I have a couple of problems with Rittenhouse's case:
First, if it was legal for him to own that gun, why didn't he purchase it himself?
He admitted to shooting an unarmed man.
He gave away his body armor, claiming he wouldn't need it, because he would be performing first aid.
He retained his weapon instead of giving it to someone who could've used it while he was performing first aid.
He provided first aid to no one.
He may well walk. But if he's found guilty of any of the primary or lesser charges, I can certainly see a strong argument for that.
Usually, when a verdict comes back quickly, it's because guilt or innocence is obvious. If a verdict doesn't come relatively short order, I think that could bode poorly for the the young Mr. Rittenhouse...