was the British and when they collapsed you turned to us.

As bad as Canada always has been Fidel Castro Jr. has made it worse.

 

[Flash]

At any rate,
The prosecutor has yet to prove any of the charges brought against Kyle...
There's 7 charges I think to date...(not really sure)

I don't think that any of them will stick. Obviously this case is a show trial...judge has admitted as much. Because obviously Kyle is going to not be convicted for murder or anything else similarly.

At best he will get a minor charge and get "time served"...and that's a maybe.

He may be found guilty of the possession of the weapon charge but it is a misdemeanor and given all the shit the Left Wing filth has made the Hero go through I suspect the judge will let him off easy.

The weapon possession law for his situation is very vague and his lawyers could probably get him off on that. However, their main effort is to focus on the murder and reckless endangerment charges, which are felonies.

There is absolutely no sane person that would not understand it was a self defense shooting. However if there are any hate filled stupid uneducated Moon Bats on that jury that haven't been taking their TDS meds then they may try to inflict their poison.

 

[Flash]

Well? I guess we shall see, won't we? I think it is a good bet, if he doesn't do time, this won't be the last we hear from Kyle, and it won't be good news.

You are confused.

From everything I have seen about him he seems like a good kid. He was at the scene of the protest to do good things . Earlier in the day he was helping to clean things up and he was trying to put out a fire caused by the asshole thug protesters. Prio to that he worked as a life guard.

He was doing a duty to the community to help protect against destruction by the Communists and BLM filth. A job that the Democrat controlled police wasn't doing. The Democrat controlled government was allowing the shitheads to do tremendous damage to the city.

From all the videos I saw he was not there to start trouble. Trouble came to him when he was attacked by the BLM/Communist assholes.

There is nothing wrong with having a weapon for protection in a violent situation. If he did not have the weapon the BLM/Communist assholes would probably have killed him because he helped to put out one of the fire they started.

 

[JohnDB]

No, actually, it's pretty clear...

Not really...the judge has already ruled it is unclear...
So what do you have to disagree with him?

 

[Canon Shooter]

The weapon possession law for his situation is very vague and his lawyers could probably get him off on that. However, their main effort is to focus on the murder and reckless endangerment charges, which are felonies.

How is it vague?

I've read the what the law states and there's simply no ambiguity when it comes to trying to Rittenhouse's case.

 

[Canon Shooter]

Not really...the judge has already ruled it is unclear...
So what do you have to disagree with him?

The judge "ruled" that it was unclear?

So the judge is going to allow the trial to proceed while one of the major factors of the case, Rittenhouse's possession of a weapon, is left unanswered as to its legality?

I don't think so...

 

[Flash]

How is it vague?

I've read the what the law states and there's simply no ambiguity when it comes to trying to Rittenhouse's case.

You are confused about this Moon Bat.

The judge even said the law is vague and that he would have to do a review before charging the jury.

Kyle may get convicted of that misdemeanor. However, being guilty of that does not mean he did not act in self defense. Having the weapon does not negate his ability to protect himself from being killed by thugs that were threatening him with a gun, trying to take away his weapon to turn on him, kicking him and trying to bash his head in with a goddamn skateboard, which can be a deadly weapon. All because he tried to put out a fire started by destructive Negroes and Communists.

Kyle is a great American hero and shown more bravery than most American that were too chickenshit to protect the community from these destructive filthy ass Negroes and Communists that spent six months destroying over 200 cities.

Why are you so confused? Is it because you are a stupid uneducated low information Moon Bat asshole that has your head up your Libtard ass?

 

[miketx]

As with any of the discussions on the Rittenhouse murders, the outcome for Rittenhouse will be secondary to the effect it will have on those Americans carrying guns who have an ichey trigger finger.

This is the great challenge that Chauvin failed to fulfill.

The reaction to the verdict for the killer won't be much different no matter which way it's decided this time. Another perfect opportunity with a cop throwing all caution to the wind, or a 17 year old little boy, won't present again for a long time.
America's course has been decided in all likelihood.

Another criminal loving traitor speaks.

 

[miketx]

Grow up!

Classic leftist babble!

 

[Flash]

 

[JohnDB]

The judge "ruled" that it was unclear?

So the judge is going to allow the trial to proceed while one of the major factors of the case, Rittenhouse's possession of a weapon, is left unanswered as to its legality?

I don't think so...

