meaner gene
Diamond Member
- Feb 11, 2017
- 21,612
- 17,382
- 2,290
That's all it takes.He didnt commit any crime other than illegal possession of a firearm
A death that occurs during the commission of a crime is murder.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That's all it takes.He didnt commit any crime other than illegal possession of a firearm
No, in Wisconsin carrying a rifle when one is under 18 is a MISDEMEANOR,Except Rittenhouse broke the law (likely a felony) in order to have the weapon for self protection.
No different than a convicted felony getting a gun for "self protection"
Unless you don't believe in law and order.
You cannot demonstrate this to be true.But he did participate in the riot.
None of this changes the fact he acted in self-defense.We need to discourage immature, untrained, inexperienced and possibly emotionally disturbed teenagers from arming themselves and acting as vigilantes. Nothing good happens from that.
So if one is jaywalking and inadvertently knocks over an elderly person who falls and dies, the jaywalker is automatically guilty of murder, right?That's all it takes.
A death that occurs during the commission of a crime is murder.
He drove from another state, and broke the law in order to do so.Rittenhouse was helping the victims he was not 'playing vigilante' you are ignorant and misinformed. Do some reading I posted links. You post 0 proof and come on here blabbering idiocy.
No, a conviction of murder requires intent. Rittenhouse was, by all appearances, defending himself against an aggressive mob.That's all it takes.
A death that occurs during the commission of a crime is murder.
he acted in self-defense.He picked a fight he had no business picking.
I ddn't write the laws that require criminals be charged for their actions (behavior) during the commission of that crime.Yea, Gene has some bizarre beliefs.
How is driving from one State to another breaking the law? You're just a stupid shit you know that?He drove from another state, and broke the law in order to do so.
No matter what good intent he had in mind, he knowingly committed a crime in order to do so.
Hence while he faces the punishment of any other criminal doing the same.
Thank God you don't write the laws otherwise we'd be living in a Marxist dictatorship.I ddn't write the laws that require criminals be charged for their actions (behavior) during the commission of that crime.
Yes, these stupid paid Marxist tools come here and spread the lies their minders feed them.he acted in self-defense.
Unless, of course, you believe the people he shot had a right to chasehim down with intent to harm.
I agree that he was not entitled to have a firearmExcept Rittenhouse broke the law (likely a felony) in order to have the weapon for self protection.
WrongA death that occurs during the commission of a crime is murder.
Off topic, deflection.Keep telling yourself that.
Edited to stay on topic. K9Buck.
What about buying a firearm by someone who's 17 in Illinois.No, in Wisconsin carrying a rifle when one is under 18 is a MISDEMEANOR,
I didn't say it can't cause someone to spin around. I'm saying there's no evidence he did. And had he spun around, he would have landed on his back.Getting shot can definitely cause one's body to spin. It's also possible that Rosenbaum misstepped and exposed his back. What is CERTAIN is that Rittenhouse was fleeing from Rosenbaum. Why do you believe that Rittenhouse was obligated to allow himself to be violently beaten?
Jaywalking isn't a crime. It's an infraction.if one is jaywalking
You're wrong. If you and your buddy rob a bank and the cops kill your buddy because he pulls out a gun, you will get charged with murder or an equivalent charge.Wrong
I agree that he was not entitled to have a firearm
but dont overreach
if libs think they can prove he planed to kill harmless ANTIFA thugs for no reason go for it
but I dont think thats what happened