Rittenhouse jury just went to deliberate

[ClaireH]

You can look up the records of the 250 people arrested just as well as anyone else can. But instead, you'll continue to lie about how the police were ordered to stand down. I'd be interested to see who said that. Was it Tucker? Laura? Which one of those clowns started that lie because I see all you animals spouting it.

“If any federal, state, or city level command was given for the police to stand down, this needs to be known and records released to the public.” Where exactly is there need for revision John Doe?

I was quite clear that if any type of communication did occur, if a verbal command to stand down happened, the public needs full disclosure. Nothing over the top about calling for communication records be reviewed JD. Are you of the mindset that governmental communication should be kept private regarding hostile situations and chaos? The choice to keep intel protected only involves protecting lives and in this case it certainly did not.

 

[tahuyaman]

Exactly...the prosecutor was arguing something he knew wasn't illegal.

Evidently he thought it was while making the argument.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Well, no.

You don't allow for the very real possibility that someone on the jury will genuinely believe that the prosecution proved its case. If a person believes that, the single most important thing he can do is vote accordingly...

If a juror actually feels that way, he or she has a duty to vote that way. Now I believe that only a moron could believe that, but in my experience morons like that sometimes manage to get on juries.

 

[Indeependent]

Evidently he thought it was while making the argument.

Evidently, the judge enjoys smacking him down.
I don't blame the prosecutor; he doesn't want to be murdered by a mob of thugs.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

“If any federal, state, or city level command was given for the police to stand down, this needs to be known and records released to the public.” Where exactly is there need for revision John Doe?

I was quite clear that if any type of communication did occur, if a verbal command to stand down happened, the public needs full disclosure. Nothing over the top about calling for communication records be reviewed JD. Are you of the mindset that governmental communication should be kept private regarding hostile situations and chaos? The choice to keep intel protected only involves protecting lives and in this case it certainly did not.

A full DOJ investigation should do it.

 

[tahuyaman]

Not in in defense of self NO and that's what he did.

That’s your opinion and you’re entitled to hold that view.

You are carrying a rifle in one hand and a medical kit in the other hand.
In what position do you maintain the rifle?

The aid bag was a back pack. He had two hands on the rifle.

 

[tahuyaman]

Evidently, the judge enjoys smacking him down.
I don't blame the prosecutor; he doesn't want to be murdered by a mob of thugs.

Brilliant response.

 

[theHawk]

This needs to be fully exposed by an investigative reporter, an actual journalist of which is a rare breed these days. If any federal, state, or city level command was given for the police to stand down, this needs to be known and records released to the public.

What needs to be investigated? The Dem leaders declared these things openly.

 

[Correll]

View attachment 565435

Sure. Whatever. Far better than supporting mob rule by people like Rosenbaum and you.

What part of that, are you not getting? My point stands. Any society that would punish someone for defending it from feral barbarians, is a dying society.

 

[Indeependent]

Brilliant response.

You are truly a LibBot wimp and not very intelligent, at least when it comes to a situation like this one.

 

[Flash]

Yes. It applies to the rioters too.

They weren’t arrested for the same reason Rittenhouse wasn’t arrested. The police stood down. Don’t ask me to explain the actions or lack of actions taken by the police

The Democrat leadership told the police not to protect property giving the rioters the green light to do anything they wanted to do.

The Democrat leadership did not do much of anything to punish the rioters that did tremendous damage.

Remember that in those days many well known Democrats were kneeling with BLM and even bailing BLM out of jail.

Here in the county were I live BLM started to do some of that destruction shit and were quickly stopped by the Sheriff's Department.

The 200 cities that BLM did so much destruction for six months all of the were run by Democrats that let them get away with it.

 

[ClaireH]

Wouldn’t you consider it a provocative act to point a rifle at people?

How can you point a rifle at someone if you dont have one? Now, stop moving the goal posts.

Initially the kid was charged with illegal possession. The judge dropped that charge. Obviously at some point the prosecutor argued that Rittenhouse was illegally in possession of the rifle. The prosecutor lost that one.

Ne also has argued the charge that he provoked a confrontation with at least one of the guys he killed. That one has yet to be decided.

It is my understanding that it’s the way the Wisconsin gun law was written regarding 17 year olds. The laws on the books were not “altered” to allow for a pass, but prevailed due to the wording and particularly with respect to hunting laws and open carry for under 16 to be supervised and 17 no mention of supervision. Almost like a loophole but that is the WI gun as well as Rittenhouse didn’t qualify under any of the legal exceptions about minors. What this means is when you read a post that claims that the judge was biased on the side of Rittenhouse it is bogus because all the judge did was examine the Wisconsin gun laws and the gun charge was dismissed.

 

[Indeependent]

The Democrat leadership told the police not to protect property giving the rioters the green light to do anything they wanted to do.

The Democrat leadership did not do much of anything to punish the rioters that did tremendous damage.

Remember that in those days many well known Democrats were kneeling with BLM and even bailing BLM out of jail.

Here in the county were I live BLM started to do some of that destruction shit and were quickly stopped by the Sheriff's Department.

The 200 cities that BLM did so much destruction for six months all of the were run by Democrats that let them get away with it.

BLM tried to start in Nassau County and the Police told them to expect to receive bullet holes as a consequence.

 

[eagle1462010]

You nutbars have a history of this BS. Every time a LW protestor of any sort is killed, you celebrate. I don't celebrate the murder or death of anyone for any reason.

And THAT is the difference between you and I.

PS: Spare me the lecture on violence when my side doesn't get what they want. Got that Loon?

I'm not going to spare you. Your side goes out and BURNS LOOTS AND MURDERS and you expect me to CARE when some of them doing it gets what they deserve.

Nope. It's not going to happen. They CHOSE TO RIOT AND BURN. Then they CHOSE TO CHASE SOMEONE WITH A GUN.

So. THEY CHOSE TO DIE.

No sympathy for that whatsoever ......NONE........Your side NEEDS TO STFU and stop gaslighting the country.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Evidently he thought it was while making the argument.

That prosecutor made all sorts of ridiculous arguments. I would take anything from Little Binger (finger) with a grain of salt.

 

[tahuyaman]

You are truly a LibBot wimp and not very intelligent, at least when it comes to a situation like this one.

I’m far more conservative than you. You bring discredit upon conservatives. You have no idea how to make your case substantively.

 

[initforme]

Any good jury takes at least a week to cover everything. I commend them.

 

[tahuyaman]

That prosecutor made all sorts of ridiculous arguments. I would take anything from Little Binger (finger) with a grain of salt.

I agree in that he was completely incompetent and had no idea how to make his case. He should be unemployed as soon as this case is over.

 

[tahuyaman]

It is my understanding that it’s the way the Wisconsin gun law was written regarding 17 year olds. The laws on the books were not “altered” to allow for a pass, but prevailed due to the wording and particularly with respect to hunting laws and open carry for under 16 to be supervised and 17 no mention of supervision. Almost like a loophole but that is the WI gun as well as Rittenhouse didn’t qualify under any of the legal exceptions about minors. What this means is when you read a post that claims that the judge was biased on the side of Rittenhouse it is bogus because all the judge did was examine the Wisconsin gun laws and the gun charge was dismissed.

I Was not discussing the illegal possession charge. I Couldn’t care less about that. Someone else brought that up in an attempt to claim I was saying something I didn’t say.

 

[ClaireH]

A full DOJ investigation should do it.

Considering the way Biden’s administration oozes with corruption and has penetrated most governmental agencies, not likely. It will probably take a foreign entity to disclose the info and then LSM will suddenly race to catch up to speed.