The judge asked, without actually asking, for the way the laws are written to be addressed... Because they are extremely unclear and unfollow-able by an average person.

 

[Canon Shooter]

The judge asked, without actually asking, for the way the laws are written to be addressed... Because they are extremely unclear and unfollow-able by an average person.

Odd.

What would be the point of asking, without really asking? That seems pretty stupid.

I thought the law was pretty unambiguous...

 

[Canon Shooter]

You are confused about this Moon Bat.

Your continued use of "Moon Bat" when addressing me shines the light of ignorance upon you.

I'm far from a leftist...

The judge even said the law is vague and that he would have to do a review before charging the jury.

Then I would suggest that the judge may very well have his head up his ass. The law is clear. There's no way to read the applicable law and conclude that Rittenhouse lawfully possessed the firearm he had...

Kyle may get convicted of that misdemeanor. However, being guilty of that does not mean he did not act in self defense.

Perhaps. I'd say that question is far more ambiguous than the question about the law, though...

Having the weapon does not negate his ability to protect himself

Nor does it absolve him from being held responsible for illegally possessing a weapon.

I think, though, you meant to say that it does not negate his right to defend himself. The weapon provides the ability. What he does with that ability is the important part...

Kyle is a great American hero and shown more bravery than most American that were too chickenshit to protect the community from these destructive filthy ass Negroes and Communists that spent six months destroying over 200 cities.

Yes, they burned and pillaged and destroyed our cities for far too long, and something should've been done by local, state and federal governments. That doesn't make Rittenhouse a hero, though...

Why are you so confused? Is it because you are a stupid uneducated low information Moon Bat asshole that has your head up your Libtard ass?

You're such an incredibly ignorant, brain dead little fuck.

Calling me a libtard is like calling Bernie Sanders a conservative.

I've never voted for a Democrat for President and I own over 40 firearms.

You're one of those little pointy-headed dipshits who's unable to even conceive that someone can disagree with you and still be on your side of the political aisle. I used to think you had your shit together. Now I'm convinced that you're the dumbest fuck on the internet...

 

[MisterBeale]

You are confused.

From everything I have seen about him he seems like a good kid. He was at the scene of the protest to do good things . Earlier in the day he was helping to clean things up and he was trying to put out a fire caused by the asshole thug protesters. Prio to that he worked as a life guard.

He was doing a duty to the community to help protect against destruction by the Communists and BLM filth. A job that the Democrat controlled police wasn't doing. The Democrat controlled government was allowing the shitheads to do tremendous damage to the city.

From all the videos I saw he was not there to start trouble. Trouble came to him when he was attacked by the BLM/Communist assholes.

There is nothing wrong with having a weapon for protection in a violent situation. If he did not have the weapon the BLM/Communist assholes would probably have killed him because he helped to put out one of the fire they started.

O.K.

I hope you are right.

 

[Flash]

I'm far from a leftist...

Then stop acting like one then.

Kyle having the AR legally or illegally does absolutely nothing to negate the self defense argument.

If you want to be an asshole and get on your high horse about him putting himself into danger by simply being there then you fail to blame the ones that attack him.

Your head is simply screwed on wrong. Typical to about the same degree as we see from these stupid Moon Bats.

If you don't want to be labeled as a Moon Bat then stop acting like one.

Kyle is innocent.

 

[Canon Shooter]

Then stop acting like one then.

You're making it abundantly clear that you're not intellectually prepared to have a mature discussion about this, simply because you're unable to wrap that pointed little head of yours around the fact that someone can disagree with you and still be conservative.

It's kinda' funny to watch you get spun up...

Kyle having the AR legally or illegally does absolutely nothing to negate the self defense argument.

I don't know that I've said otherwise.

What I have said is that there's really no question that he purchased and possessed the gun illegally. Dominick Black (who actually purchased the gun) and Rittenhouse even discussed the illegality of it before the gun was purchased. If it was legal, Black wouldn't be facing two felony counts of intentionally giving a dangerous weapon to someone under 18, resulting in death...

If you want to be an asshole and get on your high horse about him putting himself into danger by simply being there then you fail to blame the ones that attack him.

When did I do that?

Your head is simply screwed on wrong. Typical to about the same degree as we see from these stupid Moon Bats.

Well, you're certainly typical of dipshit far-right wingers, that's for sure. You';re incapable of having an actual conversation. All you want to do is tell everyone what you think (as if "thinking" is a common thing for you) and then you stomp off in a huff, like a little girl, if someone has the audacity to not agree with you 100%.

