What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rittenhouse ordered to stand trial

freyasman

Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2020
Messages
16,228
Reaction score
9,195
Points
1,128
Location
Texas

freyasman

Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2020
Messages
16,228
Reaction score
9,195
Points
1,128
Location
Texas
Then mine your hilariously wrong posts.

I cannot WAIT to live in a different rich person's mansion every week for the rest of my life! Gotta go pack!
Aren't you even a little embarrassed at the way you have shown your ass here?
 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
83,614
Reaction score
18,958
Points
2,210
You are seriously so far gone down the rabbit hole that you can't pick out the lie in that post?

That's what you're saying?
No. Again, what I am saying is you are lying. I told no lie. As evidenced by your inability to show a lie in that post.
 

Correll

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
80,128
Reaction score
19,448
Points
2,220
I am using Georgia Law as a guide. At least as it was until they changed it this year.

Specifically the statutes for Citizens Arrest as was in force when the McMichaels did their idiocy.

The law made sense. Whatever the guy had done before that time was irrelevant. The actions of that moment were paramount. The guy could have been Charles Manson and you had no right to do anything if you did not witness a crime.

Kyle had no clue who the guy was. Kyle had no way of knowing what the guy had done. It was what was happening at the time.

Kyle was trespassing too. He had no authority from the owner to be there. He had no authority from any Government agency. He was a wannabe hero.

He was a boy playing at being a man with real weapons.


None of that is relevant to what I said.


Rittenhouse judged the man to be a threat, to the point he ran away from him.

He was chased and eventually he defended himself from the man.


My point was, that the man's record, supports Rittenhouse's judgement on him at that point in time.


I don't know exactly what Rittenhouse saw in that man, that led him to consider him a threat worth running from, that portion of time seems to NOT have been recorded or if it was, not..."found".


BUT, it seems that Rittenhouse's take on the man was correct.
 

freyasman

Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2020
Messages
16,228
Reaction score
9,195
Points
1,128
Location
Texas
No. Again, what I am saying is you are lying. I told no lie. As evidenced by your inability to show a lie in that post.
Of course you did, it's right there in the post.

Go look.
 

freyasman

Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2020
Messages
16,228
Reaction score
9,195
Points
1,128
Location
Texas
Idiot...

943.14 Criminal trespass to dwellings Whoever intentionally enters the dwelling of another without the consent of some person lawfully upon the premises, under circumstances tending to create or provoke a breach of the peace, is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
History: 1977 c. 173.
Criminal trespass to a dwelling is not a lesser included offense of burglary. Raymond v. State, 55 Wis. 2d 482, 198 N.W.2d 351 (1972).
Regardless of any ownership rights in the property, if a person enters a dwelling that is another's residence, without consent, this section is violated. State v. Carls, 186 Wis. 2d 533, 521 N.W.2d 181 (Ct. App. 1994).
Entering an outbuilding accessory to a main house may be a violation. 62 Atty. Gen. 16.
"Dwellings", stupid.....




(smh)
 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
83,614
Reaction score
18,958
Points
2,210
None of that is relevant to what I said.


Rittenhouse judged the man to be a threat, to the point he ran away from him.

He was chased and eventually he defended himself from the man.


My point was, that the man's record, supports Rittenhouse's judgement on him at that point in time.


I don't know exactly what Rittenhouse saw in that man, that led him to consider him a threat worth running from, that portion of time seems to NOT have been recorded or if it was, not..."found".


BUT, it seems that Rittenhouse's take on the man was correct.
Rittenhouse ran because Rosenbaum, who might have been armed with a heavy chain at that point, went to chase him.
 

Fort Fun Indiana

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Messages
54,999
Reaction score
10,477
Points
2,070
Anyhoo...i dont think trespassing is much at issue here, since Rittenhouse is charged with murder and faces possible life in prison without parole.
 

freyasman

Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2020
Messages
16,228
Reaction score
9,195
Points
1,128
Location
Texas

Correll

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
80,128
Reaction score
19,448
Points
2,220
In the second Naked Gun movie. The character of Frank Drebbin was being honored for his 1,000th drug dealer killed. He stands up and thanks the crowd for his applause. He then said. “Truthfully I backed over the last two with my car, thankfully they turned out to be drug dealers.”

So he wasn’t a reckless driver who was a hazard to everyone on the road. He was a dedicated public servant who was doing a service to the community in getting rid of drug dealers.

That is the standard for ends justify the means that you use. I gun a man down for no reason. I’ve never seen him before. But he turns out to be a guy who beats little old ladies and take their purses. I am a hero. I knew none of that. But hey what matters is the guys record. Right?

If you want to know where that ends ask Philandro Castillo. Oh wait. You can’t. He was shot to death but it is OK despite being a valid weapons license holder. He was a traffic menace with a lot of traffic tickets.


Rittenhouse did not accidently back over Rosenbaum. He judged Rosenbaum to be a threat and acted based on that.


That we now know that Rosenbaum was a violent and dangerous man, and not say, a nice guy with a life long record of abiding the law and being nice to kittens,

is something to be taken in consideration when judging Rittenhouse, Rittenhouse's judgement and actions.


Are we done with the part, where you pretend to be unable to understand my words?
 

freyasman

Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2020
Messages
16,228
Reaction score
9,195
Points
1,128
Location
Texas
I looked. There's no lie in there. You're lying by claiming I lied.
Look again, because it's right there.



Maybe you're simply too dishonest to tell the difference.
 

Correll

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
80,128
Reaction score
19,448
Points
2,220
Odd. You refuse to deal with the reality that Rittenhouse was committing a crime before he shot anyone.......


That is a lie. I am happy to discuss any and/or all aspects of the case.

That you lied about that, and then jumped to another aspect of the case, is you dodging the fact that I made a point you could not refute.


It is called circular debating. It is very dishonest. And asshole.


1628033674378.png
 

freyasman

Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2020
Messages
16,228
Reaction score
9,195
Points
1,128
Location
Texas
The bowling alley closes at 11. Lets go get in some free bowling at midnight or so!
If you have to break and enter that's different and you know it.
If you're just standing in the parking lot of the bowling alley, you're doing nothing wrong.

If the owner asks you to leave and you don't, then, and only then, you are trespassing.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$166.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top