You're a child...

If you don't want to be labeled as a Moon Bat then stop acting like one.

Kyle is innocent.

Perhaps he is, perhaps not.

There's a lot to go through in this case, and some dipshit little boy on the internet (that'd be you, Sport) is hardly capable of determining what is and what isn't true...

 

[JohnDB]

Odd.

What would be the point of asking, without really asking? That seems pretty stupid.

I thought the law was pretty unambiguous...

Because the totality of the law is not in one place (on the lawbooks) and is in conflict with Federal regulations.
Meaning it would take a team of lawyers to wade through it all.
Open carry is legal in Wisconsin. (And it is a great place to go hunting for game) making adult supervision of a 17 year old to be possible out of line of sight and distance completely ambiguous.

Then there are lots of soldiers that are 17 years old...and they carry much more powerful weapons than a civilian semi automatic rifle.

Part of the charges against Kyle are wrapped up in these regulations which are basically either illegal or ambiguous.

A lot of the charges against Kyle are based in these firearm regulations...and if they get those dismissed and no longer able to be chargeable...then most of the case for the prosecution is evaporated and then it's just a question about self defense and whether Kyle was doing as Rosenbaum was with taunting and goading.

 

[Flash]

What I have said is that there's really no question that he purchased and possessed the gun illegally. Dominick Black (who actually purchased the gun) and Rittenhouse even discussed the illegality of it before the gun was purchased. If it was legal, Black wouldn't be facing two felony counts of intentionally giving a dangerous weapon to someone under 18, resulting in death...

There is where you confusion lies.

For some reason you are fixated on the fact that Kyle had the AR when he may not have been legal when it doesn't mean jackshit given the events of the night.

The facts are that Kyle acted in self defense.

I don't give a crap how he got the weapon but I am glad he had it because the BLM shitheads would have probably killed him or done him serious harm had he not had it.

I am a certified firearms instructor and range officer. I live and breath firearm safety. I see nothing wrong with Kyle having a firearm that night. I see nothing wrong with his good friend purchasing the AR for him and keeping it at his house. It is not even clear if it is illegal for Kyle to have the weapon on that night.

Of all the things that happen last year with the massive riots and insurrection by the Negroes and Communists the fact a straw purchase was made for Kyle does not defect my give 'o shit meter at all.

The fact that he was brought up on any charges is nothing more than the Democrat leadership in Kenosha kissing the ass of the Insurrectionist that did all the damage last year.

Kyle is innocent. Stop taking their side. It just makes you look like one of the Moon Bats and be subject to ridicule.

 

[Canon Shooter]

Because the totality of the law is not in one place (on the lawbooks) and is in conflict with Federal regulations.
Meaning it would take a team of lawyers to wade through it all.
Open carry is legal in Wisconsin. (And it is a great place to go hunting for game) making adult supervision of a 17 year old to be possible out of line of sight and distance completely ambiguous.

No one was supervising Rittenhouse the night of the shooting. The mere suggestion is beyond stupid...

Then there are lots of soldiers that are 17 years old...and they carry much more powerful weapons than a civilian semi automatic rifle.

Their are only a handful of 17 year olds in the US military. But, please, cite your source for "there are lots of soldiers who are 17"...

Part of the charges against Kyle are wrapped up in these regulations which are basically either illegal or ambiguous.

The law is pretty clear...

A lot of the charges against Kyle are based in these firearm regulations...and if they get those dismissed and no longer able to be chargeable...then most of the case for the prosecution is evaporated and then it's just a question about self defense and whether Kyle was doing as Rosenbaum was with taunting and goading.

That's a pretty big "if", and it's not likely to happen, simply because the illegal possession of the weapon is pretty cut and dry. One needn't be Sherlock Holmes to determine that he obtained and possessed the weapon illegally.

Seriously, with regards to illegal possession, what the fuck is so confusing?

948.60  Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.
(2) (a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.

https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/statutes/statutes/948/55

At the time, Kyle Rittenhouse was under the age of 18. That makes his possession of a firearm a misdemeanor. I see nothing unclear or confusing there...

 

[Concerned American]

Their are only a handful of 17 year olds in the US military. But, please, cite your source for "there are lots of soldiers who are 17"...

Fuck you, asshole. I was one of those 17-year olds in the Marine Corps in 1968. I spent time in Vietnam--WTF have you done. What an asshole.